Output interference in recognition memory

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 316-326

  Criss, Amy H ^a   Malmberg, Kenneth J ^b   Shiffrin, Richard M ^c  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Context noise; Interference; Item noise; Memory models; Output interference; Recognition memory

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953224042     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Anderson M.C., Neely J.H. Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval. Memory 1996, 237-313. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA. E. Bjork, R.A. Bjork (Eds.).
2. Atkinson R.C., Juola J.F. Search and decision processes in recognition memory. Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology 1974, Vol. 1. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco.
3. Balota, D.A., Cortese, M.J., Hutchison, K.A., Neely, J.H., Nelson, D., Simpson, G.B., & Treiman, R. (2002). The English Lexicon Project: A web-based repository of descriptive and behavioral measures for 40,481 English words and nonwords. , Washington University. http://elexicon.wustl.edu/.
4. Brown, S.D. (2010). The pervasive problem of criterion setting. Presented at the 51st Annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society.
5. Brown S.D., Steyvers M. The dynamics of experimentally induced criterion shifts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2005, 31(4):587-599.
6. Brown S.D., Steyvers M., Hemmer P. Modeling experimentally induced strategy shifts. Psychological Science 2007, 18:40-45.
7. Carrier M., Pashler H. The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory and Cognition 1992, 20:632-642.
8. Cary M., Reder L.M. A dual-process account of the list-length and strength-based mirror effects in recognition. Memory and Cognition 2003, 49:231-248.
9. Clark S., Gronlund S. Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1996, 3(1):37-60.
10. Criss A.H. The consequences of differentiation in episodic memory: Similarity and the strength based mirror effect. Journal of Memory and Language 2006, 55(4):461-478.
11. Criss A.H. The distribution of subjective memory strength: Foils and response bias. Cognitive Psychology 2009, 59:297-319.
12. Criss A. Differentiation and response bias in episodic memory: Evidence from reaction time distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2010, 36(2):484-499.
13. Criss A., Malmberg K. Evidence in favor of the early-phase elevated-attention hypothesis: The effects of letter frequency and object frequency. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59(3):331-345.
14. Criss A.H., Shiffrin R.M. Context-noise and item-noise jointly determine recognition memory: A comment on Dennis & Humphreys (2001). Psychological Review 2004, 111(3):800-807.
15. Crowder R. Principles of learning and memory 1976, Lawrence Erlbaum, Oxford England.
16. Dalezman J. Effects of output order on immediate, delayed, and final recall performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1976, 2(5):597-608.
17. Dennis S., Chapman A. The Inverse List Length Effect: A Challenge for Pure Exemplar Models of Recognition Memory. Journal of Memory and Language 2010, 63(3):416-424. 10.1016/j.jml.2010.06.001.
18. Dennis S., Humphreys M.S. The role of context in episodic recognition: The bind cue decide model of episodic memory. Psychological Review 2001, 108:452-478.
19. Dennis Simon., Lee Michael.D., Kinnell Angela. Bayesian analysis of recognition memory: The case of the list-length effect. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59(3):361-376.
20. Dong T. Cued partial recall of categorized words. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1972, 93(1):123-129.
21. Dorfman D., Glanzer M. List composition effects in lexical decision and recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language 1988, 27(6):633-648.
22. Estes W. Statistical theory of distributional phenomena in learning. Psychological Review 1955, 62(5):369-377.
23. Estes W. Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regression. Psychological Review 1955, 62(3):145-154.
24. Freeman E., Heathcote A., Chalmers K., Hockley W. Item-effects in recognition memory for words. Journal of Memory and Language 2010, 62(1):1-18.
25. Gillund G., Shiffrin R. A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review 1984, 91(1):1-67.
26. Gronlund S., Elam L. List-length effect: Recognition accuracy and variance of underlying distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1994, 20(6):1355-1369.
27. Howard M.W., Kahana M.J. A distributed representation of temporal context. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2002, 46(3):269-299. 10.1006/jmps.2001.1388.
28. Humphreys M., Pike R., Bain J., Tehan G. Global matching: A comparison of the SAM, Minerva II, Matrix, and TODAM models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1989, 33(1):36-67.
29. Jacoby L.L., Shimizu Y., Velanova K., Rhodes M.G. Age differences in depth of retrieval: Memory for foils. Journal of Memory and Language 2005, 52(4):493-504. 10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.007.
30. Kinnell A., Dennis S. The list length effect in recognition memory: An analysis of potential confounds. Memory and Cognition 2011, 39(2):348-363.
31. Klein K., Shiffrin R.M., Criss A.H. Putting context into context. The foundations of remembering: Essays in honor of Henry L. Roediger, III 2007, 171-190. Psychology Press. J.S. Nairne (Ed.).
32. Kucera, Francis W.N. Computational analysis of present-day American English 1967, Brown University Press, Providence.
33. Maguire A.M., Humphreys M.S., Dennis S., Lee M.D. Global similarity accounts of embedded-category designs: Tests of the Global Matching Models. Journal of Memory and Language 2010, 63(2):131-148.
34. Malmberg K.J. Recognition memory: A review of the critical findings and an integrated theory for relating them. Cognitive Psychology 2008, 57:335-384.
35. Malmberg K.J., Holden J.E., Shiffrin R.M. Modeling the effects of repetitions, similarity, and normative word frequency on judgments of frequency and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2004, 30(2):319-331.
36. Malmberg K., Murnane K. List composition and the word-frequency effect for recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2002, 28(4):616-630.
37. Malmberg K.J., Shiffrin R.M. The " one-shot" hypothesis for context storage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31(2):322-336. 10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.322.
38. Malmberg K., Steyvers M., Stephens J., Shiffrin R. Feature frequency effects in recognition memory. Memory and Cognition 2002, 30(4):607-613.
39. Mandler G. Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review 1980, 87:252-271.
40. McClelland J.L., Chappell M. Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychological Review 1998, 105(4):734-760.
41. McGeoch J.A. Studies in Retroactive Inhibition: I. The Temporal Course of the Inhibitory Effects of Interpolated Learning. Journal of General Psychology 1933, 9:24-42.
42. Melton A.W., von Lackum W.J. Retroactive and proactive inhibition in retention: Evidence for a two-factor theory of retroactive inhibition. American Journal of Psychology 1941, 54:157-173.
43. Mensink G., Raaijmakers J. A model for interference and forgetting. Psychological Review 1988, 95(4):434-455.
44. Murdock B. Human memory: Theory and data 1974, Lawrence Erlbaum, Oxford England.
45. Murdock B. A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review 1982, 89(6):609-626.
46. Murdock Bennet B., Anderson Rita E. Encoding, storage and retrieval of item information. Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola symposium 1975, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J. R.L. Solso (Ed.).
47. Neely J.H., Tse C. Category length produces an inverted-U discriminability function in episodic recognition memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62(6):1141-1172. 10.1080/17470210802373035.
48. Nobel P.A., Shiffrin R.M. Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27(2):384-413. 10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.384.
49. Norman D.A., Waugh N.C. Stimulus and response interference in recognition memory experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1968, 78:SS1-S59.
50. Raaijmakers J.G.W., Shiffrin R.M. SAM: A theory of probabilistic search of associative memory. The psychology of learning and motivation 1980, Vol. 14:207-262. Academic Press, New York.
51. Raaijmakers J., Shiffrin R. Search of associative memory. Psychological Review 1981, 88(2):93-134.
52. Ratcliff R., Hockley W.E. Repeated negatives in item recognition: Nonmonotonic lag functions. Attention and performance VIII 1980, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. R.S. Nickerson (Ed.).
53. Roediger H. Inhibiting effects of recall. Memory and Cognition 1974, 2(2):261-269.
54. Roediger H.L., Karpicke J.D. Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science 2006, 17:249-255.
55. Roediger H.L., Karpicke J.D. The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2006, 1:181-210.
56. Roediger H., Schmidt S. Output interference in the recall of categorized and paired-associate lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1980, 6(1):91-105.
57. Schulman A.I. The declining course of recognition memory. Memory and Cognition 1974, 1.4:14-18.
58. Shiffrin R. Forgetting: Trace erosion or retrieval failure?. Science 1970, 168(3939):1601-1603.
59. Shiffrin R., Huber D., Marinelli K. Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 1995, 21(2):267-287.
60. Shiffrin R.M., Steyvers M. A model for recognition memory: REM - Retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1997, 4:145-166.
61. Smith A., D'Agostino P., Reid L. Output interference in long-term memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1970, 24(2):85-89.
62. Starns J., White C., Ratcliff R. A direct test of the differentiation mechanism: REM, BCDMEM, and the strength-based mirror effect in recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language 2010, 63(1):18-34.
63. Steyvers M., Malmberg K. The effect of normative context variability on recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 2003, 29(5):760-766.
64. Strong Edward K. The effect of length of series upon recognition memory. Psychological Review 1912, 19(6):447-462.
65. Tulving E., Arbuckle T. Input and output interference in short-term associative memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1966, 72(1):145-150.
66. Turner, B., Van Zandt, T., & Brown, S. (submitted for publication). A dynamic stimulus-driven model of signal detection.
67. Xu J., Malmberg K. Modeling the effects of verbal- and nonverbal-pair strength on associative recognition. Memory and Cognition. 2007, 35(3):526-544.
68. Yonelinas A.P. The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 46:441-517.
69. Zechmeister E. Orthographic distinctiveness as a variable in word recognition. The American Journal of Psychology 1972, 85(3):425-430.