Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM milled polymeric three-unit fixed dental prostheses: Effect of aging regimens

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1669-1677

  Stawarczyk, Bogna ^a   Ender, Andreas ^a   Trottmann, Albert ^a   Özcan, Mutlu ^a   Fischer, Jens ^b   Hämmerle, Christoph H F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Aging; CAD CAM resins; Conventionally fabricated resins; FDPs; Fracture load; Resin blanks

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; CARBOPOL 940; GLASS CERAMICS; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); POLYMER; POLYURETHAN; SALIVA SUBSTITUTE; URETHANE DIMETHACRYLATE LUTING RESIN;

ARTICLE; CERAMICS; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DENTURE; EQUIPMENT; FIXED PARTIAL DENTURE; HUMAN; MASTICATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME;

ACRYLIC RESINS; BITE FORCE; CERAMICS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE REBASING; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; METHYLMETHACRYLATE; POLYMERS; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; POLYURETHANES; SALIVA, ARTIFICIAL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84861896608     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-011-0670-4     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alt V, Hannig M, Wostmann B, Balkenhol M (2011) Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations. Dent Mater 27: 339-347.
2. Goncu Basaran E, Ayna E, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV (2011) Load-bearing capacity of handmade and computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing-fabricated three-unit fixed dental prostheses of particulate filler composite. Acta Odontol Scand 69: 144-150.
3. Banerjee R, Banerjee S, Prabhudesai PS, Bhide SV (2010) Influence of the processing technique on the flexural fatigue strength of denture base resins: an in vitro investigation. Indian J Dent Res 21: 391-395.
4. Rocca GT, Bonnafous F, Rizcalla N, Krejci I (2010) A technique to improve the esthetic aspects of CAD/CAM composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 104: 273-275.
5. Lin CL, Chang YH, Liu PR (2008) Multi-factorial analysis of a cusp-replacing adhesive premolar restoration: a finite element study. J Dent 36: 194-203.
6. Krämer N, Kunzelmann KH, Taschner M, Mehl A, Garcia-Godoy F, Frankenberger R (2006) Antagonist enamel wears more than ceramic inlays. J Dent Res 85: 1097-1100.
7. Giordano R (2006) Materials for chairside CAD/CAM-prodeced restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 137: 14S-21S.
8. Chaysuwan D, Sirinukunwattana K, Kanchanatawewat K, Heness G, Yamashita K (2011) Machinable glass-ceramics forming as a restorative dental material. Dent Mater J 30: 358-367.
9. Luthy H, Filser F, Loeffel O, Schumacher M, Gauckler LJ, Hammerle CH (2005) Strength and reliability of four-unit all-ceramic posterior bridges. Dent Mater 21: 930-937.
10. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Scharnagl P, Handel G, Kolbeck C (2011) Influence of resilient support of abutment teeth on fracture resistance of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 24: 465-468.
11. Sterzenbach G, Kalberlah S, Beuer F, Frankenberger R, Naumann M (2011) In-vitro simulation of tooth mobility for static and dynamic load tests: a pilot study. Acta Odontol Scand 69: 316-318.
12. Rechenberg DK, Göhring TN, Attin T (2010) Influence of different curing approaches on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays. J Adhes Dent 12: 189-196.
13. Poticny DJ, Klim J (2010) CAD/CAM in-office technology: innovations after 25 years for predictable, esthetic outcomes. J Am Dent Assoc 141: 5S-9S.
14. Balkenhol M, Kohler H, Orbach K, Wostmann B (2009) Fracture toughness of cross-linked and non-cross-linked temporary crown and fixed partial denture materials. Dent Mater 25: 917-928.
15. Burtscher P (1993) Stability of radicals in cured composite materials. Dent Mater 9: 218-221.
16. Manhart J, Schmidt M, Chen HY, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R (2001) Marginal quality of tooth-colored restorations in class II cavities after artificial aging. Oper Dent 26: 357-366.
17. Rosentritt M, Siavikis G, Behr M, Kolbeck C, Handel G (2008) Approach for valuating the significance of laboratory simulation. J Dent 36: 1048-1053.
18. Rosentritt M, Behr M, van der Zel J, Feilzer AJ (2009) Approach for valuating the influence of laboratory simulation. Dent Mater 25: 348-352.
19. Fischer H, Weber M, Eck M, Erdrich A, Marx R (2004) Finite element and experimental analyses of polymer-based dental bridges reinforced by ceramic bars. J Biomech 37: 289-294.
20. Mahmood DJ, Linderoth EH, Vult von Steyern P (2011) The influence of support properties and complexity on fracture strength and fracture mode of all-ceramic fixed dental protheses. Acta Odontol Scand 69: 229-237.
21. Scherrer SS, de Rijk WG (1993) The fracture resistance of all-ceramic crowns on supporting structures with different elastic moduli. Int J Prosthodont 6: 462-467.
22. Keulemans F, Lassila LV, Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ (2009) The influence of framework design on the load-bearing capacity of laboratory-made inlay-retained fibre-reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses. J Biomech 42: 844-849.
23. Pfeiffer P, Grube L (2006) Effect of pontic height on the fracture strength of reinforced interim fixed partial dentures. Dent Mater 22: 1093-1097.
24. Waltimo A, Kononen M (1995) Maximal force and its association with signs and symptoms of craniomandibular disorders in young Finnish non-patients. Acta Ordontol Scand 53: 254-258.
25. Fasbinder DJ, Dennison JB, Heys DR, Lampe K (2005) The clinical performance of CAD/CAM-generated composite inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 136: 1714-1723.
26. Lehmann F, Spiegl K, Eickemeyer G, Rammelsberg P (2009) Adhesively luted, metal-free composite crowns after five years. J Adhes Dent 11: 493-498.
27. Vanoorbeek S, Vandamme K, Lijnen I, Naert I (2010) Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 23: 223-230.