Personalizing the interaction in a web-based educational hypermedia system: The case of INSPIRE

User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 213-267

  Papanikolaou, Kyparisia A ^a   Grigoriadou, Maria ^a   Kornilakis, Harry ^a   Magoulas, George D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^b BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptability; Adaptation; Adaptive educational hypermedia systems; Adaptive navigation support; Adaptive presentation; Adaptivity; Curriculum sequencing; Distance learning; Instructional design; Instructional strategies; Learner control; Learner model; Learning styles

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS; COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; CURRICULA; DISTANCE EDUCATION; HYPERMEDIA SYSTEMS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; WORLD WIDE WEB;

ADAPTIVE EDUCATIONAL HYPERMEDIA SYSTEMS; ADAPTIVE NAVIGATION SUPPORT; ADAPTIVE PRESENTATION; INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN; LEARNER MODEL;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 0041653182     PISSN: 09241868     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1024746731130     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. ARIADNE project. Available online at: http://ariadne.unil.ch/Metadata/ [02/2000].
2. Beaumont, I.: 1994, User modelling in the interactive anatomy tutoring system ANATOM-TUTOR. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 4(1), 21-45.
3. Berners-Lee, T., Fielding, R. and Frystyk, H.: 1996. Hypertext Transfer Protocol-HTTP/1.0. RFC 1945. Available online at:http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1945.txt
4. Bloom, B. S., 1956, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. David McKay, New York.
5. Bloom, B. S.: 1968, Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment 1(2). Los Angeles: Univ. of California at Los Angeles, Center for the Study of Evaluation of Instructional Programs, pp. 1-5.
6. Boyle, C. and Encarnacion, A. O.: 1994, MetaDoc: an adaptive hypertext reading system. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 4(1), 1-19.
7. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. and Cocking, R. R. (eds.): 1999, How People Learn. Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. Nacional Academy Press, Washington.
8. Brusilovsky, P. and Pesin, L., 1994: ISIS-Tutor: An intelligent learning environment for CDS/ISIS users. In: J. J. Levonen and M. T. Tukianinen (eds.): Proceedings of the interdisciplinary workshop on complex learning in computer environments (CLCE94), Joensuu, Finland, 29-33. Available online at: http://cs.joensuu.fi/~mtuki/www_clce.270296/Brusilov.html
9. Brusilovsky, P., Eklund, J. and Schwarz, E.: 1998, Web-based education for all: A tool for developing adaptive courseware. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 30(1-7), 291-300.
10. Brusilovsky, P.: 1996, Methods and Techniques of Adaptive Hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 6(2/3), 87-129.
11. Brusilovsky, P. 1999, Adaptive and Intelligent Technologies for Web-based Education. In: C. Rollinger and C. Peylo (eds.): Kunstliche Intelligenz, Special Issue on Intelligent Systems and Teleteaching, pp. 19-25.
12. Brusilovsky, P. 2001, Adaptive Hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11(1/2), 111-127.
13. Carroll, J. M. and Rosson, M. B.: 1990. Human-computer interaction scenarios as a design representation. In Proceedings of IEEE HICSS-23, 23rd Hawaii Intl. Conf. System Sciences Vol. II, 555-561.
14. Carver, C. A., Howard, R. A. and Lavelle, E.: 1996, Enhancing learner learning by incorporating learner learning styles into adaptive hypermedia. ED-MEDIA'96 - World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, Boston, MA, pp. 118-123.
15. Dieterich, H., Malinowski, U., Kuhme, T. and Schneider-Hufschmidt, M.: 1993, State of the Art in Adaptive User Interfaces. In: M. Schneider-Hufschmidt, T. Kuhme and U. Malinowski (eds.): Adaptive User Interfaces: Principles and Practice, Adaptive User'Interfaces, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, North-Holland, 13-48.
16. Eklund, J. and Brusilovsky, P.: 1998, The Value of Adaptivity in Hypermedia Learning Environments: A Short Review of Empirical Evidence. 2nd Workshop on Adaptive Hypertext and Hypermedia Held in Conjunction with HYPERTEXT '98: The Ninth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, pp. 11-17.
17. Eklund, J. and Sinclair, K.: 2000, An empirical appraisal of the effectiveness of adaptive interfaces for instructional systems. Educational Technology & Society 3(4), 165-177.
18. Eklund, J. and Zeilenger, R.: 1996, Navigating the Web: Possibilities and Practicalities for Adaptive Navigation Support. Proceedings of Ausweb96: The Second Australian World-Wide Web Conference. Southern Cross University Press, pp. 73-80.
19. Felder, R. M. and Silverman, L. K.: 1988, Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. Engineering Education 78(7), 674-681.
20. Fischer, G.: 1993, Shared Knowledge in Cooperative Problem-solving Systems - Integrating Adaptive and Adaptable Components. In: M. Schneider-Hufschmidt, T. Kuhme and U. Malinowski (eds.): Adaptive User Interfaces. Principles and Practice. Elsevier Science Publishers BV, Amsterdam, pp. 49-68.
21. Fung, Y. H., Ho, A. S. P. and Kwan, K. P.: 1993, Reliability and validity of the Learning Styles Questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Technology 24(1), 12-21.
22. Gagné, R.: 1977, The Conditions of Learning. Holt, Rinehart Winston, New York.
23. Gilbert, J. E. and Han, C. Y.: 1999, Adapting instruction in search of 'a significant difference'. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 22, 149-160. Available online at: http://www.idealibrary.com.
24. Grigoriadou, M. and Kanidis, E.: 2001, Learners approaches to the computer cache memory and their exploitation in the development of a web based learning environment. In: Y. Manopoulos and S. Evripidou (eds.): Proceedings of 8th Panhellenic Conference in Informatics, Nicosia, Cyprus, pp. 472-482.
25. Grigoriadou, M., Kornilakis, H., Papanikolaou, K. and Magoulas, G.: 2002, Fuzzy Inference for Learner Diagnosis in Adaptive Educational Systems. In: I. P. Vlahavas and C. D. Spyropoulos (eds.): Methods and Applications of Artificial Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 2308. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 191-202.
26. Groat, A and Musson, T.: 1995, Learning Styles: individualising computer-based learning environments. ALT-Journal 3(2), 53-62.
27. Hammond, N. V.: 1992, Tailoring hypertext for the learner. In: P. Kommers, D. Jonassen and J. T. Mayes (eds.): Cognitive Tools for Learning. Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, FRG, pp. 149-160.
28. Hannafin, R. D. and Sullivan, H. J.: 1996, Preferences and learner control over amount of instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology 88, 162-173.
29. Hartley, R., Paiva, A. and Self, J.: 1995, Externalizing Learner Models. In: J. Greer (ed.): Proceedings of International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, AACE, Washington, pp. 509-516.
30. Henze, N., Naceur, K., Nejdl, W. and Wolpers, M.: 1999, Adaptive Hyperbooks for constructivist teaching. Kunstliche Intelligenz, 26-31.
31. Hix, D. and Hartson, H. R.: 1993, Developing User Interfaces. Ensuring Usability Through Product & Process. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 38-39.
32. Hoffman, S.: 1997, Elaboration theory and hypermedia: Is there a link?. Educational Technology, 37(1), 57-64.
33. Hohl, H., Bocker, H. D. and Gunzenhauser, R.: 1996, Hypadapter: An Adaptive Hypertext System for Exploratory Learning and Programming. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 6(2-3), 131-156.
34. Honey, P. and Mumford, A.: 1992, The manual of Learning Styles. Peter Honey, Maidenhead. Published and Distributed by Peter Honey.
35. Höök, K., 1998: Evaluating the utility and usability of an adaptive hypermedia system. Knowledge-Based Systems, 10(5), 311-319.
36. Höök, K., Karlgren, J., Waern, A., Dahlbäck, N., Jansson, C.-G., Karlgren, K. and Lemaire, B.: 1996, A Glass Box Approach to Adaptive Hypermedia, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 6(2-3), 157-184.
37. Jonassen, D., Mayes, T. and McAleese, R.: 1993, A Manifesto for a Constructivist Approach to Uses of Technology in Higher Education. In: T. Duffy, J. Lowyck and D. Jonassen (eds.): Designing Environments for Constructive Learning, NATO ASI Series F, Vol. 105. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 231-247.
38. Kay, J.: 2001, Learner control. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11(1/2), 111-127.
39. Kobsa, A., Koenemann, J. and Pohl, W.: 2001, Personalized Hypermedia Presentation Techniques for Improving Online Customer Relationships. The Knowledge Engineering Review 16(2), 111-155. Available online at: http://www.ics.uci.edu/~kobsa/papers/2001-KER-kobsa.pdf
40. Kobsa, A.: 2001, Generic User Modeling Systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11(1/2), 49-63.
41. Kolb, D. A.: 1984, Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
42. Lawless, K. A. and Brown, S. W.: 1997, Multimedia learning environments: Issues of learner control and navigation. Instructional Science 25, 117-131.
43. Lin, B. and Hsieh, C.: 2001, Web-based teaching and learner control: a research review. Computers & Education 37, 377-386.
44. LTSC: 2000, Learning technology standards committee website [On-line]. Available online at: http://ltsc.ieee.org/
45. McCalla, G.: 1992, The Search for Adaptability, Flexibility and Individualization: Approaches to Curriculum in ITS. In: M. Jones and P. Winne (eds.): Adaptive Learning Environments: Foundations and frontiers. NATO ASI Series F, Vol. 85. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 91-122.
46. McLoughlin, C.: 1999, The implications of the research literature on learning styles for the design of instructional material. Australian Journal of Educational Technology 15(3), 222-241.
47. Merrill, M. D.: 1983, Component Display Theory. In: C. M. Reigeluth (ed.): Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Lawrence Erlbaum Association, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 279-333.
48. Merrill, M. D.: 1987, A Lesson Based on the Component Display Theory. In: Reigeluth, C. M. (ed.): Instructional Theories in Action: Lessons Illustrating Selected Theories and Models. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 201-244.
49. Murray, D.: 1991, Modelling for Adaptivity. In: M. J. Tauber and D. Ackermann (eds.): Mental Models and Human Computer Interaction Vol. 2. Elsevier Science Publishers BV, Amsterdam, pp. 81-95.
50. Nielsen, J.: 1993, Usability Engineering. Academic Press, San Francisco.
51. Oppermann, R.: 1994, Adaptively supported Adaptability. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 40, 472-544.
52. Papanikolaou, K. A., Magoulas, G. D. and Grigoriadou, M.: 2000, A Connectionist Approach for Supporting Personalized Learning in a Web-based Learning Environment. In: P. Brusilovsky, O. Stock and C. Strapparava (eds.): Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-based Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1892. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 189-201.
53. Reigeluth, C. M. (ed.): 1987, Instructional Theories in Action: Lessons Illustrating Selected Theories and Models. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, Hove and London.
54. Reigeluth, C. M. and Stein, F. S.: 1983, The elaboration theory of instruction. In: C. M. Reigeluth (ed.): Instructional Design Theories and Models: An Overview of Their Current Status. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, pp. 335-381.
55. Reigeluth, C. M.: 1999, What Is Instructional-Design Theory and How Is It Changing?. In: C. M. Reigeluth (ed.): Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory Vol.II. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, London, pp. 5-29.
56. Riding, R. and Douglas, G.: 1993, The effect of cognitive style and mode of presentation on learning performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology 63, 297-307.
57. Riding, R. and Watts, M.: 1997, The effect of cognitive style on the Preferred Format of Instructional Material. Educational Psychology 17 (1 2), 179-183.
58. Riding, R. and Rayner, S.: 1998, Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies. David Fulton Publishers, London.
59. Saaty, T.: 1980, The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
60. Schmeck, R. R. (ed.), 1988 Learning Strategies and Learning Styles. Plenum Press, New York.
61. Shyu, H.S. and Brown, S.W.: 1995, Learner Control: The effects on learning a procedural task during computer-based videodisc instruction. International Journal of Instructional Media 22(3), 217-231.
62. Specht, M. and Oppermann, R., 1998, ACE - Adaptive Courseware Environment. The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 4, 141-161.
63. Specht, M., Weber, G., Heitmeyer, S. and Schöch, V., 1997 AST: adaptive WWW-courseware for statistics. In: P. Brusilovsky, J. Fink and J. Kay (eds): Proceedings of Workshop, Adaptive Systems and User Modeling on the World Wide Web, 6th International Conference on User Modeling, UM97, Italy, 91-95. Available online at: http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~plb/UM97_workshop/Specht.html
64. Specht, M.: 1998, Empirical evaluation of adaptive annotation in hypermedia. In: T. Ottman and I. Tomek (eds.): ED-Media & ED-Telecom98 Conference, 2 Charlottesville. VA: AACE. pp. 1327-1332.
65. Stoyanov , S., Aroyo, L. and Kommers, P.: 1999 Intelligent Agent Instructional Design Tools for a Hypermedia Design Course. In: S. P. Lajoie and M. Vivet (eds.): Artificial Intelligence in Education. IOS Press, pp. 101-108.
66. Valley K.: 1997 Learning styles and courseware design. ALT-Journal 5(2), 42-51.
67. Van Marcjke, K.: 1992 A Generic Task Model for Instruction. In: S. Dijkstra, H. P. M. Krammer and J.J.G. van Merrienboer (eds). Instructional models for Computer-based Learning Environments, NATO ASI Series F, Vol. 104, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 171-194.
68. Van Marcke, K.: GTE: An epistemological approach to instructional modeling, Instructional Science, 26 (3/4), 147-191.
69. Vassileva J.: 1998, DCG + GTE: Dynamic Courseware Generation with Teaching Expertise. Instructional Science, 26(3/4), 317-332.
70. Vassileva, J.: 1997, Dynamic course generation on the WWW. In: B. D. Boulay and R. Mizoguchi (eds.): Artificial Intelligence in Education: Knowledge and Media in Learning Systems. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 498-505.
71. Vosniadou, S.: 1996, Towards a revised cognitive psychology for new advances in learning and instruction. Learning and Instruction 6(2), 95-109.
72. Wasson, B., 1992: PEPE: A computational framework for a content planner. In: S.A. Dijstra, H. P. M. Krammer, J. J. G. van Merrienboer, (eds.): Instructional Models in Computer-based learning environments. NATO ASI Series F, Vol. 104. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 153-170.
73. Wasson, B., Facilitating dynamic pedagogical decision making: PEPE and GTE. Instructional Science, 26(3/4), 299-316.
74. Weber, G. and Brusilovsky, P.: 2001: ELM-ART: An Adaptive Versatile System for Web-based Instruction. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12 (to appear).
75. Weber, G., Kuhl, H.-C. and Weibelzahl, S.: 2001a, Developing Adaptive Internet Based Courses with the Authoring System NetCoach. In: Reich, S., Tzagarakis, M. M., De Bra, P. M. E. (eds.).: Hypermedia: Openness, Structural Awareness and Adaptivity. Vol. 2266. Springer-Verlag, Berling. pp. 226-238.
76. Wenger, E.: 1987, AI and Tutoring Systems. Computational and Cognitive Approaches to the Communication Knowledge. M. Kaufmann Publishers, California.