Stress shielding and fatigue limits of poly-ether-ether-ketone dental implants

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 100 B, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1044-1052

  Lee, Woo Taek ^a   Koak, Jai Young ^a   Lim, Young Jun ^a   Kim, Seong Kyun ^a   Kwon, Ho Beom ^a   Kim, Myung Joo ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

dental implants; fatigue; finite element analysis; poly ether ether ketone (PEEK); stress analysis

Indexed keywords

BONE RESORPTION; COMPRESSIVE LOADING; DENTAL IMPLANT APPLICATIONS; DIRECT CONTACT; FATIGUE LIMIT; FATIGUE TESTS; LOW ELASTIC MODULUS; POLY-ETHER-ETHER-KETONE (PEEK); STATIC COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; STRAIN ENERGY DENSITY; STRESS SHIELDING; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODEL; TITANIUM ROD;

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE; CARBON FIBERS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; ETHERS; FATIGUE OF MATERIALS; FATIGUE TESTING; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GLASS FIBERS; KETONES; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; PLASTIC COATINGS; SHIELDING; STRESS ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TITANIUM;

DENTAL PROSTHESES;

CARBON FIBER; GLASS FIBER; POLY ETHER ETHER KETONE; POLYMER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENSITY; DENTITION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; LOADING TEST; MECHANICAL STRESS; STRAIN ENERGY DENSITY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; YOUNG MODULUS;

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; ELASTIC MODULUS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GLASS; HUMANS; KETONES; MATERIALS TESTING; ORTHOPEDICS; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYMERS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TITANIUM;

EID: 84862827580     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.32669     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP,. Long term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-Year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 161-172.
2. Attard NJ, Zarb GA,. Long-term treatment outcomes in edentulous patients with implant-fixed prostheses: The Toronto study. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 417-424
3. Albrektsson T, Zarb GA, Worthington P, Eriksson AR,. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1: 11-25.
4. Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP,. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-Year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990; 1: 33-40.
5. Mombelli A, Lang NP,: Clinical parameters for the evaluation of dental implants. Periodontol 1994; 4: 81-86.
6. van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Naert I, Maffei G, Jacobs R,. Marginal bone loss around implants retaining hinging mandibular overdentures, at 4-, 8- and 12-years follow-up. J Clin Periodontol 2001; 28: 628-633.
7. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomson P,. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. II. Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106: 721-764.
8. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T,. Effects of implant surfaces and designs on MBL alterations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 207-215
9. Lazzara RJ, Porter SS,. Platform switching: A new concept in implant dentistry for controlling post restorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 9-17.
10. Lautenschlager EP, Monaghan P,. Titanium and titanium alloys as dental materials. Int Dent J 1993; 43: 245-253.
11. Kohal RJ, Klaus G, Strub JR,. Zirconia-implant-supported all ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: A pilot investigation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 565-571.
12. Misch CE,. A scientific rationale for dental implant design. Dental implant prosthetics, 2nd. Mosby: St Louis; 2005. pp 322-348.
13. Huiskes R, Ruimerman R, Van Lenthe GH, Janssen JD,. Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone. Nature 2000; 405: 704-706.
14. Brown IW, Ring PA,. Osteolytic changes in the upper femoral shaft following porous-coated hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1985; 67: 218-221.
15. Kerner J, Huiskes R, van Lenthe GH, Weinans H, van Rietbergen B, Engh CA, Amis AA,. Corre-lation between pre-operative periprosthetic bone density and post-operative bone loss in THA can be explained by strain-adaptive remodeling. J Biomech 1999; 32: 695-703.
16. Ballo AM, Akca EA, Ozen T, Lassila L, Vallittu PK, Narhi TO,. Bone tissue responses to glass fiber-reinforced composite implants-A histomorphometric study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 608-615.
17. Sagomonyants KB, Jarman-Smith ML, Devine JN, Aronow MS, Gronowicz GA,. The in vitro response of human osteoblasts to polyetheretherketone(PEEK) substrates compared to commer-cially pure titanium. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 1563-1572.
18. Cook SD, Rust-Dawicki AM,. Preliminary evaluation of titanium coated PEEK dental implants. J Oral Implantol 1995; 21: 176-181.
19. Steven M. Kurtz, John N. Devine,. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 4845-4869.
20. Lee CK, Karl M, Kelly JR,. Evaluation of test protocol variables for dental implant fatigue research. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1419-1425
21. Wiskott HW, Nicholls JI, Belser UC,. Stress fatigue: Basic principles and prosthodontic implications. Int J Prosthodont 1995; 8: 105-116
22. Geng JP, Tan KBC, Liu GR,. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 585-598.
23. Simon U, Augat P, Ignatius A, Claes L,. Influence of the stiffness of bone defect implants on the mechanical conditions at the interface-A finite element analysis with contact. J Biomech 2003; 36: 1079-1086
24. Hart RT, Davy DT, Heiple KG,. A computational method for stress analysis of adaptive elastic materials with a view toward applications in strain-induced bone remodeling. J Biomech Eng 1984; 106: 342-350.
25. Weinans H, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ,. Effects of material properties of femoral hip components on bone remodeling. J Orthop Res 1992; 10: 845-853
26. Van Rietbergen B, Huiskes R, Weinans H, Sumner DR, Turner TM, Galante JO,. The mechanism of bone remodeling and resorption around press-fitted THA stems. J Biomech 1993; 26: 369-382.
27. Mellal A, Wiskott HW, Botsis J, Scherrer SS, Belser UC,. Stimulating effect of implant loading on surrounding bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 239-248.
28. Graf H, Geering AH,. Rationale for clinical application of different occlusal philosophies. Oral Sci Rev 1977; 10: 1-10.
29. Siegele D, Soltesz U,. Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989; 4: 333-340.
30. Rieger MR, Adams WK, Kinzel GL,. A finite element survey of eleven endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 457-465.
31. Turner CH, Anne V, Pidaparti RM,. A uniform strain criterion for trabecular bone ada-ptation: Do continuum-level strain gradients drive adaptation? J Biomech 1997; 30: 555-563.
32. Brown TD, Pedersen DR, Gray ML, Brand RA, Rubin CT,. Toward an identification of mecha-nical parameters initiating periosteal remodeling: A combined experimental and analytic approach. J Biomech 1990; 23: 893-905.
33. Duyck J, Ronold HJ, Van Oosterwyck H, Naert I, Vander Sloten J, Ellingsen JE,. The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: An animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 207-218.
34. Huiskes R, Weinans H, Grootenboer HJ, Dalstra M, Fudala B, Slooff TJ,. Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. J Biomech 1987; 20: 1135-1150.
35. Andreiotelli M, Kohal RJ,. Fracture strength of zirconia implants after artificial aging. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009; 11: 158-166.
36. Fontijn-Tekamp FA, Slagter AP, Van Der Bilt A, Van Hof MA, Witter DJ, Kalk W, Jansen JA,. Biting and chewing in overdentures, full dentures, and natural dentitions. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 1519-1524.
37. Adatia ND, Bayne SC, Cooper LF, Thompson JY,. Fracture resistance of yttria-stabilized zir-conia dental implant abutments. J Prosthodont 2009; 18: 17-22.
38. Ponnappan RK, Serhan H, Zarda B, Patel R, Albert T, Vaccaro AR,. Biomechanical evaluation and comparison of polyetheretherketone rod system to traditional titanium rod fixation. Spine J 2009; 9: 263-267.
39. Zhang G, Latour RA, Kennedy JM, Del Schutte H, Friedman RJ,. Long-term compressive property durability of carbon fibre-reinforced polyetheretherketone composite in physiological saline. Biomaterials 1996; 17: 781-789.
40. Brown SA, Hastings RS, Mason JJ, Moet A,. Characterization of short-fibre reinforced thermo-plastics for fracture fixation devices. Biomaterials 1990; 11: 541-547.
41. Williams KR, Watson CJ, Murphy WM, Scott J, Gregory M, Sinobad D,. Finite element analysis of fixed prostheses attached to osseointegrated implants. Quintessence Int 1990; 21: 563-570.
42. Meijer HJ, Starmans FJ, Bosman F, Steen WH,. A comparison of three finite element models of an edentulous mandible provided with implants. J Oral Rehabil 1993; 20: 147-157.
43. Ding X, Zhu XH, Liao SH, Zhang XH, Chen H,. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthodont 2009; 18: 393-402.