Tensions in informed self-assessment: How the desire for feedback and reticence to collect and use it can conflict

Academic Medicine

Volumn 86, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1120-1127

  Mann, Karen ^a,b   Van Der Vleuten, Cees ^c,d,e   Eva, Kevin ^f   Armson, Heather ^g,h   Chesluk, Ben ⁱ   Dornan, Timothy ^b,c   Holmboe, Eric ⁱ   Lockyer, Jocelyn ^j   Loney, Elaine ^k   Sargeant, Joan ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^d KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^f UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^h MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

ⁱ AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^k NONE

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80052438300     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318226abdd     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Accreditation Committee on Graduate Medical Education. Common program requirements: General competencies. http://www.acgme.org/outcome/comp/General CompetenciesStandards21307.pdf. 2007. Accessed May 17, 2011.
2. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. CanMEDS 2005 Framework. http://rcpsc.medical.org/canmeds/bestpractices/framework-e.pdf. Accessed June 28, 2010.
3. Eva KW, Regehr G. Self-assessment in the health professions: A reformulation and research agenda. Acad Med. 2005;80 (10 suppl):S46 -S54. http://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Fulltext/2005/10001/ Self-Assessment-in-the-Health-Professions-A. 15.aspx. Accessed May 16, 2011. (Pubitemid 41383274)
4. Dunning D, Heath C, Suls J. Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2004;5:69-106. (Pubitemid 41239773)
5. Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: A systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296:1094-1102. (Pubitemid 44343529)
6. Sargeant J, Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. "Directed" self-assessment: Practice and feedback within a social context. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008;28:47-54.
7. Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: Effective feedback. Med Educ. 2010;44:101-108.
8. Eva KW, Regehr G. "I'll never play professional football" and other fallacies of self-assessment. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008;28:14-19.
9. Boud D. Enhancing Learning Through Self- Assessment. London, UK: Kogan Page; 1995.
10. Epstein RM, Siegel DJ, Silberman J. Selfmonitoring in clinical practice: A challenge for medical educators. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008;28:14-19.
11. Sargeant J, Armson H, Chesluk B, et al. The processes and dimensions of informed selfassessment: A conceptual model. Acad Med. 2010;85:1212-1220. http://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Abstract/2010/07000/ The-Processes-and-Dimensions-of-Informed.28. aspx. Accessed May 16, 2011.
12. Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, Van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. Understanding the influence of emotions and reflection upon multi-source feedback acceptance and use. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008;13: 275-288.
13. Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2008.
14. Liamputtong P, Ezzy D. Qualitative Research Methods. 2nd ed. Victoria, Australia: Oxford University Press; 2005.
15. Lockyer J, Armson H, Chesluk B, et al. Feedback data sources that inform physician self-assessment. Med Teach. 2011;33:e113-e120.
16. Teunissen PW, Stapel DA, van der Vleuten C, Scherpbier A, Boor K, Scheele F. Who wants feedback? An investigation of the variables influencing residents' feedback-seeking behavior in relation to night shifts. Acad Med. 2009;84:910 -917. http://journals.lww. com/academicmedicine/Fulltext/2009/07000/Who-Wants- Feedback-An-Investigation-of-the.25.aspx. Accessed May 16, 2011.
17. Kennedy TJ, Regehr G, Baker GR, Lingard L. Preserving professional credibility: A grounded theory study of medical trainees requests for clinical support. BMJ. 2009;338: b128.
18. Kennedy TJ, Regehr G, Baker GR, Lingard L. 'It's a cultural expectation': The pressure on medical trainees to work independently in clinical practice. Med Educ. 2009;43:645-653.
19. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986.
20. Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
21. Wenger E. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
22. Hafferty F. Beyond curriculum reform: Confronting medicine's hidden curriculum. Acad Med. 1998;73:403-407. http://journals. lww.com/ academicmedicine/Abstract/1998/04000/Beyond-curriculum-reform-confronting- medicine-s.13.aspx. Accessed May 16, 2011. (Pubitemid 28215048)
23. Bleakley A. Broadening conceptions of learning in medical education: The message from teamworking. Med Educ. 2006;40:150-157.
24. Bleakley A. Curriculum as conversation. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009;14:297-301.
25. Sargeant J, Mann K. Feedback in medical education: Skills for improving learner performance. In: Cantillon P, Wood D, eds. ABC of Learning and Teaching in Medicine. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010, 29-32.
26. Driessen E, van Tartwijk J, Dornan T. The self critical doctor: Helping students become more reflective. BMJ. 2008;336:827-830. (Pubitemid 351548226)
27. Mann K, Gordon J, MacLeod A. Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: A systematic review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009;14:595-621.