Phenomenographic study of human-centered design: Educational implications

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Zoltowski, Carla B ^a   Oakes, William C ^a   Cardella, Monica E ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Purdue University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85029082042     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Simon, H. A. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd Edition, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
2. ABET (2000). Engineering criteria 2000: criteria for accrediting programs in engineering in the United States, 3rd ed 2000. See http://www.abet.org/ downloads.htm download EAC Criteria for 2000-01 (Includes EC2000) pp 32-34.
3. Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 103-120.
4. Krippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn: A new foundation for design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
5. Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84-92.
6. Dorst, K. (2008). Design research: a revolution-waiting-to-happen. Design Studies, 29(1), 4-11.
7. Zhang, T., & Dong, H. (2008). Human-centred design: an emergent conceptual model. Include2009. Available online http://www.hhc.rca.ac.uk/2084/ all/1/proceedings.aspx. Accessed 3/28/2010.
8. Damodaran, L. (1996). User involvement in the system design process - a practical guide for users. Behaviour & Information Technology, 15, 363-377.
9. Maguire, M. (2001). Methods to support human-centered design. International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, 55 (3), 587-634.
10. Casey, S. (1993). Set Phasers on Stun and other True Tales of Design, Technology, and Human Error. Santa Barbara, CA: Aegean Publishing Company.
11. Norman, D. A. (1988). The design of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
12. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.) (2000). How People Learn. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
13. Zoltowski, C. B., Oakes, W. C., and Cardella, M. C. (2011). Journal of Engineering Education. In review.
14. Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography - Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177-200.
15. Marton, F. (1988). Phenomenography: exploring different conceptions of reality. In D. M. Fetterman (Ed.), Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education: the silent scientific revolution (pp.176-205). New York: Praeger Publishers.
16. Stamouli, I., & Huggard, M. (2007). Phenomenography as a tool for understanding our students. International Symposium for Engineering Education, 2007, Dublin City University, Ireland.
17. Schroder, A., Ahlstrom, G., & Larsson, B. W. (2006). Patients' perceptions of the concept of the quality of care in the psychiatric setting: a phenomenographic study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15, 93-102.
18. Mann, L., Radcliffe, D. F., & Dall'Alba, G. (2007). Using phenomenography to investigate different ways of experiencing sustainable design. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI.
19. Reid, A., & Solomonides, I. (2007). Design students' experience of engagement and creativity. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 6(1), 27-39.
20. Daly, S. R. (2008). Design Across Discipline. PhD dissertation.
21. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (Second ed). Newbury Park, CA; London: Sage Publications.
22. Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Åkerlind, G. S. (2005). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(4), 321-334.
24. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (Second ed), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
25. Meyer, J., & Land, R. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines.ETL Project Occasional Report 4 [online]. Available from : http://www.etl.tla.ed.ac.uk/docs/ETLreport4.pdf [Accessed 3/23/2010].
26. Kabo, J., & Baillie, C. (2009). Seeing through the lens of social justice: A threshold for engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 34(4), 317-325.
27. Clayton, P. H. (2010). Workshop entitled "Generating, deepening, and documenting learning and critical thinking: The power of critical reflection." XXXX University, March 10, 2010.
28. Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (1996). Implementing service learning in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 67, 221-239.
29. Scott, J. B. (2008). The practice of usability: Teaching user engagement through service-learning. Technical Communications Quarterly, 17(4), 381-412.