Engineering design education: Research, practice, and examples that link the two

Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 201-226

  Atman, Cynthia J ^a   Eris, Ozgur ^b   McDonnell, Janet ^c   Cardella, Monica E ^d   Borgford Parnell, Jim L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d Purdue University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; DESIGN; EDUCATION; PRODUCT DESIGN; TEACHING;

CURRICULAR STRUCTURE; ENGINEERING DESIGN EDUCATION; ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS; ENGINEERING EDUCATORS; ENGINEERING GRADUATES; ENGINEERING KNOWLEDGE; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICES; UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING PROGRAMS;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 84937135617     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139013451.015     Document Type: Chapter

References (158)

1. Accreditation Board for Engineering Technology (ABET). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2013-2014. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/DisplayTemplates/DocsHandbook.aspx?id=3149
2. Adams, R. S., Fralick, B. (2010). Work in progress - A conceptions of design instrument as an assessment tool. Paper presented at the Annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Washington, DC.
3. Adams, R. S., Turns, J., Atman, C. J. (2003). Educating effective engineering designers: The role of reflective practice. Design Studies, 24(3), 275-294.
4. Agrawal, A., Borgford-Parnell, J., Atman, C. J. (2011). Citations on engineering design education (2003-2011) CELT-11-11. Seattle: University of Washington (contact celtad@uw.edu).
5. Akin, Ö. (1986). Psychology of architectural design. London: Pion.
6. Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8. Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 359-380.
9. Atman, C. J., Bursic, K. M. (1998). Verbal protocol analysis as a method to document engineering student design processes. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(2), 121-132.
10. Atman, C. J., Chimka, J. R., Bursic, K. M., Nachtmann, H. L. (1999). A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes. Design Studies, 20(2), 131-152.
11. Atman, C. J., Kilgore, D. E., Mc Kenna, A. (2008, July). Characterizing design learning: A mixed-methods study of engineering designers’ use of language. Journal of Engineering Education, 309-326.
12. Atman, C. J., Turns, J. E., Borgford-Parnell, J., Yasuhara, K. (2012). The CELT model: Linking engineering education research and practice at the Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching CELT Technical Report CELT 12-01. Seattle, WA: University of Washington (contact celtad@uw.edu).
13. Badke-Schaub, P., Goldschmidt, G., Meijer, M. (2010). How does cognitive conflict in design teams support the development of creative ideas? Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(2), 119-133.
14. Bailey, R., Szabo, Z. (2006). Assessing engineering design process knowledge. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), 508.
15. Baillie, C., Feinblatt, E., Thamae, T., Berring-ton, E. (2010). Needs and feasibility: A guide for engineers in community projects - The case of waste for life. San Rafael, CA: Morgan and Claypool.
16. Ball, L. (1990). Cognitive processes in engineering design. Plymouth, U.K.: Polytechnic South West.
17. Ball, L., Evans, J., Dennis, I. (1994). Cognitive processes in engineering design: A longitudinal study. Ergonomics, 37, 1753-1786.
18. Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bansford, J. D. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3-4):271-311.
19. Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20(6), 481-486.
20. Baya, V., Leifer, L. (1996). Understanding information management in conceptual design. In N. Cross, H. Christiaans, K. Dorst (Eds.), Analyzing design activity (p. 151-168). Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons.
21. Becker, K., Mentzer, N., Park, K. (2012). High school student engineering design thinking and performance. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education conference, San Antonio, TX.
22. Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: Longmans, Green.
23. Borgford-Parnell, J., Deibel, K., Atman, C. J. (2010). From engineering design research to engineering pedagogy: Bringing research results directly to the students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(4), 748-759.
24. Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Endowment for the Advancement of Teaching.
25. Brereton, M., Cannon, D., Mabogunje, A., Leifer, L. (1996). Collaboration in design teams: How social interaction shapes a product. In N. Cross, H. Christiaans, K. Dorst (Eds.), Analyzing design activity (p. 319-342). Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons.
26. Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84-92.
27. Bucciarelli, L. L. (1994). Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Carberry, A. R., Mc Kenna, A. F. (2011). Analyzing engineering student conceptions of modeling in design. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference, Rapid City, SD.
29. Cardella, M. E. (2006). Engineering mathematics: An investigation of students’ mathematical thinking from a cognitive engineering perspective. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.
30. Cardella, M. E., Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S. (2006). Mapping between design activities and external representations for engineering student designers. Design Studies, 27(1), 5-24.
31. Cardella, M. E., Hoffman, S. R., Ohland, M. W., Pawley, A. L. (2010). Sustaining sustainable design through “normalized sustainability” in a first-year engineering course. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(2), 366-377.
32. Carvalho, L., Dong, A., Maton, K. (2009). Legitimating design: A sociology of knowledge account of the field. Design Studies, 30(5), 483-502.
33. Catalano, G. D. (2004). Senior capstone design and ethics: A bridge to the professional world. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10, 409-415.
34. Collins, A. (2006). Cognitive apprenticeship. In S. R. K. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (p. 47-60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Coyle, E. J., Jamieson, L. H., Oakes, W. C. (2005). EPICS: Engineering projects in community service. International Journal ofEngineering Education, 21(1), 139-150.
36. Crawley, E. F., Malmquist, J., Ostlund, S., Brodeur, D. (2007). Rethinking engineering education: The CDIO approach. New York, NY: Springer.
37. Crismond, D., Adams, R. S. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738-797.
38. Cross, N. (1984). Developments in design methodology. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons.
39. Cross, N. (2006). Designerly ways of knowing. London: Springer.
40. Cross, N., Christiaans, H., Dorst, K. (1996). Analysing design activity. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons.
41. Cross, N., Cross, A. (1996). Observations of teamwork and social processes in design. In N. Cross, H. Christiaans, K. Dorst (Eds.), Analyzing design activity (p. 291-318). Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons.
42. Daly, S. (2008). Design across disciplines, Ph.D. dissertation, Purdue University.
43. Daly, S., Mann, L., Adams, R. S. (2008). A new direction for engineering education research: Unique phenomenographic results that impact big picture understandings. Paper presented at the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Yeppoon, Queensland, Australia.
44. Darke, J. (1979). The primary generator and the design process. Design Studies, 1(1), 36-44.
45. Davis, D. C., Gerlick, R., Trevisan, M. S., Brown, S. A. (2011). Establishing interrater agreement for TIDEE’s teamwork and professional development assessments. Paper presented at the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
46. DeShon, R. P., Kozlowski, S. W. J., Schmidt, A. M., Milner, K. R., Wiechmann, D. (2004). A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1035-1056.
47. Dorst, K., Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problemsolution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425-437.
48. Downey, G., Lucena, J. (2003). When students resist: Ethnography of a senior design experience in engineering education. International Journal ofEngineering Education, 19(1), 168-176.
49. Du, X., de Graaff, E., Kolmos, A. (Eds.). (2009). Research on PBL practice in engineering education. Boston, MA: Sense.
50. Dubberly, H. (2004). How do you design? A compendium of models. San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from http://www.dubberly.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/ddo_designprocess.pdf
51. Dutson, A. J., Todd, R. H., Magleby, S. P., Sorenson, C. D. (1997, January). A review of literature on teaching engineering design through project-oriented capstone courses. Journal of Engineering Education, 17-28.
52. Dweck, C. S., Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273.
53. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., Leifer, L. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal ofEngineer-ingEducation, 94(1), 103-120.
54. Dym, C. L., Little, L. (2009). Engineering design: A project-based introduction (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
55. Ehrenfeld, J. R. (2008). Sustainability by design. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
56. Eliot, M., Turns, J. (2011). Constructing professional portfolios: Sense-making and professional identity development for engineering undergraduates. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(4), 630-654.
57. Eris, Ö. (2004). Effective inquiry for innovative engineering design. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
58. Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59. Garzca, L., Palou, E., Lopez-Malo, A., Garibay, J. M. (2009). Ethnography of a first-year design experience in the introduction to engineering design course. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX.
60. Gerber, E., Mc Kenna, A., Hirsch, P., Yarnoff, C. (2010). Learning to waste and wasting to learn? How to use cradle to cradle principles to improve the teaching of design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(2), 314-323.
61. Gero, J. (1990). Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine, 11, 26-36.
62. Gero, J. S. (1996). Creativity, emergence and evolution in design. Knowledge-Based Systems, 9(7):435-448.
63. Goldschmidt, G. (2003). Cognitive economy in design reasoning. In U. Lindemann (Ed.), Human behavior in design (p. 53-62). New York, NY: Springer.
64. Green, G., Smrcek, L. (2006). On the developing role of physical models in engineering design education. European Journal ofEngineer-ingEducation, 31(2), 191-200.
65. Hadgraft, R. G., Carew, A. L., Sardine, A., Blundell, T., Blundell, D. (2008). Teaching and assessing systems thinking in engineering. Paper presented at the Research in Engineering Education Symposium, Davos, Switzerland.
66. Hatamura, Y. (2006). Decision-making in engineering design: Theory and practice. London: Springer.
67. Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P., Weil, B. (2011). Teaching innovative design reasoning: How CK theory can help to overcome fixation effect. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 25(1), 77-92.
68. Hazelrigg, G. A. (1998). A framework for decision-based engineering design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 120(4), 653-658.
69. Heywood, J. (2005). Engineering education: Research and development in curriculum and instruction. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
70. Hirsch, P. L., Mc Kenna, A. F. (2008). Using reflections to promote teamwork understanding in engineering design education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(2), 377-385.
71. Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.
72. Howe, S., Wilbarger, J. (2005). 2005 National survey of engineering capstone design courses. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2006 American Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Chicago, IL.
73. Hsu, M. C., Cardella, M., Purzer, S. & Diaz, N. M. (2010). Assessing elementary teachers’ perceptions of engineering and familiarity with design, engineering and technology: Implications on teacher professional development. Paper presented at the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, KY.
74. Hubka, V. (1982). Principles of engineering design (W. E. Eder, Trans.). Guildford, U.K.: Butterworth Scientific.
75. Hyman, B., Khanna, S., Lin, Y., Borgford-Parnell, J. (2011). A case study of using capstone design as basis for curriculum-wide project based learning. Paper presented at the ASME 2011 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exhibition, Denver, CO.
76. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Smith, K. A. (1998). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edna, MN: Interaction Book Company.
77. Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139-151.
78. Jones, J. C. (1970). Design methods: Seeds of human futures. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons.
79. Jones, J. C. (1991). Designing designing. London: Architecture Design and Technology Press.
80. Jones, T. R., Cardella, M. E., Purzer, S. (2012). Using and comparing paper and media to improve student reflection in science and design courses. Paper presented at the National Association of Research on Science Teaching Annual International Conference, Indianapolis, IN.
81. Kan, J., Gero, J. (2009). Using the FBS ontology to capture semantic design information in design protocol studies. In J. Mc Donell & P. Lloyd (Eds.), About: Designing - analysing design meetings (p. 213-229). London: Taylor & Francis.
82. Kilgore, D. E., Atman, C. J., Yasuhara, K., Barker, T., Morozov, A. (2007, October). Considering context: A study of first-year engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 321-334.
83. Kilgore, D. E., Jocuns, A., Yasuhara, K., Atman, C. J. (2010). From beginning to end: How engineering students think and talk about sustainability across the life cycle. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(2), 305-313.
84. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
85. Krippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn: A new foundation for design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Taylor & Francis.
86. Laeser, M., Moskal, B. M., Knecht, R., Lasich, D. (2003). Engineering design: Examining the impact of gender and the team’s gender composition. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1) 49-56.
87. Lau, A. (2010). Sustainable design: A new paradigm for engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(2), 252-259.
88. Lave, J., Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
89. Lawson, B. (1980). How designers think. London & Westfield, NJ: Architectural Press; Eastview Editions.
90. Lawson, B. (1997). How designers think: The design process demystified (completely rev. 3rd ed.). Oxford and Boston: Architectural Press.
91. Le Dantec, C. A. (2010). Situating design as social creation and cultural cognition. CoDesign, 6(4), 207-224.
92. Linder, B., Somerville, M., Eris, O., Tatar, N. (2010). Taking one for the team: Goal orientation and gender-correlated task division. Paper presented at the ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Arlington, VA.
93. Little, P., Cardenas, M. (2001). Use of “studio” methods in the introductory engineering design curriculum. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(3), 309-318.
94. Lloyd, P. (2000). Storytelling and the development of discourse in the engineering design process. Design Studies, 21(4), 357-373.
95. Luxhoj, J. T., Hansen, P. H. K. (1996). Engineering curriculum reform at Aalborg University. Journal of Engineering Education, 85(3), 183-186.
96. Maguire, M. (2001). Methods to support human-centered design. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 55(4), 587-634.
97. Mann, L., Dall’Alba, G., Radcliffe, D. (2007). Using phenomenography to investigate different ways of experiencing sustainable design. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI.
98. Marples, D. L. (1961). The decisions of engineering design. IRE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-8(2), 55-71.
99. Marra, R. M., Palmer, B., Litzinger, T. A. (2000). The effects of a first-year engineering design course on student intellectual development as measured by the Perry Scheme. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(1), 39-46.
100. Marton, F., Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
101. Mc Donnell, J. (1997). Descriptive models for interpreting design. Design Studies, 18(4), 457-473.
102. Mc Donnell, J., Lloyd, P. (2009). About designing: Analysing design meetings. London: Taylor & Francis.
103. Mc Donnell, J., Lloyd, P., Valkenburg, R. C. (2004). Developing design expertise through the construction of video stories. Design Studies, 25, 509-525.
104. Mc Kenna, A. F., Colgate, J. E., Carr, S. H., Olson, G. B. (2006). IDEA: Formalizing the foundation for an engineering design education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3), 671-678.
105. Mc Kenzie, L. J., Trevisan, M. S., Davis, D. C., Beyerlein S. W. (2004). Capstone design courses and assessment: A national study. In Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.
106. Mc Martin, F., Mc Kenna, A., Youssefi, K. (2000). Scenario assignments as assessment tools for undergraduate engineering education. IEEE Transactions on Education, 43(2), 111-119.
107. Mello, N. A. (2000). How can universities provide global perspective for engineers? One institution’s solution. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Conference, St. Louis, MO.
108. Melton, R. B., Cardella, M. E., Oakes, W. C., Zoltowski, C. B. (2012). Development of a design task to assess students’ understanding of human-centered design. Paper presented at the 42nd Annual ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Seattle, WA.
109. Mentzer, N., Becker, K., Park, K. (2011). High school students as novice designers. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
110. Michaelsen, L. K., Knight, A. B., Fink, L. D. (2004). Team-based learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
111. Mills, J. E., Treagust, D. F. (2003). Engineering education - is problem-based or project-based learning the answer? Australasian Journal of Engineering Education. Retrieved from http://www.aaee.com.au/journal/2003/mills_treagust03.pdf
112. Minneman, S. L. (1991). The social construction of a technical reality: Empirical studies of group engineering design practice. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
113. Molhave, A., Mc Donnell, J., Atman, C. J. (2011). Seeing and hearing: Elucidating the design process - A workshop at Central Saint Matins College of Art and Design CELT Technical Report (Vol. CELT - 11-03): University of Washington (contact celtad@uw.edu).
114. Mosborg, S., Adams, R. S., Kim, R., Atman, C. J., Turns, J., Cardella, M. (2005). Conceptions of the engineering design process: An expert study of advanced practicing professionals. Paper presented at the American Society of Engineering Education Conference, Portland, OR.
115. Neeley, W. L., Sheppard, S. D., Leifer, L. G. (2006). Design is design is design (or is it?) What we say vs. what we do in engineering education. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Chicago, IL.
116. Nefcy, E. J., Gummer, E. S., Koretsky, M. D. (2012). Characterization of student modeling in an industrially situated virtual laboratory. Paper presented at the 2012 American Society for Engineering Education, Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX.
117. Nersessian, N. J., Newstetter, W. C., Kurz-Milcke, E., Davies, J. (2002). A mixed-method approach to studying distributed cognition in evolving environments. Paper presented at the International Conference on Learning Sciences, Seattle, WA.
118. Newstetter, W. C. (1998). Of green monkeys and failed affordances: A case study of a mechanical engineering design course. Research in Engineering Design, 10(2), 118-128.
119. Newstetter, W. C., Mc Cracken, W. M. (2001). Novice conceptions of design: Implications for the design of learning environments. In Design learning and knowing: Cognition in design education (p. 63-78). New York, NY: Elsevier.
120. Okudan, G. E., Mohammed, S. (2006). Task gender orientation perceptions by novice designers: Implications for engineering design research, teaching and practice. Design Studies, 27(6):723-740.
121. Otto, N. K., Wood, L. K. (2001). Product design: Techniques in reverse engineering and new product development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
122. Pahl, G. (1997). How and why collaboration with cognitive psychologists began. Paper presented at the Designers: The Key to Successful Product Development, Darmstadt Symposium, Darmstadt, Germany.
123. Pahl, G., Beitz, W. (1996). Engineering design: A systematic approach. London: Springer-Verlag.
124. Palmer, B., Terenzini, P. T., Mc Kenna, A. F., Harper, B. J., Merson, D. (2011). Design in context: Where do the engineers of2020 learn this skill? Paper presented at the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
125. Paretti, M. (2008). Teaching communication in capstone design: The role of the instructor in situated learning. Journal ofEngineering Education, 97(4), 491-503.
126. Park, K., Pieper, J., Mentzer, N., Becker, K. (2010). Exploring engineering design knowing and thinking as an innovation in STEM learning. Paper presented at the P12 Engineering and Design Education Research Summit, Seaside, OR.
127. Pembridge, J., Paretti, M. (2010). The current state of capstone design pedagogy. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2010 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Louisville, KY.
128. Purzer, S., Chen, J., Yaday, A. (2010). Does context matter? Engineering students’ approaches to global vs local problems. Paper presented at the Frontiers in Education Conference, Arlington, VA.
129. Purzer, S., Hilpert, J. C. (2011). Special session: Cognitive processes critical for ill-defined problem solving: Linking theory, research, and classroom implications. Paper presented at the 41st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Rapid City, SD.
130. Purzer, S. Y. (2011). The relationship between team discourse, self-efficacy, and individual achievement: A sequential mixed-methods study. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(4), 655-679.
131. Rittel, H. W. J., Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169.
132. Roberts, C., Yasar, S., Morrell, D., Henderson, M., Danielson, S., Cooke, J. (2007a). A pilot study of engineering design teams using protocol analysis. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Honolulu, HI.
133. Roberts, C., Yasar, S., Morrell, D., Henderson, M., Danielson, S., Cooke, N. (2007b). A pilot study of engineering design teams using protocol analysis. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2007 ASEE Annual Conference, Honolulu, HI.
134. Roozenburgh, N., Eekels, J. (1995). Product design: Fundamentals and methods. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
135. Rowe, P. G. (1987). Design thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
136. Safoutin, M. J., Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S. (2000a). The design attribute framework CELT Technical Report 99-01. Seattle, WA: University of Washington (contact celtad@uw.edu).
137. Safoutin, M. J., Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Rutat, T., Kramlich, J. C., Firidley, J. L. (2000b). A design attribute framework for course planning and learning assessment. IEEE Transactions on Education, 43(2), 188-199.
138. Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
139. Sheppard, S., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., Sullivan, W. M. (2009). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
140. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
141. Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 87101.
142. Sobek, D., II. (2002). Preliminary findings from coding student design journals. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Montreal, Canada.
143. Somerville, M., Anderson, D., Berbeco, H., Bourne, J. R., Crisman, J., Dabby, D., Zas-tavker, Y. (2005). The Olin College curriculum: Thinking toward the future. IEEE Transactions on Education, 48(1), 198-205.
144. Stacey, M., Eckert, C., Earl, C. (2009). From Ronchamp by sledge: On the pragmatics of object references. In J. Mc Donell & P. Lloyd (Eds.), About: Designing - analysing design meetings (p. 361-379). London: Taylor & Francis.
145. Suh, N. P. (1990). The principles of design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
146. Todd, R. H., Magleby, S. P., Sorenson, C. D., Swan, B. R., Anthony, D. K. (1995, April). A survey of capstone engineering courses in North America. Journal of Engineering Education, 165-174.
147. Ullman, G. D. (1992). The mechanical design process. New York, NY: Mc Graw-Hill.
148. Ulrich, K. T., Eppinger, S. D. (1995). Product design and development. New York, NY: Mc Graw-Hill.
149. Vanasupa, L., Burton, R., Stolk, J., Zimmerman, J. B., Leifer, L., Anastas, P. T. (2010). The systemic correlation between mental modes and sustainable design: Implications for engineering educators. International Journal ofEngineer-ingEducation, 26(2), 428-450.
150. Visser, W. (1992). Designers activities examined at 3 levels - Organization, strategies and problem-solving processes. Knowledge-Based Systems, 5(1), 92-104.
151. Visser, W. (2006). The cognitive artifacts of designing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
152. Williams, C. B., Gero, J., Lee, Y., Paretti, M. (2011). Exploring the effect of design education on the design cognition of mechanical engineering students. Paper presented at the ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conference & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC/CIE 2011), Washington, DC.
153. Wilson, J. M., Jennings, W. C. (2000). Studio courses: How Information technology is changing the way we teach, on campus and off. Paper presented at the IEEE Conference.
154. Yasar-Purzer, S., Henderson, M., Mc Kay, A., Roberts, C., &de Pennington, A. (2008). Comparing the design problem solving processes of product design and engineering student teams in the US and UK. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
155. Zoltowski, C. B. (2010). Students’ ways of experiencing human-centered design. Ph.D. dissertation, Purdue University.
156. Zoltowski, C. B., Cardella, M., Oakes, W. C. (2011b). The development of assessment tools usingphenomenography. Paper presented at the Research in Engineering Education Symposium, Madrid, Spain.
157. Zoltowski, C. B., Cardella, M. E., Oakes, W. C. (2011a). Phenomenographic study of human-centered design: Educational implications. Paper presented at the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education, Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
158. Zoltowski, C. B., Oakes, W. C., Cardella, M. E. (2012). Students’ ways of experiencing human-centered design. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 28-59.