Sources of interference in item and associative recognition memory

Psychological Review

Volumn 122, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 260-311

  Osth, Adam F ^a   Dennis, Simon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Associative recognition; Global matching; Hierarchical bayesian analysis; Memory models; Recognition memory

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; LEARNING; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RECALL; RECOGNITION;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; HUMANS; MENTAL RECALL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 84926407930     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: 19391471     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0038692     Document Type: Article

References (223)

1. Aminoff, E. M., Clewett, D., Freeman, S., Frithsen, A., Tipper, C., Johnson, A.,... Miller, M. B. (2012). Individual differences in shifting decision criterion: A recognition memory study. Memory & Cognition, 40, 1016-1030.
2. Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1972). Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 79, 97-123.
3. Anderson, J. A., Silverstein, J. W., Ritz, S. A., & Jones, R. S. (1977). Distinctive features, categorical perception, and probability learning:Some applications of a neural model. Psychological Review, 84, 413-451.
4. Annis, J., Malmberg, K. J., Criss, A. H., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2013). Sources of interference in recognition testing. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1365-1376.
5. Arlot, S., & Celisse, A. (2010). A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Statistical Surveys, 4, 40-79.
6. Arndt, J., & Hirshman, E. (1998). True and false recognition in MINERVA2:Explanations from a global matching perspective. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 371-391.
7. Benjamin, A. S. (2013). Where is the criterion noise in recognition? (Almost) everyplace you look: Comment on Kellen, Klauer, and Singmann (2012). Psychological Review, 120, 720-726.
8. Benjamin, A. S., Diaz, M., & Wee, S. (2009). Signal detection with criterion noise: Applications to recognition memory. Psychological Review, 116, 84-115.
9. Botvinick, M. M., & Plaut, D. C. (2006). Short-term memory for serial order: A recurrent neural network model. Psychological Review, 113, 201-233.
10. Bowles, N. L., & Glanzer, M. (1983). An analysis of interference in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 11, 307-315.
11. Brady, T. F., Konkle, T., Alvarez, G. A., & Oliva, A. (2008). Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 14325-14329.
12. Brown, G. D. A., Neath, I., & Chater, N. (2007). A temporal ratio model of memory. Psychological Review, 114, 539-576.
13. Brown, G. D. A., Preece, T., & Hulme, C. (2000). Oscillator-based memory for serial order. Psychological Review, 107, 127-181.
14. Brown, J., Lewis, V. J., & Monk, A. F. (1977). Memorability, word frequency and negative recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 461-473.
15. Brown, S. D., & Heathcote, A. (2008). The simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 153-178.
16. Buchler, N. G., Faunce, P., Light, L. L., Gottfredson, N., & Reder, L. M. (2011). Effects of repetition on associative recognition in young and older adults: Item and associative strengthening. Psychology and Aging, 26, 111-126.
17. Buchler, N. G., Light, L. L., & Reder, L. M. (2008). Memory for items and associations: Distinct representations and processes in associative recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 183-199.
18. Carey, S. T., & Lockhart, R. S. (1973). Encoding differences in recognition and recall. Memory & Cognition, 1, 297-300.
19. Cary, M., & Reder, L. M. (2003). A dual-process account of the list-length and strength-based mirror effects in recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 231-248.
20. Chalmers, K. A., & Humphreys, M. S. (1998). Role of generalized and episode specific memories in the word frequency effect in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory & Cognition, 24, 610-632.
21. Chalmers, K. A., Humphreys, M. S., & Dennis, S. (1997). A naturalistic study of the word frequency effect in episodic recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25, 780-784.
22. Chappell, M., & Humphreys, M. S. (1994). An auto-associative neural network for sparse representations: Analysis and application to models of recognition and cued recall. Psychological Review, 101, 103-128.
23. Cho, K. W., & Neely, J. H. (2013). Null category-length and target-lure relatedness effects in episodic recognition: A constraint on item-noise interference models. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 1331-1355.
24. Clark, S. E. (1997). A familiarity-based account of confidence-accuracy inversions in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 232-238.
25. Clark, S. E., & Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 37-60.
26. Clark, S. E., & Hori, A. (1995). List length and overlap effects in forcedchoice associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 23, 456-461.
27. Clark, S. E., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1992). Cuing effects and associative information in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 20, 580-598.
28. Cleary, A. M., Curran, T., & Greene, R. L. (2001). Memory for detail in item versus associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 29, 413-423.
29. Cox, G. E., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2012). Criterion setting and the dynamics of recognition memory. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 135-150.
30. Criss, A. H. (2006). The consequences of differentiation in episodic memory:Similarity and the strength based mirror effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 461-478.
31. Criss, A. H. (2009). The distribution of subjective memory strength: List strength and response bias. Cognitive Psychology, 59, 297-319.
32. Criss, A. H. (2010). Differentiation and response bias in episodic memory:Evidence from reaction time distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 484-499.
33. Criss, A. H., Malmberg, K. J., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2011). Output interference in recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 316-326.
34. Criss, A. H., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2004). Context-noise and item-noise jointly determine recognition memory: A comment on Dennis and Humphreys (2001). Psychological Review, 111, 800-807.
35. Dalezman, J. J. (1976). Effects of output order on immediate, delayed, and final recall performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 597-608.
36. Davelaar, E. J. (2007). Sequential retrieval and inhibition of parallel (re)activated representations: A neurocomputational comparison of competitive queuing and resampling models. Adaptive Behavior, 15, 51-71.
37. Davelaar, E. J. (2013). A novelty-induced change in episodic (NICE) context account of primacy effects in free recall. Psychology, 4, 695-703.
38. Davelaar, E. J., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., Ashkenazi, A., Haarmann, H., & Usher, M. (2005). The demise of short-term memory revisited: Empirical and computational investigations of recency effects. Psychological Review, 112, 3-42.
39. DeCarlo, L. T. (2002). Signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions:Theoretical developments with applications to recognition memory. Psychological Review, 109, 710-721.
40. DeCarlo, L. T. (2007). The mirror effect and mixture signal detection theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 18-33.
41. Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of the occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17-22.
42. Dennis, S., & Chapman, A. (2010). The inverse list length effect: A challenge for pure exemplar models of recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 416-424.
43. Dennis, S., & Humphreys, M. S. (2001). A context noise model of episodic word recognition. Psychological Review, 108, 452-478.
44. Dennis, S., Lee, M. D., & Kinnell, A. (2008). Bayesian analysis of recognition memory: The case of the list-length effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 361-376.
45. Dewhurst, S. A., & Anderson, S. J. (1999). Effects of exact and category repetition in true and false recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 27, 664-673.
46. Dong, T. (1972). Cued partial recall of categorized words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 123-129.
47. Dosher, B. A., & Rosedale, G. (1989). Integrated retrieval cues as a mechanism for priming in retrieval from memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 191-211.
48. Egan, J. P. (1958). Recognition memory and the operating characteristic (Tech. Note AFCRC-TN-58-51). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, Hearing and Communication Laboratory.
49. Eich, J. M. (1982). A composite holographic associative recall model. Psychological Review, 89, 627-661.
50. Estes, W. K., & Maddox, W. T. (2005). Risks of drawing inferences about cognitive processes from model fits to individual versus average performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 403-408.
51. Farrell, S. (2006). Mixed-list phonological similarity effects in delayed serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 587-600.
52. Farrell, S. (2012). Temporal clustering and sequencing in short-term memory and episodic memory. Psychological Review, 119, 223-271.
53. Farrell, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2002). An endogenous distributed model of ordering in serial recall. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 59-79.
54. Gallo, D. A., Sullivan, A. L., Daffner, K. R., Schacter, D. L., & Budson, A. E. (2004). Associative recognition in Alzheimer's disease: Evidence for impaired recall-to-reject. Neuropsychology, 18, 556-563.
55. Gardiner, J. M., Craik, F. I. M., & Birtwistle, J. (1972). Retrieval cues and release from proactive inhibition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 778-783.
56. Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
57. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 13, 8-20.
58. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 5-16.
59. Glanzer, M., Adams, J. K., & Iverson, G. (1991). Forgetting and the mirror effect in recognition memory: Concentering of underlying distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 81-93.
60. Glanzer, M., Adams, J. K., Iverson, G. J., & Kim, K. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 100, 546-567.
61. Glanzer, M., & Bowles, N. (1976). Analysis of the word-frequency effect in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 21-31.
62. Glanzer, M., Hilford, A., & Maloney, L. T. (2009). Likelihood ratio decisions in memory: Three implied regularities. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 431-455.
63. Glanzer, M., Kim, K., Hilford, A., & Adams, J. K. (1999). Slope of the receiver-operating characteristic in recognition memory. Journal of Ex-perimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 500-513.
64. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Huntington, NY: Krieger.
65. Gronlund, S. D., & Elam, L. E. (1994). List-length effect: Recognition accuracy and variance of underlying distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1335-1369.
66. Heathcote, A. (2003). Item recognition memory and the receiver operating characteristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1210-1230.
67. Henson, R. N. A. (1998). Short-term memory for serial order: The start-end model. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 73-137.
68. Hicks, J. L., & Starns, J. J. (2014). Strength cues and blocking at test promote reliable within-list criterion shifts in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 42, 742-754.
69. Hilford, A., Glanzer, M., & Kim, K. (1997). Encoding, repetition, and the mirror effect in recognition memory: Symmetry in motion. Memory & Cognition, 25, 593-605.
70. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528-551.
71. Hirshman, E. (1995). Decision processes in recognition memory: Criterion shifts and the list-strength paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 302-313.
72. Hockley, W. E., & Cristi, C. (1996a). Tests of encoding tradeoffs between item and associative information.. Memory & Cognition, 24, 202-216.
73. Hockley, W. E., & Cristi, C. (1996b). Tests of the separate retrieval of item and associative information using a frequency-judgment task.. Memory & Cognition, 24, 796-811.
74. Hockley, W. E., & Niewiadomski, M. W. (2007). Strength-based mirror effects in item and associative recognition: Evidence for within-list criterion changes. Memory & Cognition, 35, 679-688.
75. Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2002). A distributed representation of temporal context. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46, 268-299.
76. Humphreys, M. S., Bain, J. D., & Pike, R. (1989). Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: A theory for episodic, semantic, and procedural tasks. Psychological Review, 96, 208-233.
77. Humphreys, M. S., Pike, R., Bain, J. D., & Tehan, G. (1989). Global matching: A comparison of the SAM, Minerva II, Matrix and TODAM models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 33, 36-67.
78. Humphreys, M. S., & Tehan, G. (1992). A simultaneous examination of recency and cuing effects. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning theory to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 2, pp. 143-159). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
79. Jakab, E., & Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (2009). The role of item strength in retrieval-induced forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 607-617.
80. Jang, Y., & Huber, D. E. (2008). Context retrieval and context change in free recall: Recalling from long-term memory drives list isolation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 112-127.
81. Jang, Y., Mickes, L., & Wixted, J. T. (2012). Three tests and three corrections: A comment on Koen and Yonelinas (2010). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 513-523.
82. Johns, B. T., Jones, M. N., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2012). A synchronization account of false recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 486-518.
83. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
84. Jones, M. N., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2007). Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon. Psychological Review, 114, 1-37.
85. Jordan, M. I. (2004). Graphical models. Statistical Science, 19, 140-155.
86. Kahana, M. J., Rizzuto, D. S., & Schneider, A. R. (2005). Theoretical correlations and measured correlations: Relating recognition and recall in four distributed memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning Memory & Cognition, 31, 933-953.
87. Kantner, J., & Lindsay, D. S. (2012). Response bias in recognition memory as a cognitive trait. Memory & Cognition, 40, 1163-1177.
88. Karlsen, P. J., & Snodgrass, J. G. (2004). The word-frequency paradox for recall/recognition occurs for pictures. Psychological Research, 68, 271-276.
89. Kellen, D., Klauer, K. C., & Singmann, H. (2012). On the measurement of criterion noise in signal detection theory: The case of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 119, 457-479.
90. Kelley, R., & Wixted, J. T. (2001). On the nature of associative information in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 701-722.
91. Keppel, G., & Underwood, B. (1962). Proactive inhibition in short-term retention of single items. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1, 153-161.
92. Kim, K., & Glanzer, M. (1993). Speed versus accuracy instructions, study time, and the mirror effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 638-652.
93. Kim, K., & Glanzer, M. (1995). Intralist interference in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1096-1107.
94. Kinnell, A., & Dennis, S. (2011). The list length effect in recognition memory: An analysis of potential confounds. Memory & Cognition, 39, 348-363.
95. Kinnell, A., & Dennis, S. (2012). The role of stimulus type in list length effects in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 40, 311-325.
96. Klein, K. A., Shiffrin, R. M., & Criss, A. H. (2007). Putting context in context. In J. S. Nairne (Ed.), The foundations of remembering: Essays in honor of Henry L. Roediger III (pp. 171-189). New York, NY:Psychology Press.
97. Koen, J. D., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2010). Memory variability is due to the contribution of recollection and familiarity, not to encoding variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1536-1542.
98. Koen, J. D., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2013). Still no evidence for the encoding variability hypothesis: A reply to Jang, Mickes, and Wixted (2012), and Starns, Rotello, and Ratcliff (2012). Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 304-312.
99. Konkle, T., Brady, T. F., Alvarez, G., & Oliva, A. (2010). Conceptual distinctiveness supports detailed visual long-term memory for real-world objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 558-578.
100. Kumaran, D., & McClelland, J. L. (2012). Generalization through the recurrent interaction of episodic memories: A model of the hippocampal system. Psychological Review, 119, 573-616.
101. Lee, M. D. (2008). Three case studies in the Bayesian analysis of cognitive models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1-15.
102. Lee, M. D. (2011). How cognitive modeling can benefit from hierarchical Bayesian models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55, 1-7.
103. Lee, M. D., & Vanpaemel, W. (2008). Exemplars, prototypes, similarities, and rules in category representation: An example of Hierarchical Bayesian Analysis. Cognitive Science, 32, 1403-1424.
104. Lehman, M., & Malmberg, K. J. (2013). A buffer model of memory encoding and temporal correlations in retrieval. Psychological Review, 120, 155-189.
105. Lewandowsky, S., & Murdock, B. B. (1989). Memory for serial order. Psychological Review, 96, 25-57.
106. Light, L. L., Patterson, M. M., Chung, C., & Healy, M. R. (2004). Effects of repetition and response deadline on associative recognition in young and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1182-1193.
107. Madigan, S. (1983). Picture memory. In J. C. Yuillie (Ed.), Imagery, memory, and cognition: Essays in honor of Allan Paivio (pp. 65-89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
108. Maguire, A. M., Humphreys, M. S., Dennis, S., & Lee, M. D. (2010). Global similarity accounts of embedded-category designs: Tests of the global matching models. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 131-148.
109. Malmberg, K. J., Criss, A. H., Gangwani, T. H., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2012). Overcoming the negative consequences of interference from recognition memory testing. Psychological Science, 23, 115-119.
110. Malmberg, K. J., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2005). The "one-shot" hypothesis for context storage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 322-336.
111. Malmberg, K. J., & Xu, J. (2007). On the flexibility and the fallibility of associative memory. Memory & Cognition, 35, 545-556.
112. Marr, D. (1971). A theory for archicortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 262, 23-81.
113. McClelland, J. L., & Chappell, M. (1998). Familiarity breeds differentiation:A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 105, 724-760.
114. McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'Reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102, 419-457.
115. Mensink, G. J., & Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (1988). A model for interference and forgetting. Psychological Review, 95, 434-455.
116. Mickes, L., Johnson, E. M., & Wixted, J. T. (2010). Continuous recollection versus unitized familiarity in associative recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 843-863.
117. Montenegro, M., Myung, J. I., & Pitt, M. A. (2014). Analytical expressions for the REM model of recognition memory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 60, 23-28.
118. Morey, R. D., Pratte, M. S., & Rouder, J. N. (2008). Problematic effects of aggregation in zROC analysis and a hierarchical modeling solution. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52, 376-388.
119. Morrell, H. E. R., Gaitan, S., & Wixted, J. T. (2002). On the nature of the decision axis in signal-detection based models of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1095-1110.
120. Mueller, S. T., & Weidemann, C. T. (2008). Decision noise: An explanation for observed violations of signal detection theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 465-494.
121. Mulligan, N., & Stone, M. (1999). Attention and conceptual priming:Limits on the effects of divided attention in the category-exemplar production task. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 253-280.
122. Murdock, B. B. (1962). The serial position effect of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 482-488.
123. Murdock, B. B. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 89, 609-626.
124. Murdock, B. B. (1997). Context and mediators in a theory of distributed associative memory (TODAM2). Psychological Review, 104, 839-862.
125. Murdock, B. B. (2003). The mirror effect and the spacing effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 570-588.
126. Murdock, B. B., & Anderson, R. E. (1975). Encoding, storage, and retrieval of item information. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 145-194). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
127. Murdock, B. B., & Kahana, M. J. (1993a). Analysis of the list-strength effect.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 689-697.
128. Murdock, B. B., & Kahana, M. J. (1993b). List-Strength and list-length effects: Reply to Shiffrin, Ratcliff, Murnane, and Nobel (1993).. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1450-1453.
129. Murdock, B. B., & Okada, R. (1970). Interresponse times in single-trial free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 263-267.
130. Murnane, K., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1991a). Interference and the representation of events in memory.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 855-874.
131. Murnane, K., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1991b). Word repetitions in sentence recognition.. Memory & Cognition, 19, 119-130.
132. Myung, J. I., Montenegro, M., & Pitt, M. A. (2007). Analytic expressions for the BCDMEM model of recognition memory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 51, 198-204.
133. Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2000). Adult age differences in memory performance:Tests of an associative deficit hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2000, 1170-1187.
134. Neely, J. H., & Tse, C.-S. (2009). Category length produces an inverted-U discriminability function in episodic recognition memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1141-1172.
135. Nelson, A. B., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2013). The co-evolution of knowledge and event memory. Psychological Review, 120, 356-394.
136. Nobel, P. A., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2001). Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 384-413.
137. Norman, K. A., & O'Reilly, R. C. (2003). Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complementary learning systems approach. Psychological Review, 110, 611-646.
138. Norman, K. A., Tepe, K., Nyhus, E., & Curran, T. (2008). Event-related potential correlates of interference effects on recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 36-43.
139. Nosofsky, R. M. (1986). Attention, similarity and the identificationcategorization relationship. Journal of Experimental psychology: General, 115, 39-57.
140. Nosofsky, R. M. (1991). Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 17, 3-27.
141. O'Reilly, R. C., & McClelland, J. L. (1994). Hippocampal conjunctive encoding, storage, and recall: Avoiding a trade-off. Hippocampus, 4, 661-682.
142. O'Reilly, R. C., & Rudy, J. W. (2001). Conjunctive representations in learning and memory: Principles of cortical and hippocampal function. Psychological Review, 108, 311-345.
143. Osth, A. F., & Dennis, S. (2014). Associative recognition and the list strength paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 42, 583-594.
144. Osth, A. F., Dennis, S., & Kinnell, A. (2014). Stimulus type and the list strength paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1826-1841.
145. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
146. Paivio, A. (1976). Imagery in recall and recognition. In J. Brown (Ed.), Recall and recognition (pp. 103-129). London: Wiley.
147. Peixotto, H. E. (1947). Proactive inhibition in the recognition of nonsense syllables. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 81-91.
148. Pike, R. (1984). Comparison of convolution and matrix distributed memory systems for associative recall and recognition. Psychological Review, 91, 281-294.
149. Pitt, M. A., & Myung, J. I. (2002). When a good fit can be bad. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 421-425.
150. Plummer, M. (2003). JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling. In K. Hornik, F. Leisch, & A. Zeileis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on disturbed statistical computing (dsc 2003). Vienna, Austria.
151. Polyn, S. M., Norman, K. A., & Kahana, M. J. (2009). A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 116, 129-156.
152. Pooley, J. P., Lee, M. D., & Shankle, W. R. (2011). Understanding memory impairment with memory models and hierarchical Bayesian analysis. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 4, 7-56.
153. Pratte, M. S., & Rouder, J. N. (2011). Hierarchical single- and dual process models of recognition memory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55, 36-46.
154. Pratte, M. S., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2010). Separating mnemonic process from participant and item effects in the assessment of ROC asymmetries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 224-232.
155. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93-134.
156. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108.
157. Ratcliff, R., Clark, S. E., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1990). List-strength effect: I. Data and discussion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory & Cognition, 16, 163-178.
158. Ratcliff, R., & Hockley, W. E. (1980). Repeated negatives in item recognition:Nonmonotonic lag functions. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
159. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20, 873-922.
160. Ratcliff, R., McKoon, G., & Tindall, M. (1994). Empirical generality of data from recognition memory: Receiver-operating characteristic functions and implications for the global memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 763-785.
161. Ratcliff, R., & Murdock, B. B. (1976). Retrieval processes in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 83, 190-214.
162. Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C. F., & Gronlund, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review, 99, 518-535.
163. Ratcliff, R., & Starns, J. J. (2009). Modeling confidence and response time in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 116, 59-83.
164. Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T., & McKoon, G. (1999). Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. Psychological Review, 106, 261-300.
165. Reder, L. M., Angstadt, P., Cary, M., Erickson, M. A., & Ayers, M. S. (2002). A reexamination of stimulus-frequency effects in recognition:Two mirrors for low- and high-frequency pseudowords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 138-152.
166. Roberts, W. A. (1972). Free recall of word lists varying in length and rate of presentation: A test of total-time hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 365-372.
167. Robinson, K. J., & Roediger, H. L. (1997). Associative processes in false recall and false recognition. Psychological Science, 8, 231-237.
168. Roediger, H. L. (1974). Inhibiting effects of recall. Memory & Cognition, 2, 261-269.
169. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories:Remembering words not present in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-814.
170. Roediger, H. L., & Schmidt, S. R. (1980). Output interference in the recall of categorized and paired-associate lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 6, 91-105.
171. Rotello, C. M., Masson, M. E. J., & Verde, M. F. (2008). Type I error rates and power analyses for single-point sensitivity measures. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 389-401.
172. Rouder, J. N., & Lu, J. (2005). An introduction to Bayesian hierarchical models with an application in the theory of signal detection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 573-604.
173. Rumelhart, D. E. (1990). Brain style computation: Learning and generalization. In S. F. Zornetzer, J. L. Davis, & C. Lau (Eds.), An introduction to neural and electronic networks (pp. 405-420). San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
174. Sahakyan, L., & Hendricks, H. E. (2012). Context change and retrieval difficulty in the list-before-last paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 40, 844-860.
175. Schölkopf, B., & Smola, A. J. (2002). Learning with kernels. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
176. Schulman, A. L. (1974). The declining course of recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 2, 14-18.
177. Sederberg, P. B., Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2008). A contextbased theory of recency and contiguity in free recall. Psychological Review, 115, 893-912.
178. Shepard, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 156-163.
179. Shiffrin, R. M., Huber, D. E., & Marinelli, K. (1995). Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 267-287.
180. Shiffrin, R. M., Lee, M. D., Kim, W., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2008). A survey of model evaluation approaches with a tutorial on hierarchical Bayesian methods. Cognitive Science, 32, 1248-1284.
181. Shiffrin, R. M., Ratcliff, R., & Clark, S. E. (1990). List-strength effect: II. Theoretical mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory & Cognition, 16, 179-195.
182. Shiffrin, R. M., & Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory:REM: Retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 145-166.
183. Singer, M. (2009). Strength-based criterion shifts in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 37, 976-984.
184. Singer, M., & Wixted, J. T. (2006). Effect of delay on recognition decisions:Evidence for a criterion shift. Memory & Cognition, 34, 125-137.
185. Standing, L. (1973). Learning 10,000 pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 207-222.
186. Starns, J. J., & Olchowski, J. E. (2014). Shifting the criterion is not the difficult part of trial-by-trial criterion shifts in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 43, 49-59.
187. Starns, J. J., & Ratcliff, R. (2014). Validating the unequal-variance assumption in recognition memory using response time distributions instead of ROC functions: A diffusion model analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 70, 36-52.
188. Starns, J. J., Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2012). Evaluating the unequalvariance and dual-process explanations of the zROC slopes with response time data and the diffusion model. Cognitive Psychology, 64, 1-34.
189. Starns, J. J., Ratcliff, R., & White, C. N. (2012). Diffusion model drift rates can be influenced by decision processes: An analysis of the strengthbased mirror effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1137-1151.
190. Starns, J. J., Rotello, C. M., & Ratcliff, R. (2012). Mixing strong and weak targets provides no evidence against the unequal-variance explanation of zROC slope: A comment on Koen and Yonelinas (2010). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 793-801.
191. Starns, J. J., White, C. N., & Ratcliff, R. (2010). A direct test of the differentiation mechanism: REM, BCDMEM, and the strength-based mirror effect in recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 18-34.
192. Starns, J. J., White, C. N., & Ratcliff, R. (2012). The strength-based mirror effect in subjective strength ratings: The evidence for differentiation can be produced without differentiation. Memory & Cognition, 40, 1189-1199.
193. Stretch, V., & Wixted, J. T. (1998a). Decision rules for recognition memory confidence judgments.. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1397-1410.
194. Stretch, V., & Wixted, J. T. (1998b). On the differences between strengthbased and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1379-1396.
195. Strong, E. K. J. (1912). The effect of length of series upon recognition memory. Psychological Review, 19, 447-462.
196. Tehan, G., & Humphreys, M. S. (1995). Transient phonemic codes and immunity to proactive interference. Memory & Cognition, 23, 181-191.
197. Tehan, G., & Humphreys, M. S. (1996). Cuing effects in short-term recall. Memory & Cognition, 24, 719-732.
198. Treves, A., & Rolls, E. T. (1992). Computational constraints suggest the need for two distinct input systems to the hippocampal CA3 network. Hippocampus, 2, 189-200.
199. Tulving, E., & Hastie, R. (1972). Inhibition Effects of Intralist Repetition in Free Recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 297-304.
200. Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
201. Turner, B. M., Dennis, S., & Van Zandt, T. (2013). Likelihood-free Bayesian analysis of memory models. Psychological Review, 120, 667-678.
202. Turner, B. M., Sederberg, P. B., Brown, S. D., & Steyvers, M. (2013). A method for efficiently sampling from distributions with correlated dimensions. Psychological Methods, 18, 368-384.
203. Underwood, B. J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 122-129.
204. Underwood, B. J. (1978). Recognition memory as a function of the length of study list. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 12, 89-91.
205. Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550-592.
206. Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., & Lee, M. D. (2011). Hierarchical diffusion models for two-choice response times. Psychological Methods, 16, 44-62.
207. Vanpaemel, W., & Lee, M. D. (2012). Using priors to formalize theory:Optimal attention and the generalized context model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 1047-1056.
208. Ward, G. (2002). A recency-based account of the list length effect in free recall. Memory & Cognition, 30, 885-892.
209. Watkins, O. C., & Watkins, M. J. (1975). Buildup of proactive inhibition as a cue-overload effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 104, 442-452.
210. Wickelgren, W. A. (1968). Unidimensional strength theory and component analysis of noise in absolute and comparative judgments. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 5, 102-122.
211. Wickelgren, W. A., & Norman, D. A. (1966). Strength models and serial position in short-term recognition memory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 3, 316-347.
212. Wickens, D. D. (1970). Encoding categories of words: An empirical approach to meaning. Psychological Review, 77, 1-15.
213. Wickens, D. D., Born, D. G., & Allen, C. K. (1963). Proactive inhibition and item similarity in short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 2, 440-445.
214. Wickens, T. D. (2002). Elementary signal detection theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
215. Wixted, J. T. (1992). Subjective memorability and the mirror effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 681-690.
216. Wixted, J. T. (2007). Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 114, 152-176.
217. Wixted, J. T., Ghadisha, H., & Vera, R. (1997). Recall latency following pure and mixed-strength Lists: A direct test of the relative strength model of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 523-538.
218. Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (1994). Analyzing the dynamics of free recall:An integrative review of the empirical literature. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 89-106.
219. Wood, G., & Underwood, B. J. (1967). Implicit responses and conceptual similarity. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 6, 1-10.
220. Xu, J., & Malmberg, K. J. (2007). Modeling the effects of verbal and nonverbal pair strength on associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 35, 526-544.
221. Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1341-1354.
222. Yonelinas, A. P., Hockley, W. E., & Murdock, B. B. (1992). Tests of the list-strength effect in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 345-355.
223. Zechmeister, E. B., Curt, C., & Sebastian, J. A. (1978). Errors in a recognition memory task are a U-shaped function of word frequency. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 371-373.