Bioinformatics approaches for the functional interpretation of protein lists: From ontology term enrichment to network analysis

Proteomics

Volumn 15, Issue 5-6, 2015, Pages 981-996

  Laukens, Kris ^a,b   Naulaerts, Stefan ^a,b   Berghe, Wim Vanden ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b ANTWERP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Data interpretation; Functional bioinformatics; Overrepresentation analysis; Pathways; Protein networks

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; PROTEOME; TRANSCRIPTOME;

BIOINFORMATICS; FUNCTIONAL PROTEOMICS; METABOLISM; ONTOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; BIOLOGICAL ONTOLOGY; BIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN DATABASE;

BIOLOGICAL ONTOLOGIES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; PROTEINS;

EID: 84924746762     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201400296     Document Type: Review

References (181)

1. Curtis, R. K., Orešič, M., Vidal-Puig, A., Pathways to the analysis of microarray data. Trends Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 429-435.
2. Werner, T., Bioinformatics applications for pathway analysis of microarray data. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2008, 19, 50-54.
3. Faro, A., Giordano, D., Spampinato, C., Combining literature text mining with microarray data: advances for system biology modeling. Brief. Bioinform. 2011, bbr018.
4. Boguski, M. S., McIntosh, M. W., Biomedical informatics for proteomics. Nature 2003, 422, 233-237.
5. Palagi, P. M., Hernandez, P., Walther, D., Appel, R. D., Proteome informatics I: bioinformatics tools for processing experimental data. Proteomics 2006, 6, 5435-44.
6. Kumar, C., Mann, M., Bioinformatics analysis of mass spectrometry-based proteomics data sets. Febs Lett. 2009, 583, 1703-1712.
7. Malik, R., Dulla, K., Nigg, E. A., Körner, R., From proteome lists to biological impact- tools and strategies for the analysis of large MS data sets. Proteomics 2010, 10, 1270-1283.
8. Matthiesen, R., Azevedo, L., Amorim, A., Carvalho, A.S., Discussion on common data analysis strategies used in MS-based proteomics. Proteomics 2011, 11, 604-619.
9. Goh, W. W. B., Wong, L., Computational proteomics: designing a comprehensive analytical strategy. Drug Discov. Today 2014, 19, 266-274.
10. Lisacek, F., Cohen-Boulakia, S., Appel, R. D., Proteome informatics II: Bioinformatics for comparative proteomics. Proteomics 2006, 6, 5445-5466.
11. Drăghici, S., Khatri, P., Martins, R. P., Ostermeier, G. C., Krawetz, S. A., Global functional profiling of gene expression. Genomics 2003, 81, 98-104.
12. Khatri, P., Drăghici, S., Ontological analysis of gene expression data: current tools, limitations, and open problems. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 3587-3595.
13. Gamberoni, G., Lamma, E., Lodo, G., Marchesini, J. et al., Fun&Co: identification of key functional differences in transcriptomes. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2725-2732.
14. Goeman, J. J., Bühlmann, P., Analyzing gene expression data in terms of gene sets: methodological issues. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 980-987.
15. Frijters, R., Heupers, B., Beek, P. van, Bouwhuis, M. et al., CoPub: a literature-based keyword enrichment tool for microarray data analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, W406-W410.
16. Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T., Lempicki, R. A., Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, 1-13.
17. Geistlinger, L., Csaba, G., Küffner, R., Mulder, N., Zimmer, R., From sets to graphs: towards a realistic enrichment analysis of transcriptomic systems. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, i366-i373.
18. Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G. et al., Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature 2011, 473, 337-342.
19. Zubarev, R. A., The challenge of the proteome dynamic range and its implications for in-depth proteomics. Proteomics 2013, 13, 723-726.
20. Louie, B., Higdon, R., Kolker, E., The necessity of adjusting tests of protein category enrichment in discovery proteomics. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 3007-3011.
21. Kim, M. S., Pinto, S. M., Getnet, D., Nirujogi, R. S. et al., A draft map of the human proteome. Nature 2014, 509, 575-581.
22. Wilhelm, M., Schlegl, J., Hahne, H., Gholami, A. M. et al., Mass-spectrometry-based draft of the human proteome. Nature 2014, 509, 582-587.
23. Kelchtermans, P., Bittremieux, W., De Grave, K., Degroeve, S. et al., Machine learning applications in proteomics research: How the past can boost the future. Proteomics 2014, 14, 353-366.
24. Mathesius, U., Imin, N., Chen, H., Djordjevic, M. A. et al., Evaluation of proteome reference maps for cross-species identification of proteins by peptide mass fingerprinting. Proteomics 2002, 2, 1288-1303.
25. Laukens, K., Deckers, P., Esmans, E., Van Onckelen, H., Witters, E., Construction of a two-dimensional gel electrophoresis protein database for the Nicotiana tabacum cv. Bright Yellow-2 cell suspension culture. Proteomics 2004, 4, 720-727.
26. Cottrell, J. S., Protein identification using MS/MS data. J. Proteomics 2011, 74, 1842-1851.
27. Lievens, S., Eyckerman, S., Lemmens, I., Tavernier, J., Large-scale protein interactome mapping: strategies and opportunities. Expert Rev. Proteomics 2010, 7, 679-690.
28. Van Leene, J., Hollunder, J., Eeckhout, D., Persiau, G. et al., Targeted interactomics reveals a complex core cell cycle machinery in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2010, 6, 397.
29. Corominas, R., Yang, X., Lin, G. N., Kang, S. et al., Protein interaction network of alternatively spliced isoforms from brain links genetic risk factors for autism. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3650.
30. Fadden, P., Huang, K. H., Veal, J. M., Steed, P. M. et al., Application of chemoproteomics to drug discovery: identification of a clinical candidate targeting Hsp90. Chem. Biol. 2010, 17, 686-694.
31. Roux, P. P., Thibault, P., The coming of age of phosphoproteomics-from large data sets to inference of protein functions. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2013, 12, 3453-3464.
32. Van den Berg, B. H. J., Tholey, A., Mass spectrometry-based proteomics strategies for protease cleavage site identification. Proteomics 2012, 12, 516-529.
33. Bantscheff, M., Lemeer, S., Savitski, M. M., Kuster, B., Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: critical review update from 2007 to the present. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2012, 404, 939-965.
34. Neilson, K. A., Ali, N. A., Muralidharan, S., Mirzaei, M. et al., Less label, more free: approaches in label-free quantitative mass spectrometry. Proteomics 2011, 11, 535-553.
35. Oberg, A. L., Mahoney, D. W., Statistical methods for quantitative mass spectrometry proteomic experiments with labeling. BMC Bioinformatics 2012, 13, S7.
36. Liu, W., Li, C., Xu, Y., Yang, H. et al., Topologically inferring risk-active pathways toward precise cancer classification by directed random walk. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 2169-2177.
37. Matzke, M. M., Brown, J. N., Gritsenko, M. A., Metz, T. O. et al., A comparative analysis of computational approaches to relative protein quantification using peptide peak intensities in label-free LC-MS proteomics experiments. Proteomics 2013, 13, 493-503.
38. Carpentier, S. C., Panis, B., Swennen, R., Lammertyn, J., Finding the significant markers: statistical analysis of proteomic data. Methods Mol. Biol. Clifton Nj 2008, 428, 327-347.
39. Jung, K., Statistics in experimental design, preprocessing, and analysis of proteomics data. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 696, 259-272.
40. Naulaerts, S., Meysman, P., Bittremieux, W., Vu, T. N. et al., A primer to frequent itemset mining for bioinformatics. Brief. Bioinform. 2013. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbt074.
41. The UniProt consortium, reorganizing the protein space at the universal protein resource (UniProt). Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 40, D71-D75.
42. Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D. et al., Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25, 25-29.
43. Jelier, R., Goeman, J. J., Hettne, K. M., Schuemie, M. J. et al., Literature-aided interpretation of gene expression data with the weighted global test. Brief. Bioinform. 2011, 12, 518-529.
44. Schnoes, A. M., Ream, D. C., Thorman, A. W., Babbitt, P. C., Friedberg, I., Biases in the experimental annotations of protein function and their effect on our understanding of protein function space. Plos Comput. Biol. 2013, 9, e1003063.
45. Maciejewski, H., Gene set analysis methods: statistical models and methodological differences. Brief. Bioinform. 2014, 15, 504-518.
46. Berriz, G. F., King, O. D., Bryant, B., Sander, C., Roth, F. P., Characterizing gene sets with FuncAssociate. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 2502-2504.
47. Khatri, P., Draghici, S., Ostermeier, G. C., Krawetz, S. A., Profiling gene expression using onto-express. Genomics 2002, 79, 266-270.
48. Zeeberg, B. R., Feng, W., Wang, G., Wang, M. D. et al., GoMiner: a resource for biological interpretation of genomic and proteomic data. Genome Biol. 2003, 4, R28.
49. Maere, S., Heymans, K., Kuiper, M., BiNGO: a Cytoscape plugin to assess overrepresentation of Gene Ontology categories in Biological Networks. Bioinformatics 2005, 21, 3448-3449.
50. Ye, J., Fang, L., Zheng, H., Zhang, Y. et al., WEGO: a web tool for plotting GO annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, W293-297.
51. Salomonis, N., Hanspers, K., Zambon, A. C., Vranizan, K. et al., GenMAPP 2: new features and resources for pathway analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8, 217.
52. Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T., Lempicki, R. A., Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 4, 44-57.
53. Zheng, Q., Wang, X. J., GOEAST: a web-based software toolkit for Gene Ontology enrichment analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, W358-W363.
54. Bindea, G., Mlecnik, B., Hackl, H., Charoentong, P. et al., ClueGO: a Cytoscape plug-in to decipher functionally grouped gene ontology and pathway annotation networks. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1091-1093.
55. Du, Z., Zhou, X., Ling, Y., Zhang, Z., Su, Z., agriGO: a GO analysis toolkit for the agricultural community. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, W64-W70.
56. Zhang, S., Cao, J., Kong, Y. M., Scheuermann, R. H., GO-Bayes: Gene Ontology-based overrepresentation analysis using a Bayesian approach. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 905-911.
57. Wang, J., Duncan, D., Shi, Z., Zhang, B., WEB-based GEne SeT AnaLysis Toolkit (WebGestalt): update 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, W77-W83.
58. Glaab, E., Baudot, A., Krasnogor, N., Schneider, R., Valencia, A., EnrichNet: network-based gene set enrichment analysis. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, i451-i457.
59. Pan, W., A comparative review of statistical methods for discovering differentially expressed genes in replicated microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 2002, 18, 546-554.
60. Dalman, M. R., Deeter, A., Nimishakavi, G., Duan, Z. H., Fold change and p-value cutoffs significantly alter microarray interpretations. BMC Bioinformatics 2012, 13, S11.
61. Nam, D., Kim, S. Y., Gene-set approach for expression pattern analysis. Brief. Bioinform. 2008, 9, 189-197.
62. Grossmann, S., Bauer, S., Robinson, P. N., Vingron, M., Improved detection of overrepresentation of Gene-Ontology annotations with parent-child analysis. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 3024-3031.
63. Huang, W. L., Tung, C. W., Ho, S. W., Hwang, S. F., Ho, S. Y., ProLoc-GO: Utilizing informative Gene Ontology terms for sequence-based prediction of protein subcellular localization. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9, 80.
64. Young, M. D., Wakefield, M. J., Smyth, G. K., Oshlack, A., Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 2010, 11, R14.
65. Chen, R., Yi, E. C., Donohoe, S., Pan, S. et al., Pancreatic cancer proteome: the proteins that underlie invasion, metastasis, and immunologic escape. Gastroenterology 2005, 129, 1187-1197.
66. Kim, M. S., Pinto, S. M., Getnet, D., Nirujogi, R. S. et al., A draft map of the human proteome. Nature 2014, 509, 575-581.
67. Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S. et al., Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005, 102, 15545-15550.
68. Keller, A., Backes, C., Lenhof, H. P., Computation of significance scores of unweighted Gene Set Enrichment Analyses. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8, 290.
69. Hill, W. D., Davies, G., van de Lagemaat, L. N., Christoforou, A. et al., Human cognitive ability is influenced by genetic variation in components of postsynaptic signalling complexes assembled by NMDA receptors and MAGUK proteins. Transl. Psychiatry 2014, 4, e341.
70. Cha, S., Imielinski, M. B., Rejtar, T., Richardson, E. A. et al., In Situ proteomic analysis of human breast cancer epithelial cells using laser capture microdissection (LCM)-LC/MS: Annotation by protein set enrichment analysis (PSEA) and gene ontology (GO). Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, mcp.M110.000398.
71. Hunter, S., Apweiler, R., Attwood, T. K., Bairoch, A. et al., InterPro: the integrative protein signature database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, D211-D215.
72. Kanehisa, M., Goto, S., Sato, Y., Kawashima, M. et al., Data, information, knowledge and principle: back to metabolism in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D199-D205.
73. Tomfohr, J., Lu, J., Kepler, T. B., Pathway level analysis of gene expression using singular value decomposition. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6, 225.
74. Edelman, E., Porrello, A., Guinney, J., Balakumaran, B. et al., Analysis of sample set enrichment scores: assaying the enrichment of sets of genes for individual samples in genome-wide expression profiles. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, e108-e116.
75. Kim, S. B., Yang, S., Kim, S. K., Kim, S. C. et al., GAzer: gene set analyzer. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 1697-1699.
76. Tian, L., Greenberg, S. A., Kong, S. W., Altschuler, J. et al., Discovering statistically significant pathways in expression profiling studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005, 102, 13544-13549.
77. Benjamini, Y., Hochberg, Y., Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. 1995, 57, 289-300.
78. Tarca, A. L., Bhatti, G., Romero, R., A comparison of gene set analysis methods in terms of sensitivity, prioritization and specificity. Plos One 2013, 8, e79217.
79. Tu, K., Yu, H., Zhu, M., MEGO: gene functional module expression based on gene ontology. Biotechniques 2005, 38, 277-283.
80. Kim, S. Y., Volsky, D. J., PAGE: parametric analysis of gene set enrichment. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6, 144.
81. Al-Shahrour, F., Arbiza, L., Dopazo, H., Huerta-Cepas, J. et al., From genes to functional classes in the study of biological systems. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8, 114.
82. Luo, W., Friedman, M. S., Shedden, K., Hankenson, K. D., Woolf, P. J., GAGE: generally applicable gene set enrichment for pathway analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10, 161.
83. Mootha, V. K., Lindgren, C. M., Eriksson, K. F., Subramanian, A. et al., PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat. Genet. 2003, 34, 267-273.
84. Hung, J. H., Yang, T. H., Hu, Z., Weng, Z., DeLisi, C., Gene set enrichment analysis: performance evaluation and usage guidelines. Brief. Bioinform. 2012, 13, 281-291.
85. Dinu, I., Potter, J. D., Mueller, T., Liu, Q. et al., Gene-set analysis and reduction. Brief. Bioinform. 2009, 10, 24-34.
86. Nam, D., De-correlating expression in gene-set analysis. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, i511-i516.
87. Khatri, P., Sirota, M., Butte, A. J., Ten years of pathway analysis: current approaches and outstanding challenges. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2012, 8, e1002375.
88. Geeleher, P., Hartnett, L., Egan, L. J., Golden, A. et al., Gene-set analysis is severely biased when applied to genome-wide methylation data. Bioinformatics 2013, 29, 1851-1857.
89. Jelier, R., Schuemie, M. J., Veldhoven, A., Dorssers, L. C. et al., Anni 2.0: a multipurpose text-mining tool for the life sciences. Genome Biol. 2008, 9, R96.
90. Van Haagen, H. H. H. B. M., 't Hoen, P. A. C., Botelho Bovo, A., de Morrée, A. et al., Novel protein-protein interactions inferred from literature context. PLoS One 2009, 4, e7894.
91. Chaussabel, D., Sher, A., Mining microarray expression data by literature profiling. Genome Biol. 2002, 3, research0055.1-research0055.16.
92. Alako, B. T., Veldhoven, A., Baal, S. van, Jelier, R. et al., CoPub Mapper: mining MEDLINE based on search term co-publication. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6, 51.
93. Soldatos, T. G., O'Donoghue, S. I., Satagopam, V. P., Jensen, L. J. et al., Martini: using literature keywords to compare gene sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, 26-38.
94. Wang, J. H., Zhao, L. F., Lin, P., Su, X. R. et al., GenCLiP 2.0: a web server for functional clustering of genes and construction of molecular networks based on free terms. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2534-2536.
95. Jenssen, T. K., Laegreid, A., Komorowski, J., Hovig, E., A literature network of human genes for high-throughput analysis of gene expression. Nat. Genet. 2001, 28, 21-28.
96. Glenisson, P., Coessens, B., Vooren, S. V., Mathys, J. et al., TXTGate: profiling gene groups with text-based information. Genome Biol. 2004, 5, R43.
97. Tjioe, E., Berry, M. W., Homayouni, R., Discovering gene functional relationships using FAUN (Feature Annotation Using Nonnegative matrix factorization). BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11, S14.
98. Barbosa-Silva, A., Soldatos, T. G., Magalhães, I. L., Pavlopoulos, G. A. et al., LAITOR-literature assistant for identification of terms co-occurrences and relationships. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11, 70.
99. Barbosa-Silva, A., Fontaine, J. F., Donnard, E. R., Stussi, F. et al., PESCADOR, a web-based tool to assist text-mining of biointeractions extracted from PubMed queries. BMC Bioinformatics 2011, 12, 435.
100. Qiao, N., Huang, Y., Naveed, H., Green, C. D., Han, J. D. J., CoCiter: An efficient tool to infer gene function by assessing the significance of literature co-citation. PLoS One 2013, 8, e74074.
101. Goh, W. W. B., Lee, Y. H., Zubaidah, R. M., Jin, J. et al., Network-based pipeline for analyzing ms data: an application toward liver cancer. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 2261-2272.
102. Goh, W. W. B., Lee, Y. H., Chung, M., Wong, L., How advancement in biological network analysis methods empowers proteomics. Proteomics 2012, 12, 550-563.
103. Goh, W. W. B., Fan, M., Low, H. S., Sergot, M., Wong, L., Enhancing the utility of proteomics signature profiling (PSP) with pathway derived Subnets (PDSs), performance analysis and specialised ontologies. BMC Genomics 2013, 14, 35.
104. Goh, W. W. B., Wong, L., Networks in proteomics analysis of cancer. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2013, 24, 1122-1128.
105. Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N. S. et al., Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13, 2498-2504.
106. Pavlopoulos, G. A., Wegener, A. L., Schneider, R., A survey of visualization tools for biological network analysis. Biodata Min. 2008, 1, 12.
107. Gehlenborg, N., O'Donoghue, S. I., Baliga, N. S., Goesmann, A. et al., Visualization of omics data for systems biology. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, S56-S68.
108. Li, J., Zimmerman, L. J., Park, B. H., Tabb, D. L. et al., Network-assisted protein identification and data interpretation in shotgun proteomics. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2009, 5.
109. Wu, C. C., Hsu, C. W., Chen, C. D., Yu, C. J. et al., Candidate Serological biomarkers for cancer identified from the secretomes of 23 cancer cell lines and the human protein atlas. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9, 1100-1117.
110. Imielinski, M., Cha, S., Rejtar, T., Richardson, E. A. et al., Integrated proteomic, transcriptomic, and biological network analysis of breast carcinoma reveals molecular features of tumorigenesis and clinical relapse. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2012, 11, M111.014910.
111. Higareda-Almaraz, J. C., Enríquez-Gasca, M. R., Hernández-Ortiz, M., Resendis-Antonio, O., Encarnación-Guevara, S., Proteomic patterns of cervical cancer cell lines, a network perspective. BMC Syst. Biol. 2011, 5, 96.
112. Van Damme, E., Laukens, K., Dang, T. H., Van Ostade, X., A manually curated network of the PML nuclear body interactome reveals an important role for PML-NBs in SUMOylation dynamics. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2010, 6, 51-67.
113. Draghici, S., Khatri, P., Tarca, A. L., Amin, K. et al., A systems biology approach for pathway level analysis. Genome Res. 2007, 17, 1537-1545.
114. Soh, D., Dong, D., Guo, Y., Wong, L., Consistency, comprehensiveness, and compatibility of pathway databases. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11, 449.
115. Cavalieri, D., Castagnini, C., Toti, S., Maciag, K. et al., Eu.Gene Analyzer a tool for integrating gene expression data with pathway databases. Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl. 2007, 23, 2631-2632.
116. Foroushani, A. B. K., Brinkman, F. S. L., Lynn, D. J., Pathway-GPS and SIGORA: identifying relevant pathways based on the over-representation of their gene-pair signatures. PeerJ 2013, 1, e229.
117. Doderer, M. S., Anguiano, Z., Suresh, U., Dashnamoorthy, R. et al., Pathway Distiller-multisource biological pathway consolidation. BMC Genomics 2012, 13, 1-16.
118. Matthews, L., Gopinath, G., Gillespie, M., Caudy, M. et al., Reactome knowledgebase of human biological pathways and processes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, D619-622.
119. Pico, A. R., Kelder, T., van Iersel, M. P., Hanspers, K. et al., WikiPathways: pathway editing for the People. PLoS Biol 2008, 6, e184.
120. Karp, P. D., Ouzounis, C. A., Moore-Kochlacs, C., Goldovsky, L. et al., Expansion of the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases to 160 genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, 6083-6089.
121. Cerami, E. G., Gross, B. E., Demir, E., Rodchenkov, I. et al., Pathway Commons, a web resource for biological pathway data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, D685-D690.
122. Mi, H., Muruganujan, A., Thomas, P. D., PANTHER in 2013: modeling the evolution of gene function, and other gene attributes, in the context of phylogenetic trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, D377-D386.
123. Rahnenführer, J., Domingues, F. S., Maydt, J., Lengauer, T., Calculating the statistical significance of changes in pathway activity from gene expression data. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 2004, 3, 1-29.
124. Dutta, B., Wallqvist, A., Reifman, J., PathNet: a tool for pathway analysis using topological information. Source Code Biol. Med. 2012, 7, 10.
125. Tarca, A. L., Draghici, S., Khatri, P., Hassan, S. S. et al., A novel signaling pathway impact analysis. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 75-82.
126. Hung, J. H., Whitfield, T. W., Yang, T. H., Hu, Z. et al., Identification of functional modules that correlate with phenotypic difference: the influence of network topology. Genome Biol. 2010, 11, R23.
127. Shojaie, A., Michailidis, G., Analysis of Gene Sets Based on the Underlying Regulatory Network. J. Comput. Biol. 2009, 16, 407-426.
128. Jacob, L., Neuvial, P., Dudoit, S., Gains in Power from Structured Two-Sample Tests of Means on Graphs. Ann. Appl. Stat. 2012, 6, 561-600.
129. Mitrea, C., Taghavi, Z., Bokanizad, B., Hanoudi, S. et al., Methods and approaches in the topology-based analysis of biological pathways. Front. Physiol. 2013, 4, 278.
130. De Las Rivas, J., Fontanillo, C., Protein-Protein Interactions Essentials: Key Concepts to Building and Analyzing Interactome Networks. Plos Comput Biol 2010, 6, e1000807.
131. Tang, H., Zhong, F., Xie, H., A quick guide to biomolecular network studies: Construction, analysis, applications, and resources. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012, 424, 7-11.
132. Xenarios, I., Salwínski, L., Duan, X. J., Higney, P. et al., DIP, the Database of Interacting Proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30, 303-305.
133. Keshava Prasad, T. S., Goel, R., Kandasamy, K., Keerthikumar, S. et al., Human protein reference database-2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, D767-D772.
134. Stark, C., Breitkreutz, B. J., Chatr-aryamontri, A., Boucher, L. et al., The BioGRID Interaction Database: 2011 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39, D698-D704.
135. Kerrien, S., Aranda, B., Breuza, L., Bridge, A. et al., The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2012. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, D841-D846.
136. Licata, L., Briganti, L., Peluso, D., Perfetto, L. et al., MINT, the molecular interaction database: 2012 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, D857-D861.
137. Lachmann, A., Ma'ayan, A., Lists2Networks: Integrated analysis of gene/protein lists. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11, 87.
138. Schaefer, M. H., Fontaine, J. F., Vinayagam, A., Porras, P. et al., HIPPIE: Integrating Protein Interaction Networks with Experiment Based Quality Scores. PLoS One 2012, 7, e31826.
139. Chen, E. Y., Tan, C. M., Kou, Y., Duan, Q. et al., Enrichr : interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool. BMC Bioinformatics 2013, 14, 128.
140. Lehne, B., Schlitt, T., Protein-protein interaction databases: keeping up with growing interactomes. Hum. Genomics 2009, 3, 291-297.
141. Orchard, S., Ammari, M., Aranda, B., Breuza, L. et al., The MIntAct project-IntAct as a common curation platform for 11 molecular interaction databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D358-D363.
142. Franceschini, A., Szklarczyk, D., Frankild, S., Kuhn, M. et al., STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, D808-D815.
143. Bult, C. J., Drabkin, H. J., Evsikov, A., Natale, D. et al., The representation of protein complexes in the Protein Ontology (PRO). BMC Bioinformatics 2011, 12, 371.
144. Khoury, G. A., Baliban, R. C., Floudas, C. A., Proteome-wide post-translational modification statistics: frequency analysis and curation of the swiss-prot database. Sci. Reports 2011, 1.
145. Beltrao, P., Bork, P., Krogan, N. J., van Noort, V., Evolution and functional cross-talk of protein post-translational modifications. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2013, 9, 714.
146. Minguez, P., Parca, L., Diella, F., Mende, D. R. et al., Deciphering a global network of functionally associated post-translational modifications. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2012, 8, 599.
147. Deribe, Y. L., Pawson, T., Dikic, I., Post-translational modifications in signal integration. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010, 17, 666-672.
148. Choudhary, C., Mann, M., Decoding signalling networks by mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11, 427-439.
149. Lee, T. Y., dbPTM: an information repository of protein post-translational modification. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, D622-D627.
150. Gnad, F., Gunawardena, J., Mann, M., PHOSIDA 2011: the posttranslational modification database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 39, D253-D260.
151. Dinkel, H., Chica, C., Via, A., Gould, C. M. et al., Phospho.ELM: a database of phosphorylation sites-update 2011. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 39, D261-D267.
152. Hornbeck, P. V., Kornhauser, J. M., Tkachev, S., Zhang, B. et al., PhosphoSitePlus: a comprehensive resource for investigating the structure and function of experimentally determined post-translational modifications in man and mouse. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, D261-D270.
153. Horn, H., Schoof, E. M., Kim, J., Robin, X. et al., KinomeXplorer: an integrated platform for kinome biology studies. Nat. Methods 2014, 11, 603-604.
154. Benayoun, B. A., Veitia, R. A., A post-translational modification code for transcription factors: sorting through a sea of signals. Trends Cell Biol. 2009, 19, 189-197.
155. Minguez, P., Letunic, I., Parca, L., Bork, P., PTMcode: a database of known and predicted functional associations between post-translational modifications in proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, D306-D311.
156. MacQuarrie, K. L., Fong, A. P., Morse, R. H., Tapscott, S. J., Genome-wide transcription factor binding: beyond direct target regulation. Trends Genet. 2011, 27, 141-148.
157. Johnson, D. S., Mortazavi, A., Myers, R. M., Wold, B., Genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein-dna interactions. Science 2007, 316, 1497-1502.
158. Wingender, E., The TRANSFAC project as an example of framework technology that supports the analysis of genomic regulation. Brief. Bioinform. 2008, 9, 326-332.
159. Deplancke, B., Dupuy, D., Vidal, M., Walhout, A. J. M., A Gateway-Compatible Yeast One-Hybrid System. Genome Res. 2004, 14, 2093-2101.
160. Walhout, A. J. M., Unraveling transcription regulatory networks by protein-DNA and protein-protein interaction mapping. Genome Res. 2006, 16, 1445-1454.
161. Vaquerizas, J. M., Kummerfeld, S. K., Teichmann, S. A., Luscombe, N. M., A census of human transcription factors: function, expression and evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10, 252-263.
162. Zhu, C., Byers, K. J. R. P., McCord, R. P., Shi, Z. et al., High-resolution DNA-binding specificity analysis of yeast transcription factors. Genome Res. 2009, 19, 556-566.
163. Hafner, M., Landthaler, M., Burger, L., Khorshid, M. et al., Transcriptome-wide identification of RNA-binding protein and microRNA target sites by PAR-CLIP. Cell 2010, 141, 129-141.
164. Guo, A. Y., Sun, J., Jia, P., Zhao, Z., A Novel microRNA and transcription factor mediated regulatory network in schizophrenia. BMC Syst. Biol. 2010, 4, 10.
165. Inui, M., Martello, G., Piccolo, S., MicroRNA control of signal transduction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11, 252-263.
166. John, B., Enright, A. J., Aravin, A., Tuschl, T. et al., Human MicroRNA Targets. PLoS Biol 2004, 2, e363.
167. Lewis, B. P., Burge, C. B., Bartel, D. P., Conserved Seed Pairing, Often Flanked by Adenosines, Indicates that Thousands of Human Genes are MicroRNA Targets. Cell 2005, 120, 15-20.
168. Kertesz, M., Iovino, N., Unnerstall, U., Gaul, U., Segal, E., The role of site accessibility in microRNA target recognition. Nat. Genet. 2007, 39, 1278-1284.
169. Garrenton, L. S., Young, S. L., Thorner, J., Function of the MAPK scaffold protein, Ste5, requires a cryptic PH domain. Genes Dev. 2006, 20, 1946-1958.
170. Good, M. C., Zalatan, J. G., Lim, W. A., Scaffold Proteins: Hubs for Controlling the Flow of Cellular Information. Science 2011, 332, 680-686.
171. Kuhn, M., Szklarczyk, D., Pletscher-Frankild, S., Blicher, T. H. et al., STITCH 4: integration of protein-chemical interactions with user data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D401-D407.
172. Remmerie, N., De Vijlder, T., Laukens, K., Dang, T. H. et al., Next generation functional proteomics in non-model plants: A survey on techniques and applications for the analysis of protein complexes and post-translational modifications. Phytochemistry 2011, 72, 1192-1218.
173. Nishimura, D., BioCarta. Biotech Softw. Internet Rep. 2001, 2, 117-120.
174. Bader, G. D., Betel, D., Hogue, C. W. V., BIND: the Biomolecular Interaction Network Database. Nucl. Acids Res. 2003, 31, 248-250.
175. Yamamoto, S., Sakai, N., Nakamura, H., Fukagawa, H. et al., INOH: ontology-based highly structured database of signal transduction pathways. Database 2011, 2011, bar052-bar052.
176. Pruitt, K. D., Brown, G. R., Hiatt, S. M., Thibaud-Nissen, F. et al., RefSeq: an update on mammalian reference sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, D756-D763.
177. Beißbarth, T., Speed, T. P., GOstat: find statistically overrepresented Gene Ontologies within a group of genes. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, 1464-1465.
178. Goeman, J. J., Geer, S. A. van de, Kort, F. de, Houwelingen, H. C. van, A global test for groups of genes: testing association with a clinical outcome. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, 93-99.
179. Hänzelmann, S., Castelo, R., Guinney, J., GSVA: gene set variation analysis for microarray and RNA-seq data. BMC Bioinformatics 2013, 14, 7.
180. Bessarabova, M., Ishkin, A., JeBailey, L., Nikolskaya, T., Nikolsky, Y., Knowledge-based analysis of proteomics data. BMC Bioinformatics 2012, 13, S13.
181. Farfán, F., Ma, J., Sartor, M. A., Michailidis, G., Jagadish, H. V., Think back: knowledge-based interpretation of high throughput data. BMC Bioinformatics 2012, 13, 1-7.