Continuous Recollection Versus Unitized Familiarity in Associative Recognition

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 843-863

  Mickes, Laura ^a   Johnson, Emily M ^a   Wixted, John T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Associative recognition; Familiarity; Recollection; Signal detection theory

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RECALL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RECOGNITION; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; LINEAR MODELS; MENTAL RECALL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES; VOCABULARY;

EID: 77954166631     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0019755     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Atkinson R.C., Joula J.F. Factors influencing speed and accuracy of word recognition. Attention and performance IV 1973, 583-612. Academic Press, New York, NY. S. Kornblum (Ed.).
2. Bodner G.E., Lindsay D.S. Remembering and knowing in context. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 48:563-580.
3. Buchler N.G., Light L.L., Reder L.M. Memory for items and associations: Distinct representations and processes in associative recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:183-199.
4. Clark S.E. Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition. Memory & Cognition 1992, 20:231-243.
5. Clark S.E., Hori A. List length and overlap effects in forced-choice associative recognition. Memory & Cognition 1995, 23:456-461.
6. Cohn M., Moscovitch M. Dissociating measures of associative memory: Evidence and theoretical implications. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 57:437-454.
7. DeCarlo L.T. Signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions: Theoretical developments with applications to recognition memory. Psychological Review 2002, 109:710-721.
8. DeCarlo L.T. An application of signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions to source discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:767-778.
9. Donaldson W. The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing. Memory & Cognition 1996, 24:523-533.
10. Dunn J.C. Remember-know: A matter of confidence. Psychological Review 2004, 111:524-542.
11. Dunn J.C. The dimensionality of the remember-know task: A state-trace analysis. Psychological Review 2008, 115:426-446.
12. Egan J.P. Recognition memory and the operating characteristic (Tech. Note AFCRC-TN-58-51) 1958, Indiana University, Hearing and Communication Laboratory, Bloomington.
13. Eichenbaum H., Yonelinas A.P., Ranganath C. The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2007, 30:123-152.
14. Eldridge L.L., Sarfatti S., Knowlton B.J. The effect of testing procedure on remember-know judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002, 9:139-145.
15. Gallo D.A., Sullivan A.L., Daffner K.R., Schacter D.L., Budson A.E. Associative recognition in Alzheimer's disease: Evidence for impaired recall-to-reject. Neuropsychology 2004, 18:556-563.
16. Gardiner J., Ramponi C., Richardson-Klavehn A. Experiences of remembering, knowing, and guessing. Consciousness and Cognition 1998, 7:1-26.
17. Giovanello K.S., Verfaellie M., Keane M.M. Disproportionate deficit in associative recognition relative to item recognition in global amnesia. Cognitive Affective Behavioral Neuroscience 2003, 3:186-194.
18. Glanzer M., Kim K., Hilford A., Adams J.K. Slope of the receiver-operating characteristic in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1999, 25:500-513.
19. Green D.M., Swets J.A. Signal detection theory and psychophysics 1966, Wiley, New York, NY.
20. Greene R.L. Mirror effect in order and associative information: Role of response strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1996, 22:687-695.
21. Habib R., Nyberg L. Neural correlates of availability and accessibility in memory. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18:1720-1726.
22. Haskins A.L., Yonelinas A.P., Quamme J.R., Ranganath C. Perirhinal cortex supports encoding and familiarity-based recognition of novel associations. Neuron 2008, 59:554-560.
23. Healy M.R., Light L.L., Chung C. Dual-process models of associative recognition in young and older adults: Evidence from receiver operating characteristics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:768-788.
24. Heathcote A. Item recognition memory and the receiver operating characteristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:1210-1230.
25. Hockley W.E. Item versus associative information: Further comparisons of forgetting rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1992, 18:1321-1330.
26. Hockley W.E. Reflections of the mirror effect for item and associative recognition. Memory & Cognition 1994, 22:713-722.
27. Hockley W.E., Consoli A. Familiarity and recollection in item and associative recognition. Memory & Cognition 1999, 27:657-664.
28. Hockley W.E., Cristi C. Tests of encoding tradeoffs between item and associative information. Memory & Cognition 1996, 24:202-216.
29. Jacoby L.L. A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language 1991, 30:513-541.
30. Jones T.C., Jacoby L.L. Feature and conjunction errors in recognition memory: Evidence for dual-process theory. Journal of Memory and Language 2001, 45:82-102.
31. Kelley R., Wixted J.T. On the nature of associative information in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:701-722.
32. Macmillan N.A., Creelman C.D. Detection theory: A user's guide 2005, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. 2nd ed.
33. Malmberg K.J., Shiffrin R.M. The " one-shot" hypothesis for context storage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:322-336.
34. Malmberg K.J., Xu J. On the flexibility and on the fallibility of associative memory. Memory & Cognition 2007, 35:545-556.
35. Mandler G. Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review 1980, 87:252-271.
36. Mickes L., Wais P.E., Wixted J.T. Recollection is a continuous process: Implications for dual-process theories of recognition memory. Psychological Science 2009, 20:509-515.
37. Nobel P.A., Shiffrin R.M. Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:384-413.
38. Parks C.M., Yonelinas A.P. Moving beyond pure signal-detection models: Comment on Wixted (2007). Psychological Review 2007, 114:188-201.
39. Qin J., Raye C.L., Johnson M.K., Mitchell K.J. Source ROCs are (typically) curvilinear: Comment on Yonelinas (1999). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2001, 27:1110-1115.
40. Quamme J.R., Yonelinas A.P., Norman K.A. Effect of unitization on associative recognition in amnesia. Hippocampus 2007, 17:192-200.
41. Rajaram S. Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. Memory & Cognition 1993, 21:89-102.
42. Ratcliff R., Sheu C., Gronlund S.D. Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review 1992, 99:518-535.
43. Rotello C.M., Heit E. Associative recognition: A case of recall-to-reject processing. Memory & Cognition 2000, 28:907-922.
44. Sauvage M.M., Fortin N.J., Owens C.B., Yonelinas A.P., Eichenbaum H. Recognition memory: Opposite effects of hippocampal damage on recollection and familiarity. Nature Neuroscience 2008, 11:16-18.
45. Slotnick S.D., Dodson C.S. Support for a continuous (single process) model of recognition memory and source memory. Memory & Cognition 2005, 33:151-170.
46. Speer N.K., Curran T. ERP correlates of familiarity and recollection processes in visual associative recognition. Brain Research 2007, 1174:97-109.
47. Squire L.R., Wixted J.T., Clark R.E. Recognition memory and the medial temporal lobe: A new perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2007, 8:872-883.
48. Stark C.E., Bayley P.J., Squire L.R. Recognition memory for single items and for associations is similarly impaired following damage to the hippocampal region. Learning & Memory 2002, 9:238-242.
49. Starns J.J., Ratcliff R. Two dimensions are not better than one: STREAK and the univariate signal detection model of remember/know performance. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:169-182.
50. Turriziani P., Fadda L., Caltagirone C., Carlesimo G.A. Recognition memory for single items and for associations in amnesic patients. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:426-433.
51. Van Overschelde J.P., Rawson K.A., Dunlosky J. Category norms: An updated and expanded version of the Battig and Montague (1969) norms. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 50:289-335.
52. Verde M.F. The retrieval practice effect in associative recognition. Memory & Cognition 2004, 32:1265-1272.
53. Verde M.F., Rotello C.M. Strong memories obscure weak memories in associative recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11:1062-1066.
54. Wais P.E., Mickes L., Wixted J.T. Remember/know judgments probe degrees of recollection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20:400-405.
55. Wixted J.T. Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review 2007, 114:152-176.
56. Wixted J.T., Squire L.R. Constructing receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) with experimental animals: Cautionary notes. Learning & Memory 2008, 15:687-690.
57. Wixted J.T., Stretch V. In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11:616-641.
58. Xu J., Malmberg K.J. Modeling the effects of verbal and nonverbal pair strength on associative recognition. Memory & Cognition 2007, 35:526-544.
59. Yonelinas A.P. Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:1341-1354.
60. Yonelinas A.P. Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition 1997, 25:747-763.
61. Yonelinas A.P. The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source memory: A formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1999, 25:1415-1434.
62. Yonelinas A.P. The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 46:441-517.
63. Yonelinas A.P., Jacoby L.L. The relation between remembering and knowing as bases for recognition: Effects of size congruency. Journal of Memory and Language 1995, 34:622-643.