Corrigendum to "The consequences of differentiation in episodic memory: Similarity and the strength based mirror effect" [J. Mem. Lang. 55 (2006) 461-478] (DOI:10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.003);The consequences of differentiation in episodic memory: Similarity and the strength based mirror effect

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 461-478

  Criss, Amy H ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Criterion shifts; Differentiation; False memory; Memory models; Mirror effect; Recognition memory

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750083349     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.08.005     Document Type: Erratum

References (63)

1. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D., & Simpson, G. B. (2002). The English Lexicon Project: A web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and nonwords. Available from http://elexicon.wustl.edu/, Washington University.
2. Benjamin A.S., and Bawa S. Distractor plausibility and criterion placement in recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 51 (2004) 159-172
3. Brown J., Lewis V.J., and Monk A.F. Memorability, word frequency and negative recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 29 (1977) 461-473
4. Brown S., and Steyvers M. The dynamics of experimentally induced criterion shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31 4 (2005) 587-599
5. Brown, S., Steyvers, M., & Hemmer, P. (in press). Modeling experimentally induced strategy shifts. Psychological Science.
6. Cary M., and Reder L.M. A dual-process account of the list-length and strength-based mirror effects in recognition. Memory and Cognition 49 (2003) 231-248
7. Criss, A. H. (2005). The representation of single items and associations in episodic memory. Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 2004. Dissertation Abstracts International-B, 65(12), 6882.
8. Criss, A. H., & McClelland, J. L. (in press - this issue). Differentiating the differentiation models: A Comparison of the retrieving effectively from memory model (REM) and the subjective likelihood model (SLiM). Journal of Memory and Language, doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.06.003.
9. Criss A.H., and Shiffrin R.M. Pairs do not suffer interference from other types of pairs or single items in associative recognition. Memory and Cognition 32 8 (2004) 1284-1297
10. Criss A.H., and Shiffrin R.M. Context noise and item noise jointly determine recognition memory: A comment on Dennis & Humphreys (2001). Psychological Review 111 3 (2004) 800-807
11. Criss A.H., and Shiffrin R.M. List discrimination and representation in associative recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31 6 (2005) 1199-1212
12. DeCarlo L.T. Signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions: Theoretical developments with applications to recognition memory. Psychological Review 109 (2002) 710-721
13. Dennis S., and Humphreys M.S. A context noise model of episodic word recognition. Psychological Review 108 2 (2001) 452-477
14. Diller D.E., Nobel P.A., and Shiffrin R.M. An ARC-REM model for accuracy and response time in recognition and cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27 (2001) 414-443
15. Dobbins I., and Kroll N. Distinctiveness and the recognition mirror effect: Evidence for an item-based criterion placement heuristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31 (2005) 1186-1198
16. Dunn J.C. Remember-Know: A matter of confidence. Psychological Review 111 (2004) 524-542
17. Estes W.K., and Maddox W.T. Risks of drawing inferences about cognitive processes from model fits to individual versus average performance. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 12 (2005) 403-408
18. Gibson E. A systematic application of the concepts of generalization and differentiation to verbal learning. Psychological Review 47 (1940) 196-229
19. Gibson E. Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development (1969), Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York
20. Gibson J., and Gibson E. Perceptual learning - differentiation or enrichment?. Psychological Review 62 (1955) 32-41
21. Gillund G., and Shiffrin R.M. A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review 91 (1984) 1-67
22. Glanzer M., and Adams J.K. The mirror effect in recognition memory. Memory and Cognition 13 1 (1985) 8-20
23. Glanzer M., and Adams J.K. The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16 1 (1990) 5-16
24. Goldstone R.L. The role of similarity in categorization: Providing a groundwork. Cognition 52 (1994) 125-157
25. Green D.M., and Swets J.A. Signal detection theory and psychophysics (1966), Wiley, Oxford, UK
26. Heit E., Brockdorff N., and Lamberts K. Adaptive changes of response criterion in recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 10 3 (2002) 718-723
27. Hintzman D.L. Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple trace memory model. Psychological Review 95 (1988) 528-551
28. Hintzman D.L., and Curran T. When encoding fails: Instructions, feedback, and registration without learning. Memory and Cognition 23 2 (1995) 213-226
29. Hintzman D.L., Curran T., and Oppy B. Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: Registration without learning?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18 4 (1992) 667-680
30. Hirshman E. Decision processes in recognition memory: Criterion shifts and the list strength paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 21 (1995) 302-331
31. Hockley W.E. Reflections of the mirror effect for item and associative recognition. Memory and Cognition 22 (1994) 713-722
32. Hockley, W. E., & Niewiadomski, M. W. (in press). Strength-based mirror effects in item and associative recognition: Evidence for within-list criterion changes. Memory and Cognition.
33. Humphreys M.S., Pike R., Bain J.D., and Tehan G. Global matching: A comparison of the SAM, Minerva II, Matrix, and TODAM models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 33 (1989) 36-67
34. Kim K., and Glanzer M. Speed versus accuracy instructions, study time, and the mirror effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19 (1993) 638-665
35. Lund K., and Burgess C. Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentation, and Computers 28 (1996) 203-208
36. Macmillan N.A., and Creelman C.D. Detection theory: A user's guide (1991), Cambridge University Press, New York
37. Malmberg K.J., Holden J., and Shiffrin R.M. Modeling the effects of repetitions, similarity, and normative word frequency on old-new recognition and judgments of frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30 (2004) 319-333
38. McClelland J.L., and Chappell M. Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychological Review 105 4 (1998) 734-760
39. Metcalfe-Eich J.M. Levels of processing, encoding specificity, elaboration, and CHARM. Psychological Review 92 (1985) 1-38
40. MIT Speech Communication Group. (2005). Lexical access from features sentences. Available from http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/27283.
41. Morrell H., Gaitan S., and Wixted J.T. On the nature of the decision axis in signal detection-based models of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28 (2002) 1095-1110
42. Murnane K., and Shiffrin R.M. Word repetitions in sentence recognition. Memory and Cognition 19 2 (1991) 119-130
43. Murdock B.B. Context and mediators: A theory of distributed associative memory (TODAM2). Psychological Review 104 4 (1997) 839-862
44. Murdock B.B. The mirror effect and the spacing effect. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 10 (2003) 570-588
45. Murdock B., Smith D., and Bai J. Judgments of frequency and recency in a distributed memory model. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 45 (2001) 564-602
46. Nosofsky R.M. Similarity, frequency, and category representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14 1 (1988) 54-56
47. Raaijmakers J.G.W. Spacing and repetition effects in human memory: Application of the SAM model. Cognitive Science 27 (2003) 431-452
48. Ratcliff R., Clark S.E., and Shiffrin R.M. List-strength effect: I. Data and discussion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16 2 (1990) 163-178
49. Reder L.M., Nhouyvanisvong A., Schunn C.D., Ayers M.S., Angstadt P., and Hiraki K. A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26 (2000) 294-320
50. Roediger III H.L., and McDermott K.B. Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 (1995) 803-881
51. Schooler L., Shiffrin R.M., and Raaijmakers J.G.W. A model for implicit effects in perceptual identification. Psychological Review 108 (2001) 257-272
52. Shiffrin R.M., Huber D.E., and Marinelli K. Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 (1995) 267-287
53. Shiffrin R.M., Ratcliff R., and Clark S.E. List-strength effect: II. Theoretical mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 16 2 (1990) 179-195
54. Shiffrin R.M., and Steyvers M. A model for recognition memory: REM - Retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 4 (1997) 145-166
55. Steyvers, M. (2000) Modeling semantic and orthographic similarity effects on memory for individual words. Dissertation, Psychology Department, Indiana University.
56. Stretch V., and Wixted J.T. Decision rules for recognition memory confidence judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 24 6 (1998) 1397-1410
57. Tversky A. Features of similarity. Psychological Review 84 (1977) 327-352
58. Verde, M., & Rotello, C. (in press). Memory strength and the decision process in recognition memory. Memory and Cognition.
59. Vokey J.R., and Read J.D. Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces. Memory and Cognition 20 3 (1992) 291-302
60. Wagenmakers E.J.M., Steyvers M., Raaijmakers J.G.W., Shiffrin R.M., van Rijn H., and Zeelenberg R. A model for evidence accumulation in the lexical decision task. Cognitive Psychology 48 (2004) 332-367
61. Wickens T.D. Elementary signal detection theory (2001), Oxford University Press
62. Xu, J., & Malmberg, K. J. (in press). Modeling the effects of verbal- and non-verbal pair strength on associative recognition. Memory and Cognition.
63. Zaki S.R., and Nosofsky R.M. Exemplar accounts of blending and distinctiveness effects in perceptual old new recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27 4 (2001) 1022-1041