Nano-TiO2/PEEK bioactive composite as a bone substitute material: In vitro and in vivo studies

International Journal of Nanomedicine

Volumn 7, Issue , 2012, Pages 1215-1225

  Wu, Xiaomian ^a   Liu, Xiaochen ^b   Wei, Jie ^c   Ma, Jian ^d   Deng, Feng ^a   Wei, Shicheng ^a  

^a CHONGQING MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c East China University of Science and Technology   (China)

^d TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Bioactivity; Implant; Nanocomposite; Polyether ether ketone; Polymer; TiO2

Indexed keywords

NANOCOMPOSITE; NANOPARTICLE; POLY(ETHER ETHER KETONE); POLYMER; TITANIUM OXIDE NANOPARTICLE; TITANIUM OXIDE POLY(ETHER ETHER KETONE) NANOCOMPOSITE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; KETONE; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; POLYETHERETHERKETONE; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMECHANICS; BONE IMPLANT; BONE REGENERATION; BONE VOLUME; CELL ADHESION; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL VIABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOTOXICITY; DOG; G2 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; HISTOLOGY; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NONHUMAN; OPTICAL DENSITY; OSTEOBLAST; PARTICLE SIZE; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PSEUDOPODIUM; ROUGHNESS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE PROSTHESIS; CELL CYCLE; CELL SHAPE; CELL SURVIVAL; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECT; HUMAN; TUMOR CELL LINE;

PSEUDOPODA;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; BONE SUBSTITUTES; CELL ADHESION; CELL CYCLE; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; CELL SURVIVAL; DOGS; HUMANS; KETONES; NANOCOMPOSITES; OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOGENESIS; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM;

EID: 84862337821     PISSN: 11769114     EISSN: 11782013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S28101     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Sugita Y, Ishizaki K, Iwasa F, et al. Effects of pico-to-nanometer-thin TiO2 coating on the biological properties of microroughened titanium. Biomaterials. 2011;32(33):8374-8384.
2. Taxt-Lamolle SF, Rubert M, Haugen HJ, Lyngstadaas SP, Ellingsen JE, Monjo M. Controlled electro-implementation of fluoride in titanium implant surfaces enhances cortical bone formation and mineralization. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(3):1025-1032.
3. Rausch-fan X, Qu Z, Wieland M, Matejka M, Schedle A. Differentiation and cytokine synthesis of human alveolar osteoblasts compared to osteoblast-like cells (MG63) in response to titanium surfaces. Dent Mater. 2008;24(1):102-110.
4. Buly RL, Huo MH, Salvati E, Brien W, Bansal M. Titanium wear debris in failed cemented total hip arthroplasty: An analysis of 71 cases. J Arthroplasty. 1992;7(3):315-323.
5. Stadelmann VA, Terrier A, Pioletti DP. Microstimulation at the boneimplant interface upregulates osteoclast activation pathways. Bone. 2008;42(2):358-364.
6. Ramakrishna S, Mayer J, Wintermantel E, Leong KW. Biomedical applications of polymer-composite materials: a review. Compos Sci Technol. 2001;61(9):1189-1224.
7. Han CM, Lee EJ, Kim HE, et al. The electron beam deposition of titanium on polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and the resulting enhanced biological properties. Biomaterials. 2010;31(13):3465-3470.
8. Wong KL, Wong CT, Liu WC, et al. Mechanical properties and in vitro response of strontium-containing hydroxyapatite/polyetheretherketone composites. Biomaterials. 2009;30(23-24):3810-3817.
9. Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007;28(32):4845-4869.
10. 2 nano-network on titanium surface increases the human cell growth. Dent Mater. 2009;25(8):1022-1029.
11. Long M, Rack HJ. Titanium alloys in total joint replacement-a materials science perspective. Biomaterials. 1998;19(18):1621-1639.
12. 2 effects on calcium phosphate mineralization. Mater Sci Eng C. 2009;29(8):2355-2359.
13. 2 on medical grade polyetheretherketone to assist osseous integration. Surf Coat Technol. 2009;204(6-7):1121-1125.
14. Gutwein LG, Webster TJ. Osteoblast and chondrocyte proliferation in the presence of alumina and titania nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res. 2002;4(3):231-238.
15. Kubo K, Tsukimura N, Iwasa F, et al. Cellular behavior on TiO2 nanonodular structures in a micro-to-nanoscale hierarchy model. Biomaterials. 2009;30(29):5319-5329.
16. 2 nanotube surface. Acta Biomater. 2009;5(8):3215-3223.
17. Lu X, Lv X, Sun Z, Zheng Y. Nanocomposites of poly(l-lactide) and surface-grafted TiO2 nanoparticles: Synthesis and characterization. Eur Polym J. 2008;44(8):2476-2481.
18. 2 nanoparticle-filled composites for tissue engineering scaffolds. Compos Sci Technol. 2007;67(6):1139-1147.
19. Wei J, Chen QZ, Stevens MM, Roether JA, Boccaccini AR. Biocompatibility and bioactivity of PDLLA/TiO2 and PDLLA/TiO2/ Bioglass® nanocomposites. Mat Sci Eng C. 2008;28(1):1-10.
20. Wong KL, Wong CT, Liu WC, et al. Mechanical properties and in vitro response of strontium-containing hydroxyapatite/polyether ether ketone composites. Biomaterials. 2009;30(23-24):3810-3817.
21. Gittens RA, McLachlan T, Olivares-Navarrete R, et al. The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation. Biomaterials. 2011;32(13):3395-3403.
22. 2 nanotubes with different diameters on gene expression and osseointegration of implants in minipigs. Biomaterials. 2011;32(29):6900-6911.
23. 2 long-term exposure. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2009;241(2):182-194.
24. 2) nanoparticles. Toxicol In Vitro. 2010;24(3):1002-1008.
25. 2 nanocomposite films. Composites Part A. 2005;36(6): 721-727.
26. Wang J, Liu Y, Jiao F, et al. Time-dependent translocation and potential impairment on central nervous system by intranasally instilled TiO2 nanoparticles. Toxicology. 2008;254(1-2):82-90.
27. Wang Y, Wertheim DF, Jones AS, Coombes AG. Micro-CT in drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2000;74(1):41-49.
28. 3 particulates. Mater Chem Phys. 2005;90(1): 185-195.
29. Pegueroles M, Aparicio C, Bosio M, et al. Spatial organization of osteoblast fibronectin matrix on titanium surfaces: Effects of roughness, chemical heterogeneity and surface energy. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(1): 291-301.
30. Zhao G, Raines AL, Wieland M, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD. Requirement for both micron-and submicron scale structure for synergistic responses of osteoblasts to substrate surface energy and topography. Biomaterials. 2007;28(18):2821-2829.
31. Johnson LC, Johnson RW, Munoz SA, Mundy GR, Peterson TE, Sterling JA. Longitudinal live animal micro-CT allows for quantitative analysis of tumor-induced bone destruction. Bone. 2011;48(1):141-151.
32. Samei E, Saunders RS, Badea CT, et al. Micro-CT imaging of breast tumors in rodents using a liposomal, nanoparticle contrast agent. Int J Nanomedicine. 2009;4(1):277-282.
33. Jones AC, Arns CH, Sheppard AP, Hutmacher DW, Milthorpe BK, Knackstedt MA. Assessment of bone ingrowth into porous biomaterials using Micro-CT. Biomaterials. 2007;28(15):2491-2504.
34. Alt V, Lips KS, Henkenbehrens C, et al. A new animal model for implant-related infected non-unions after intramedullary fixation of the tibia in rats with fluorescent in situ hybridization of bacteria in bone infection. Bone. 2011;48(5):1146-1153.
35. Zhou W, Han C, Song Y, et al. The performance of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-implant complexes prepared by cell sheet engineering techniques. Biomaterials. 2010;31(12):3212-3221.