Tests of encoding tradeoffs between item and associative information

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 202-216

  Hockley, William E ^a   Cristi, Carolina ^a  

^a WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; RECOGNITION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0029966644     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03200881     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. ANDERSON, J. R., & BOWER, G. H. (1972). Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 79, 97-123.
2. BAIN, J. D., & HUMPHREYS, M. S. (1988). Relational context: Independent cues, meanings, or configurations? In G. M. Davies & D. M. Thompson (Eds.), Memory in context: Cotext in memory (pp. 97-137). London: Wiley.
3. BALOTA, D. A., & NEELY, J. H. (1980). Test-expectancy and word-frequency effects in recall and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 576-587.
4. BEGG, I. (1978). Imagery and organization in memory: Instructional effects. Memory & Cognition, 6, 174-183.
5. BEGG, I. (1979). Trace loss and the recognition failure of unrecalled words. Memory & Cognition, 7, 113-123.
6. BEGG, I., & AZZARELLO, M. (1988). Recognition and recall of invisible objects Memory & Cognition, 16, 327-336.
7. BEGG, I., MAXWELL, D., MITTERER, J. O., & HARRIS, G. (1986). Estimates of frequency: Attribute or attribution? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, 496-508.
8. BEGG, I., & SIKICH, D. (1984). Imagery and contextual organization. Memory & Cognition, 12, 52-59.
9. BOWER, G. H. (1970). Imagery as a relational organizer in associative learning. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 9, 529-533.
10. BOWER, G. H., & WINZENZ, D. (1970). Comparison of associative learning strategies. Psychonomic Science, 20, 119-120.
11. BURNS, D. J. (1993). Item gains and losses during hypermnesic recall: Implications for the item-specific-relational information distinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 163-173.
12. CLARK, S. E. (1992). Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition. Memory & Cognition, 20, 231-243.
13. CLARK, S. E., & BURCHETT, R. E. R. (1994). Word frequency and list composition effects in associative recognition and recall. Memory & Cognition, 22, 55-62.
14. CLARK, S. E., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1992). Cuing effects and associative information in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 20, 580-598.
15. CONNOR, J. M. (1977). Effects of organization and expectancy on recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 5, 315-318.
16. DEMPSTER, R. N., & ROHWER, W. D. (1974). Component analysis of the elaborative encoding effect in paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 400-408.
17. DOSHER, B. A. (1988). Retrieval dynamics of item and associative information. Unpublished manuscript.
18. DOSHER, B. A. (1991). Bias and discrimination in cuing of memory: A weighted decisions model. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock (pp. 249-278). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. EINSTEIN, G. O., & HUNT, R. R. (1980). Levels of processing and organizatio: Additive effects of individual item and relational processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 588-598.
20. FRIENDLY, M., FRANKLIN, P. E., HOFFMAN, E., & RUBIN, D. C. (1982). The Toronto Word Pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 14, 375-399.
21. GILLUND, G., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1984) A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
22. GLANZER, M., & ADAMS, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 13, 8-20.
23. GLANZER, M., & ADAMS, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 5-16.
24. GLANZER, M., ADAMS, J. K., IVERSON, G. I., & KIM, K. (1993). The regularities of recognition memory. Psychological Review, 100, 546-567.
25. GLENBERG, A., SMITH, S M., & GREEN, C. (1977). Type I rehearsal: Maintenance and more. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 16, 339-352.
26. GRONLUND, S. D., & RATCLIFF, R. (1989). Time course of item and associative information: Implications for global memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 846-858.
27. HINTZMAN, D. L. (1994). On explaining the mirror effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 201-205.
28. HIRSHMAN, E., & BJORK, R. A (1988) The generation effect: Support for a two-factor theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 484-494.
29. HOCKLEY, W. E. (1991). Recognition memory for item and associative information: A comparison of forgetting rates. In W E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B Murdock (pp. 227-248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. HOCKLEY, W. E. (1992). Item versus associative information: Further comparisons of forgetting rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 1321-1330.
31. HOCKLEY, W. E. (1994). Reflections of the mirror effect for item and associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 22, 713-722
32. HUMPHREYS, M. S. (1976). Relational information and the context effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 4, 221-232.
33. HUMPHREYS, M S. (1978). Item and relational information: A case for context independent retrieval. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 17, 175-187.
34. HUNT, R. R., & EINSTEIN, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 20, 497-514.
35. HUNT, R. R., & SETA, C. E. (1984). Category size effects in recall. The roles of relational and individual item information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 454-464.
36. KLEIN, S B., LOFTUS, J , KIHLSTRON, J. F., & ASERON, R. (1989). Effects of item-specific and relational information on hyperamnesic recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 1192-1197.
37. KUČERA, F., & FRANCIS, W. (1967). Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
38. LEWANDOWSKY, S., & LI, S.-C. (1993). Intralist distractors and recall direction: Constraints on models of memory for serial order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 895-908.
39. LEWANDOWSKY, S., & LI, S.-C. (1994). Memory for serial order revisited. Psychological Review, 101, 539-543.
40. LEWANDOWSKY, S., & MURDOCK, B. B., JR. (1989). Memory for serial order information. Psychological Review, 96, 25-57.
41. MARSCHARK, M., & HUNT, R. R. (1989). A reexamination of the role of imagery in learning and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 710-720.
42. MAY, R. B., & SANDE, G. N. (1982). Encoding expectancies and word frequency in recall and recognition. American Journal of Psychology, 95, 485-495.
43. MCGEE, R. (1980). Imagery and recognition memory: The effects of relational organization. Memory & Cognition, 8, 394-399.
44. MURDOCK, B. B., JR. (1974). Human memory: Theory and data. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
45. MURDOCK, B. B., JR. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 89, 609-626.
46. MURDOCK, B. B., JR. (1983). A distributed memory model for serialorder information. Psychological Review, 90, 316-338.
47. MURDOCK, B. B. (1987). Serial-order effects in a distributed-memory model. In D. S. Gorfein & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Memory and learning: The Ebbinghaus centennial conference (pp. 277-310). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
48. MURDOCK, B. B. (1989). Learning in a distributed memory model. In C. Izawa (Ed.), Current issues in cognitive processes: The Floweree Symposium on Cognition (pp. 69-106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. MURDOCK, B. B. (1992). Item and associative information in a distributed memory model. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 36, 68-99.
50. MURDOCK, B. B. (1993). TODAM2: A model for the storage and retrieval of item, associative, and serial-order information. Psychological Review, 100, 183-203.
51. MURDOCK, B. B. (1995, January). Item and associative information in a distributed-memory model. Paper presented at the Twentieth Annual Interdisciplinary Conference, Jackson Hole, Wyoming.
52. MURDOCK, B. B., & HOCKLEY, W. E. (1989). Short-term memory for associations. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 24, pp. 71-108). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
53. NEELY, J. H., & BALOTA, D. A. (1981). Test-expectancy and semanticorganization effects in recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 9, 283-300.
54. PAIVIO, A., YUILLE, J. C., & MADIGAN, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 76 (1, Pt. 2), 1-25
55. RAAIJMAKERS, J. G. W., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93-134.
56. REDER, L. M., ANDERSON, J. R., & BJORK, R. A. (1974). A semantic interpretation of encoding specificity. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 648-656.
57. WEBER, E. U. (1988). Expectation and variance of item resemblance distributions in a convolution-correlation model of distributed memory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 32, 1-43.
58. YONELINAS, A., HOCKLEY, W. E., & MURDOCK, B. B. (1992). Tests of the list-strength effect in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 345-355.