The development of assessment tools using phenomenography

Research in Engineering Education Symposium 2011, REES 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 562-570

  Zoltowski, Carla B ^a   Cardella, Monica E ^a   Oakes, William C ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT DEVELOPMENT; ASSESSMENT TOOL; ASSESSMENT TOOL DEVELOPMENT; PHENOMENOGRAPHY;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION; TOOLS;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84883095702     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Agogino, A. (2008). Introduction to human-centered design. Engineering Pathway. Accessed online April 12, 2011. http://nsdl.org/resource/2200/ 20090506221721828T
2. Åkerlind, G. S. (2005). Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development, 24(4), 321-334.
3. Atman, C. J., and Adams., R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Edu., 96(4), 359-379.
4. Atman, C. J., and Chimka., J. R., Bursic, K. M., & Nachtmann, H. N. (1999). A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes. Design Studies, 20(2), 131-152.
5. Bailey, R. & Szabo, Z. (2006). Assessing engineering design process knowledge. International Journal of Engineering Education, 22 (3), 508-518.
6. Beyerlein, S., Davis, D., Trevisan, M., Thompson, P., & Harrison, O. (2006). Assessment Framework for Capstone Design Courses. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Chicago, IL.
7. Bowden, J. & Green, P.(Eds) (2005). Doing Developmental Phenomenography, Melbourne: RMIT Univ. Press.
8. Bransford, J. D., and Brown., A. L., & Cocking, R.R. (Eds.) (2000). How People Learn. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
9. Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84-92.
10. Bucciarelli, L. (1994). Designing Engineers. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
11. Bursic, K. M. & Atman, C. J. (1997). Information gathering: A critical step for quality in the design process. Quality Management Journal, 4(4), 60-75.
12. Buchanan, Richard (2001). Design research and the new learning. Design Issues, 17(4), 3-23. Posted Online March 13, 2006. http://www.mitpressjournals. org/doi/pdf/10.1162/07479360152681056
13. Coyle, E. J., and Jamieson., L. H., & Oakes, W. C. (2005). EPICS: Engineering Projects in Community Service. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(1), 139-150.
14. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (Second ed), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
15. Daly, S. R. (2008). Design Across Discipline. PhD dissertation.
16. Dixon, J. R. & Duffey, M. R. (1990). The neglect of engineering design. California Management Review, 32(2), 9-23.
17. Dym, C. L., and Agogino., A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 103-120.
18. IDEO (2010). Human-Centered Design Toolkit 2nd Edition. Online: http://www.ideo.com/images/uploads/work/casestudies/pdfs/IDEO-HCD-ToolKit- Complete-for-Download.pdf. Accessed 3/28/2010.
19. Mann, L., and Radcliffe., D. F., & Dall'Alba, G. (2007). Using phenomenography to investigate different ways of experiencing sustainable design. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI.
20. Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography - Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177-200.
21. Marton, F. (1988). Phenomenography: exploring different conceptions of reality. In D. M. Fetterman (Ed.), Qualitative approaches to evaluation in education: the silent scientific revolution (pp. 176-205). New York: Praeger Publishers.
22. Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23. Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749.
24. Newstetter, W. C., & McCracken, W. M. (2001). Novice conceptions of design: implications for the design of learning environments. In C. Eastman, W. McCracken & W. Newstetter (Eds.), Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.
25. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (Second ed). Newbury Park, CA; London: Sage Publications.
26. Reid, A., & Solomonides, I. (2007). Design students' experience of engagement and creativity. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 6(1), 27-39.
27. Schroder, A., Ahlstrom, G., & Larsson, B. W. (2006). Patients' perceptions of the concept of the quality of care in the psychiatric setting: a phenomenographic study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 15, 93-102.
28. Simon, H. A. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd Edition, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
29. Sims-Knight, J. E., Upchurch, R. L., & Fortier, P. (2005). A simulation task to assess students' design process skill. Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis, IN.
30. Stamouli, I., & Huggard, M. (2007). Phenomenography as a tool for understanding our students. International Symposium for Engineering Education, 2007, Dublin City University, Ireland.
31. Tinto, V. (1987), Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32. Yun, J., Cardella, M. Purzer, S., Hsu, M-C., & Chae, Y. (2010). Development of Parents' Engineering Awareness Survey (PEAS) according to the knowledge, attitudes, and behavior framework. Proceedings of the Annual American Society of Engineering Education Conference, Louisville, KY.
33. Zoltowski, C. B., and Oakes., W. C., and Cardella, M. C. (2012). Students' Ways of Experience Human-Centered Design. Journal of Engineering Education. To appear January 2012.