Revisiting Teacher Feedback in EFL Writing from Sociocultural Perspectives

TESOL Quarterly

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 201-213

  Lee, Icy ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84894451605     PISSN: 00398322     EISSN: 15457249     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tesq.153     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anton, M. (2003, March). Dynamic assessment of advanced foreign language learners. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Washington, DC.
2. Atkinson, D. (2003). L2 writing in the post-process era: Introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 3-15. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00123-6
3. Bourke, R., & McGee, A. (2012). The challenge of change: Using activity theory to understand a cultural innovation. Journal of Educational Change, 17, 217-233. doi:10.1007/s10833-011-9179-5
4. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
5. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156. doi:10.1080/13639080020028747
6. Engeström, Y. (2008a). Enriching activity theory without shortcuts. Interacting With Computers, 20, 256-259. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2007.07.003
7. Engeström, Y. (2008b). Quand le centre se dérobe: La notion de knotworking et ses promises [When the center does not hold: The concept and prospects of knotworking]. Sociologie du Travail, 50, 303-330. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2007.07.003
8. Feuerstein, R. (1990). The theory of structural cognitive modifiability. In B. Z. Presseisen (Ed.), Learning and thinking styles: Classroom interaction (pp. 68-134). Washington, DC: National Education Association.
9. Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments, and techniques. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
10. Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M., & Miller, R. (1980). Instructional enrichment. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
11. Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Rynders, J. (1988). Don't accept me as I am. New York, NY: Plenum.
12. Fullan, M. (2002). The change leader. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 16-20.
13. Furneaux, C., Paran, A., & Fairfax, B. (2007). Teacher stance as reflected in feedback on student writing: An empirical study of secondary school teachers in five countries. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 69-94. doi:10.1515/IRAL.2007.003
14. Goldstein, L. M. (2001). For Kyla: What does the research say about responding to ESL writers? In T. Silva & P. Matsuda (Eds.), On second language writing (pp. 73-90). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Goldstein, L. M. (2006). Feedback and revision in second language writing: Contextual, teacher, and student variables. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 185-205). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16. Haneda, M. (2007). Modes of engagement in foreign language writing: An activity theoretical perspective. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64, 301-332. doi:10.3138/cmlr.64.2.297
17. Helstad, K., & Lund, A. (2012). Teachers' talk on students' writing: Negotiating students' texts in interdisciplinary teacher teams. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 28, 599-608. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.01.004
18. Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Contexts and issues in feedback on L2 writing: An introduction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 1-19). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
19. Kozulin, A. (2002). Sociocultural theory and the mediated learning experience. School Psychology International, 23, 7-35. doi:10.1177/0143034302023001729
20. Kozulin, A., & Garb, E. (2002). Dynamic assessment of EFL text comprehension of at-risk students. School Psychology International, 23, 112-127. doi:10.1177/0143034302023001733
21. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 11-33. doi:10.1177/1362168810383328
22. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
23. Lee, I. (2004). Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 285-312. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2004.08.001
24. Lee, I. (2008a). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 144-164. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001
25. Lee, I. (2008b). Understanding teachers' written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 69-85. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.10.001
26. Lee, I. (2009). A new look at an old problem: How teachers can liberate themselves from the drudgery of marking student writing. Prospect: An Australian Journal of Teaching/Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL), 24(2), 34-41.
27. Lee, I. (2011). Working smarter, not working harder: Re-visiting teacher feedback in the L2 writing classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 67, 377-399. doi:10.3138/cmlr.67.3.377
28. Lei, X. (2008). Exploring a sociocultural approach to writing strategy research: Mediated actions in writing activities. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 217-236. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.04.001
29. Leont'ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37-70). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
30. Lo, J., & Hyland, F. (2007). Enhancing students' engagement and motivation in writing: The case of primary students in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 219-237. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.06.002
31. Nelson, C. P., & Kim, M.-K. (2001, March). Contradictions, appropriation, and transformation: An activity theory approach to L2 writing and classroom practices. Paper presented at the Texas Foreign Language Education Conference, Austin, TX.
32. Peña, E. D., & Gillam, R. B. (2000). Dynamic assessment of children referred for speech and language evaluations. In C. Lidz & J. Elliott (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (Vol. 6, pp. 543-576). Oxford, England: Elsevier Science.
33. Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9, 233-265. doi:10.1191/1362168805lr166oa
34. Presseisen, B. Z. (1992, February). Implementing thinking in the school's curriculum. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Association for Cognitive Education, Riverside, CA.
35. Roth, M. W., & Lee, Y.-J. (2007). Vygotsky's neglected legacy: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 2, 186-232. doi:10.3102/0034654306298273
36. Sam, C. (2012). Activity theory and qualitative research in digital domains. Theory Into Practice, 51, 83-90. doi:10.1080/00405841.2012.662856
37. Smagorinsky, P., Cook, L. S., Jackson, A. Y., Moore, C., & Fry, P. G. (2004). Tensions in learning to teach: Accommodation and the development of a teaching identity. Journal of Teacher Education, 55, 8-24. doi:10.1177/0022487103260067
38. Thorne, S. (2004). Cultural historical activity theory and the object of innovation. In O. St. John, K. van Esch, & E. Schalkwijk (Eds.), New insights into foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 51-70). Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
39. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. New York, NY: Plenum.
40. Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179-200. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004
41. Zhao, H. (2010). Investigating learners' use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom. Assessing Writing, 15, 3-17. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.002
42. Zhu, W., & Mitchell, D. (2012). Participation in peer response as activity: An examination of peer response stances from an activity theory perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 46, 362-386. doi:10.1002/tesq.22