PEEK dental implants: A review of the literature

Journal of Oral Implantology

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 743-749

  Schwitalla, Andreas ^a   Müller, Wolf Dieter ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Animal experiments; Dental implants; Finite element method; Osseointegration; Peek

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; KETONE; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; POLYETHERETHERKETONE;

ANIMAL; BONE REGENERATION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DOG; HUMAN; REVIEW; TOOTH IMPLANT;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DOGS; HUMANS; KETONES; OSSEOINTEGRATION; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS;

EID: 84892378405     PISSN: 01606972     EISSN: 15481336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00002     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Turkyilmaz I, Company AM, McGlumphy EA. Should edentulous patients be constrained to removable complete dentures? The use of dental implants to improve the quality of life for edentulous patients. Gerodontology. 2010;27:3-10.
2. Brånemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindström J, Ohlsson A. Intraosseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;3:81-100.
3. Shapira L, Klinger A, Tadir A, Wilensky A, Halabi A. Effect of a niobium-containing titanium alloy on osteoblast behavior in culture. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:578-582.
4. Velasco-Ortega E, Jos A, Cameán AM, Pato-Mourelo J, Segura-Egea JJ. In vitro evaluation of cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of a commercial titanium alloy for dental implantology. Mutat Res. 2010;702:17-23.
5. Egusa H, Ko N, Shimazu T, Yatani H. Suspected association of an allergic reaction with titanium dental implants: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100:344-347.
6. Müller K, Valentine-Thon E. Hypersensitivity to titanium: clinical and laboratory evidence. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2006;27:31-35. Erratum in: Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2007;28:iii.
7. Thomas P, Bandl WD, Maier S, Summer B, Przybilla B. Hypersensitivity to titanium osteosynthesis with impaired fracture healing, eczema, and T-cell hyperresponsiveness in vitro: case report and review of the literature. Contact Dermatitis. 2006;55:199-202.
8. Tschernitschek H, Borchers L, Geurtsen W. Nonalloyed titanium as a bioinert metal-a review. Quintessence Int. 2005;36: 523-530.
9. Sicilia A, Cuesta S, Coma G, Arregui I, Guisasola C, Ruiz E, Maestro A. Titanium allergy in dental implant patients: a clinical study on 1500 consecutive patients. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19: 823-835.
10. Bougherara H, Bureau MN, Yahia L. Bone remodeling in a new biomimetic polymer-composite hip stem. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;92:164-174.
11. Sarot JR, Contar CM, Cruz AC, de Souza Magini R. Evaluation of the stress distribution in CFR-PEEK dental implants by the three-dimensional finite element method. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21:2079-2085.
12. Frost HM. Perspectives: bone's mechanical usage windows. Bone Miner. 1992;19:257-271.
13. Huiskes R, Weinans H, van Rietbergen B. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;274:124-134.
14. Yildirim M, Fischer H, Marx R, Edelhoff D. In vivo fracture resistance of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90:325-331.
15. Andreiotelli M, Wenz HJ, Kohal RJ. Are ceramic implants a viable alternative to titanium implants? A systematic literature review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:32-47.
16. Aydin C, Yilmaz H, Ata SO. Single-tooth zirconia implant located in anterior maxilla. A clinical report. N Y State Dent J. 2010; 76:30-33.
17. Sandhaus S. The C.B.S. implant. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent. 1969;23:153-161.
18. Sandhaus S. Oral rehabilitation using implantation method C.B.S. [in German]. ZWR. 1971;80:597-604.
19. Schulte W, Heimke G. The Tübinger immediate implant [in German]. Quintessenz. 1976;27:17-23.
20. Schulte W, Kleineikenscheidt H, Lindner K, et al. Animal experiments on the question of healing around the Tübingen immediate implant. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1978;33:326-331.
21. Schulte W, Kleineikenscheidt H, Schareyka R, Heimke G. Concept and testing of the Tübingen immediate implant. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1978;33:319-325.
22. Schulte W, Kleineikenscheidt H, Lindner K, Schareyka R. The Tübingen immediate implant in clinical studies. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1978;33:348-359.
23. d'Hoedt B, Lukas D, Schulte W. Das Tübinger Implantat als Sofort-und Spätimplantat; ein statistischer Vergleich. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1986;41:1068-1072.
24. Ozkurt Z, Kazazoǧlu E. Zirconia dental implants: a literature review. J Oral Implantol. 2011;37:367-376.
25. Ozkurt Z, Kazazoǧlu E. Clinical success of zirconia in dental applications. J Prosthodont. 2010;19:64-68.
26. Moon SM, Ingalhalikar A, Highsmith JM, Vaccaro AR. Biomechanical rigidity of an all-polyetheretherketone anterior thoracolumbar spinal reconstruction construct: an in vitro corpec-tomy model. Spine J. 2009;9:330-335.
27. Skinner HB. Composite technology for total hip arthro-plasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;235:224-236.
28. Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007;28:4845-4869.
29. Liao K. Performance characterization and modeling of a composite hip prosthesis. Exp Tech. 1994;18:33-38.
30. Maharaj GR, Jamison RD. Intraoperative impact: characterization and laboratory simulation on composite hip prostheses. In: Jamison RD, Gilbertson LN, ed. STP 1178: Composite Materials for Implant Applications in the Human Body: Characterization and Testing. Philadelphia, Pa: ASTM; 1993:98-108.
31. Kelsey DJ, Springer GS, Goodman SB. Composite implant for bone replacement. J Compos Mater. 1997;31:1593-1632.
32. Corvelli AA, Biermann PJ, Roberts JC. Design, analysis and fabrication of a composite segmental bone replacement implant. J Adv Mater. 1997;28:2-8.
33. Hanasono MM, Goel N, DeMonte F. Calvarial reconstruction with polyetheretherketone implants. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62:653-655.
34. Koch FP, Weng D, Krämer S, Biesterfeld S, Jahn-Eimermacher A, Wagner W. Osseointegration of one-piece zirconia implants compared with a titanium implant of identical design: a histomorphometric study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010; 21:350-356.
35. Cook SD, Rust-Dawicki AM. Preliminary evaluation of titanium-coated PEEK dental implants. J Oral Implantol. 1995;21: 176-181.
36. Hufenbach W, Gottwald R, Markwardt J, Eckelt U, Modler N, Reitemeier B. Computation and experimental examination of an implant structure made by a fibre-reinforced building method for the bypass of continuity defects of the mandible [in German]. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2008;53:306-313.
37. Tetelman ED, Babbush CA. A new transitional abutment for immediate aesthetics and function. Implant Dent. 2008;17:51-58.
38. Berendsen AD, Smit TH, Hoeben KA, Walboomers XF, Bronckers AL, Everts V. Alkaline phosphatase-induced mineral deposition to anchor collagen fibrils to a solid surface. Biomaterials. 2007;28:3530-3536.