Adapting and personalizing the communication in a synchronous communication tool

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 203-216

  Gogoulou, Agoritsa ^a   Gouli, E ^a   Grigoriadou, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Communicative acts; Computer mediated communication; Personalization; Sentence openers; Structured dialogue

Indexed keywords

EID: 43349096278     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: 13652729     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00254.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baker M. Lund K. (1996) Flexibly structuring the inter action in a CSCL environment. In Proceedings of the EuroAIED Conference (eds P. Brna, A. Paiva J. Self), pp. 401 407. Ediaoes Colibri, Lisbon.
2. Baker M. Lund K. (1997) Promoting reflective interac tions in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 13, 175 193.
3. Baker M., de Vries E., Lund K. Quignard M. (2001) Computer-mediated epistemic interactions for co-constructing scientific notions: lessons learned from a five-year research programme. In Proceedings of EuroCSCL 2001: European Perspectives on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (eds P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings K. Hakkarainen), pp. 89 96. Maastricht McLuhan Institute, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
4. Barros M. Verdejo M. (2000) Analysing student interaction processes in order to improve collaboration. The DEGREE approach. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 11, 221 241.
5. Bunt H. (1995) Dialogue control functions and interaction design. In Dialogue and Instruction: Modeling Interaction in Intelligent Tutoring Systems (eds R.-J. Beun, M. Baker M. Reiner), pp. 197 214. NATO ASI Series. Springer, Berlin.
6. Dillenbourg P. (1999) Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Elsevier Science, Oxford.
7. Dillenbourg P. (2002) Over-scripting CSCL: the risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In Three Worlds of CSCL Can We Support CSCL (ed. P.A. Kirschner), pp. 61 91. Open Universiteit Nederlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
8. Dimitracopoulou A. (2005) Designing collaborative learning systems: current trends and future research agenda. In Proceedings of CSCL 2005 Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL): The Next 10 Years (eds T. Koschmann, D. Suthers T.W. Chan), pp. 115 123. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
9. Gerosa M.A., Fuks H. Lucena C.J.P. (2001) Use of categorization and structuring of messages in order to organize the discussion and reduce information overload in asynchronous textual communication tools. In Proceedings of 7th International Workshop on Groupware (CRIWG'01), pp. 136 141. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC.
10. Gogoulou A., Gouli E., Grigoriadou M. Samarakou M. (2004) Adapting the 'communication-scaffolding' tools in a web-based collaborative learning environment. In Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2004, pp. 1153 1161. AACE, Chesapeake, VA.
11. Gogoulou A., Gouli E., Grigoriadou M. Samarakou M. (2005) ACT: a web-based Adaptive Communication Tool. In Proceedings of CSCL 2005 Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL): The Next 10 Years (eds T. Koschmann, D. Suthers T.W. Chan), pp. 180 189. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
12. Gouli E., Gogoulou A., Grigoriadou M. Samarakou M. (2003) Towards the development of an Adaptive Communication Tool promoting cognitive and communication skills. In Proceedings of the 11th PEG Conference (PEG 2003), (eds J. Nichol T. Gavrilova), [CD-ROM]. St. Petersburg, Russia.
13. Gouli E., Gogoulou A., Grigoriadou M. Samarakou M. (2005) Supporting and guiding learners' collaboration through a Structured Adaptive Communication Tool. In Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2005, pp. 3671 3678. AACE, Chesapeake, VA.
14. Hron A., Hesse F., Cress U. Giovis C. (2000) Implicit and explicit dialogue structuring in virtual learning groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology 70, 53 64.
15. Jeong A. (2004) The combined effects of response time and message content on group interactions in computer-supported collaborative argumentation. Journal of Distance Education 19, 36 53.
16. Jermann P. (1999) Structuring and regulating collaborative interaction by semi-structured interfaces and interaction meters. Presented at the Workshop on Analysing Educational Dialogue Interaction, AIED 99.
17. Jermann J., Soller A. Lesgold A. (2004) Computer software support for CSCL. In What We Know About CSCL and Implementing It in Higher Education (eds J.W. Strijbos, P.A Kirschner R.L. Martens), pp. 141 166. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
18. Johnson D.W. Johnson R.T. (1994) Learning Together and Alone. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
19. Jonassen D.H. Grabowski B.L. (1993) Handbook of Individual Differences: Learning and Instruction. LEA, Hove, UK.
20. Kay J. (2001) Learner control. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11, 111 127.
21. Lazonder A., Wilhelm P. Ootes S. (2003) Using sentence openers to foster student interaction in computer-mediated learning environments. Computers and Education 41, 291 308.
22. McAlister S., Ravenscroft A. Scanlon E. (2004a) Combining interaction and context design to support collaborative argumentation using a tool for synchronous CMC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20, 194 204.
23. McAlister S., Ravenscroft A. Scanlon E. (2004b) Designing to promote improved online educational argumentation: an evaluation study. In Networked Learning 2004 (eds S. Banks, P. Goodyear, V. Hodgson, C. Jones, V. Lally, D. McConnell C. Steeples), pp. 541 548. Lancaster and Sheffield Universities, Preston and Sheffield, UK.
24. Mayer R.E. (2002) A taxonomy for computer-based assessment of problem-solving. Computers in Human Behavior 18, 623 632.
25. Ravenscroft A. (2007) Promoting thinking and conceptual change with digital dialogue games. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00232.x.
26. Robertson J., Good J. Pain H. (1998) BetterBlether: the design and evaluation of a discussion tool for education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 9, 219 236.
27. Rosatelli M. Self J. (2004) A Collaborative Case Study System for Distance Learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 14, 97 125.
28. Scardamalia M., Bereiter C. Lamon M. (1994) The CSILE project: trying to bring the classroom into world 3. In Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Practice (ed. K. McGilly), pp. 201 228. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
29. Sébastien G. Leroux P. (2002) An approach to automatic analysis of learners' social behavior during computer-mediated synchronous conversations. In Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 6th International Conference, ITS 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2363 /2002 (eds S.A. Cerri, G. Gouardères F. Paraguacu), pp. 630 640. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg.
30. Snow E.R. (1980) Aptitudes, learner control and adaptive instruction. Journal of Educational Psychologist 15, 151 158.
31. Soller A. (2001) Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12, 40 62.
32. Soller A., Lesgold A., Linton F. Goodwin B. (1999) What makes peer interaction effective? Modelling effective communication in an intelligent CSCL. In Proceedings of the 1999 AAAI Fall Symposium: Psychological Models of Communication in Collaborative Systems, pp. 116 123. Cape Cod, MA.
33. Weinberger A., Fischer F. Mandl H. (2001) Scripts and Scaffolds in Problem-Based Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Environments: Fostering Parti cipation and Transfer (Research report no. 144). Ludwig-Maximilians University, Institute for Empirical Pedagogy and Pedagogical Psychology, Munich. Available at: http://home.emp.paed.uni-muenchen.de/∼weinberg/download (last accessed 3 June 2007).