Protein identification using MS/MS data

Journal of Proteomics

Volumn 74, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1842-1851

  Cottrell, John S ^a  

^a Matrix Science Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Database search; Protein identification; Protein inference; Tutorial

Indexed keywords

GENOMIC DNA;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CHROMATOGRAPHY; CODING; DATA BASE; DNA FINGERPRINTING; DNA SEQUENCE; EXON; INTRON; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHORT SURVEY;

ANIMALS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; PROTEIN PROCESSING, POST-TRANSLATIONAL; PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 80052033624     PISSN: 18743919     EISSN: 18767737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.05.014     Document Type: Short Survey

References (52)

1. Barton S.J., Whittaker J.C. Review of factors that influence the abundance of ions produced in a tandem mass spectrometer and statistical methods for discovering these factors. Mass Spectrom Rev 2009, 28(1):177-187.
2. Kelleher N.L. Top-down proteomics. Anal Chem 2004, 76(11):196A-203A.
3. Fricker L.D., Lim J.Y., Pan H., Che F.Y. Peptidomics: identification and quantification of endogenous peptides in neuroendocrine tissues. Mass Spectrom Rev 2006, 25(2):327-344.
4. Papayannopoulos I.A. The interpretation of collision-induced dissociation tandem mass spectra of peptides. Mass Spectrom Rev 1995, 14(1):49-73.
5. Paizs B., Suhai S. Fragmentation pathways of protonated peptides. Mass Spectrom Rev 2005, 24(4):508-548.
6. Roepstorff P., Fohlman J. Proposal for a common nomenclature for sequence ions in mass spectra of peptides. Biomed Mass Spectrom 1984, 11(11):601.
7. McAlister G.C., Berggren W.T., Griep-Raming J., Horning S., Makarov A., Phanstiel D., et al. A proteomics grade electron transfer dissociation-enabled hybrid linear ion trap-orbitrap mass spectrometer. J Proteome Res 2008, 7(8):3127-3136.
8. Seidler J., Zinn N., Boehm M.E., Lehmann W.D. De novo sequencing of peptides by MS/MS. Proteomics 2010, 10(4):634-649.
9. Mann M., Wilm M. Error-tolerant identification of peptides in sequence databases by peptide sequence tags. Anal Chem 1994, 66(24):4390-4399.
10. Searle B.C., Dasari S., Turner M., Reddy A.P., Choi D., Wilmarth P.A., et al. High-throughput identification of proteins and unanticipated sequence modifications using a mass-based alignment algorithm for MS/MS de novo sequencing results. Anal Chem 2004, 76(8):2220-2230.
11. Shevchenko A., Sunyaev S., Loboda A., Shevehenko A., Bork P., Ens W., et al. Charting the proteomes of organisms with unsequenced genomes by MALDI-quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry and BLAST homology searching. Anal Chem 2001, 73(9):1917-1926.
12. Tabb D.L., Saraf A., Yates J.R. GutenTag: high-throughput sequence tagging via an empirically derived fragmentation model. Anal Chem 2003, 75(23):6415-6421.
13. Sunyaev S., Liska A.J., Golod A., Shevchenko A., Shevchenko A. MultiTag: multiple error-tolerant sequence tag search for the sequence-similarity identification of proteins by mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 2003, 75(6):1307-1315.
14. Eng J.K., McCormack A.L., Yates J.R. An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 1994, 5(11):976-989.
15. Choudhary J.S., Blackstock W.P., Creasy D.M., Cottrell J.S. Matching peptide mass spectra to EST and genomic DNA databases. Trends Biotechnol 2001, 19(10):S17-S22.
16. Luethy R., Kessner D.E., Katz J.E., McLean B., Grothe R., Kani K., et al. Precursor-ion mass re-estimation improves peptide identification on hybrid instruments. J Proteome Res 2008, 7(9):4031-4039.
17. Cox J., Mann M. Computational principles of determining and improving mass precision and accuracy for proteome measurements in an Orbitrap. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 2009, 20(8):1477-1485.
18. Martens L., Chambers M., Sturm M., Kessner D., Levander F., Shofstahl J., et al. mzML - a community standard for mass spectrometry data. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010, http://www.mcponline.org/content/10/1/R110.000133.
19. Jensen O.N. Interpreting the protein language using proteomics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006, 7(6):391-403.
20. Beausoleil S.A., Villen J., Gerber S.A., Rush J., Gygi S.P. A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat Biotechnol 2006, 24(10):1285-1292.
21. Olsen J.V., Blagoev B., Gnad F., Macek B., Kumar C., Mortensen P., et al. Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell 2006, 127(3):635-648.
22. Tanner S., Shu H.J., Frank A., Wang L.C., Zandi E., Mumby M., et al. InsPecT: identification of posttranslationally modified peptides from tandem mass spectra. Anal Chem 2005, 77(14):4626-4639.
23. Tsur D., Tanner S., Zandi E., Bafna V., Pevzner P.A. Identification of post-translational modifications by blind search of mass spectra. Nat Biotechnol 2005, 23(12):1562-1567.
24. Tanner S., Payne S.H., Dasari S., Shen Z., Wilmarth P.A., David L.L., et al. Accurate annotation of peptide modifications through unrestrictive database search. J Proteome Res 2008, 7(1):170-181.
25. Ruttenberg B.E., Pisitkun T., Knepper M.A., Hoffert J.D. PhosphoScore: an open-source phosphorylation site assignment tool for MSn data. J Proteome Res 2008, 7(7):3054-3059.
26. Lu B.W., Ruse C., Xu T., Park S.K., Yates J. Automatic validation of phosphopeptide identifications from tandem mass spectra. Anal Chem 2007, 79(4):1301-1310.
27. Bailey C.M., Sweet S.M.M., Cunningham D.L., Zeller M., Heath J.K., Cooper H.J. SLoMo: automated site localization of modifications from ETD/ECD mass spectra. J Proteome Res 2009, 8(4):1965-1971.
28. Savitski M.M., Nielsen M.L., Zubarev R.A. ModifiComb, a new proteomic tool for mapping substoichiometric post-translational modifications, finding novel types of modifications, and fingerprinting complex protein mixtures. Mol Cell Proteomics 2006, 5(5):935-948.
29. Savitski M.M., Lemeer S., Boesche M., Lang M., Mathieson T., Bantscheff M., et al. Confident phosphorylation site localization using the Mascot Delta Score. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010, http://www.mcponline.org/content/10/2/M110.003830.
30. Ahrne E., Muller M., Lisacek F. Unrestricted identification of modified proteins using MS/MS. Proteomics 2010, 10(4):671-686.
31. Sadygov R.G., Cociorva D., Yates J.R. Large-scale database searching using tandem mass spectra: Looking up the answer in the back of the book. Nat Methods 2004, 1(3):195-202.
32. Field H.I., Fenyo D., Beavis R.C. RADARS, a bioinformatics solution that automates proteome mass spectral analysis, optimises protein identification, and archives data in a relational database. Proteomics 2002, 2(1):36-47.
33. Clauser K.R., Baker P., Burlingame A.L. Role of accurate mass measurement (+/-10ppm) in protein identification strategies employing MS or MS/MS and database searching. Anal Chem 1999, 71(14):2871-2882.
34. Bafna V., Edwards N. SCOPE: a probabilistic model for scoring tandem mass spectra against a peptide database. Bioinformatics 2001, 17(suppl 1):S13-S21.
35. Colinge J., Masselot A., Giron M., Dessingy T., Magnin J. OLAV: towards high-throughput tandem mass spectrometry data identification. Proteomics 2003, 3(8):1454-1463.
36. Perkins D.N., Pappin D.J., Creasy D.M., Cottrell J.S. Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 1999, 20(18):3551-3567.
37. Geer L.Y., Markey S.P., Kowalak J.A., Wagner L., Xu M., Maynard D.M., et al. Open mass spectrometry search algorithm. J Proteome Res 2004, 3(5):958-964.
38. Keller A., Nesvizhskii A.I., Kolker E., Aebersold R. Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal Chem 2002, 74(20):5383-5392.
39. Spivak M., Weston J., Bottou L., Kall L., Noble W.S. Improvements to the percolator algorithm for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics data sets. J Proteome Res 2009, 8(7):3737-3745.
40. Nesvizhskii A.I., Vitek O., Aebersold R. Analysis and validation of proteomic data generated by tandem mass spectrometry. Nat Methods 2007, 4(10):787-797.
41. Eng J.K., Fischer B., Grossmann J., MacCoss M.J. A fast SEQUEST cross correlation algorithm. J Proteome Res 2008, 7(10):4598-4602.
42. Bradshaw R.A., Burlingame A.L., Carr S., Aebersold R. Reporting protein identification data: the next generation of guidelines. Mol Cell Proteomics 2006, 5(5):787-788.
43. Binz P.-A., Barkovich R., Beavis R.C., Creasy D., Horn D.M., Julian R.K., et al. Guidelines for reporting the use of mass spectrometry informatics in proteomics. Nat Biotechnol 2008, 26(8):862.
44. Elias J.E., Gygi S.P. Target-decoy search strategy for increased confidence in large-scale protein identifications by mass spectrometry. Nat Methods 2007, 4(3):207-214.
45. Nesvizhskii A.I., Aebersold R. Interpretation of shotgun proteomic data - the protein inference problem. Mol Cell Proteomics 2005, 4(10):1419-1440.
46. Duncan M.W., Aebersold R., Caprioli R.M. The pros and cons of peptide-centric proteomics. Nat Biotechnol 2010, 28(7):659-664.
47. Ma B. Challenges in computational analysis of mass spectrometry data for proteomics. J Comput Sci Technol 2010, 25(1):107-123.
48. Kumar C., Mann M. Bioinformatics analysis of mass spectrometry-based proteomics data sets. FEBS Lett 2009, 583(11):1703-1712.
49. McHugh L., Arthur J.W. Computational methods for protein identification from mass spectrometry data. PLoS Comput Biol 2008, 4(2).
50. Matthiesen R. Methods, algorithms and tools in computational proteomics: a practical point of view. Proteomics 2007, 7(16):2815-2832.
51. Hernandez P., Muller M., Appel R.D. Automated protein identification by tandem mass spectrometry: issues and strategies. Mass Spectrom Rev 2006, 25(2):235-254.
52. Eidhammer I., Flikka K., Martens L., Mikalsen S.-O. Computational methods for mass spectrometry proteomics 2007, Wiley, Chichester, UK.