Global similarity accounts of embedded-category designs: Tests of the Global Matching models

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 131-148

  Maguire, Angela M ^a   Humphreys, Michael S ^a   Dennis, Simon ^b   Lee, Michael D ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian analysis; Category length; False memory; Global Matching; Hypothesis testing

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954214839     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.03.007     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Anderson J.A., Bower G.H. Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall. Psychological Review 1972, 79:97-123.
2. Arndt J., Hirshman E. True and false recognition in MINERVA2: Explanations from a global matching perspective. Journal of Memory and Language 1998, 39:371-391.
3. Battig W.F., Montague W.E. Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph 1969, 80:1-46.
4. Benjamin A.S. Recognition memory and introspective remember/know judgments: Evidence for the influence of distractor plausibility on " remembering" and a caution about purportedly nonparametric measures. Memory & Cognition 2005, 33:261-269.
5. Benjamin A.S., Bawa S. Distractor plausibility and criterion placement in recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 51:159-172.
6. Bower G.H., Clark M.C., Lesgold A.M., Winzenz D. Hierarchical recall schemes in recall of categorized word lists. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1969, 8:501-506.
7. Brainerd C.J., Reyna V.F., Mojardin A.H. Conjoint recognition. Psychological Review 1999, 106:160-179.
8. Cary M., Reder L.M. A dual-process account of the list-length and strength-based mirror effects in recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 49:231-248.
9. Casey P.J., Heath R.A. Category norms for Australians. Australian Journal of Psychology 1988, 40:323-329.
10. Clark S.E., Gronlund S.D. Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1996, 3:37-60.
11. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 1992, 112:155-159.
12. Criss A. The consequences of differentiation in episodic memory: Similarity and the strength based mirror effect. Journal of Memory and Language 2006, 55:461-478.
13. Criss A.H., Shiffrin R.M. Context noise and item noise jointly determine recognition memory: A comment on Dennis & Humphreys (2001). Psychological Review 2004, 111:800-807.
14. D'Agostino P.R. The blocked-random effect in recall and recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1969, 8:815-820.
15. Deese J. On the prediction of the occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1959, 58:17-22.
16. Dennis S., Humphreys M.S. A context noise model of episodic recognition memory. Psychological Review 2001, 108:452-478.
17. Dennis S., Lee M.D., Kinnell A. Bayesian analysis of recognition memory: The case of the list-length effect. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:361-376.
18. Dewhurst S.A. Category repetition and false recognition: Effects of instance frequency and category size. Journal of Memory and Language 2001, 44:153-167.
19. Dobbins I.G., Kroll N.E.A., Liu Q. Confidence-accuracy inversions in scene recognition: A remember-know analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1998, 24:1306-1315.
20. Eich J.M. A composite holographic associative recall model. Psychological Review 1982, 89:627-661.
21. Eich J.M. Levels of processing, encoding specificity, elaboration, and CHARM. Psychological Review 1985, 92:1-38.
22. Gallo D.A., Roediger H.L., McDermott K.B. Associative false recognition occurs without strategic criterion shifts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2001, 8:579-586.
23. Gillund G., Shiffrin R.M. A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review 1984, 91:1-67.
24. Heathcote A., Raymond F., Dunn J. Recollection and familiarity in recognition memory: Evidence from ROC curves. Journal of Memory and Language 2006, 55:495-514.
25. Higham P.A., Brooks L.R. Learning the experimenter's design: Tacit sensitivity to the structure of memory lists. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 1997, 50:199-215.
26. Hintzman D.L. Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review 1988, 95:528-551.
27. Humphreys M.S., Bain J.D. Recognition memory: A cue and information analysis. Memory & Cognition 1983, 11:583-600.
28. Humphreys M.S., Pike R., Bain J.D., Tehan G. Global matching: A comparison of the SAM, MINERVA II, Matrix, and TODAM models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1989, 33:36-67.
29. Maguire, A. M. (2005). False alarms in episodic recognition: An examination of base-rate, similarity-based, and comprehensive theories. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Brisbane, Australia: University of Queensland.
30. Mandler G. Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review 1980, 87:252-271.
31. Mather M., Henkel L.A., Johnson M.K. Evaluating characteristics of false memories: Remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared. Memory & Cognition 1997, 25:826-837.
32. McClelland J.L., Chappell M. Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychological Review 1998, 105:734-760.
33. Metcalfe J. Composite holographic associative recall model (CHARM) and blended memories in eyewitness testimony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1990, 119:145-160.
34. Miller M.B., Wolford G.L. Theoretical commentary: The role of criterion shift in false memory. Psychological Review 1999, 106:398-405.
35. Mulligan N.W., Stone M. Attention and conceptual priming: Limits on the effects of divided attention in the category-exemplar production task. Journal of Memory and Language 1999, 41:253-280.
36. Murdock B.B. A theory for the storage and retrieval of word and associative information. Psychological Review 1982, 89:609-626.
37. Murnane K., Shiffrin R.M. Interference and the representation of events in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1991, 17:855-874.
38. Murnane K., Phelps M.P. A global activation approach to the effect of changes in environmental context on recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1993, 19:882-894.
39. Murnane K., Phelps M.P. When does a different environmental context make a difference in recognition? A global activation model. Memory & Cognition 1994, 22:584-590.
40. Murnane K., Phelps M.P. Effects of changes in relative cue strength on context-dependent recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1995, 21:158-172.
41. Neely J.H., Balota D.A. Test expectancy and semantic organization effects in recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition 1981, 9:283-306.
42. Neely J.H., Tse C.S. Category length produces an inverted - U discriminability function in recognition memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62:1141-1172.
43. Norman K.A., Schacter D.L. False recognition in younger and older adults: Exploring the characteristics of illusory memories. Memory & Cognition 1997, 25:838-848.
44. Pike R. A comparison of convolution and matrix distributed memory systems. Psychological Review 1984, 91:281-294.
45. Ratcliff R., Clark S.E., Shiffrin R.M. The list-strength effect: I. Data and discussion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1990, 16:163-178.
46. Ratcliff R., Sheu C.-F., Gronlund S.D. Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review 1992, 99:518-535.
47. Reder L.M., Nesbit G.W. Locus of the Moses Illusion: Imperfect encoding, retrieval, or match?. Journal of Memory and Language 1991, 30:385-406.
48. Roediger H.L., McDermott K.B. Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1995, 21:803-814.
49. Shiffrin R., Huber D., Marinelli K. Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1995, 21:267-287.
50. Shiffrin R.M., Ratcliff R., Clark S.E. The list-strength effect: II. Theoretical mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1990, 16:179-195.
51. Shiffrin R.M., Steyvers M. A model for recognition memory: REM - Retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1997, 4:145-166.
52. Tulving E. Similarity relations in recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1981, 20:479-496.
53. Tussing A.A., Greene R.L. Differential effects of repetition on true and false recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 1999, 40:520-533.
54. Underwood B.J. False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1965, 70:122-129.
55. Wagenmakers E.-J. A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p-values. Accepted pending minor revisions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 1:1-10.
56. Westerberg C.E., Marsolek C.J. Sensitivity reductions in false recognition: A measure of false memories with stronger theoretical implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:747-759.
57. Wixted J.T. Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychological Review 2007, 114:152-176.
58. Wixted J.T., Stretch V. The case against a criterion-shift account of false memory. Psychological Review 2000, 107:368-376.
59. Yoon, C., Feinberg, F., Hu, P., Gutchess, A. H., Hedden, T., Chen, H., et al. (2003). Category norms as a function of culture and age: Comparisons of item responses to 105 categories by American and Chinese adults. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan. Retrieved 01.09.04. http://agingmind.beckman.uiuc.edu/Cat_Norms/index.html.