Students' ways of experiencing human-centered design

Journal of Engineering Education

Volumn 101, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 28-59

  Zoltowski, Carla B ^a   Oakes, William C ^a   Cardella, Andmonica E ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Human centered design; Phenomenography; User centered design

Indexed keywords

COST ENGINEERING; EDUCATION; STUDENTS; USER CENTERED DESIGN;

COMPETITIVE ECONOMY; DEVELOPMENT COSTS; EMPATHIC DESIGNS; ENGINEERING DESIGN; ENGINEERING PROGRAM; HUMAN-CENTERED DESIGNS; INFORMATION SOURCES; PHENOMENOGRAPHY;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 84856684272     PISSN: 10694730     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00040.x     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. ABET. (2000). Engineering Criteria 2000: Criteria for accrediting programs in engineering in the United States, 3rd ed. Retrieved from http://www.ele.uri.edu/faculty/daly/criteria.2000.html.
2. Agogino, A. (2008). Introduction to human-centered design. Engineering Pathway. Accessed online April 12, 2011. http://nsdl.org/resource/2200/ 20090506221721828T
3. Åkerlind, G. S. (2005). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(4), 321-334. (Pubitemid 43084446)
4. Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 359-379. (Pubitemid 350073919)
5. Atman, C. J., Chimka, J. R., Bursic, K. M., & Nachtmann, H. N. (1999). A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes. Design Studies, 20(2), 131-152.
6. Bennett, P. (2006). Listening lessons: Make consumers part of the design process by tuning in. Point, (March). Retrieved from http://www.ideo.com/images/ uploads/news/pdfs/ 265293-final.pdf
7. Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
8. Bowden, J., & Green, P. (Eds) (2005). Doing developmental phenomenography. Melbourne, Australia: RMIT University Press.
9. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.) (2000). How people learn. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
10. Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1996). Implementing service learning in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 67(2), 221-239.
11. Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84-92.
12. Buchanan, Richard (2001). Design research and the new learning. Design Issues, 17(4), 3-23.
13. Casey, S. (1993). Set phasers on stun and other true tales of design, technology, and human error. Santa Barbara, CA: Aegean Publishing Company.
14. Christiaans, H., & Dorst, C. (1992). Cognitive models in industrial design engineering: A protocol study. In D. L. Taylor & D. A. Stauer (Eds.), Design theory and methodology - DTM92. New York, NY: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
15. Clarkson, J., Coleman, R., Keates, S., & Lebbon, C. (2003). Inclusive design: Design for the whole population. London, UK: Springer.
16. Clayton, P. H. (2010). Workshop entitled "Generating, deepening, and documenting learning and critical thinking: The power of critical reflection." Purdue University, March 10, 2010.
17. Coyle, E. J., Jamieson, L. H., & Oakes, W. C. (2005). EPICS: Engineering Projects in Community Service. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 139-150. (Pubitemid 40173822)
18. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
19. Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 25(5), 427-441.
20. Daly, S. R. (2008). Design across discipline. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
21. Damodaran, L. (1996). User involvement in the system design process - a practical guide for users. Behaviour & Information Technology, 15(6), 363-377. (Pubitemid 126595173)
22. Dym, C. L., & Little, P. (2004). Engineering design: A project-based introduction. New York, NY, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
23. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103-120.
24. EPICS Design Process. (2009, May). Retrieved from https://sharepoint.ecn. purdue.edu/epics/teams/Public%20Documents/EPICS-Design-Process.pdf
25. Guenther, K. (2006). Developing personas to understand user needs. Online, 30(5): 49-51. (Pubitemid 44939735)
26. Stanford Institute of Design. (2010). Our vision. Retrieved from http://dschool.stanford.edu/ big-picture/our-vision.php.
27. Hoffman, R. R., Feltovich, P. J., Ford, K. M., Woods, D. D., Klein, G., & Feltovich, A. (2002). A rose by any other name... would probably be given an acronym. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 17(4), 72-80.
28. IDEO (2011). Human-Centered Design Toolkit 2nd Edition. Retrieved from http://www.ideo.com/work/human-centered-design-toolkit/
29. Jacobs, G., & Ip, B. (2004). Establishing user requirements: Incorporating gamer preferences into interactive games design. Design Studies, 26(3), 243-255. (Pubitemid 40391304)
30. Jonas, W. (2001). A scenario for design. Design Issues, 17(2), 62.
31. Keates, S., & Clarkson, J. (2003). Countering design exclusion: An introduction to inclusive design. London, UK: Springer.
32. Kensing, F., & Blomberg, J. (1998). Participatory design: Issues and concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 7(3), 167-185. (Pubitemid 128510645)
33. Krippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn: A new foundation for design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
34. Kurakawa, K. (2004). A scenario-driven conceptual design information model and its formation. Research in Engineering Design, 15(2): 122-137.
35. Lawson, B. (2004). What designers know. Oxford, UK, Architectural Press.
36. Maguire, M. (2001). Methods to support human-centered design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55(4), 587-634.
37. Mann, L., Radcliffe, D. F., & Dall'Alba, G. (2007). Using phenomenography to investigate different ways of experiencing sustainable design. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI.
38. Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography - Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177-200.
39. Marton, F. (1988). Phenomenography: Exploring different conceptions of reality. In D. M. Fetterman (Ed.), Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education: the silent scientific revolution (pp. 176-205). New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.
40. Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41. Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. ETL Project Occasional Report 4 [online]. Retrieved from http://www.etl.tla.ed. ac.uk/docs/ETLreport4.pdf
42. Mosborg, S., Adams, R. Kim, R. Atman, C.J., Turns, J., & Cardella, M. (2005). Conceptions of the engineering design process: An expert study of advanced practicing professionals. Proceedings of the Annual American Society of Engineering Education Conference, Portland, Oregon.
43. National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
44. National Academy of Engineering. (2005). Educating the engineer of 2020. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
45. Newstetter, W. C., & McCracken, W. M. (2001). Novice conceptions of design: Implications for the design of learning environments. In C. Eastman, W. McCracken & W. Newstetter (Eds.), Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.
46. Nicolle, C. A., & Maguire, M.(2003). Empathic modeling in teaching design for all. Proceedings of International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Zurich, Switzerland.
47. Norman, D. A. (1988). The design of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
48. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed). Newbury Park, CA; London, UK: Sage Publications.
49. Reid, A., & Solomonides, I. (2007). Design students' experience of engagement and creativity. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 6(1), 27-39.
50. Sanders, L. (2008). An evolving map of design practice and design research. Interactions, 15(6), 13-17.
51. Sanoff, H. (2007). Special issue on participatory design. Design Studies, 28(3), 213-215. (Pubitemid 46552054)
52. Schroder, A., Ahlstrom, G., & Larsson, B. W. (2006). Patients' perceptions of the concept of the quality of care in the psychiatric setting: a phenomenographic study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15(1), 93-102. (Pubitemid 43455096)
53. Scott, J. B. (2008). The practice of usability: Teaching user engagement through servicelearning. Technical Communications Quarterly, 17(4), 381-412.
54. Shambaugh, N. (2004) Using student-develop scenarios to couple design and reflection. TechTrends, 48(3): 26-30.
55. Shulman, L. S. (2008). Foreword. In S. D. Sheppard, K. Macatangay, A. Colby, & W. M. Sullivan. (2009). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
56. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd Ed). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. Stamouli, I., & Huggard, M. (2007). Phenomenography as a tool for understanding our students. Proceedings of the International Symposium for Engineering Education, Dublin City University, Ireland.
58. Sugar, W. A. (2001). What is so good about user-centered design? Documenting the effect of usability sessions on novice software designers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(3), 235.
59. Ullman, D. G. (2003). The mechanical design process (3rd Ed). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
60. Zhang, T., & Dong, H. (2008). Human-centred design: an emergent conceptual model. Include 2009. Retrieved from http://www.hhc.rca.ac.uk/2084/ all/1/proceedings.aspx. Accessed 3/28/2010