Computational proteomics: Designing a comprehensive analytical strategy

Drug Discovery Today

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 266-274

  Goh, Wilson Wen Bin ^a,b   Wong, Limsoon ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; BIOINFORMATICS; DATA BASE; DRUG TARGETING; EPIGENETICS; GENE ONTOLOGY; HUMAN; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PERFORMANCE; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SEARCH ENGINE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; DRUG DESIGN; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING; METABOLISM; MOLECULARLY TARGETED THERAPY; PROCEDURES;

BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DRUG DESIGN; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENING ASSAYS; HUMANS; MOLECULAR TARGETED THERAPY; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 84896400808     PISSN: 13596446     EISSN: 18785832     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2013.07.008     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. W.W. Goh, and L. Wong Networks in proteomics analysis of cancer Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2013 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.02.011 (Epub ahead of print)
2. M. Mann et al. The coming age of complete, accurate, and ubiquitous proteomes Mol. Cell 49 2013 583 590
3. W.W. Goh et al. How advancement in biological network analysis methods empowers proteomics Proteomics 12 2012 550 563
4. W.W. Goh et al. Proteomics signature profiling (PSP): a novel contextualization approach for cancer proteomics J. Proteome Res. 11 2012 1571 1581
5. A. Christoforou, and K.S. Lilley Taming the isobaric tagging elephant in the room in quantitative proteomics Nat. Methods 8 2011 911 913
6. J. Eriksson, and D. Fenyo Improving the success rate of proteome analysis by modeling protein-abundance distributions and experimental designs Nat. Biotechnol. 25 2007 651 655 (Pubitemid 46897209)
7. L. Kall, and O. Vitek Computational mass spectrometry-based proteomics PLoS Comput. Biol. 7 2011 E1002277
8. H. Wang et al. Intact-protein-based high-resolution three-dimensional quantitative analysis system for proteome profiling of biological fluids Mol. Cell. Proteomics 4 2005 618 625 (Pubitemid 40862241)
9. L.M. de Godoy et al. Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast Nature 455 2008 1251 1254
10. H. Liu et al. A model for random sampling and estimation of relative protein abundance in shotgun proteomics Anal. Chem. 76 2004 4193 4201 (Pubitemid 38943698)
11. S.P. Schrimpf et al. Comparative functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster proteomes PLoS Biol. 7 2009 E48
12. F. Desiere et al. Integration with the human genome of peptide sequences obtained by high-throughput mass spectrometry Genome Biol. 6 2005 R9
13. P. Picotti, and R. Aebersold Selected reaction monitoring-based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions Nat. Methods 9 2012 555 566
14. L.C. Gillet et al. Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11 2012 O111 016717
15. A.I. Nesvizhskii A survey of computational methods and error rate estimation procedures for peptide and protein identification in shotgun proteomics J. Proteomics 73 2010 2092 2123
16. V. Granholm, and L. Kall Quality assessments of peptide-spectrum matches in shotgun proteomics Proteomics 11 2011 1086 1093
17. M.R. Hoopmann, and R.L. Moritz Current algorithmic solutions for peptide-based proteomics data generation and identification Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 24 2013 31 38
18. J.K. Eng et al. A face in the crowd: recognizing peptides through database search Mol. Cell. Proteomics 10 2011 R111 009522
19. T. Koenig et al. Robust prediction of the MASCOT score for an improved quality assessment in mass spectrometric proteomics J. Proteome Res. 7 2008 3708 3717
20. J.K. Eng et al. A fast SEQUEST cross correlation algorithm J. Proteome Res. 7 2008 4598 4602
21. I.V. Shilov et al. The Paragon Algorithm, a next generation search engine that uses sequence temperature values and feature probabilities to identify peptides from tandem mass spectra Mol. Cell. Proteomics 6 2007 1638 1655 (Pubitemid 47506173)
22. J. Cox, and M. Mann MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification Nat. Biotechnol. 26 2008 1367 1372
23. C. Bauer et al. PPINGUIN: peptide profiling guided identification of proteins improves quantitation of iTRAQ ratios BMC Bioinformatics 13 2012 34
24. N. Lietzen et al. Compid: a new software tool to integrate and compare MS/MS based protein identification results from Mascot and Paragon J. Proteome Res. 9 2010 6795 6800
25. T. Kwon et al. MSblender: a probabilistic approach for integrating peptide identifications from multiple database search engines J. Proteome Res. 10 2011 2949 2958
26. E.W. Deutsch et al. A guided tour of the Trans-Proteomic Pipeline Proteomics 10 2010 1150 1159
27. J. Griss et al. Consequences of the discontinuation of the International Protein Index (IPI) database and its substitution by the UniProtKB 'complete proteome' sets Proteomics 11 2011 4434 4438
28. F.L. Sirota et al. Beware of moving targets: reference proteome content fluctuates substantially over the years J. Bioinform. Comput. Biol. 10 2012 1250020
29. J. Griss et al. Published and perished? The influence of the searched protein database on the long-term storage of proteomics data Mol. Cell. Proteomics 10 2011 M111 008490
30. B. Ma et al. PEAKS: powerful software for peptide de novo sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 17 2003 2337 2342 (Pubitemid 37243319)
31. R.S. Johnson, and J.A. Taylor Searching sequence databases via de novo peptide sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry Mol. Biotechnol. 22 2002 301 315 (Pubitemid 35252826)
32. N. Colaert et al. Analysis of the resolution limitations of peptide identification algorithms J. Proteome Res. 10 2011 5555 5561
33. D. Soh et al. Finding consistent disease subnetworks across microarray datasets BMC Bioinformatics 12 Suppl. 13 2011 S15
34. W.W. Goh et al. Enhancing the utility of Proteomics Signature Profiling (PSP) with Pathway Derived Subnets (PDSs), performance analysis and specialised ontologies BMC Genomics 14 2013 35
35. M. Claassen et al. Proteome coverage prediction for integrated proteomics datasets J. Comput. Biol. 18 2011 283 293
36. F. Suits et al. Threshold-avoiding proteomics pipeline Anal. Chem. 83 2011 7786 7794
37. P. Khatri et al. Ten years of pathway analysis: current approaches and outstanding challenges PLoS Comput. Biol. 8 2012 E1002375
38. D. Soh et al. Consistency, comprehensiveness, and compatibility of pathway databases BMC Bioinformatics 11 2010 449
39. N. Pavelka et al. A power law global error model for the identification of differentially expressed genes in microarray data BMC Bioinformatics 5 2004 203
40. J. Li et al. Network-assisted protein identification and data interpretation in shotgun proteomics Mol. Syst. Biol. 5 2009 303
41. W.W. Goh et al. Network-based pipeline for analysing MS data: an application toward liver cancer J. Proteome Res. 10 2011 2261 2272
42. W.L. Huang et al. ProLoc-GO: utilizing informative Gene Ontology terms for sequence-based prediction of protein subcellular localization BMC Bioinformatics 9 2008 80
43. W.W. Goh et al. Comparative network-based recovery analysis and proteomic profiling of neurological changes in valproic acid-treated mice J. Proteome Res. 12 2013 2116 2127
44. E.I. Boyle et al. GO::TermFinder - open source software for accessing Gene Ontology information and finding significantly enriched Gene Ontology terms associated with a list of genes Bioinformatics 20 2004 3710 3715 (Pubitemid 40136825)
45. Q. Zheng, and X.J. Wang GOEAST: a web-based software toolkit for Gene Ontology enrichment analysis Nucleic Acids Res. 36 Web Server issue 2008 W358 W363
46. H. Min et al. Integration of prostate cancer clinical data using an ontology J. Biomed. Inform. 42 2009 1035 1045
47. S. Grossmann et al. Improved detection of overrepresentation of Gene-Ontology annotations with parent child analysis Bioinformatics 23 2007 3024 3031 (Pubitemid 350162867)
48. C.J. Bult et al. The representation of protein complexes in the Protein Ontology (PRO) BMC Bioinformatics 12 2011 371
49. S.R. Ramakrishnan et al. Integrating shotgun proteomics and mRNA expression data to improve protein identification Bioinformatics 25 2009 1397 1403
50. W.W. Goh et al. The role of miRNAs in complex formation and control Bioinformatics 28 2012 453 456
51. N. Raghavan et al. On methods for gene function scoring as a means of facilitating the interpretation of microarray results J. Comput. Biol. 13 2006 798 809 (Pubitemid 43801006)
52. S. Muraoka et al. Strategy for SRM-based verification of biomarker candidates discovered by iTRAQ method in limited breast cancer tissue samples J. Proteome Res. 11 2012 4201 4210
53. R. Narumi et al. A strategy for large-scale phosphoproteomics and SRM-based validation of human breast cancer tissue samples J. Proteome Res. 11 2012 5311 5322