Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics

Journal of Prosthodontic Research

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 12-19

  Najeeb, Shariq ^a   Zafar, Muhammad S ^b   Khurshid, Zohaib ^c,d   Siddiqui, Fahad ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b TAIBAH UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^d KING FAISAL UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^e MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Bioactivity; Implants; PEEK; Polymers; Prosthodontics

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; DENTAL MATERIAL; KETONE; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; NANOMATERIAL; POLYETHERETHERKETONE; TOOTH IMPLANT;

DENTAL ABUTMENT; HUMAN; REMOVABLE PARTIAL DENTURE; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CROWNS; DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS; DENTURE, PARTIAL, REMOVABLE; HUMANS; KETONES; NANOSTRUCTURES; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS;

EID: 84955207932     PISSN: 18831958     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.001     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Toth J.M., Wang M., Estes B.T., Scifert J.L., Seim H.B., Turner A.S. Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications. Biomaterials 2006, 27:324-334.
2. Kurtz S.M., Devine J.N. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 2007, 28:4845-4869.
3. Pokorny D., Fulin P., Slouf M., Jahoda D., Landor I., Sosna A. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Part II: Application in clinical practice. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2010, 77:470-478.
4. Staniland P., Wilde C., Bottino F., Di Pasquale G., Pollicino A., Recca A. Synthesis, characterization and study of the thermal properties of new polyarylene ethers. Polymer 1992, 33:1976-1981.
5. Skinner H.B. Composite technology for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1988, 235:224-236.
6. Lee W., Koak J., Lim Y., Kim S., Kwon H., Kim M. Stress shielding and fatigue limits of poly-ether-ether-ketone dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2012, 100:1044-1052.
7. Staines M., Robinson W., Hood J. Spherical indentation of tooth enamel. J Mater Sci 1981, 16:2551-2556.
8. Rees J., Jacobsen P. The elastic moduli of enamel and dentine. Clin Mater 1993, 14:35-39.
9. Martin R., Ishida J. The relative effects of collagen fiber orientation, porosity, density, and mineralization on bone strength. J Biomech 1989, 22:419-426.
10. Sano H., Ciucchi B., Matthews W.G., Pashley D.H. Tensile properties of mineralized and demineralized human and bovine dentin. J Dent Res 1994, 73:1205-1211.
11. Sandler J., Werner P., Shaffer M.S., Demchuk V., Altstädt V., Windle A.H. Carbon-nanofibre-reinforced poly(ether ether ketone) composites. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf 2002, 33:1033-1039.
12. Cavalli V., Giannini M., Carvalho R.M. Effect of carbamide peroxide bleaching agents on tensile strength of human enamel. Dental Mater 2004, 20:733-739.
13. Rho J.Y., Ashman R.B., Turner C.H. Young's modulus of trabecular and cortical bone material: ultrasonic and microtensile measurements. J Biomech 1993, 26:111-119.
14. Vallittu P. Some aspects of the tensile strength of unidirectional glass fibre-polymethyl methacrylate composite used in dentures. J Oral Rehabil 1998, 25:100-105.
15. Zafar M.S., Ahmed N. Nanoindentation and surface roughness profilometry of poly methyl methacrylate denture base materials. Technol Health Care 2014, 22:573-581.
16. Niinomi M. Mechanical properties of biomedical titanium alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 1998, 243:231-236.
17. Rabiei A., Sandukas S. Processing and evaluation of bioactive coatings on polymeric implants. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2013, 101:2621-2629.
18. Barkarmo S., Wennerberg A., Hoffman M., Kjellin P., Breding K., Handa P., et al. Nano-hydroxyapatite-coated PEEK implants: a pilot study in rabbit bone. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2013, 101:465-471.
19. Barkarmo S., Andersson M., Currie F., Kjellin P., Jimbo R., Johansson C.B., et al. Enhanced bone healing around nanohydroxyapatite-coated polyetheretherketone implants: an experimental study in rabbit bone. J Biomater Appl 2014, 29:737-747.
20. Johansson P., Jimbo R., Kjellin P., Currie F., Chrcanovic B.R., Wennerberg A. Biomechanical evaluation and surface characterization of a nano-modified surface on PEEK implants: a study in the rabbit tibia. Int J Nanomed 2014, 9:3903.
21. Lai Y.H., Kuo M.C., Huang J.C., Chen M. On the PEEK composites reinforced by surface-modified nano-silica. Mater Sci Eng A 2007, 458:158-169.
22. 2/PEEK bioactive composite as a bone substitute material: in vitro and in vivo studies. Int J Nanomed 2012, 7:1215-1225.
23. Suska F., Omar O., Emanuelsson L., Taylor M., Gruner P., Kinbrum A., et al. Enhancement of CRF-PEEK osseointegration by plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite: a rabbit model. J Biomater Appl 2014, 29:234-242.
24. Poulsson A.H., Eglin D., Zeiter S., Camenisch K., Sprecher C., Agarwal Y., et al. Osseointegration of machined, injection moulded and oxygen plasma modified PEEK implants in a sheep model. Biomaterials 2014, 35:3717-3728.
25. Wang L., He S., Wu X., Liang S., Mu Z., Wei J., et al. Polyetheretherketone/nano-fluorohydroxyapatite composite with antimicrobial activity and osseointegration properties. Biomaterials 2014, 35:6758-6775.
26. Schmidlin P.R., Stawarczyk B., Wieland M., Attin T., Hämmerle C.H., Fischer J. Effect of different surface pre-treatments and luting materials on shear bond strength to PEEK. Dental Mater 2010, 26:553-559.
27. Costa-Palau S., Torrents-Nicolas J., Brufau-de Barberà M., Cabratosa-Termes J. Use of polyetheretherketone in the fabrication of a maxillary obturator prosthesis: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2014, 112:680-682.
28. Kern M., Lehmann F. Influence of surface conditioning on bonding to polyetheretherketon (PEEK). Dental Mater 2012, 28:1280-1283.
29. Uhrenbacher J., Schmidlin P.R., Keul C., Eichberger M., Roos M., Gernet W., et al. The effect of surface modification on the retention strength of polyetheretherketone crowns adhesively bonded to dentin abutments. J Prosthet Dent 2014, 112:1489-1497.
30. Maekawa M., Kanno Z., Wada T., Hongo T., Doi H., Hanawa T., et al. Mechanical properties of orthodontic wires made of super engineering plastic. Dent Mater J 2015, 34:114-119.
31. Sarot J.R., Contar C.M.M., da Cruz A.C.C., de Souza Magini R. Evaluation of the stress distribution in CFR-PEEK dental implants by the three-dimensional finite element method. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2010, 21:2079-2085.
32. Huang R., Shao P., Burns C., Feng X. Sulfonation of poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK): kinetic study and characterization. J Appl Polym Sci 2001, 82:2651-2660.
33. Nieminen T., Kallela I., Wuolijoki E., Kainulainen H., Hiidenheimo I., Rantala I. Amorphous and crystalline polyetheretherketone: mechanical properties and tissue reactions during a 3-year follow-up. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2008, 84:377-383.
34. Wenz L., Merritt K., Brown S., Moet A., Steffee A. In vitro biocompatibility of polyetheretherketone and polysulfone composites. J Biomed Mater Res 1990, 24:207-215.
35. Morrison C., Macnair R., MacDonald C., Wykman A., Goldie I., Grant M.H. In vitro biocompatibility testing of polymers for orthopaedic implants using cultured fibroblasts and osteoblasts. Biomaterials 1995, 16:987-992.
36. Koch F., Weng D., Krämer S., Biesterfeld S., Jahn-Eimermacher A., Wagner W. Osseointegration of one-piece zirconia implants compared with a titanium implant of identical design: a histomorphometric study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010, 21:350-356.
37. Schwitalla A., Müller W. PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature. J Oral Implantol 2013, 39:743-749.
38. Zhao M., An M., Wang Q., Liu X., Lai W., Zhao X., et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of human osteoblast-like MG-63 cells in response to bioinert implant material titanium and polyetheretherketone. J Proteomics 2012, 75:3560-3573.
39. Khurshid Z., Zafar M., Qasim S., Shahab S., Naseem M., AbuReqaiba A. Advances in nanotechnology for restorative dentistry. Materials 2015, 8:717-731.
40. Najeeb S., Khurshid Z., Matinlinna J.P., Siddiqui F., Nassani M.Z., Baroudi K. Nanomodified peek dental implants: bioactive composites and surface modification-a review. Int J Dent 2015, Article ID 381759 [E-Pub ahead of print].
41. Cook S.D., Rust-Dawicki A.M. Preliminary evaluation of titanium-coated PEEK dental implants. J Oral Implantol 1995, 21:176-181.
42. Wheeler S.L. Eight-year clinical retrospective study of titanium plasma-sprayed and hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996, 11:340-350.
43. Ha S., Mayer J., Koch B., Wintermantel E. Plasma-sprayed hydroxylapatite coating on carbon fibre reinforced thermoplastic composite materials. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1994, 5:481-484.
44. Javed F., Vohra F., Zafar S., Almas K. Significance of osteogenic surface coatings on implants to enhance osseointegration under osteoporotic-like conditions. Implant Dent 2014, 23:679-686.
45. Waser-Althaus J., Salamon A., Waser M., Padeste C., Kreutzer M., Pieles U., et al. Differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on plasma-treated polyetheretherketone. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2014, 25:515-525.
46. Chan C., Ko T., Hiraoka H. Polymer surface modification by plasmas and photons. Surf Sci Rep 1996, 24:1-54.
47. Nakahara I., Takao M., Goto T., Ohtsuki C., Hibino S., Sugano N. Interfacial shear strength of bioactive-coated carbon fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone after in vivo implantation. J Orthop Res 2012, 30:1618-1625.
48. Nakahara I., Takao M., Bandoh S., Bertollo N., Walsh W.R., Sugano N. In vivo implant fixation of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK hip prostheses in an ovine model. J Orthop Res 2013, 31:485-492.
49. Randolph S., Fowlkes J., Rack P. Focused, nanoscale electron-beam-induced deposition and etching. Crit Rev Solid State Mater Sci 2006, 31:55-89.
50. Han C., Lee E., Kim H., Koh Y., Kim K.N., Ha Y., et al. The electron beam deposition of titanium on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and the resulting enhanced biological properties. Biomaterials 2010, 31:3465-3470.
51. Wildemann B., Bamdad P., Holmer C., Haas N., Raschke M., Schmidmaier G. Local delivery of growth factors from coated titanium plates increases osteotomy healing in rats. Bone 2004, 34:862-868.
52. 2 surface onto polyetheretherketone for effective immobilization and delivery of bone morphogenetic protein. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 2014, 102:793-800.
53. Mantese J.V., Brown I.G., Cheung N.W., Collins G.A. Plasma-immersion ion implantation. MRS Bull 1996, 21:52-56.
54. 2 on carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone. Biomaterials 2014, 35:5731-5740.
55. Zhao Y., Wong H.M., Wang W., Li P., Xu Z., Chong E.Y., et al. Cytocompatibility, osseointegration, and bioactivity of three-dimensional porous and nanostructured network on polyetheretherketone. Biomaterials 2013, 34:9264-9277.
56. Wu H., Ma C.M., Li C., Chen C. Swelling behavior and solubility parameter of sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone). J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 2006, 44:3128-3134.
57. Zaidi S.J., Mikhailenko S., Robertson G., Guiver M., Kaliaguine S. Proton conducting composite membranes from polyether ether ketone and heteropolyacids for fuel cell applications. J Membr Sci 2000, 173:17-34.
58. Pino M., Stingelin N., Tanner K. Nucleation and growth of apatite on NaOH-treated PEEK, HDPE and UHMWPE for artificial cornea materials. Acta Biomater 2008, 4:1827-1836.
59. Zhou H., Goel V.K., Bhaduri S.B. A fast route to modify biopolymer surface: a study on polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Mater Lett 2014, 125:96-98.
60. Bakar M.A., Cheng M., Tang S., Yu S., Liao K., Tan C., et al. Tensile properties, tension-tension fatigue and biological response of polyetheretherketone-hydroxyapatite composites for load-bearing orthopedic implants. Biomaterials 2003, 24:2245-2250.
61. 2 nanotubes with different diameters on gene expression and osseointegration of implants in minipigs. Biomaterials 2011, 32:6900-6911.
62. Zafar M.S., Ahmed N. Nano-mechanical evaluation of dental hard tissues using indentation technique. World Appl Sci J 2013, 28:1393-1399.
63. Zafar M.S., Ahmed N. Nanomechanical characterization of exfoliated and retained deciduous incisors. Technol Health Care 2014, 22:785-793.
64. Hahnel S., Wieser A., Lang R., Rosentritt M. Biofilm formation on the surface of modern implant abutment materials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014, [Epub ahead of print].
65. Koutouzis T., Richardson J., Lundgren T. Comparative soft and hard tissue responses to titanium and polymer healing abutments. J Oral Implantol 2011, 37:174-182.
66. Tannous F., Steiner M., Shahin R., Kern M. Retentive forces and fatigue resistance of thermoplastic resin clasps. Dental Mater 2012, 28:273-278.
67. Stawarczyk B., Beuer F., Wimmer T., Jahn D., Sener B., Roos M., et al. Polyetheretherketone-a suitable material for fixed dental prostheses?. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2013, 101:1209-1216.
68. Sproesser O., Schmidlin P.R., Uhrenbacher J., Roos M., Gernet W., Stawarczyk B. Effect of sulfuric acid etching of polyetheretherketone on the shear bond strength to resin cements. J Adhes Dent 2014, 16:465-472.
69. Keul C., Liebermann A., Schmidlin P.R., Roos M., Sener B., Stawarczyk B. Influence of PEEK surface modification on surface properties and bond strength to veneering resin composites. J Adhes Dent 2014, 16:383-392.
70. Reich S., Wichmann M., Nkenke E., Proeschel P. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2005, 113:174-179.
71. Alt V., Hannig M., Wöstmann B., Balkenhol M. Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations. Dental Mater 2011, 27:339-347.
72. Stawarczyk B., Ender A., Trottmann A., Özcan M., Fischer J., Hämmerle C.H. Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM milled polymeric three-unit fixed dental prostheses: effect of aging regimens. Clin Oral Investig 2012, 16:1669-1677.
73. Stawarczyk B., Eichberger M., Uhrenbacher J., Wimmer T., Edelhoff D., Schmidlin P.R. Three-unit reinforced polyetheretherketone composite FDPs: influence of fabrication method on load-bearing capacity and failure types. Dent Mater J 2015, 34:7-12.
74. Beuer F., Steff B., Naumann M., Sorensen J.A. Load-bearing capacity of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures with different computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) fabricated framework materials. Eur J Oral Sci 2008, 116:381-386.
75. Kolbeck C., Behr M., Rosentritt M., Handel G. Fracture force of tooth-tooth-and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008, 19:1049-1053.
76. Zok F., Miserez A. Property maps for abrasion resistance of materials. Acta Mater 2007, 55:6365-6371.