Faculty staff perceptions of feedback to residents after direct observation of clinical skills

Medical Education

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 201-215

  Kogan, Jennifer R ^a   Conforti, Lisa N ^b   Bernabeo, Elizabeth C ^b   Durning, Steven J ^c   Hauer, Karen E ^d   Holmboe, Eric S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b AMERICAN BOARD OF INTERNAL MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL MEDICINE; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STAFF; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; STANDARD; TEACHING; UNIVERSITY;

ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMMUNICATION; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FACULTY; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNAL MEDICINE; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; MALE; MEDICAL STAFF; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; TEACHING;

EID: 84855846915     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04137.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Govaerts MJB, van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT, Muijtjens AM. Broadening perspectives on clinical performance assessment: rethinking the nature of in-training assessment. Adv Health Sci Educ 2007;12 (2):239-60.
2. Govaerts MJB, Schuwirth LWT, van der Vleuten CPM, Muijtjens AMM. Workplace-based assessment: effects of rater expertise. Adv Health Sci Educ 2011;16 (2):151-65.
3. van der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT. Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Med Educ 2005;39 (3):309-17.
4. van der Ridder JMM, Stokking KM, McGaghie WC, ten Cate OT. What is feedback in clinical education? Med Educ 2008;42 (2):189-97.
5. Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA 1983;250 (6):777-81.
6. Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA 2006;296 (9):1094-102.
7. Sargeant J, Armson H, Chesluk B, Dornan T, Eva K, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Mann K, van der Vleuten C. Processes and dimensions of informed self-assessment: a conceptual model. Acad Med 2010;85 (7):1212-20.
8. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 2004;10 (Suppl):70-81.
9. Archer JC. State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback. Med Educ 2010;44 (1):101-8.
10. Brinko KT. The practice of giving feedback to improve teaching. What is effective? J Higher Educ 1993;64 (5):574-93.
11. Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback intervention on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull 1996;119:254-84.
12. Cianci AM, Klein HJ, Seijts GH. The effect of negative feedback on tension and subsequent performance: the main and interactive effects of goal content and conscientiousness. J Appl Psychol 2010;95 (4):618-30.
13. Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res 2007;77 (1):81-112.
14. Hewson MG, Little ML. Giving feedback in medical education: verification of recommended techniques. J Gen Intern Med 1998;13 (2):111-6.
15. Holmboe ES, Yepes M, Williams F, Huot SJ. Feedback and the mini-clinical evaluation exercise. J Gen Intern Med 2004;2:558-61.
16. Skeff KM, Stratos GA, Bergen MR, Albright CL, Berman J, Farquhar J, Sox HC Jr. The Stanford Faculty Development Program: a dissemination approach to faculty development for medical teachers. Teach Learn Med 1992;4 (3):180-7.
17. Bing-You RG, Towbridge RL. Why medical educators may be failing at feedback. JAMA 2009;302 (12):1330-1.
18. Sender-Liberman A, Liberman M, Steinert Y, McLeod P, Meterissian S. Surgery residents and attending surgeons have different perspectives of feedback. Med Teach 2005;27 (5):470-2.
19. McIlwrick J, Nair B, Montgomery G. 'How am I doing?' Many problems but few solutions related to feedback delivery in undergraduate psychiatry education. Acad Psychiatry 2006;30 (2):130-5.
20. Gil D, Heins M, Jones PB. Perceptions of medical school faculty members and students on clinical clerkship feedback. J Med Educ 1984;1:856-64.
21. Isaacson JH, Posk LK, Litaker DG, Halperin AK. Residents' perceptions of the evaluation process. J Gen Intern Med 1995;10 (Suppl):89.
22. Holmboe ES, Ward DS, Reznick RK, Katsufrakis PJ, Leslie KM, Patel VL, Ray DD, Nelson EA. Faculty development in assessment: the missing link in competency-based medical education. Acad Med 2011;86:460-7.
23. Kogan JR, Holmboe ES, Hauer KE. Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees: a systematic review. JAMA 2009;302 (12):1316-26.
24. Watling CJ, Kenyon CF, Schulz V, Goldszmidt MA, Zibrowski EM, Lingard L. An exploration of faculty perspectives on the in-training evaluation of residents. Acad Med 2010;85 (7):1157-62.
25. Kogan JR, Hess BJ, Conforti LN, Holmboe ES. What drives faculty ratings of residents' clinical skills? The impact of faculty's own clinical skills. Acad Med 2010;10 (Suppl):25-8.
26. Kogan JR, Conforti L, Bernabeo E, Iobst W, Holmboe ES. Opening the black box of clinical skills assessment via direct observation: a conceptual model. Med Educ 2011;45 (10):1048-60.
27. Norcini JJ, Blank LL, Arnold GK, Kimball HR. The mini-CEX (clinical evaluation exercise): a preliminary investigation. Ann Intern Med 1995;123 (10):795-9.
28. Durning SJ, Cation LJ, Markert RJ, Pangaro LN. Assessing the reliability and validity of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise for internal medicine residency training. Acad Med 2002;77 (9):900-4.
29. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications 1998.
30. Patton MQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 2001.
31. Chamez K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications 2006.
32. Shute VJ. Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research 2008;78 (1):153-89.
33. Durning SJ, Artino AR, Pangaro L, van der Vleuten C, Schuwirth L. Perspective: redefining context in the clinical encounter: implications for research and training in medical education. Acad Med 2010;85 (5):894-901.
34. Bredo E. Reconstructing educational psychology: situated cognition and Deweyian pragmatism. Educ Psychol 1994;29 (1):23-5.
35. Kirshner J, Whitson JA. Situated Cognition. Social, Semiotic and Psychological Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1997.
36. Young MF, Barab SA, Garrett S. Agent as detector: an ecological psychology perspective on learning by perceiving-acting systems. In: Jonassen DH, Land SM, eds. Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2000;147-72.
37. Shepard LA. The role of assessment in a learning culture. In: Desforges C, Fox R, eds. Teaching and Learning: The Essential Readings. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing 2008;229-53.
38. Davies D, Jacobs A. Sandwiching complex interpersonal feedback. Small Group Behav 1985;16:387-96.
39. Kaprielian VS, Gradison M. Effective use of feedback. Fam Med 1998;30 (6):406-7.
40. Milan FB, Parish SJ, Reichgott MJ. A model for educational feedback based on clinical communication skills strategies: beyond the 'feedback sandwich'. Teach Learn Med 2006;18 (1):42-7.
41. Burack JH, Irby DM, Carline JD, Root RK, Larson EB. Teaching compassion and respect. Attending physicians' responses to problematic behaviours. J Gen Intern Med 1999;14 (1):49-55.
42. Sargeant J, Mann K, van der Vleuten C, Metsemakers J. 'Directed' self-assessment: practice and feedback within a social context. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2008;28 (1):47-54.
43. Eva KW, Munoz J, Hanson MD, Walsh A, Wakefield J. Which factors, personal or external, most influence students' generation of learning goals? Acad Med 2010;10 (Suppl):102-5.
44. Stewart J. To call or not to call: a judgement of risk by pre-registration house officers. Med Educ 2008;42:938-44.
45. Kennedy TJ, Regehr G, Baker GR, Lingard L. Preserving professional credibility: grounded theory study of medical trainees' requests for clinical support. BMJ 2009;338:b128.
46. Holmboe ES, Ginsburg S, Bernabeo E. The rotational approach to medical education: time to confront our assumptions? Med Educ 2011;45 (1):69-80.
47. Schwartz A, Pappas C, Bashook PG, Bordage G, Edison M, Prasad B, Swiatkowski V. Conceptual frameworks in the study of duty hours changes in graduate medical education: a review. Acad Med 2011;86 (1):18-29.