Alternative views on knowledge: presentation of open learner models

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3220, Issue , 2004, Pages 689-698

  Mabbott, Andrew ^a   Bull, Susan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; STUDENTS;

INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; LEARNER MODEL; LEARNING STYLE; MULTIPLE REPRESENTATION; OPEN LEARNER MODELING; OPEN LEARNER MODELS;

INTELLIGENT VEHICLE HIGHWAY SYSTEMS;

EID: 35048852099     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_65     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bull, S. and Pain, H.: "Did I Say What I Think I Said, and Do You Agree With Me?": Inspecting and Questioning the Student Model. Proceedings of World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Charlottesville, VA (1995) 501-508
2. Dimitrova, V.: StyLE-OLM: Interactive Open Learner Modelling. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Vol 13 (2002) 35-78
3. Kay, J.: Learner Know Thyself: Student Models to Give Learner Control and Responsibility. Proc. of Intl. Conference on Computers in Education, Kuching, Malaysia (1997) 18-26
4. Zapata-Rivera, J.D., and Greer, J.: Externalising Learner Modelling Representations. Workshop on External Representations of AIED: Muliple Forms and Multiple Roles. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (2001) 71-76
5. Weber, G. and Specht, M.: User Modeling and Adaptive Navigation Support in WWWBased Tutoring Systems. Proceedings of User Modeling '97 (1997) 289-300
6. Kolb, D. A.: Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey (1984)
7. Felder, R. M. and Silvcrman, L. K.: Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. Engineering Education, 78(7) (1998) 674-681.
8. Collins, A. and Brown, J. S.: The Computer as a Tool for Learning through Reflection. In H. Mandl and A. Lesgold (eds.) Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Springer-Verlag, New York (1998) 1-18
9. Bajraktarevic, N., Hall, W., and Fullick, P.: Incorporating Learning Styles in Hypermedia Environment: Empirical Evaluation. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Nottingham (2003) 41-52
10. Carver, C. A.: Enhancing Student Learning through Hypermedia Courseware and Incorporation of Learning Styles. IEEE Transactions on Education 42(1) (1999) 33-38
11. Cimolino, L., Kay, J. and Miller, A.: Incremental Student Modelling and Reflection by Verified Concept-Mapping. Proc. of Workshop on Learner Modelling for Reflection, International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Sydney (2003) 219-227
12. Carnot, M. J., Dunn, B., Cañas, A. J.: Concept Maps vs. Web Pages for Information Searching and Browsing. Available from the Institute for Human and Machine Cognition website: http://www.ihmc.us/users/acanas/Publications/ CMapsVSWebPagesExpl/CMapsVSWebPagesExpl.htm, accessed 18/05/2004 (2001)
13. O'Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F. and Hall, R. H.: Knowledge Maps as Scaffolds for Cognitive Processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14 (1) (2002) 71-86
14. Shang, Y., Shi, H. and Chen, S.: An Intelligent Distributed Environment for Active Learning. Journal on Educational Resources in Computing 1(2) (2001) 1-17
15. Riding, R. and Rayner, S.: Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies. David Fulton Publishers, London (1998)
16. Witkin, H.A., Moore, C.A., Goodenough, D.R. and Cox, P.W.: Field-Dependent and Field-Independent Cognitive Styles and Their Implications. Review of Educational Research 47 (1977) 1-64.
17. Pask, G.: Styles and Strategies of Learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology 46. (1976) 128-148.
18. Felder, R. M. and Soloman, B. A.: Index of Learning Styles. Available: http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/ILSpage.html, accessed 24/02/04 (1996)
19. Felder, R.: Author's Preface to Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. Avail.: http://www.ncsu.edu/felder-public/Papers/LS-1988. pdf, accessed 05/03/04 (2002)
20. Bull, S., McEvoy, A. and Reid, E.: Learner Models to Promote Reflection in Combined Desktop PC/Mobile Intelligent Learning Environments. Proceedings of Workshop on Learner Modelling for Reflection, International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Sydney (2003) 199-208.
21. Kay, J.: The um Toolkit for Cooperative User Modelling. User Modelling and User Adapted Interaction. 4, Kluwer, Netherlands (1995) 149-196
22. Barnard, Y., and Sandberg, J. Self-explanations, Do We Get them from Our Students? Proc. of European Conf. on Artificial Intelligence in Education. Lisbon (1996) 115-121
23. Loo, R.: Kolb's Learning Styles and Learning Preferences: Is there a Linkage? Educational Psychology, 24 (1) (2004) 98-108
24. Linton, F., Joy, D., Schaefer, P., Charron, A.: OWL: A Recommender System for Organization-Wide Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 3(1) (2000) 62-76
25. Bull, S. and Broady, E.: Spontaneous Peer Tutoring from Sharing Student Models. Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence in Education '97. IOS Press (1997) 143-150
26. Beck, J., Stem, M. and Woolf, B. P.: Cooperative student models. Proceedings of Artifical Intelligence in Education '97. IOS Press (1997) 127-134