The "educational Alliance" as a Framework for Reconceptualizing Feedback in Medical Education

Academic Medicine

Volumn 90, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 609-614

  Telio, Summer ^a   Ajjawi, Rola ^b   Regehr, Glenn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COOPERATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PSYCHOLOGY; STANDARDS; THINKING;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; LEARNING; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; THINKING;

EID: 84936081881     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: 1938808X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000560     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Puschmann T. A History of Medical Education. New York, NY: Harner Publishing; 1966 [originally published in 1891].
2. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Common Program Requirements. Published 2011 [no longer available]. http:// www. acgme. org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/ dh-dutyhoursCommonPR07012007. pdf. Accessed September 14, 2012.
3. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. General Standards Applicable to All Residency Programs B Standards. Published 2011, revised 2013. http://www. royalcollege. ca/portal/page/portal/rc/common/documents/ accreditation/accreditation-blue-book-b- standards-e. pdf. Accessed September 12, 2014.
4. Wood BP. Feedback: A key feature of medical training. Radiology. 2000;215:17-19.
5. Richardson BK. Feedback. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11:e1-e5.
6. Branch WT Jr, Paranjape A. Feedback and reflection: Teaching methods for clinical settings. Acad Med. 2002;77(12 pt 1): 1185-1188.
7. Sender Liberman A, Liberman M, Steinert Y, McLeod P, Meterissian S. Surgery residents and attending surgeons have different perceptions of feedback. Med Teach. 2005;27:470-472.
8. Jensen AR, Wright AS, Kim S, Horvath KD, Calhoun KE. Educational feedback in the operating room: A gap between resident and faculty perceptions. Am J Surg. 2012;204:248-255.
9. Yarris LM, Linden JA, Gene Hern H, et al; Emergency Medicine Education Research Group (EMERGe). Attending and resident satisfaction with feedback in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2009;16(suppl 2):S76-S81.
10. Irby DM. What clinical teachers in medicine need to know. Acad Med. 1994;69:333-342.
11. Ende J, Pomerantz A, Erickson F. Preceptors' strategies for correcting residents in an ambulatory care medicine setting: A qualitative analysis. Acad Med. 1995;70:224-229.
12. Kogan JR, Conforti LN, Bernabeo EC, Durning SJ, Hauer KE, Holmboe ES. Faculty staff perceptions of feedback to residents after direct observation of clinical skills. Med Educ. 2012;46:201-215.
13. Burack JH, Irby DM, Carline JD, Root RK, Larson EB. Teaching compassion and respect. Attending physicians' responses to problematic behaviors. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:49-55.
14. Duffield KE, Spencer JA. A survey of medical students' views about the purposes and fairness of assessment. Med Educ. 2002;36:879-886.
15. Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Eva K, et al. Tensions in informed self-assessment: How the desire for feedback and reticence to collect and use it can conflict. Acad Med. 2011;86:1120-1127.
16. Boehler ML, Rogers DA, Schwind CJ, et al. An investigation of medical student reactions to feedback: A randomised controlled trial. Med Educ. 2006;40:746-749.
17. Kluger A, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: Historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull. 1996;119:254-284.
18. Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2007;77:81-112.
19. Shute VJ. Focus on formative feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2008;78:153-189.
20. Davies D, Jacobs A. Sandwiching complex interpersonal feedback. Small Group Behav. 1985;16:387-396.
21. Hewson MG, Little ML. Giving feedback in medical education: Verification of recommended techniques. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:111-116.
22. Bienstock JL, Katz NT, Cox SM, Hueppchen N, Erickson S, Puscheck EE. To the point: Medical education reviews-providing feedback. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:508-513.
23. van de Ridder JMM, Stokking KM, McGaghie WC, Ten Cate OTJ. What is feedback in clinical education? Med Educ. 2008;42:189-197.
24. Pendleton D, Schofield T, Havelock P. The Consultation: An Approach to Learning and Teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1985.
25. LeBaron SW, Jernick J. Evaluation as a dynamic process. Fam Med. 2000;32:13-14.
26. Brown N, Cooke L. Giving effective feedback to psychiatric trainees. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2009;15:123-128.
27. Chowdhury RR, Kalu G. Learning to give feedback in medical education. Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;6:243-247.
28. Gigante J, Dell M, Sharkey A. Getting beyond "good job": How to give effective feedback. Pediatrics. 2011;127:205-207.
29. Thomas JD, Arnold RM. Giving feedback. J Palliat Med. 2011;14:233-239.
30. Wong A. Review article: Teaching, learning, and the pursuit of excellence in anesthesia education. Can J Anaesth. 2012;59:171-181.
31. Klaber B. Effective feedback: An essential skill. Postgrad Med J. 2012;88:187-188.
32. Krackov SK. Expanding the horizon for feedback. Med Teach. 2011;33:873-874.
33. Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: Effective feedback. Med Educ. 2010;44:101-108.
34. Bing-You RG, Trowbridge RL. Why medical educators may be failing at feedback. JAMA. 2009;302:1330-1331.
35. Walsh K. The rules. BMJ. 2005;331:574.
36. Watling CJ, Kenyon CF, Schulz V, Goldszmidt MA, Zibrowski E, Lingard L. An exploration of faculty perspectives on the in-training evaluation of residents. Acad Med. 2010;85:1157-1162.
37. Watling CJ, Lingard L. Toward meaningful evaluation of medical trainees: The influence of participants' perceptions of the process. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012;17:183-194.
38. Bing-You RG, Paterson J, Levine MA. Feedback falling on deaf ears: Residents' receptivity to feedback tempered by sender credibility. Med Teach. 1997;19:40-44.
39. Sargeant J, Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. "Directed" self-assessment: Practice and feedback within a social context. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008;28:47-54.
40. Sargeant J, Armson H, Chesluk B, et al. The processes and dimensions of informed selfassessment: A conceptual model. Acad Med. 2010;85:1212-1220.
41. Eva KW, Armson H, Holmboe E, et al. Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: On the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012;17:15-26.
42. Watling C, Driessen E, van der Vleuten CP, Lingard L. Learning from clinical work: The roles of learning cues and credibility judgements. Med Educ. 2012;46:192-200.
43. Mitchell AM, Black, MJ. Freud and Beyond: A History of Modern Psychoanalytic Thought. New York, NY: Basic Books; 1996.
44. Gabbard GO, Westen D. Rethinking therapeutic action. Int J Psychoanal. 2003;84(pt 4):823-841.
45. Greenson RR. The working alliance and the transference neurosis. Psychoanal Q. 1965;34:155-181.
46. Bordin ES. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychother Theory Res Pract. 1979;16:252-260.
47. Hill CE, Knox S. Processing the therapeutic relationship. Psychother Res. 2009;19:13-29.
48. Horvath AO. The therapeutic relationship: From transference to alliance. J Clin Psychol. 2000;56:163-173.
49. Hannan C, Lambert MJ, Harmon C, et al. A lab test and algorithms for identifying clients at risk for treatment failure. J Clin Psychol. 2005;61:155-163.
50. Lambert M. Presidential address: What we have learned from a decade of research aimed at improving psychotherapy outcome in routine care. Psychother Res. 2007;17:1-14.
51. Norcross JC. Psychotherapy Relationships That Work: Therapist Contributions and Responsiveness to Patients. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2002.
52. Ahn HN, Wampold BE. Where oh where are the specific ingredients? A meta-analysis of component studies in counseling and psychotherapy. J Couns Psychol. 2001;48:251-257.
53. Burlingame G, Strauss B; AGPA CORE-R Task Force. CORE Battery-Revised: An Assessment Toolkit for Promoting Optimal Group Selection, Process and Outcome. New York, NY: American Group Psychotherapy Association; 2006.
54. Del Re AC, Flückiger C, Horvath AO, Symonds D, Wampold BE. Therapist effects in the therapeutic alliance-outcome relationship: A restricted-maximum likelihood meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2012;32:642-649.
55. Martin DJ, Garske JP, Davis MK. Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68:438-450.
56. Safran JD, Muran CJ. Negotiating the Therapeutic Alliance: A Relational Treatment Guide. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2000.
57. Samstag LW, Batchelder ST, Muran JC, Safran JD, Winston A. Early identification of treatment failures in short-term psychotherapy. An assessment of therapeutic alliance and interpersonal behavior. J Psychother Pract Res. 1998;7:126-143.
58. Tryon GS, Kane AS. Relationship of working alliance to mutual and unilateral termination. J Couns Psychol. 1993;40:33-36.
59. Høglend P, Hersoug AG, Bøgwald KP, et al. Effects of transference work in the context of therapeutic alliance and quality of object relations. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011;79:697-706.
60. Tryon GS, Kane AS. The helping alliance and unilateral termination. Couns Psychol Q. 1990;3:233-238.
61. Tryon GS, Kane AS. Client involvement, working alliance, and type of therapy termination. Psychother Res. 1995;5: 189-198.
62. Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA. 1983;250:777-781.