Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: On the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes

Advances in Health Sciences Education

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 15-26

  Eva, Kevin W ^a   Armson, Heather ^b   Holmboe, Eric ^c   Lockyer, Jocelyn ^b   Loney, Elaine ^d   Mann, Karen ^d   Sargeant, Joan ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^c AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE   (United States)

^d DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Confidence; Feedback; Performance improvement; Self appraisal; Self assessment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EDUCATION; FEAR; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; SELF CONCEPT; TEACHING; THINKING;

BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; FEAR; FEEDBACK; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; SELF EFFICACY; TEACHING; THINKING;

EID: 84856741959     PISSN: 13824996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10459-011-9290-7     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. San Francisco: Freeman.
2. Beach, M. C., & Inui, T. (2006). Relationship-centered care: A constructive reframing. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21, S3-S8.
3. Bjork, R. A. (1999). Assessing our own competence: Heuristics and illusions. In: Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Boehler, M. L., Rogers, D. A., Schwind, C. J., Mayforth, R., Quin, J., Williams, R. G., et al. (2006). An investigation of medical student reactions to feedback: A randomized controlled trial. Medical Education, 40, 746-749.
5. Boud, D. (1999). Avoiding the traps: Seeking good practice in the use of self assessment and reflection in professional courses. Social Work in Education, 18, 121-132.
6. Davis, D. A., Mazmanian, P. E., Fordis, M., van Harrison, R., Thorpe, K. E., & Perrier, L. (2006). Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: A systematic review. JAMA, 288, 1057-1060.
7. Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 69-106.
8. Dweck, C. S. (1999). Caution-Praise can be dangerous. American Educator, 23, 4-9.
9. Ericsson, K. A. (2004). Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Academic Medicine, 79, S70-S81.
10. Eva, K. W. (2009). Diagnostic error in medical education: Where wrongs can make rights. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14, 71-81.
11. Eva, K. W., & Regehr, G. (2005). Self-assessment in the Health Professions: A Reformulation and Research Agenda. Academic Medicine, 80(10 Suppl.), S46-S54.
12. Eva, K. W., & Regehr, G. (2008). "I'll never play professional football" and other fallacies of self-assessment. Journal for Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 28, 14-19.
13. Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2000). Miswanting. In J. Forgas (Ed.), Thinking and feeling: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 178-197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Gilovich, T. (1991). How people know what isn't so: The fallibility of reason in everyday life. New York: The Free Press.
15. Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res, 77(1), 81-112.
16. Kennedy, T. J., Regehr, G., Baker, G. R., & Lingard, L. (2009). Preserving professional credibility: Grounded theory study of medical trainees' requests for clinical support. Medical Education, 43, 645-653.
17. Kluger, A. N., & van Dijk, D. (2010) Feedback, the various tasks of the physician, and the feed forward alternative. Medical Education44, 1166-1174.
18. Kornell, N., & Son, L. K. (2009). Learners' choices and beliefs about self-testing. Memory, 17, 493-501.
19. Kromann, C. B., Jensen, M. L., & Ringsted, C. (2009). The effect of testing on skills learning. Medical Education, 43, 21-27.
20. Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121-1134.
21. Kübler-Ross, E. (2005). On grief and grieving: Finding the meaning of grief through the five stages of loss. NY: Simon & Schuster Ltd.
22. Larsen, D. P., Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L., 3rd. (2008). Test-enhanced learning in medical education. Medical Education, 42, 959-966.
23. Liamputtong, P., & Ezzy, D. (2005). Qualitative research methods (2nd ed.). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
24. Makoul, G., & Clayman, M. L. (2006). An intergrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns, 60(3), 301-312.
25. Sargeant, J., Armson, H., Chesluk, B., Dornan, T., Eva, K., Holmboe, E., Lockyer, J., Loney, E., Mann, K., van der Vleuten, C. (2010). The processes and dimensions of informed self-assessment. Academic Medicine Epub Apr 2, 2010.
26. Sargeant, J., Mann, K., van der Vleuten, C., & Metsemakers, J. (2008). "Directed" self-assessment: Practice and feedback within a social context. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 28, 47-54.
27. Schmidt, R. A. (1991). Frequent augmented feedback can degrade learning: Evidence and interpretations. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor neuroscience. Kluwer: Dordrecht.
28. Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153-189.
29. Stewart, J. (2008). To call or not to call: A judgement of risk by pre-registration house officers. Medical Education, 42, 938-944.
30. Teunissen, P. W., Scheele, F., Scherpbier, A. J., van der Vleuten, C. P., Boor, K., van Luijk, S. J., et al. (2007). How residents learn: Qualitative evidence for the pivotal role of clinical activities. Medical Education, 41, 763-770.
31. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.