Some useful tactics to modify, map and mine data from intelligent tutors

Natural Language Engineering

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 195-208

  Mostow, Jack ^a   Beck, Joseph ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; DATA MINING; DATA STRUCTURES; DECODING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

AUTOMATED READING TUTOR; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS; TACTICS;

INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

EID: 33646871997     PISSN: 13513249     EISSN: 14698110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1351324906004153     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aist, G. (2001) Towards automatic glossarization: Automatically constructing and administering vocabulary assistance factoids and multiple-choice assessment. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12: 212-231.
2. Aist, G. and Mostow, J. (1998) Estimating the effectiveness of conversational behaviors in a reading tutor that listens. Working Notes of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Applying Machine Learning to Discourse Processing, Stanford, CA.
3. Aleven, V., Popescu, O. and Koedinger, K. (2002) Pilot-testing a tutorial dialogue system that supports self-explanation. 6th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 344-354. Biarritz, France.
4. Arroyo, I., Beck, J. E., Woolf, B. P., Beal, C. R. and Schultz, K. (2000) Macroadapting AnimalWatch to gender and cognitive differences with respect to hint interactivity and symbolism. 5th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS2000), pp. 574-583. Montreal, Canada.
5. Beck, J. E. (ed.) (2004) Proceedings of the ITS2004 Workshop on Analyzing Student-Tutor Interaction Logs to Improve Educational Outcomes. Maceio, Brazil.
6. Beck, J. E., Jia, P. and Mostow, J. (2004a) Automatically assessing oral reading fluency in a computer tutor that listens. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning 2: 61-81.
7. Beck, J. E., Mostow, J. and Bey, J. (2004b) Can automated questions scaffold children's reading comprehension? Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 478-490. Maceio, Brazil.
8. Beck, J. E., Woolf, B. P. and Beal, C. R. (2000) ADVISOR: A machine learning architecture for intelligent tutor construction. Proceedings of the Seventeenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 552-557. Austin, Texas.
9. Calfee, R., Kukich, K., Landauer, T., Laham, D., Foltz, P., Hirschman, L., Breck, E., Burger, J. and Ferro, L. (2000) The debate on automated essay grading. IEEE Intelligent Systems 15(5): 22-37.
10. Corbett, A. and Anderson, J. (1995) Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User modeling and user-adapted interaction 4: 253-278.
11. Corbett, A., McLaughlin, M. S. and Scarpinatto, K. C. (2000) Modeling student knowledge: Cognitive tutors in high school and college. User modeling and user-adapted interaction 10: 81-108.
12. Goodman, B., Hitzeman, J., Linton, F. and Ross, H. (2003) Towards intelligent agents for collaborative learning: Recognizing the roles of dialogue participants. 9th International Conference on User Modeling, pp. 363- 367. Johnstown, PA.
13. Heiner, C., Beck, J. E. and Mostow, J. (2004) Improving the help selection policy in a Reading Tutor that listens. Proceedings of the InSTIL/ICALL Symposium on NLP and Speech Technologies in Advanced Language Learning Systems, pp. 195-198. Venice, Italy.
14. Heiner, C., Beck, J. E. and Mostow, J. (2005) When do students interrupt help? Effects of time, help type, and individual differences. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2005), pp. 819-826. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
15. Koedinger, K. R. and Anderson, J. R. (1993) Reifying implicit planning in geometry: Guidelines for model-based intelligent tutoring system design. In: S. P. Lajoie and S. J. Derry (eds.), Computers as Cognitive Tools, pp. 15-45. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Menard, S. (1995) Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 106.
17. Merceron, A. and Yacef, K. (2005) Educational data mining: A case study. In: C.-K. Looi, G. McCalla, B. Bredeweg and J. Breuker (eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education: Supporting Learning through Intelligent and Socially Informed Technology (Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence), pp. 467-474. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
18. Mostow, J. (in press) Evaluation purposes, excuses, and methods: Experience from a Reading Tutor that listens. In: C. K. Kinzer and L. Verhoeven (eds.), Interactive Literacy Education, Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Mostow, J. and Aist, G. (1997) The sounds of silence: Towards automated evaluation of student learning in a Reading Tutor that listens. Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-97), pp. 355-361. Providence, RI.
20. Mostow, J.and Aist, G. (1999) Giving help and praise in a reading tutor with imperfect listening - because automated speech recognition means never being able to say you're certain. CALICO Journal 16(3): 407-424.
21. Mostow, J. and Aist, G. (2001) Evaluating tutors that listen: An overview of Project LISTEN. In: K. Forbus and P. Feltovich (eds.), Smart Machines in Education, pp. 169-234. Menlo Park, CA: MIT/AAAI Press.
22. Mostow, J., Aist, G., Beck, J., Chalasani, R., Cuneo, A., Jia, P. and Kadaru, K. (2002a) A la recherche du temps perdu, or as time goes by: Where does the time go in a Reading Tutor that listens? Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS2002), pp. 320-329. Biarritz, Franc.
23. Mostow, J., Aist, G., Bey, J., Burkhead, P., Cuneo, A., Junker, B., Rossbach, S., Tobin, B., Valeri, J. and Wilson, S. (2002b) Independent practice versus computer-guided oral reading: Equal-time comparison of sustained silent reading to an automated reading tutor that listens. Ninth Annual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Chicago, IL.
24. Mostow, J., Beck, J., Chalasani, R., Cuneo, A. and Jia, P. (2002c) Viewing and analyzing multimodal human-computer tutorial dialogue: A database approach. Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces (ICMI 2002), Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 129-134.
25. Mostow, J., Aist, G., Burkhead, P., Corbett, A., Cuneo, A., Eitelman, S., Huang, C., Junker, B., Sklar, M. B. and Tobin, B. (2003) Evaluation of an automated Reading Tutor that listens: Comparison to human tutoring and classroom instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research 29(1): 61-117.
26. Mostow, J., Beck, J., Bey, J., Cuneo, A., Sison, J., Tobin, B. and Valeri, J. (2004) Using automated questions to assess reading comprehension, vocabulary, and effects of tutorial interventions. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning 2: 97-134.
27. Mostow, J. and Beck, J. (2005) Micro-analysis of fluency gains in a Reading Tutor that listens: Wide vs. repeated guided oral reading, Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading. Toronto.
28. Mostow, J., Beck, J., Cen, H., Cuneo, A., Gouvea, E. and Heiner, C. (2005a) An educational data mining tool to browse tutor-student interactions: Time will tell! Proceedings of the Workshop on Educational Data Mining, National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 15-22. Pittsburgh, PA.
29. Mostow, J., Beck, J., Cuneo, A., Gouvea, E. and Heiner, C. (2005b) A generic tool to browse tutor-student interactions: Time will tell! Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2005), pp. 884-886. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
30. Mostow, J., Aist, G., Huang, C., Junker, B., Kennedy, R., Lan, H., Latimer, D., O'Connor, R., Tassone, R., Tobin, B. and Wierman, A. (in press) 4-Month evaluation of a learner-controlled Reading Tutor that listens. In: V. M. Holland and F. N. Fisher (eds.), Speech Technology for Language Learning, Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
31. Poulsen, R. (2004) Tutoring Bilingual Students With an Automated Reading Tutor That Listens: Results of a Two-Month Pilot Study. Unpublished Masters Thesis, DePaul University, Chicago, IL.
32. Roshenshine, B., Meister, C. and Chapman, S. (1996) Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research 66(2): 181-221.
33. Self, J. (1988) Bypassing the intractable problem of student modelling. Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 18-24.
34. Shute, V., Gawlick-Grendell, L. A., Young, R. K. and Burnham, C. A. (1996) An experiential system for learning probability: Stat Lady description and evaluation. Instructional Science 24(1): 25-46.
35. Soller, A. L. (2001) Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12(1): 40-62.
36. Soller, A. (2004a) Computational modeling and analysis of knowledge sharing in collaborative distance learning. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 14(1): 351-381.
37. Soller, A. (2004b) Understanding knowledge-sharing breakdowns: A meeting of the quantitative and qualitative minds. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20(3): 213-223.
38. Vassileva, J., Greer, J., McCalla, G., Deters, R., Zapata, D., Mudgal, C. and Grant, S. (1999) A multi-agent approach to the design of peer-help environments. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 38-45. Le Mans, France.
39. Weiser, M. (1984) Program slicing. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 10(4): 352-357.