Decoding signalling networks by mass spectrometry-based proteomics

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 427-439

  Choudhary, Chunaram ^a   Mann, Matthias ^a,b  

^a University of Copenhagen   (Denmark)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETYLATION; BIOINFORMATICS; GLYCOSYLATION; MASS SPECTROMETRY; METHYLATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; UBIQUITINATION;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 77952956167     PISSN: 14710072     EISSN: 14710080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrm2900     Document Type: Review

References (126)

1. Seet, B. T., Dikic, I., Zhou, M. M. & Pawson, T. Reading protein modifications with interaction domains. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 473-483 (2006).
2. Hunter, T. The age of crosstalk: phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and beyond. Mol. Cell 28, 730-738 (2007).
3. Shevchenko, A., Tomas, H., Havlis, J., Olsen, J. V. & Mann, M. In-gel digestion for mass spectrometric characterization of proteins and proteomes. Nature Protoc. 1, 2856-2860 (2006).
4. Link, A. J. et al. Direct analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry. Nature Biotech. 17, 676-682 (1999).
5. Washburn, M. P., Wolters, D. & Yates, J. R., 3rd. Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identification technology. Nature Biotech. 19, 242-247 (2001). (Pubitemid 32220565)
6. Domon, B. & Aebersold, R. Mass spectrometry and protein analysis. Science 312, 212-217 (2006).
7. Cox, J. & Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nature Biotech. 26, 1367-1372 (2008).
8. Steen, H. & Mann, M. The ABC's (and XYZ's) of peptide sequencing. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 699-711 (2004).
9. Schroeder, M. J., Shabanowitz, J., Schwartz, J. C., Hunt, D. F. & Coon, J. J. A neutral loss activation method for improved phosphopeptide sequence analysis by quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 76, 3590-3598 (2004).
10. Olsen, J. V. et al. Higher-energy C-trap dissociation for peptide modification analysis. Nature Methods 4, 709-712 (2007).
11. Olsen, J. V. et al. A dual pressure linear ion trap orbitrap instrument with very high sequencing speed. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 8, 2759-2769 (2009).
12. Zubarev, R. A. et al. Electron capture dissociation for structural characterization of multiply charged protein cations. Anal. Chem. 72, 563-573 (2000).
13. Syka, J. E. et al. Novel linear quadrupole ion trap/FT mass spectrometer: performance characterization and use in the comparative analysis of histone H3 post-translational modifications. J. Proteome Res. 3, 621-626 (2004).
14. Ong, S. E. & Mann, M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics turns quantitative. Nature Chem. Biol. 1, 252-262 (2005).
15. Ong, S. E. et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 376-386 (2002).
16. Mann, M. Functional and quantitative proteomics using SILAC. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 952-958 (2006).
17. Kruger, M. et al. SILAC mouse for quantitative proteomics uncovers kindlin-3 as an essential factor for red blood cell function. Cell 134, 353-364 (2008).
18. Geiger, T., Cox, J. Pawel, O., Wisniewski, J. R. & Mann, M. Super-SILAC mix for quantitative proteomics of human tumor tissue. Nature Methods 7, 383-385 (2010).
19. Ross, P. L. et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 3, 1154-1169 (2004).
20. Ow, S. Y. et al. iTRAQ underestimation in simple and complex mixtures: "the good, the bad and the ugly". J. Proteome Res. 8, 5347-5355 (2009).
21. Zhang, Y. et al. A robust error model for iTRAQ quantification reveals divergent signaling between oncogenic FLT3 mutants in acute myeloid leukemia. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 17 Dec 2009 (doi: 10.1074/mcp.M900452-MCP200).
22. Hsu, J. L., Huang, S. Y., Chow, N. H. & Chen, S. H. Stable-isotope dimethyl labeling for quantitative proteomics. Anal. Chem. 75, 6843-6852 (2003).
23. Boersema, P. J., Raijmakers, R., Lemeer, S., Mohammed, S. & Heck, A. J. Multiplex peptide stable isotope dimethyl labeling for quantitative proteomics. Nature Protoc. 4, 484-494 (2009).
24. Nielsen, M. L. et al. Iodoacetamide-induced artifact mimics ubiquitination in mass spectrometry. Nature Methods 5, 459-460 (2008).
25. Mueller, L. N., Brusniak, M. Y., Mani, D. R. & Aebersold, R. An assessment of software solutions for the analysis of mass spectrometry based quantitative proteomics data. J. Proteome Res. 7, 51-61 (2008).
26. Trost, M. et al. The phagosomal proteome in interferon-γ-activated macrophages. Immunity 30, 143-154 (2009).
27. Wong, J. W. & Cagney, G. An overview of label-free quantitation methods in proteomics by mass spectrometry. Methods Mol. Biol. 604, 273-283.
28. Luber, C. et al. Quantitative proteomics reveals subset-specific viral recognition in dendritic cells. Immunity 32, 279-289 (2010).
29. de Godoy, L. M. et al. Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast. Nature 455, 1251-1254 (2008).
30. Malmstrom, J. et al. Proteome-wide cellular protein concentrations of the human pathogen Leptospira interrogans. Nature 460, 762-765 (2009).
31. Rivers, J., Simpson, D. M., Robertson, D. H., Gaskell, S. J. & Beynon, R. J. Absolute multiplexed quantitative analysis of protein expression during muscle development using QconCAT. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 1416-1427 (2007).
32. Brunner, E. et al. A high-quality catalog of the Drosophila melanogaster proteome. Nature Biotech. 25, 576-583 (2007).
33. Hanke, S., Besir, H., Oesterhelt, D. & Mann, M. Absolute SILAC for accurate quantitation of proteins in complex mixtures down to the attomole level. J. Proteome Res. 7, 1118-1130 (2008).
34. Ghaemmaghami, S. et al. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425, 737-741 (2003).
35. Huh, W. K. et al. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 425, 686-691 (2003).
36. Wisniewski, J. R., Zougman, A., Nagaraj, N. & Mann, M. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nature Methods 6, 359-362 (2009).
37. Schmidt, A., Claassen, M. & Aebersold, R. Directed mass spectrometry: towards hypothesis-driven proteomics. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 13, 510-517 (2009).
38. Wolf-Yadlin, A., Hautaniemi, S., Lauffenburger, D. A. & White, F. M. Multiple reaction monitoring for robust quantitative proteomic analysis of cellular signaling networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 5860-5865 (2007). (Pubitemid 47175624)
39. Kitteringham, N. R., Jenkins, R. E., Lane, C. S., Elliott, V. L. & Park, B. K. Multiple reaction monitoring for quantitative biomarker analysis in proteomics and metabolomics. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 877, 1229-1239 (2009).
40. Unwin, R. D., Griffiths, J. R. & Whetton, A. D. A sensitive mass spectrometric method for hypothesis-driven detection of peptide post-translational modifications: multiple reaction monitoring-initiated detection and sequencing (MIDAS). Nature Protoc. 4, 870-877 (2009).
41. Picotti, P., Bodenmiller, B., Mueller, L. N., Domon, B. & Aebersold, R. Full dynamic range proteome analysis of S. cerevisiae by targeted proteomics. Cell 138, 795-806 (2009).
42. Kumar, C. & Mann, M. Bioinformatics analysis of mass spectrometry-based proteomics data sets. FEBS Lett. 583, 1703-1712 (2009).
43. Elias, J. E. & Gygi, S. P. Target-decoy search strategy for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Methods Mol. Biol. 604, 55-71.
44. Ashburner, M. et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nature Genet. 25, 25-29 (2000).
45. Kanehisa, M., Goto, S., Kawashima, S., Okuno, Y. & Hattori, M. The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, D277-D280 (2004).
46. Jensen, O. N. Interpreting the protein language using proteomics. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 391-403 (2006).
47. Witze, E. S., Old, W. M., Resing, K. A. & Ahn, N. G. Mapping protein post-translational modifications with mass spectrometry. Nature Methods 4, 798-806 (2007).
48. Zhao, Y. & Jensen, O. N. Modification-specific proteomics: strategies for characterization of post-translational modifications using enrichment techniques. Proteomics 9, 4632-4641 (2009).
49. Macek, B., Mann, M. & Olsen, J. V. Global and site-specific quantitative phosphoproteomics: principles and applications. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 49, 199-221 (2009).
50. Choudhary, C. et al. Lysine acetylation targets protein complexes and co-regulates major cellular functions. Science 325, 834-840 (2009).
51. Olsen, J. V. et al. Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell 127, 635-648 (2006).
52. Beausoleil, S. A., Villen, J., Gerber, S. A., Rush, J. & Gygi, S. P. A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nature Biotech. 24, 1285-1292 (2006).
53. Gnad, F. et al. PHOSIDA (phosphorylation site database): management, structural and evolutionary investigation, and prediction of phosphosites. Genome Biol. 8, R250 (2007).
54. Olsen, J. V. et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals widespread full phosphorylation site occupancy during mitosis. Sci. Signal. 3, ra3 (2010).
55. Ong, S. E., Mittler, G. & Mann, M. Identifying and quantifying in vivo methylation sites by heavy methyl SILAC. Nature Methods 1, 119-126 (2004).
56. Kim, S. C. et al. Substrate and functional diversity of lysine acetylation revealed by a proteomics survey. Mol. Cell 23, 607-618 (2006).
57. Wang, Q. et al. Acetylation of metabolic enzymes coordinates carbon source utilization and metabolic flux. Science 327, 1004-1007.
58. Zhao, S. et al. Regulation of cellular metabolism by protein lysine acetylation. Science 327, 1000-1004.
59. Peng, J. et al. A proteomics approach to understanding protein ubiquitination. Nature Biotech. 21, 921-926 (2003).
60. Golebiowski, F. et al. System-wide changes to SUMO modifications in response to heat shock. Sci. Signal. 2, ra24 (2009).
61. Pedrioli, P. G. et al. Automated identification of SUMOylation sites using mass spectrometry and SUMmOn pattern recognition software. Nature Methods 3, 533-539 (2006).
62. Matic, I. et al. In vivo identification of human small ubiquitin-like modifier polymerization sites by high accuracy mass spectrometry and an in vitro to in vivo strategy. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 7, 132-144 (2008).
63. Burlingame, A. L., Baillie, T. A. & Russell, D. H. Mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 64, 467R-502R (1992).
64. Muzio, M. et al. FLICE, a novel FADD-homologous ICE/CED-3-like protease, is recruited to the CD95 (Fas/APO-1) death-inducing signaling complex. Cell 85, 817-827 (1996).
65. Ficarro, S. B. et al. Phosphoproteome analysis by mass spectrometry and its application to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature Biotech. 20, 301-305 (2002).
66. Nita-Lazar, A., Saito-Benz, H. & White, F. M. Quantitative phosphoproteomics by mass spectrometry: past, present, and future. Proteomics 8, 4433-4443 (2008).
67. Dengjel, J., Kratchmarova, I. & Blagoev, B. Receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: a view from quantitative proteomics. Mol. Biosyst. 5, 1112-1121 (2009).
68. Blagoev, B., Ong, S. E., Kratchmarova, I. & Mann, M. Temporal analysis of phosphotyrosine-dependent signaling networks by quantitative proteomics. Nature Biotech. 22, 1139-1145 (2004).
69. Schmelzle, K., Kane, S., Gridley, S., Lienhard, G. E. & White, F. M. Temporal dynamics of tyrosine phosphorylation in insulin signaling. Diabetes 55, 2171-2179 (2006).
70. Kruger, M. et al. Dissection of the insulin signaling pathway via quantitative phosphoproteomics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2451-2456 (2008).
71. Gruhler, A. et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics applied to the yeast pheromone signaling pathway. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 310-327 (2005).
72. Mayya, V. et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis of T cell receptor signaling reveals system-wide modulation of protein-protein interactions. Sci. Signal. 2, ra46 (2009).
73. Jorgensen, C. et al. Cell-specific information processing in segregating populations of Eph receptor ephrin-expressing cells. Science 326, 1502-1509 (2009).
74. Kratchmarova, I., Blagoev, B., Haack-Sorensen, M., Kassem, M. & Mann, M. Mechanism of divergent growth factor effects in mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Science 308, 1472-1477 (2005).
75. Graumann, J. et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) and proteome quantitation of mouse embryonic stem cells to a depth of 5,111 proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 7, 672-683 (2008).
76. Prokhorova, T. A. et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) and quantitative comparison of the membrane proteomes of self-renewing and differentiating human embryonic stem cells. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 8, 959-970 (2009).
77. Van Hoof, D. et al. Phosphorylation dynamics during early differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 5, 214-226 (2009).
78. Brill, L. M. et al. Phosphoproteomic analysis of human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 5, 204-213 (2009).
79. Swaney, D. L., Wenger, C. D., Thomson, J. A. & Coon, J. J. Human embryonic stem cell phosphoproteome revealed by electron transfer dissociation tandem mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 995-1000 (2009).
80. Dephoure, N. et al. A quantitative atlas of mitotic phosphorylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 10762-10767 (2008).
81. Steen, J. A. et al. Different phosphorylation states of the anaphase promoting complex in response to antimitotic drugs: a quantitative proteomic analysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 6069-6074 (2008).
82. Matsuoka, S. et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science 316, 1160-1166 (2007).
83. Stokes, M. P. et al. Profiling of UV-induced ATM/ATR signaling pathways. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 19855-19860 (2007).
84. Daub, H. et al. Kinase-selective enrichment enables quantitative phosphoproteomics of the kinome across the cell cycle. Mol. Cell 31, 438-448 (2008).
85. Malik, R. et al. Quantitative analysis of the human spindle phosphoproteome at distinct mitotic stages. J. Proteome Res. 8, 4553-4563 (2009).
86. Blume-Jensen, P. & Hunter, T. Oncogenic kinase signalling. Nature 411, 355-365 (2001).
87. Qiao, Y., Molina, H., Pandey, A., Zhang, J. & Cole, P. A. Chemical rescue of a mutant enzyme in living cells. Science 311, 1293-1297 (2006).
88. Guo, A. et al. Signaling networks assembled by oncogenic EGFR and c-Met. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 692-697 (2008).
89. Amanchy, R. et al. Identification of c-Src tyrosine kinase substrates using mass spectrometry and peptide microarrays. J. Proteome Res. 7, 3900-3910 (2008).
90. Rikova, K. et al. Global survey of phosphotyrosine signaling identifies oncogenic kinases in lung cancer. Cell 131, 1190-1203 (2007).
91. Zanivan, S. et al. Solid tumor proteome and phosphoproteome analysis by high resolution mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 7, 5314-5326 (2008).
92. Old, W. M. et al. Functional proteomics identifies targets of phosphorylation by B-Raf signaling in melanoma. Mol. Cell 34, 115-131 (2009).
93. Sorkin, A. & von Zastrow, M. Endocytosis and signalling: intertwining molecular networks. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 609-622 (2009).
94. Choudhary, C. et al. Mislocalized activation of oncogenic RTKs switches downstream signaling outcomes. Mol. Cell 36, 326-339 (2009).
95. Bantscheff, M. et al. Quantitative chemical proteomics reveals mechanisms of action of clinical ABL kinase inhibitors. Nature Biotech. 25, 1035-1044 (2007).
96. Karaman, M. W. et al. A quantitative analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity. Nature Biotech. 26, 127-132 (2008).
97. Sharma, K. et al. Proteomics strategy for quantitative protein interaction profiling in cell extracts. Nature Methods 6, 741-744 (2009).
98. Pan, C., Olsen, J. V., Daub, H. & Mann, M. Global effects of kinase inhibitors on signaling networks revealed by quantitative phosphoproteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 8, 2796-2808 (2009).
99. Huber, A. et al. Characterization of the rapamycin-sensitive phosphoproteome reveals that Sch9 is a central coordinator of protein synthesis. Genes Dev. 23, 1929-1943 (2009).
100. Mertins, P. et al. Investigation of protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B function by quantitative proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 7, 1763-1777 (2008).
101. Hilger, M., Bonaldi, T., Gnad, F. & Mann, M. Systems-wide analysis of a phosphatase knock-down by quantitative proteomics and phosphoproteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 8, 1908-1920 (2009).
102. Smolka, M. B., Albuquerque, C. P., Chen, S. H. & Zhou, H. Proteome-wide identification of in vivo targets of DNA damage checkpoint kinases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 10364-10369 (2007).
103. Holt, L. J. et al. Global analysis of Cdk1 substrate phosphorylation sites provides insights into evolution. Science 325, 1682-1686 (2009).
104. Kumar, N., Wolf-Yadlin, A., White, F. M. & Lauffenburger, D. A. Modeling HER2 effects on cell behavior from mass spectrometry phosphotyrosine data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3, e4 (2007).
105. Linding, R. et al. Systematic discovery of in vivo phosphorylation networks. Cell 129, 1415-1426 (2007).
106. Miller, M. L. et al. Linear motif atlas for phosphorylation-dependent signaling. Sci. Signal. 1, ra2 (2008).
107. Tan, C. S. et al. Comparative analysis reveals conserved protein phosphorylation networks implicated in multiple diseases. Sci. Signal. 2, ra39 (2009).
108. Gingras, A. C., Gstaiger, M., Raught, B. & Aebersold, R. Analysis of protein complexes using mass spectrometry. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 645-654 (2007).
109. Vermeulen, M., Hubner, N. C. & Mann, M. High confidence determination of specific protein-protein interactions using quantitative mass spectrometry. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 19, 331-337 (2008).
110. Glatter, T., Wepf, A., Aebersold, R. & Gstaiger, M. An integrated workflow for charting the human interaction proteome: insights into the PP2A system. Mol. Syst. Biol. 5, 237 (2009).
111. Goudreault, M. et al. A PP2A phosphatase high density interaction network identifies a novel striatin-interacting phosphatase and kinase complex linked to the cerebral cavernous malformation 3 (CCM3) protein. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 8, 157-171 (2009).
112. von Kriegsheim, A. et al. Cell fate decisions are specified by the dynamic ERK interactome. Nature Cell Biol. 11, 1458-1464 (2009).
113. Blagoev, B. et al. A proteomics strategy to elucidate functional protein-protein interactions applied to EGF signaling. Nature Biotech. 21, 315-318 (2003).
114. Schulze, W. X., Deng, L. & Mann, M. Phosphotyrosine interactome of the ErbB-receptor kinase family. Mol. Syst. Biol. 1, 2005.0008 (2005).
115. Hanke, S. & Mann, M. The phosphotyrosine interactome of the insulin receptor family and its substrates IRS-1 and IRS-2. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 8, 519-534 (2009).
116. Selbach, M. et al. Host cell interactome of tyrosine-phosphorylated bacterial proteins. Cell Host Microbe 5, 397-403 (2009).
117. Trinkle-Mulcahy, L. & Lamond, A. I. Toward a high-resolution view of nuclear dynamics. Science 318, 1402-1407 (2007).
118. Waanders, L. F. et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of single pancreatic islets. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 18902-18907 (2009).
119. Mallick, P. et al. Computational prediction of proteotypic peptides for quantitative proteomics. Nature Biotech. 25, 125-131 (2007).
120. Makarov, A. et al. Performance evaluation of a hybrid linear ion trap/orbitrap mass spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 78, 2113-2120 (2006).
121. Olsen, J. V. et al. Parts per million mass accuracy on an Orbitrap mass spectrometer via lock mass injection into a C-trap. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4, 2010-2021 (2005).
122. Zubarev, R. & Mann, M. On the proper use of mass accuracy in proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6, 377-381 (2007).
123. Mann, M. & Kelleher, N. L. Precision proteomics: the case for high resolution and high mass accuracy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18132-18138 (2008).
124. Wang, Z. et al. Extensive crosstalk between O-GlcNAcylation and phosphorylation regulates cytokinesis. Sci. Signal. 3, ra2 (2010).
125. Soufi, B. et al. Global analysis of the yeast osmotic stress response by quantitative proteomics. Mol. Biosyst. 5, 1337-1346 (2009).
126. Pan, C., Gnad, F., Olsen, J. V. & Mann, M. Quantitative phosphoproteome analysis of a mouse liver cell line reveals specificity of phosphatase inhibitors. Proteomics 8, 4534-4546 (2008).