Context and Mediators in a Theory of Distributed Associative Memory (TODAM2)

Psychological Review

Volumn 104, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 839-862

  Murdock, Bennet B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009783736     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.839     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Abramson, N. (1963). Information theory and coding. New York: McGraw-Hill.
2. Anderson, J. A. (1973). A theory for the recognition of items from short memorized lists. Psychological Review, 80, 417-438.
3. Anderson, J. A., Silverstein, J. W., Ritz, S. A., & Jones, R. S. (1977). Distinctive features, categorical perception, and probability learning: Some applications of a neural model. Psychological Review, 84, 413-451.
4. Asch, S. E. (1969). A reformulation of the problem of associations. American Psychologist, 24, 92-102.
5. Atkinson, R. C., Bower, G. H., & Crothers, E. J. (1965). An introduction to mathematical learning theory. New York: Wiley.
6. Atkinson, R. C., & Raugh, M. R. (1975). An application of the mnemonic keyword method to the acquisition of a Russian vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 126-133.
7. Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2, pp. 89-195). New York: Academic Press.
8. Bjork, R. A., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1989). On the puzzling relationship between environmental context and human memory. In C. Izawa (Ed.), Current issues in cognitive processes: The Tulane Floweree Symposium on Cognition (pp. 313-342). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Borsellino, A., & Poggio, T. (1973). Convolution and correlation algebra. Kybernetik, 122, 113-122.
10. Bower, G. H. (1967). A multicomponent theory of the memory trace. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 1, pp. 229-325). New York: Academic Press.
11. Clark, S. E. (1992). Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition. Memory & Cognition, 20, 231-243.
12. Clark, S. E., & Burchett, R. E. R. (1994). Word frequency and list composition effects in associative recognition and recall. Memory & Cognition, 22, 55-62.
13. Clark, S. E., & Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 37-60.
14. Clark, S. E., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1987). Recognition of multiple-item probes. Memory & Cognition, 15, 367-378.
15. Dyne, A. M., Humphreys, M. S., Bain, J. D., & Pike, R. (1990). Associative interference effects in recognition and recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 813-824.
16. Estes, W. K. (1955). Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regression. Psychological Review, 62, 145-154.
17. Fernandez, A., & Glenberg, A. M. (1985). Changing environmental context does not reliably affect memory. Memory & Cognition, 13, 333-345.
18. Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
19. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Theory and data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 5-16.
20. Glanzer, M., Adams, J. K., Iverson, G. J., & Kim, K. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 100, 546-567.
21. Greene, R. L. (1994, November). Mirror effect in order and associative information. Paper presented at the Psychonomics Meeting, St. Louis, MO.
22. Greene, R. L. (1996). Mirror effect in order and associative information: The role of response strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 687-695.
23. Gronlund, S. D., & Ratcliff, R. (1989). Time course of item and associative information: Implications for global memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 846-858.
24. Grossberg, S. (1978). Do all neural models really look alike? A comment on Anderson, Silverstein, Ritz, & Jones. Psychological Review, 85, 592-596.
25. Hintzman, D. L. (1986). "Schema abstraction" in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411-428.
26. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528-551.
27. Hintzman, D. L. (1992). Mathematical constraints and the Tulving-Wiseman law. Psychological Review, 99, 536-542.
28. Hintzman, D. L., Caulton, D. A., & Curran, T. (1994). Retrieval constraints and the mirror effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 275-289.
29. Hockley, W. E. (1991). Recognition memory for item and associative memory: A comparison of forgetting rates. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock (pp. 227-248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Hockley, W. E. (1992). Item versus associative information: Further comparisons of forgetting rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1321-1330.
31. Hockley, W. E. (1994). Reflections of the mirror effect for item and associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 22, 713-722.
32. Hockley, W. E., & Cristi, C. (1996). Tests of encoding tradeoffs between item and associative information. Memory & Cognition, 24, 202-216.
33. Hockley, W. E., & Murdock, B. B. (1987). A decision model for accuracy and response latency in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 94, 341-358.
34. Hockley, W. E., & Murdock, B. B. (1992). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and item recognition: A reply to Gronlund and Ratcliff. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 36, 461-467.
35. Hopfield, J. J. (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 79, 2554-2558.
36. Humphreys, M. S. (1976). Relational information and the context effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 4, 221-232.
37. Humphreys, M. S., Bain, J. D., & Pike, R. (1989). Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: A theory for episodic, semantic, and procedural tasks. Psychological Review, 96, 208-233.
38. Humphreys, M. S., Pike, R., Bain, J. D., & Tehan, G. (1989). Global matching: A comparison of the SAM, Minerva II, Matrix, and TODAM models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 33, 36-67.
39. Jordan, M. I. (1986). An introduction to linear algebra in parallel distributed processing. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Foundations (Vol. 1, pp. 365-422). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Kahana, M. J. (1997). An analysis of the recognition-recall relations in four distributed memory models. Manuscript submitted for publication.
41. Kohler, W. (1941). On the nature of association. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 84, 489-502.
42. Lewandowsky, S. (1993). The rewards and hazards of computer simulations. Psychological Science, 4, 236-243.
43. Lewandowsky, S., & Li, S-C. (1994). Memory for serial order revisited. Psychological Review, 101, 534-538.
44. Liepa, P. (1977). Models of content addressable distributed associative memory (CADAM). Unpublished manuscript, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
45. Light, L. L., & Carter-Sobel, L. (1970). Effects of changed semantic context on recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 1-11.
46. McElree, B., & Dosher, B. A. (1993). Serial retrieval processes and the recovery of order information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 291-315.
47. McGee, R. (1980). Imagery and recognition memory: The effects of relational organization. Memory & Cognition, 8, 394-399.
48. Mensink, G. J. M., & Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (1988). A model for interference and forgetting. Psychological Review, 95, 434-455.
49. Metcalfe, J. (1991). Recognition failure and the composite memory trace in CHARM. Psychological Review, 98, 529-553.
50. Metcalfe-Eich, J. M. (1982). A composite holographic associative recall model. Psychological Review, 89, 627-661.
51. Metcalfe-Eich, J. M. (1985). Levels of processing, encoding specificity, elaboration, and CHARM. Psychological Review, 92, 1-38.
52. Murdock, B. B. (1963). Interpolated recall in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 525-532.
53. Murdock, B. B. (1974). Human memory: Theory and data. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
54. Murdock, B. B. (1979). Convolution and correlation in perception and memory. In L. G. Nilsson (Ed.), Perspectives in memory research: Essays in honor of Uppsala University's 500th anniversary (pp. 105-119). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Murdock, B. B. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 89, 609-626.
56. Murdock, B. B. (1989). Learning in a distributed memory model. In C. Izawa (Ed.), Current issues in cognitive processes: The Tulane Floweree Symposium on Cognition (pp. 69-106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. Murdock, B. B. (1993). TODAM2: A model for the storage and retrieval of item, associative, and serial-order information. Psychological Review. 100, 183-203.
58. Murdock, B. B. (1995). Similarity in a distributed memory model. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 251-264.
59. Murdock, B. B. (1996). Item, associative, and serial-order information in TODAM. In S. Gathercole (Ed.), Models of short-term memory (pp. 239-266). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
60. Murdock, B. B., & Hockley, W. E. (1989). Short-term memory for associations. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 24, pp. 71-108). New York: Academic Press.
61. Murdock, B. B., & Kahana, M. J. (1993). An analysis of the list-strength effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 689-697.
62. Murdock, B. B., & Lamon, M. (1988). The replacement effect: Repeating some items while replacing others. Memory & Cognition, 16, 91-101.
63. Murnane, K., & Phelps, M. P. (1993). A global activation approach to the effect of changes in environmental context on recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 882-894.
64. Murnane, K., & Phelps, M. P. (1994). When does a different environmental context make a difference in recognition? A global activation model. Memory & Cognition, 22, 584-590.
65. Murnane, K., & Phelps, M. P. (1995). Effects of changes in relative cue strength on context-dependent recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 158-172.
66. Ohrt, D. D., & Gronlund, S. D. (1995. August). List-length effect: Control and theoretical implications. Paper presented at the Mathematical Psychology Society meetings, Irvine, CA.
67. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85, 59-108.
68. Ratcliff, R. (1981). Parallel-processing mechanisms and processing of organized information in human memory. In G. E. Hinton & J. A. Anderson (Eds.), Parallel models of associative memory (pp. 265-283). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
69. Ratcliff, R., Clark, S. E., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1990). The list-strength effect: I. Data and discussion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 163-178.
70. Ratcliff, R., McKoon, G., & Tindall, M. (1994). Empirical generality of data from recognition memory receiver-operating characteristic functions and implications for global memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 763-785.
71. Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C.-F., & Gronlund, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC slopes. Psychological Review, 99, 518-535.
72. Reed, A. V. (1976). List length and the time-course of recognition in immediate memory. Memory & Cognition, 4, 16-30.
73. Rock, I., & Ceraso, J. (1964). Toward a cognitive theory of associative learning. In C. Scheerer (Ed.), Cognition: Theory, research, promise (pp. 110-146). New York: Harper & Row.
74. Shepard, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 156-163.
75. Shiffrin, R. M., & Raaijmakers, J. (1992). The SAM retrieval model: A retrospective and prospective. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning theory to connectionst theory: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 2, pp. 69-86). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
76. Smith, S. M. (1988). Environmental context-dependent memory. In D. M. Thomson & G. M. Davies (Eds.), Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 13-34). New York: Wiley.
77. Thomson, D. M., & Tulving, E. (1970). Associative encoding and retrieval: Weak and strong cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 255-262.
78. Thurstone, L. L. (1930). The relation between learning time and length of task. Psychological Review, 37, 44-58.
79. Tulving, E., & Arbuckle, T. Y. (1963). Sources of intratrial interference in immediate recall of paired associates. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1, 321-334.
80. Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
81. Tulving, E., & Wiseman, S. (1975). Relation between recognition and recognition failure of recallable words. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 6, 79-82.
82. Underwood, B. J. (1969). Attributes of memory. Psychological Review, 76, 559-573.
83. Weber, E. U. (1988). Expectation and variance of item resemblance distributions in a convolution-correlation model of distributed memory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 32, 1-43.