Teaching communication in capstone design: The role of the instructor in situated learning

Journal of Engineering Education

Volumn 97, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 491-503

  Paretti, Marie C ^a,b  

^a State University   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication; Situated learning; Writing

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; CURRICULA; EDUCATION; TEACHING; TECHNICAL WRITING;

CAPSTONE DESIGN COURSE; CLASSROOM PRACTICES; COMMUNICATION SKILLS; COMMUNICATION TASK; ENGINEERING CLASSROOMS; LEARNING MECHANISM; SITUATED LEARNING; TECHNICAL COMMUNICATIONS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 68349114848     PISSN: 10694730     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00995.x     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. 2005. Criteria for accreditingengineeringprograms. Baltimore, MD: ABET, Inc.
2. Alford, Elizabeth M., and David Rocheleau. 1998. Designing effective writing and presentation assignments for freshman engineering students. In Web proceedings, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, http://fie.engmg.pitt.edu/fie98/papers/1093.pdf. Last accessed March 2008.
3. Aller, Betsy M., and M. Sean Clancey. 2000. Creating communication modules for an engineering enterprise initiative: Programmatic and rhetorical considerations. Paper presented at the Council of Programs in Technical and Scientific Communication. Menomonie, WI.
4. Anson, Chris M., and Lee Forsberg. 1990. Moving beyond the academic community: Transitional stages in professional writing. Written Communication 7(2):200-31.
5. Artemeva, Natasha, Susan Logie, and Jennie St-Martin. 1999. From page to stage: How theories of genre and situated learning help introduce engineering students to discipline-specific communication. Technical Communication Quarterly 8(3):301-16.
6. Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1986. Speech genres and other late essays. Trans. by V. W. McGee. Eds. C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
7. Bakhurst, David. 1997. Activity, consciousness, and communication. In Mind, culture, and activity: Seminal papers from the laboratory of comparative human cognition, eds. M. Cole, Y. Engestrom, and O. Vasquez. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Bazerman, Charles. 1994. Systems of genres and the enactment of social intentions. In Genre and the new rhetoric, eds. A. Freedman and P. Medway. London: Taylor & Francis.
9. Bazerman, Charles. 1999. Introduction: Changing regularities of genre. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 42(1):1-2.
10. Bazerman, Charles, and Paul Prior, eds. 2004. What writing does and how it does it:An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Berkenkotter, Carol, and Thomas Huckin. 1995. Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Boiarsky, Carolyn. 2004. Teaching engineering students to communicate effectively. A metacognitive approach. International Journal of Engineering Education 20(2):251-60.
13. Borrego, Maura. 2007. Conceptual difficulties experienced by trained engineers learning educational research methods. Journal of Engineering Education 96(2):91-102.
14. Brinkman, Gert W., and Thea M. van der Geest. 2003. Assessment of communication competencies in engineering design projects. Technical Communication Quarterly 12(1):67-81.
15. Brown, John Seely, Allan Collins, and Paul Duguid. 1989. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher 18(1):32-42.
16. Burnham, Christopher, Michele Auzeenne, and Ricardo B. Jacquez. 2005. Writing assessment for design: Using writing to teach and learn engineering design. Paper presented at the Conference on College Composition and Communication. San Francisco, CA.
17. Cooper, Marilyn M., and Michael Holzman. 1989. Writing as social action. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
18. Cross, Geoffrey. 2000. Collective form: An exploration of large-group writing. Journal of Business Communication 37(1):77-100.
19. Dannels, Deanna P. 2000. Learning to be professional: Technical classroom discourse, practice, and professional identity construction. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 14(1):5-37.
20. Dannels, Deanna P. 2003. Teaching and learning design presentations in engineering: Contradictions between academic and workplace activity systems. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 17(2):139-69.
21. Davis, Denny C, and Steven W. Beyerlein. 2005. Development and use of an engineer profile. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Portland, OR.
22. Dias, P., A. Freedman, P. Medway, and A. Pare. 1999. Worlds apart: Acting and writing in academic and workplace contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Foor, Cynthia E., Susan E. Walden, and Deborah A. Trytten. 2007. "I wish that I belonged more in this whole engineering group:" Achieving individual diversity. Journal'of Engineering Education 96(2):103-15.
24. Ford, Julie Dyke. 2004. Knowledge transfer across disciplines: Tracking rhetorical strategies from a technical communication classroom to an engineering classroom. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 47(4):1-15.
25. Fornaro, R. J., M. R. Heil, and S. W. Peretti. 2001. Enhancing technical communication skills of engineering students: An experiment in multidisciplinary design. In Web proceedings, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie2001/papers/1429.pdf, pp. S2G.1-S2G.6. Last accessed March 2008. Reno, NV.
26. Freedman, Aviva, and Christine Adam. 1996. Learning to write professionally: 'Situated learning' and the transition from university to professional discourse. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 10(4):395-427.
27. Freedman, Aviva, Christine Adams, and Graham Smart. 1994. Wearing suits to class: Simulations as genre. Written Communication 11(2):193-226.
28. Freedman, Aviva, and Peter Medway, eds. 1994. Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor and Francis.
29. Haas, Christina. 1994. Learning to read biology: One student's rhetorical development in College. Written Communication 11(1):43-84.
30. Haswell, Richard. 1991. Gaining ground in college writing: Tales of development and interpretation. Dallas, TX: Southern Methodist University Press.
31. Helbling, Jim, David Lanning, and Ron Madler. 2005. Integrating communications into team-taught senior design courses. In Web proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, http://www.asee.org/acPapers/2005- 979-Final.pdf. Last accessed March 2008. Portland, OR.
32. Henry, Jim. 2000. Writing workplace cultures: An archaeology of professional writing. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
33. Hirsch, Penny, Barbara Shwom, Charles Yarnoff, John C. Anderson, David M. Kelso, Gregory B. Olson, and J. Edward Colgate. 2001. Engineering design and communication: The case for interdisciplinary collaboration. International Journal of Engineering Education 17 (4-5): 342-48.
34. Hunt, Russell A. 1994. Traffic in genres, in classrooms and out. In Genre and the new rhetoric, eds. A. Freedman and P. Medway. New York: Taylor & Francis.
35. Kain, Donna, and Elizabeth Wardle. 2005. Building context: Using activity theory to teach about genre in multi-major professional communication courses. Technical Communication Quarterly 14(2):113-39.
36. Katz, Susan M. 1998a. Part I-Learning writing in organizations: What newcomers learn about writing on the job. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 41(2):107-14.
37. Katz, Susan M. 1998b. Part II-How newcomers learn to write: Resources for guiding newcomers. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 41(3):165-73.
38. Kirsch, Gesa, and Patricia A. Sullivan. 1992. Methods and methodology in composition research. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
39. Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wegner. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Leander, Kevin, and Paul Prior. 2004. Speaking and writing: How talk and text interact in situated practices. In What writing does and how it does it: An introduction to analyzing texts and textual practices, eds C. Bazerman and P. Prior. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41. McCarthy, Linda Perkins. 1994. A Stranger in strange lands: A college student writing across the curriculum. In Landmark essays: Writing across the curriculum, eds. C. Bazerman and D. R. Russell. Davis, CA: Hermagoras Press. Original edition, Research in the teaching of english (1987).
42. McEachern, Robert W. 1997. Writing "bad news" in an arts organization: A sociocognitive inquiry. Dissertation Abstracts International 58-07A:2632.
43. McEachern, Robert W. 1998. Meeting minutes as symbolic action. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 12(2):198-216.
44. McKenna, Ann F., and Penny Hirsch. 2005. Evaluating student confidence in engineering design, teamwork and communication. In Web proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, http://www.asee.org/acPapers/2005-979- Final.pdf. Last accessed March 2008. Portland, OR.
45. McKenzie, Larry J., Michael S. Trevisan, Denny C. Davis, and Steven W. Beyerlein. 2004. Capstone design courses and assessment: A national study. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. Salt Lake City, UT.
46. Miller, Carolyn. 1984. Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70:151-67.
47. Miller, George A., and Patricia M. Gildea. 1987. How children learn words. Scientific American 257(3):94-99.
48. Mosenthal, P., L. Tamor, and S. Wolmsley, eds. 1983. Research on writing: Principles and methods. New York: Longman.
49. Nardi, Bonnie A. 1992. Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models and distributed cognition. In Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction, ed. B. Nardi. Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
50. National Academy of Engineering 2004. The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press....
51. National Research Council Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education 2000. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
52. Newell, J. A., A. J. Marchese, R. P. Ramachandran, B. Sukumaran, and R. Harvey. 1999. Multidisciplinary design and communication: A pedagogical vision. The International Journal of Engineering Education 15(5):376-82.
53. Norback, Judith Shaul, Garlie A. Forehand, Stephanie A. Jernigan, and Alexander B. Quinn. 2002. Teaching workplace communication in senior design. In Web proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, http://www.asee.org/acPapers/2005-979-Final.pdf. Last accessed March 2008. Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
54. Orlikowski, Wanda, and JoAnne Yates. 1994. Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 39(4):541-74.
55. Paretti, Marie C. 2006. Audience awareness: Leveraging problembased learning to teach workplace communication practice. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 49(6):189-98.
56. Paretti, Marie C, and Christine B. Burgoyne. 2005. Integrating engineering and communication: A study of capstone design courses. In Web proceedings, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie2005/papers/1205.pdf, pp. F4D.23-F4D.28. Last accessed March 2008. Indianapolis, IN.
57. Pet-Armacost, J., and R. L. Armacost. 2003. Enhancing communication and professional practice skills in an introductory engineering course. In Web proceedings, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie2003/papers/1470.pdf, pp. F1E.10-F1E.15. Last accessed March 2008. Boulder, CO.
58. Ramachandran, Ravi P., Anthony J. Marchese, Raul Ordonez, Carlos Sun, Eric Constants, John L. Schmalzel, Heidi L. Newell, Harriet Benavidez, and Julie Haynes. 2002. Engineering design-integration of multidisciplinary design and technical communication: An inexorable link. The International Journal of Engineering Education 18(1):32-38.
59. Robinson, Mark A., Paul R. Sparrow, Chris Clegg, and Kamal Birdi. 2005. Design engineering competencies: future requirements and predicted changes in the forthcoming decade. Design Studies 26(2):123-53.
60. Russell, David R. 1997. Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication 14(4):504-54.
61. Sageev, Pneena, and Carol J. Romanowski. 2001. A Message from recent engineering graduates in the marketplace: Results of a survey on technical communication skills. Journal of Engineering Education 90(4):685-97.
62. Schryer, Catherine. 1993. Records as genre. Written Communication 10(2):200-34.
63. Shwom, Barbara, Penny Hirsch, Charles Yarnoff, and John C. Anderson. 1999. Engineering design and communication: A foundational course for freshmen. Language and'Learning Across the Disciplines 3(2):107-12.
64. Spinuzzi, Clay. 1996. Pseudotransactionality, activity theory, and professional writing instruction. Technical Communication Quarterly 5(3):295-308.
65. Spinuzzi, Clay. 2003. Tracing genres through organizations: A sociocultural approach to information design. In Acting with technology, eds. B. A. Nardi, V. Kaptelinin and K. Foot. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66. Stein, David. 1998. Situated learning in adult education. ERIC Digest, http://www.ericdigests.org/1998-3/adult-education.html (last accessed, March 2008).
67. Swarts, J., and Lee Odell. 2001. Rethinking the evaluation of writing in engineering courses. In Web proceedings, ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie2001/papers/1283.pdf, pp. T3A.25-T3A.30. Last accessed March 2008. Reno, NV.
68. Thompson, Nancy, Elizabeth M. Alford, Changyong Liao, Robert Johnson, and Michael A. Matthews. 2005. Integrating undergraduate research into engineering: A communications approach to holistic education. Journalof Engineering Education 94(3):297-308.
69. Tonso, Karen L. 2006. Teams that work Campus culture, engineer identity, and social interactions. Journal of Engineering Education 95(1):25-37.
70. Vygotsky, Lev S. 1962/1986. Thought and language. Revised ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
71. Vygotsky, Lev S. 1978. Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
72. Walker, Kristin. 2005. Implications of technology tools in the online professional communication classroom: An activity theory analysis. Paper presented at the Conference on College Composition and Communication. San Francisco, CA.
73. Wardle, Elizabeth. 2004. Identity, authority, and learning to write in the workplace. Enculturation 5 (2). http://enculturation.gmu.edu/5-2/ wardle.html. Last accessed March 2008.
74. Williams, Julia M. 2002. The engineering portfolio: Communication, reflection, and student learning outcomes assessment. International Journal of Engineering Education 18(2):199-207.
75. Williamson, W. J., and Philip H. Sweany. 1999. Linking communication and software design courses for professional development in computer science. Language and LearningAcross the Disciplines 3(2):103-06.
76. Winsor, Dorothy A. 1996. Writinglike an engineer: A rhetorical education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
77. Yalvac, B., H. D. Smith, J. Troy, and P. Hirsch. 2007. Promoting advanced writing skills in an upper-level engineering class. Journal of Engineering Education 96(2):117-28.
78. Yin, Robert K. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.