Erratum to The role of stimulus type in list length effects in recognition memory (Mem Cogn, 10.3758/s13421-011-0164-2);The role of stimulus type in list length effects in recognition memory

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 311-325

  Kinnell, Angela ^a,b   Dennis, Simon ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^c OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

List length effect; Recognition

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FACE; FRACTAL ANALYSIS; HUMAN; LEARNING; LONG TERM MEMORY; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RECOGNITION; STUDENT;

ADULT; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FACE; FRACTALS; HUMANS; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SERIAL LEARNING; STUDENTS;

EID: 84864486196     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: 15325946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-012-0289-y     Document Type: Erratum

References (53)

1. Bahrick, H. P., Bahrick, P. O., & Wittlinger, R. P. (1975). Fifty years of memory for names and faces: A cross-sectional approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 54-75.
2. Bowles, N. L., & Glanzer, M. (1983). An analysis of interference in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 11, 307-315.
3. Brandt, M. (2007). Bridging the gap between measurement models and theories of human memory. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 215, 72-85.
4. Buratto, L. G., & Lamberts, K. (2008). List strength effect without list length effect in recognition memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 218-226.
5. Cary, M., & Reder, L. M. (2003). A dual-process account of the list-length and strength-based mirror effects in recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 231-248.
6. Chalmers, K. (2005). Basis of recency and frequency judgements of novel faces: Generalised strength or episode-specific memories? Memory, 13, 484-498.
7. Clark, S. E. (1992). Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition. Memory & Cognition, 20, 231-243.
8. Clark, S. E., & Burchett, R. E. R. (1994). Word frequency and list composition effects in associative recognition and recall. Memory & Cognition, 22, 55-62.
9. Clark, S. E., & Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 37-60. doi: 10. 3758/BF03210740.
10. Clark, S. E., & Hori, A. (1995). List length and overlap effects in forced-choice associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 23, 456-461.
11. Clark, S. E., Hori, A., & Callan, D. E. (1993). Forced-choice associative recognition: Implications for global-memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 871-881.
12. Clark, S. E., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1992). Cuing effects and associative information in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 20, 580-598.
13. Criss, A. H., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2004a). Context noise and item noise jointly determine recognition memory: A comment on Dennis and Humphreys (2001). Psychological Review, 111, 800-807. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 111. 3. 800.
14. Criss, A. H., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2004b). Pairs do not suffer interference from other types of pairs or single items in associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 32, 1284-1297. doi: 10. 3758/BF03206319.
15. Curran, T., Schacter, D. L., Norman, K. A., & Galluccio, L. (1997). False recognition after a right frontal lobe infarction: Memory for general and specific information. Neuropsychologia, 35, 1035-1049.
16. Dennis, S. (1995). The Sydney Morning Herald word database. Available at http://psy. uq. edu. au/CogPsych/Noetica.
17. Dennis, S., & Chapman, A. (2010). The inverse list length effect: A challenge for pure exemplar models of recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 416-424.
18. Dennis, S., & Humphreys, M. S. (2001). A context noise model of episodic word recognition. Psychological Review, 108, 452-478. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 108. 2. 452.
19. Dennis, S., Lee, M. D., & Kinnell, A. (2008). Bayesian analysis of recognition memory: The case of the list-length effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 361-376.
20. Farah, M. J., Wilson, K.-D., Drain, M., & Tanaka, J. N. (1998). What is "special" about face perception? Psychological Review, 105, 482-498. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 105. 3. 482.
21. Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1990). Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition. Memory & Cognition, 18, 23-30. doi: 10. 3758/BF03202642.
22. Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
23. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 13, 8-20. doi: 10. 3758/BF03198438.
24. Greene, R. (2004). Recognition memory for pseudowords. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 259-267.
25. Gronlund, S. D., & Elam, L. E. (1994). List-length effect: Recognition accuracy and variance of underlying distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1355-1369.
26. Hintzman, D. L. (1984). MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 16, 96-101. doi: 10. 3758/BF03202365.
27. Hockley, W. E. (1991). Recognition memory for item and associative information: A comparison of forgetting rates. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock (pp. 227-248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Hockley, W. E. (1992). Item versus associative information: Further comparisons of forgetting rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1321-1330.
29. Humphreys, M. S., Bain, J. D., & Pike, R. (1989). Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: A theory of episodic, semantic, and procedural tasks. Psychological Review, 96, 208-233. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 96. 2. 208.
30. Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 110. 3. 306.
31. Jang, Y., & Huber, D. E. (2008). Context retrieval and context change in free recall: Recalling from long-term memory drives list isolation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 112-127.
32. Kinnell, A., & Dennis, S. (2011). The list length effect in recognition memory: An analysis of potential confounds. Memory & Cognition, 39, 348-363.
33. Lauwerier, H. (1991). Fractals: Images of chaos (S. Gill-Hoffstadt, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1987).
34. Maguire, A. M., Humphreys, M. S., Dennis, S., & Lee, M. D. (2010). Global similarity accounts of embedded-category designs: Tests of the global matching models. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 131-148. doi: 10. 1016/j. jml. 2010. 03. 007.
35. Martelli, M., Majaj, N. J., & Pelli, D. G. (2005). Are faces processed like words? A diagnostic test for recognition by parts. Journal of Vision, 5(1), 58-70.
36. Martínez, A., & Benavente, R. (1998). The AR Face Database (CVC Tech. Rep. #24). Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Centre de Visió per Computador.
37. Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 89, 609-626. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 89. 6. 609.
38. Murnane, K., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1991). Interference and the representation of events in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 855-874. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 17. 5. 855.
39. Nobel, P. A., & Huber, D. E. (1993, August). Modeling forced-choice associative recognition through a hybrid of global recognition and cued-recall. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Boulder, CO.
40. Nobel, P. A., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2001). Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 384-413.
41. Norman, K. A., Tepe, K., Nyhus, E., & Curran, T. (2008). Event-related potential correlates of interference effects on recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 36-43.
42. Ratcliff, R., Clark, S. E., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1990). List-strength effect: I. Data and discussion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 163-178.
43. Shepard, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 156-163. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5371(67)80067-7.
44. Shiffrin, R. M., Huber, D. E., & Marinelli, K. (1995). Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 267-287.
45. Shiffrin, R., Ratcliff, R., Murnane, K., & Nobel, P. (1993). TODAM and the list-strength and list-length effects: Comment on Murdock and Kahana (1993a). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1445-1449. doi: 10. 1037/0278-7393. 19. 6. 1445.
46. Shiffrin, R. M., & Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 145-166. doi: 10. 3758/BF03209391.
47. Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50. doi: 10. 1037/0096-3445. 117. 1. 34.
48. Strong, E. K., Jr. (1912). The effect of length of series upon recognition memory. Psychological Review, 19, 447-462.
49. Tulving, E., & Pearlstone, Z. (1966). Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5, 381-391.
50. Underwood, B. J. (1978). Recognition memory as a function of length of study list. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 12, 89-91.
51. Weeks, C. S., Humphreys, M. S., & Hockley, W. E. (2007). Buffered forgetting: When targets and distractors are both forgotten. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1267-1282.
52. Whittlesea, B. W. A., & Williams, L. D. (2000). The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 547-565.
53. Xu, J., & Malmberg, K. J. (2007). Modeling the effects of verbal and nonverbal pair strength on associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 35, 526-544. doi: 10. 3758/BF03193292.