Constructing interpretative views of learners' interaction behavior in an open learner model

IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 201-214

  Papanikolaou, Kyparisia A ^a  

^a SCHOOL OF PEDAGOGICAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATION   (Greece)

Author keywords

Adaptive hypermedia; Interaction analysis; Open learner modeling; Visualization

Indexed keywords

AIR NAVIGATION; FLOW VISUALIZATION; HYPERMEDIA SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS; STUDENTS;

ADAPTIVE EDUCATIONAL HYPERMEDIA; ADAPTIVE HYPERMEDIA; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; INTERACTION ANALYSIS; INTERACTION BEHAVIOR; METACOGNITIVE SKILLS; OPEN LEARNER MODELING; UNDERSTANDABILITY;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84933051306     PISSN: 19391382     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TLT.2014.2363663     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. C. Romero and S. Ventura, "Educational Data mining," IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. C, Appl. Rev., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 601-618, Oct. 2010.
2. R. Farzan, P. Brusilovsky, "Social navigation support in e-learning: what are the real footprints?," Intell. Techniques Web Personalisation, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 49-80, 2005.
3. A. Dimitrakopoulou, A. Petrou, A. Martinez, J. A. Marcos, V. Kollias, P. Jermann, A. Harrer, Y. Dimitriadis, and L. Bollen. (2006). "State of the art of interaction analysis for Metacognitive Support & Diagnosis".[Online]. Available: http://hal.archivesouvertes. fr/hal-00190146/
4. J. Janssen, G. Erkens, P. A. Kirschner, "Group awareness tools: It's what you do with it that matters," Comput. Human Behav., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1046-1058, 2011.
5. L.P. Macfadyen and S. Dawson, "Mining LMS data to develop an "early warning system," Comput. Edu., vol. 54 no. 2, pp. 588-599, 2010.
6. R. Mazza and V. Dimitrova, "CourseVis: A graphical student monitoring tool for supporting instructors in web-based distance courses," Int. J. Human-Comput. Studies, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 125-139, 2007.
7. A. Adesina and D. Molloy, "Virtual Learning Process Environment: Cohort Analytics for learning and learning processes," World Acad. Sci., Eng. Technol., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 55-64, 2012.
8. B. M. McLaren, K. R. Koedinger, M. Schneider, A. Harrer, and L. Bollen, "Bootstrapping novice data: Semi-automated tutor authoring using student log files," presented at the Workshop Analyzing Student-Tutor Interaction Logs Improve Educ. Outcomes, 7th Int. Conf. Intell. Tutoring Syst., Maceió, Brazil, Aug./Sep. 2004.
9. M. Bienkowski and M. B. Feng, "Means, Enhancing Teaching and Learning Through Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics: An Issue Brief," U.S. Dept. Edu., Washington, DC, USA, 2012.
10. A. Mitrovic and B. Martin, "Evaluating the effect of open student models on self-assessment," Int. J. Artif. Intell. Edu., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 121-144, 2007.
11. S. Bull and J. Kay, "Student Models that Invite the Learner In: The SMILI Open Learner Modelling Framework," Int. J. Artif. Intell. Edu., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 89-120, 2007.
12. S. Bull and J. Kay, "Open learner models as drivers for metacognitive processes," Int. Handbook Metacog. Learning Technol., Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol. 28, pp. 349-365, Springer New York, 2013.
13. S. Govaerts, K. Verbert, J. Klerkx, and E. Duval, "Visualizing activities for self-reflection and awareness," International Conference on Web-based Learning 2010, X. Luo et al. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6483, pp. 91-100, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010.
14. R. Mazza, L. Mazzola, C. Glahn, D. Verpoorten, A. Nussbaumer, C. Steiner, and D. Heckmann, "Design of interactive visualization of models and students data," Deliverable 4.5a of GRAPPLE, FP7 European Project, 2009.
15. C. Glahn, M. Specht, and R. Koper, "Visualisation of interaction footprints for engagement in online communities," Educational Technology & Society, vol. 12 no. 3, pp. 44-57, 2009.
16. J-F. Rouet and J.-M. Passerault, "Analysing learner-hypermedia interaction: An overview of on-line methods," Instructional Sci., vol. 27, pp. 201-219, 1999.
17. J. Mostow and J. Beck, "Some useful tactics to modify, map and mine data from intelligent tutors," natural language engineering, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 195-208, Cambridge University Press UK, Jun. 2006.
18. N. Avouris, V. Komis, G. Fiotakis, M. Margaritis, and E. Voyiatzaki, "Logging of fingertip actions is not enough for analysis of learning activities," presented at the Workshop Usage Anal. Learn. Syst., Amsterdam, he Netherlands, July. 2005.
19. H. Zhang, K. Almeroth, A. Knight, M. Bulger, and R. Mayer, "Moodog: Tracking students' Online Learning Activities," in Proceedings of the World Conference on Education, Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2007, C. Montgomerie and J. Seale, eds., Chesapeake, VA, USA: AACE, pp. 4415-4422, 2007.
20. R. Mazza and L. Botturi, "Monitoring an online course with the GISMO Tool: A case study," J. Interactive Learn. Res., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 251-265, 2007.
21. J. Kay, N. Maisonneuve, K. Yacef, and P. Reiman, "The big five and visualisations of team work activity," in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS2006), M. Ikeda, K. Ashley, and T.-W. Chan, Eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 197-206, vol. 4053, 2006.
22. J. Janssen, G. Erkens, and P. A. Kirschner, "Group awareness tools: It's what you do with it that matters," Comput. Human Behav. Edu., vol. 27, pp. 1046-1058, 2011.
23. D. Clauzel, K. Sehaba, and Y. Prié, "Enhancing synchronous collaboration by using interactive visualisation of modelled traces," Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 19 no. 1, pp. 84-97, 2011.
24. Th. Bratitsis and A. Dimitrakopoulou, "Interpretation issues in monitoring and analyzing group interactions in asynchronous discussions," Int. J. e-Collaboration, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 20-40, 2008.
25. C. Glahn, M. Specht, and P. Koper, "Smart Indicators on Learning Interactions," in Creating New Learning Experiences on a Global Scale, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4753, E. Duval, R. Klamma,M. Wolpers (eds.), Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2007.
26. J. Vassileva and L. Sun, "Evolving social visualization design aimed at increasing participation in a class-based online community," Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 443-466, 2008.
27. K. Gabner, M. Jansen, A. Harrer, K. Herrmann, and H.U. Hoppe, "Analysis methods for collaboration models and activities," presented at the Comput. Supported Collaborative Learn. Conf., Bergen, Norway, 2003.
28. T. Mochizuki, H. Kato, S. Hisamatsu, K. Yaegashi, S. Fujitani, T. Nagata, J. Nakahara, T. Nishimori, and M. Suzuki, "Promotion of Self-assessment for learners in online discussion using the visualization software," presented at the Comput. Supported Collaborative Learn. Conf., Taiwan, 2005.
29. A. Gogoulou, E. Gouli, and M. Grigoriadou, "Adapting and personalizing the communication in a synchronous communication tool," J. Comput. Assisted Learn., vol. 24, pp. 203-216, 2008.
30. A. Soller, A. Martinez, P. Jermann, and M. Muehlenbrock, "From Mirroring to Guiding: A review of state of the art technology for supporting collaborative learning," Int. J. Artif. Intell. Edu., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 261-290, 2005.
31. Weber, G. and Brusilovsky, P. "ELM-ART: An adaptive versatile system for web-based instruction," Int. J. AI Educ., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 351-384, 2001.
32. P. Brusilovsky, "KnowledgeTree: A distributed architecture for adaptive e-learning," in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International World Wide Web Conference. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press, pp. 104-113, 2004.
33. J. D. Zapata-Rivera and J. Greer, J., "Inspecting and visualizing distributed bayesian student models," in Intelligent Tutoring Systems, G. Gauthier, C. Frasson, and K. VanLehn (Eds.) Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 544-553, 2000.
34. A. Mabbott and S. Bull, "Alternative views on knowledge: Presentation of open learner models," in Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Intel. Tutoring Syst. (ITS2004), J. C. Lester, Eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3220, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2004, pp. 689-698.
35. I. H. Hsiao, F. Bakalov, P. Brusilovsky, and B. König-Ries, "Progressor: Social navigation support through open social student modeling," New Review Hypermedia Multimedia, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 112-131, 2013.
36. J. Vassileva, G. McCalla, and J. Greer, "Multi-agent multi-user modeling in i-help," User Model. User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 13, no. 1-2, pp. 179-210, 2003.
37. M. A. Chatti, A. L. Dyckhoff, U. Schroeder and H. Thüs. "A reference model for Learning Analytics," Int. J. Technol. Enhanced Learn., vol. 4, nos. 5-6, pp. 318-331, 2012.
38. J. D. Zapata-Rivera and J. Greer, "Analyzing learner reflection in the learning game," in Proc. Workshop Learner Model. Reflection, AIED Conf., pp. 288-298, 2003.
39. P.R. Pintrich, "The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and assessing," Theory Practice, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 219-225, 2002.
40. C. McLoughlin and R. Hollingworth, "The weakest link: Is webbased learning capable of supporting problem-solving and metacognition?," in Proc. ASCILITE, pp. 117-120, 2001.
41. K.A. Papanikolaou, M. Grigoriadou, H. Kornilakis, G.D. Magoulas, "Personalizing the interaction in a Web-based educational hypermedia system: The case of INSPIRE," User-Modeling User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 213-267, 2003.
42. C. N. Gunawardena, K. Carabajal, and C. A. Lowe, "Critical analysis of models and methods used to evaluate online learning networks," in American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. Seattle, WA, USA: American Educational Research Association, 2001.
43. D.R. Garrison and N.D. Vaughan, Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles and guidelines. New York, NY, USA: Wiley, 2008.
44. M. Kalantzis and B. Cope, New Learning: Elements of a Science of Education, 2nd ed., Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
45. ARIADNE project. [Online]. Available at: http:// ariadne-eu.org, Oct. 2014.
46. C. Brooks and G. McCalla, "Towards flexible learning object metadata," Int. J. Continuing Eng. Edu. Life-Long Learn., vol. 16, no. 1-2, pp. 50-63, 2006.
47. V. Dimitrova, G. McCalla, S. Bull, "Open learner models: Research Questions," J. Artif. Intell. Edu., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 217-226, 2007.
48. A. Dimitracopoulou, "Computer based interaction analysis supporting self-regulation: Achievements and prospects of an emerging research direction," Technol. Instruction Cognition Learn., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 291-314, 2009.
49. N. Van Labeke, P. Brna, R. Morales, "Opening up the interpretation process in an open learner model," Int. J. Artif. Intell. Edu., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 305-338, 2007.
50. D. Zapata-Rivera, E. G. Hansen, V. J. Shute, J. S. Underwood, and M.I. Bauer, "Evidence-based approach to interacting with open student models," Int. J. Artif. Intell. Edu., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 273-303, 2007.
51. D. Zapata-Rivera and J. Greer, "Exploring various guidance mechanisms to support interaction with inspectable learner models," Proc. Intell. Tutoring Syst., pp. 442-452, 2002.
52. B. Shneiderman, "The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations," in Proc. IEEE Symp. Vis. Lang., pp. 336-343, 1996.
53. D. Roy, S. Sarkar, and S. Ghose, "A comparative study of learning object metadata, learning material repositories, metadata annotation and an automatic metadata annotation tool," M. Joshi H. Boley, and R. Akerker (Eds.), Adv. Semantic Comput., vol. 2, pp. 103-126, TMRF e-Book, 2010.
54. K. Papanikolaou and M. Grigoriadou, "Combining adaptive hypermedia with project and case based learning," Int. J. Edu. Multimedia Hypermedia, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 191-220, 2009.
55. I.-H. Hsiao, S. Sosnovsky, and P. Brusilovsky, "Guiding students to the right questions: Adaptive navigation support in an E-Learning system for Java programming," J. Comput. Assisted Learn., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 270-283, 2010.
56. S. Bull, A. Mabbott, and A. Abu-Issa, "UMPTEEN: Named and anonymous learner model access for instructors and peers," Int. J. Artif. Intell. Edu., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 227-253, 2007.