Conceptions of the engineering design process: An expert study of advanced practicing professionals

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 2143-2169

  Mosborg, Susan ^a   Adams, Robin ^a   Kim, Rebecca ^a   Atman, Cynthia J ^a,b   Turns, Jennifer ^a   Cardella, Monica ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b NSF Funded Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; CURRICULA; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; ENGINEERS; PROBLEM SOLVING; STUDENTS; TEXTBOOKS;

BLOCK-FLOW MODEL; CORPORATES; ENGINEERING DESIGN PROCESS; STAKEHOLDERS;

PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS;

EID: 22544480557     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Dixon, J. (1966). Design engineering: Inventiveness, analysis, and decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
2. Bucciarelli, L. L. (1988). Engineering design process. In F. A. Dubinskas (Ed.), Making Time (pp. 92-121). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
3. Woodson, T. T. (1966). Introduction to engineering design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
4. Moore, P. L., Atman, C. J., Bursic, K. M., Shuman, L. J., & Gottfried, B. S. (1995). Do freshmen design texts adequately define the engineering design process? ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.
5. Burghardt, M. D. (1999). Introduction to engineering. New York: HarperCollins.
6. Eide, A. R., Jenison, R. D., Mashaw, L. H., & Northrup, L. L. (2002). Engineering fundamentals and problem solving. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Archer, B. (1979). Design as a discipline. Design Studies, 1(1), 17-24.
8. Ullman, D. G. (2003). The mechanical design process. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
9. Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology ([ABET)] (20041998). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs: Effective for evaluations during the 2005-2006 accreditation cycle. Engineering Criteria 2000: Criteria for accrediting programs in engineering in the United States (2nd edition ed.). Baltimore, MD: Engineering Accreditation Commission, Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology.
10. Nussbaum, B. (1994, May 17). The power of design. Business Week, 3883, 86-94.
11. Haik, Y. (2003). Engineering design process. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole- Thompson Learning.
12. Kemper, J. D., & Sanders, B. R. (2001). Engineers and their profession. New York: Oxford
13. Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1996). Engineering design: A systematic approach. New York: Springer.
14. Newstetter, W.C. and McCracken, W.M. (2001). Novice conceptions of design: Implications for the design of learning environments. In C. M. Eastman, W. M. McCracken, & W. Newstetter (Eds.), Design Learning and Knowing: Cognition in Design Education, (pp.63-78). New York: Elsevier.
15. Purcell, A. T., & Gero, J. S. (1996). Design and other types of fixation. Design Studies, 17, 363-383.
16. Atman C. J., Chimka J. R., Bursic, K. M., & Nachtmann, H. N. (1999). A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes. Design Studies 20, (2), pp. 131-152.
17. Ferguson, E. S. (1992). Engineering and the mind's eye. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Bucciarelli, L. L. (2001). Design knowing and learning: A socially mediated activity. In C. M. Eastman, W. M. McCracken, & and W. Newstetter (Eds.), Design Learning and Knowing: Cognition in Design Education. (pp. 297-314). New York: Elsevier.
19. Cross, N. (2001). Design cognition: Results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity. In C. M. Eastman, W. M. McCracken, & W. Newstetter (Eds.), Design Learning and Knowing: Cognition in Design Education (pp. 297-314). New York: Elsevier.
20. Petre, M. (2004). Disciplines of innovation in engineering design. In N. Cross and E. Edmonds (Eds.), Expertise in Design: Design Thinking and Research Symposium 6 (pp.87-100). Sydney, Australia: University of Technology, Creativity and Cognition Studios Press.
21. Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (1994). Toward a general theory of expertise. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Adams R.S., Turns J, & Atman C.J. (2003). Educating effective engineering designers: The role of reflective practice. Design Studies, 24, Special Issue on the Fifth Design Thinking Research Symposium Conference 24 (3), pp. 275-294.
23. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (n.d.). Techniques to identify themes in qualitative data. Accessed November 22, 2004, from http://www.analytictech. com/mb870/ryan-bernard_techniques_to_identify_themes_in.htmBiographies
25. Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
26. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.) (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.