A framework for decision-based engineering design

Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions of the ASME

Volumn 120, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 653-658

  Hazelrigg, G A ^a  

^a NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; LIFE CYCLE; MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; OPERATIONS RESEARCH; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT;

ENGINEERING DESIGN;

MACHINE DESIGN;

EID: 0032304699     PISSN: 10500472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.2829328     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Akao, Y., ed., 1988, Quality Function Deployment: Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design, Productivity Press, Portland, OR.
2. Arrow, K. J., 1963, Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd ed., Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
3. Bernoulli, D., 1738, Exposition of a New Theory on the Measurement of Risk, “Specimen Theoriae Novae de Mensura Sortis,” Commentarii Academiae Scientiaruni Imperialis Petropolitanae, Tomus V. [See also, A. N. Page, Utility Theory: A Book of Readings, John Wiley & Sons, inc., NY, 1968, pp. 199-214.]
4. Boothroyd, G., 1987, “Design for Assembly-The Key to Design for Manufacture,” International Journal of Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 2, pp. 3-11.
5. Carroll, L., 1865, Alice in Wonderland.
6. Clemen, R. T., 1991, Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis, PWS-Kent Publishing Company, Boston, MA.
7. Doming, W. E., 1986, Out of the Crisis, MIT/CAES, Cambridge, MA.
8. de Neufville, R., 1990, Applied Systems Analysis, McGraw-Hill, Inc., Singapore.
9. Fishburn, P. C., 1968, Utility Theory, Management Science, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 335-378.
10. Grayson, L. P., 1993, The Making of an Engineer, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., NY.
11. Hauser, J. R., and Clausing, D., 1988, The House of Quality, Harvard Business Review, May, pp. 63-73.
12. Hazelrigg, G. A., 1994, “Rethinking the Curriculum,” ASEE Prism, December, p. 56.
13. Hazelrigg, G. A., 1996a, Systems Engineering: An Approach to Information-Based Design, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
14. Hazelrigg, G. A., 1996b, The Implications of Arrow's Impossibility Theorem on Approaches to Optimal Engineering Design, ASME JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, June, Vol. 118, pp. 161-164.
15. Heal, G. M., 1973, The Theory of Economic Planning, American Elsevier Publishing Co., Inc., NY.
16. Hildebrandt, S., and Tromba, A., 1985, Mathematics and Optimal Form, W. H. Freeman and Co., NY.
17. Keeny, R. L., 1973, “A Decision Analysis with Multiplicative Objectives: The Mexico City Airport,” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Vol. 4., pp. 101-117.
18. Keeny, R. L., 1974, “Multiplicative Utility Functions,” Operations Research, Vol. 1, pp. 23-25.
19. Luce, R. D., and Raiffa, H., 1957, Games and Decisions, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., NY.
20. Marshall, K. T., and Oliver, R. M., 1995, Decision Making and Forecasting, McGraw-Hill, Inc., NY.
21. Sage, A. P., 1977, Methodology for Large-Scale Systems, McGraw-Hill Book Company, NY.
22. Suh, N. P., 1990, The Principles of Design, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
23. Taguchi, G., 1993, On Robust Technology Development, ASME Press, NY.
24. Tribus, M., 1969, Rational Descriptions, Decisions and Designs, Pergamon Press, Elmsford, NY.
25. von Neumann, J., and Morgenstem, O., 1953, The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Third Edition, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
26. Wasserman, G. S., 1993, “On How to Prioritize Design Requirements During the QFD Planning Phase,” IEE Transactions, Vol. 25, No. 3, May, pp. 59-65.