The Co-evolution of knowledge and event memory

Psychological Review

Volumn 120, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 356-394

  Nelson, Angela B ^a   Shiffrin, Richard M ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Events; Frequency effects; Knowledge; Memory; Retrieval; Storage

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; EPISODIC MEMORY; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MEMORY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RECALL; RECOGNITION; REPETITION PRIMING; STATISTICAL MODEL; TEMPORAL LOBE; TIME;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CUES; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MEMORY; MEMORY, EPISODIC; MENTAL RECALL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REPETITION PRIMING; TEMPORAL LOBE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84881099246     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0032020     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Adelman, J. S., Brown, G. D. A., & Quesada, J. F. (2006). Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science, 17, 814-823. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01787.x.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal and Learning Behavior, 22, 261-295. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(83)90201-3.
3. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Anderson, M. C., Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1063-1087. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1063.
5. Annis, J., Malmberg, K. J., Criss, A. H., & Shiffrin, R. M. (in press). Sources of interference in recognition testing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition.
6. Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In R. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2, pp. 89-195). doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60422-3.
7. Becker, C. A. (1979). Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 252-259. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.5.2.252.
8. Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (1990). Gist is the grist: Fuzzy-trace theory and the new intuitionism. Developmental Review, 10, 3-47. doi: 10.1016/0273-2297(90)90003-M.
9. Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2002). Fuzzy-trace theory and false memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 164-169. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00192.
10. Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V. F. (2007). Explaining developmental reversals in false memory. Psychological Science, 18, 442-448. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01919.x.
11. Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Mojardin, A. H. (1999). Conjoint recognition. Psychological Review, 106, 160-179. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.160.
12. Brainerd, C. J., Wright, R., Reyna, V. F., & Payne, D. G. (2002). Dualretrieval processes in free and associative recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 120-152. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2796.
13. Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1971). The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 331-350. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(71)90019-3
14. Broadbent, D. E. (1967). Word frequency effect and response bias. Psychological Review, 74, 1-15. doi:10.1037/h0024206.
15. Cox, G. E., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2011). Criterion setting and the dynamics of recognition memory. In L. Carlson, C. Hölscher, & T. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 114-119). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
16. Cox, G. E., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2012). Criterion setting and the dynamics of recognition memory. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 135-150. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01177.x.
17. Criss, A. H., Malmberg, K. J., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2011). Output interference in recognition memory testing. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 316-326. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.02.003.
18. Criss, A. H., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2004a). Context noise and item noise jointly determine recognition memory: A comment on Dennis and Humphreys (2001). Psychological Review, 111, 800-807. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.800.
19. Criss, A. H., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2004b). Interactions between study task, study time, and the low-frequency hit rate advantage in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 778-786. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.778.
20. Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17-22. doi:10.1037/h0046671.
21. Dennis, S., & Humphreys, M. S. (2001). The role of context in episodic recognition: The bind cue decide model of episodic memory. Psychological Review, 108, 452-478. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.2.452.
22. Estes, W. K. (1955). Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regression. Psychological Review, 62, 145-154. doi:10.1037/h0048509.
23. Estes, W. K., & Maddox, W. T. (2002). On the processes underlying stimulus-familiarity effects in recognition of words and nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1003-1018. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.6.1003.
24. Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.91.1.1.
25. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 13, 8-20. doi:10.3758/BF03198438.
26. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 5-16. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.16.1.5.
27. Glanzer, M., Adams, J. K., Iverson, G. J., & Kim, K. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 100, 546-567. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.546.
28. Godden, D. R., & Baddeley, A. D. (1975). Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: On land and under water. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 325-331. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01468.x.
29. Gregg, V. H. (1976). Word frequency, recognition and recall. In J. Brown (Ed.), Recall and recognition (pp. 183-216). London, England: Wiley.
30. Hemmer, P., & Steyvers, M. (2009a). A Bayesian account of reconstructive memory. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 189-202. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01010.x.
31. Hemmer, P., & Steyvers, M. (2009b). Integrating episodic memories and prior knowledge at multiple levels of abstraction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 80-87. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.1.80.
32. Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2002). A distributed representation of temporal context. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46, 269-299. doi:10.1006/jmps.2001.1388.
33. Huber, D. E., Shiffrin, R. M., Lyle, K. B., & Ruys, K. I. (2001). Perception and preference in short-term word priming. Psychological Review, 108, 149-182. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.149.
34. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(91)90025-F.
35. Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.110.3.306.
36. Jacoby, L. L., & Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 126-135. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.118.2.126.
37. James, K. H., & Atwood, T. P. (2009). The role of sensorimotor learning in the perception of letter-like forms: Tracking the causes of neural specialization for letters. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26, 91-110. doi: 10.1080/02643290802425914.
38. Jones, M. N., Kintsch, W., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2006). High-dimensional semantic space accounts of priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 534-552. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.07.003.
39. Kinsbourne, M., & George, J. (1974). The mechanism of the wordfrequency effect on recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 63-69. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80031-9.
40. Klein, K. A., Shiffrin, R. M., & Criss, A. H. (2007). Putting context in context. In J. S. Nairne (Ed.), The foundations of remembering: Essays in Honor of Henry L. Roediger III (pp. 171-190). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
41. Laird, J. E. (2012). The Soar cognitive architecture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Lieberman, H., & Pentland, A. (1982). Microcomputer-based estimation of psychophysical thresholds: The Best PEST. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 14, 21-25. doi:10.3758/BF03202110.
43. Lloyd, M. E., Newcombe, N. S., & Doydum, A. (2009). Memory binding in early childhood: Evidence for a retrieval deficit. Child Development, 80, 1321-1328. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01353.x.
44. Maddox, W. T., & Estes, W. K. (1997). Direct and indirect stimulusfrequency effects in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 539-559. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.3.539.
45. Malmberg, K. J., Criss, A. H., Gangwani, T. H., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2012). Overcoming the negative consequences of interference that results from recognition memory testing. Psychological Science, 23, 115-119. doi: 10.1177/0956797611430692.
46. Malmberg, K. J., Holden, J. E., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2004). Modeling the effects of repetitions, similarity, and normative word frequency on old-new recognition and judgments of frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 319-331. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.319.
47. Malmberg, K. J., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2005). The "one-shot" hypothesis for context storage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 322-336. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.322.
48. Malmberg, K. J., Steyvers, M., Stephens, J. D., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2002). Feature frequency effects in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 30, 607-613. doi:10.3758/BF03194962.
49. McClelland, J. L., & Chappell, M. (1998). Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 105, 724-760. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.4.734-760.
50. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0.
51. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of the effect of context in perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375.
52. Mensink, G.-J. M., & Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (1988). A model for interference and forgetting. Psychological Review, 95, 434-455. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.434.
53. Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3-65. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.3.
54. Milner, B. (1970). Memory and the medial temporal regions of the brain. In K. H. Priobram & D. E. Broadbent (Eds.), Biology of memory (pp.29-50). New York, NY: Academic Press.
55. Mueller, S. T., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2006, June). REM-II: A model of the developmental co-evolution of episodic memory and semantic knowledge. Paper presented at the International Conference on Learning and Development (ICDL), Bloomington, IN.
56. Mueller, S. T., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2007). Incorporating connotation of meaning into models of semantic representation: An application to text corpus analysis. In D. S. McNamara & J. G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society (pp. 64-70). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
57. Murdock, B. B. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 89, 609-626. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.89.6.609.
58. Murdock, B. B., & Anderson, R. E. (1975). Encoding, storage and retrieval of item information. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 145-194). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
59. Murnane, K., & Phelps, M. P. (1993). A global activation approach to the effect of changes in environmental context on recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 882-894. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.19.4.882.
60. Murnane, K., & Phelps, M. P. (1994). When does a different environmental context make a difference in recognition? A global activation model. Memory & Cognition, 22, 584-590. doi:10.3758/BF03198397.
61. Murnane, K., & Phelps, M. P. (1995). Effects of changes in relative cue strength on context-dependent recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 158-172. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.158.
62. Murnane, K., Phelps, M. P., & Malmberg, K. (1999). Context-dependent recognition memory: The ICE theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 403-415. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.128.4.403.
63. Neely, J. H. (1989). Experimental dissociations and the episodic/semantic memory distinction. In H. L. Roediger & E. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp.229-270). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Nelson, A. B., & Steyvers, M. (2004). Memory for Chinese characters. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Irvine.
65. Pelli, D. G., Farell, B., & Moore, D. C. (2003, June 12). The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition. Nature, 423, 752-756. doi:10.1038/nature01516.
66. Quillian, M. R. (1967). Word concepts: A theory and simulation of some basic semantic capabilities. Behavioral Science, 12, 410-430. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830120511.
67. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Jacob, E. (2013). Rethinking inhibition theory: On the problematic status of the inhibition theory for forgetting. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 98-122. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.10.002.
68. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1980). SAM: A theory of probabilistic search of associative memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 14, pp. 207-262). doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60162-0.
69. Raaijmakers, J. G. W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93-134. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.2.93.
70. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (1997). A counter model for implicit priming in perceptual word identification. Psychological Review, 104, 319-343. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.319.
71. Reder, L. M., Angstadt, P., Cary, M., Erickson, M. A., & Ayers, M. S. (2002). A reexamination of stimulus-frequency effects in recognition: Two mirrors for low- and high-frequency pseudowords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 138-152. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.1.138.
72. Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Schunn, C. D., Ayers, M. S., Angstadt, P., & Hiraki, K. (2000). A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 294-320. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.2.294.
73. Rice, G. A., & Robinson, D. O. (1975). The role of bigram frequency in the perception of words and nonwords. Memory & Cognition, 3, 513-518. doi:10.3758/BF03197523.
74. Roediger, H. L., & Challis, B. H. (1992). Effects of exact repetition and conceptual repetition on free recall and primed word fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 3-14. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.18.1.3.
75. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp. 63-131). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
76. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words notpresented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-814. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803.
77. Roediger, H. L., Weldon, M. S., & Challis, B. H. (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. In H. L. Roediger & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 3-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
78. Rogers, T. T., & McClelland, J. L. (2004). Semantic cognition: A parallel distributed processing approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
79. Rossion, B., Gauthier, I., Goffaux, V., Tarr, M. J., & Crommelinck, M. (2002). Expertise training with novel objects leads to left-lateralized facelike electrophysiological responses. Psychological Science, 13, 250-257. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00446.
80. Rovee-Collier, C. (1997). Dissociations in infant memory: Rethinking the development of implicit and explicit memory. Psychological Review, 104, 467-498. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.3.467.
81. Rubenstein, H., Garfield, L., & Millikan, J. A. (1970). Homographic entries in the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 487-494. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(70)80091-3.
82. Sanborn, A. N., Malmberg, K. J., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2004). High-level effects of masking on perceptual identification. Vision Research, 44, 1427-1436. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2004.01.004.
83. Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., & Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 1-17. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.3.1.1.
84. Schiller, D., Monfils, M., Raio, C. M., Johnson, D., LeDoux, J. E., & Phelps, E. A. (2010, January 7). Preventing the return of fear in humans using reconsolidation update mechanisms. Nature, 463, 49-53. doi: 10.1038/nature08637.
85. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1-66. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.1.1.
86. Schooler, L. J., Shiffrin, R. M., & Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (2001). A Bayesian model for implicit effects in perceptual identification. Psychological Review, 108, 257-272. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.257.
87. Shiffrin, R. M., & Lightfoot, N. (1997). Perceptual learning of alphanumeric-like characters. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 36, 45-81. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60281-9.
88. Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127.
89. Shiffrin, R. M., & Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM-Retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 145-166. doi:10.3758/BF03209391.
90. Shiffrin, R. M., & Steyvers, M. (1998). The effectiveness of retrieval from memory. In M. Oaksford & N. Chater (Eds.), Rational models of cognition (pp. 73-95). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
91. Sikström, S. (2001). The variance theory of the mirror effect in recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 408-438. doi:10.3758/BF03196178.
92. Smith, S. M., Glenberg, A., & Bjork, R. A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory. Memory & Cognition, 6, 342-353. doi:10.3758/BF03197465.
93. Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory (pp. 381-402). New York, NY: Academic Press.
94. Tulving, E. (1993). What is episodic memory? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 67-70.
95. Tulving, E., & Thompson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373. doi:10.1037/h0020071.
96. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Steyvers, M., Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Shiffrin, R. M., van Rijn, H., & Zeelenberg, R. (2004). A model for evidence accumulation in the lexical decision task. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 332-367. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2003.08.001.
97. Wagenmakers, E.-J. M., Zeelenberg, R., Huber, D., Raaijmakers, J. G. W., Shiffrin, R. M., & Schooler, L. J. (2003). REMI and ROUSE: Quantitative models for long-term and short-term priming in perceptual identification. In J. Bowers & C. J. Marsolek (Eds.), Rethinkig implicit memory (pp. 105-123). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
98. Wagenmakers, E.-J. M., Zeelenberg, R., & Raaijmakers, J. G. W. (2000). Testing the counter model for perceptual identification: Effects of repetition priming and word frequency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 662-667. doi:10.3758/BF03213004.
99. Wixted, J. T., & Mickes, L. (2010). A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments. Psychological Review, 117, 1025-1054. doi:10.1037/a0020874.
100. Zacks, J. M., & Tversky, B. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 3-21. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.3.