A quick guide to biomolecular network studies: Construction, analysis, applications, and resources

Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications

Volumn 424, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 7-11

  Tang, Hailin ^a,b   Zhong, Fan ^b   Xie, Hongwei ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Interaction; Model; Network; Pathway

Indexed keywords

GENE INTERACTION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SHORT SURVEY; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DATABASES, GENETIC; DISEASE; GENES; GENETIC TESTING; HUMANS; INFORMATION SERVICES; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84864092600     PISSN: 0006291X     EISSN: 10902104     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.06.085     Document Type: Short Survey

References (73)

1. De Las Rivas J., Fontanillo C. Protein-protein interactions essentials: key concepts to building and analyzing interactome networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2010, 6:e1000807.
2. Bader G.D., Cary M.P., Sander C. Pathguide: a pathway resource list. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34:D504-D506.
3. Bruggeman F.J., Westerhoff H.V. The nature of systems biology. Trends Microbiol. 2007, 15:45-50.
4. Bansal M., Belcastro V., Ambesi-Impiombato A., et al. How to infer gene networks from expression profiles. Mol. BiolSyst. 2007, 3:78.
5. Viswanathan G.A., Seto J., Patil S., et al. Getting started in biological pathway construction and analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2008, 4:e16.
6. Zhao J., Yu H., Luo J., et al. Hierarchical modularity of nested bow-ties in metabolic networks. BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7:386.
7. Missiuro P.V., Liu K., Zou L., et al. Information flow analysis of interactome networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2009, 5:e1000350.
8. Liu W., Li D., Zhang Z., et al. SigFlux: A novel network feature to evaluate the importance of proteins in signal transduction networks. BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7:515.
9. Klamt S., Haus U.U., Theis F. Hypergraphs and cellular networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2009, 5:e1000385.
10. Royer L., Reimann M., Andreopoulos B., et al. Unraveling protein networks with power graph analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2008, 4:e1000108.
11. Han J.D.J., Bertin N., Hao T., et al. Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Nature 2004, 430:88-93.
12. Bhardwaj N., Yan K.K., Gerstein M.B. Analysis of diverse regulatory networks in a hierarchical context shows consistent tendencies for collaboration in the middle levels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2010, 107:6841-6846.
13. Jothi R., Balaji S., Wuster A., et al. Genomic analysis reveals a tight link between transcription factor dynamics and regulatory network architecture. Mol. BiolSyst. 2009, 5:294.
14. Oberdorf R., Kortemme T. Complex topology rather than complex membership is a determinant of protein dosage sensitivity. Mol. BiolSyst 2009, 5:253.
15. Alexander R.P., Kim P.M., Emonet T., et al. Understanding modularity in molecular networks requires dynamics. Science Signaling 2009, 2:pe44.
16. Hughey J.J., Lee T.K., Covert M.W. Computational modeling of mammalian signaling networks. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev Syst. Biol. Med 2010, 2:194-209.
17. Lequieu J., Chakrabarti A., Nayak S., et al. Computational modeling and analysis of insulin induced eukaryotic translation initiation. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2011, 7:e1002263.
18. Meng T., Somani S., P D. Modeling and simulation of biological systems with stochasticity. In Silico Biol. 2004, 209-293.
19. Colvin J., Monine M.I., Faeder J.R., et al. Simulation of large-scale rule-based models. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:910-917.
20. Wang D.Y.Q., Cardelli L., Philip A., et al. Computational modeling of the EGFR network elucidates control mechanisms regulating signal dynamics. BMC Syst. Biol. 2009, 3:118.
21. Bachmann J., Raue A., Schilling M., et al. Division of labor by dual feedback regulators controls JAK2/STAT5 signaling over broad ligand range. Mol. BiolSyst. 2011, 7:516.
22. Feist A.M., Herrgard M.J., Thiele I., et al. Reconstruction of biochemical networks in microorganisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7:129-143.
23. Schellenberger J., Park J.O., Conrad T.M., et al. BiGG: a Biochemical Genetic and Genomic knowledgebase of large scale metabolic reconstructions. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:213.
24. Teschendorff A.E., Severini S. Increased entropy of signal transduction in the cancer metastasis phenotype. BMC Syst. Biol. 2010, 4:104.
25. Suzuki H., Forrest A.R., van Nimwegen E., et al. The transcriptional network that controls growth arrest and differentiation in a human myeloid leukemia cell line. Nat. Genet. 2009, 41:553-562.
26. Zhu J., Zhang B., Smith E.N., et al. Integrating large-scale functional genomic data to dissect the complexity of yeast regulatory networks. Nat. Genet. 2008, 40:854-861.
27. Goh K.I., Cusick M.E., Valle D., et al. The human disease network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 2007, 104:8685-8690.
28. Chavali S., Barrenas F., Kanduri K., et al. Network properties of human disease genes with pleiotropic effects. BMC Syst. Biol. 2010, 4:78.
29. Feldman I., Rzhetsky A., Vitkup D. Network properties of genes harboring inherited disease mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 2008, 105:4323-4328.
30. Jonsson P.F., Bates P.A. Global topological features of cancer proteins in the human interactome. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:2291-2297.
31. Cui Q., Ma Y., Jaramillo M., et al. A map of human cancer signaling. Mol. BiolSyst. 2007, 3:152.
32. Sun J., Zhao Z. A comparative study of cancer proteins in the human protein-protein interaction network. BMC Genet. 2010, 11(Suppl 3):S5.
33. Navlakha S., Kingsford C. The power of protein interaction networks for associating genes with diseases. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:1057-1063.
34. Ortutay C., Vihinen M. Identification of candidate disease genes by integrating Gene Ontologies and protein-interaction networks: case study of primary immunodeficiencies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:622-628.
35. Li L., Zhang K., Lee J., et al. Discovering cancer genes by integrating network and functional properties. BMC Med. Genet. 2009, 2:61.
36. Xu J., Li Y. Discovering disease-genes by topological features in human protein-protein interaction network. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:2800-2805.
37. Keller A., Backes C., Gerasch A., et al. A novel algorithm for detecting differentially regulated paths based on gene set enrichment analysis. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:2787-2794.
38. Hung J.H., Whitfield T.W., Yang T.H., et al. Identification of functional modules that correlate with phenotypic difference. the influence of network topology. Genome Biol. 2010, 11:R23.
39. Chuang H.Y., Lee E., Liu Y.T., et al. Network-based classification of breast cancer metastasis. Mol. BiolSyst. 2007, 3:140.
40. Ideker T., Krogan N.J. Differential network biology. Mol. BiolSyst 2012, 8:565.
41. Emmert-Streib F., Glazko G.V. Pathway analysis of expression data: deciphering functional building blocks of complex diseases. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2011, 7:e1002053.
42. Tranchevent L.C., Capdevila F.B., Nitsch D., et al. A guide to web tools to prioritize candidate genes. Brief Bioinformatics 2011, 12:22-32.
43. Ein-Dor L., Zuk O., Domany E. Thousands of samples are needed to generate a robust gene list for predicting outcome in cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 2006, 103:5923-5928.
44. Barabasi A.L., Gulbahce N., Loscalzo J. Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2011, 12:56-68.
45. Ideker T., Sharan R. Protein networks in disease. Genome Res. 2008, 18:644-652.
46. Cusick M.E., Yu H., Smolyar A., et al. Literature-curated protein interaction datasets. Nat. Methods 2009, 6:39-46.
47. Hucka M., Finney A., Sauro H.M., et al. The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:524-531.
48. Lloyd C.M., Halstead M.D., Nielsen P.F. CellML: its future, present and past. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2004, 85:433-450.
49. Hermjakob H. The HUPO PSI's molecular interaction format-a community standard for the representation of protein interaction data. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 177-183.
50. Demir E., Cary M.P., Paley S., et al. The BioPAX community standard for pathway data sharing. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28:935-942.
51. Le Novere N., Hucka M., Mi H., et al. The Systems Biology Graphical Notation. Nat. Biotechnol. 2009, 27:735-741.
52. Stromback L., Lambrix P. Representations of molecular pathways: an evaluation of SBML, PSI MI and BioPAX. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:4401-4407.
53. Chaurasia G., Herzel H., Futschik M.E. Comparison and integration of large-scale human protein-protein interaction maps. FEBS J. 2007, 274:300.
54. Mathivanan S., Periaswamy B., Gandhi T.K.B., et al. An evaluation of human protein-protein interaction data in the public domain. BMC Bioinformatics 2006, 7:S19.
55. Futschik M.E., Chaurasia G., Herzel H. Comparison of human protein-protein interaction maps. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:605-611.
56. Bauer-Mehren A., Furlong L.I., Sanz F. Pathway databases and tools for their exploitation: benefits, current limitations and challenges. Mol. BiolSyst. 2009, 5:290.
57. Soh D., Dong D., Guo Y., et al. Consistency, comprehensiveness, and compatibility of pathway databases. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:449.
58. Shmelkov E., Tang Z., Aifantis I., et al. Assessing quality and completeness of human transcriptional regulatory pathways on a genome-wide scale. Biol. Direct 2011, 6:15.
59. Jensen L.J., Kuhn M., Stark M., et al. STRING 8-a global view on proteins and their functional interactions in 630 organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:D412-D416.
60. Cerami E.G., Gross B.E., Demir E., et al. Pathway Commons, a web resource for biological pathway data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:D685-D690.
61. Kamburov A., Pentchev K., Galicka H., et al. ConsensusPathDB: toward a more complete picture of cell biology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:D712-D717.
62. Schilstra M.J., Li L., Matthews J., et al. CellML2SBML: conversion of CellML into SBML. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:1018-1020.
63. Moutselos K., Kanaris I., Chatziioannou A., et al. KEGGconverter: a tool for the in-silico modelling of metabolic networks of the KEGG Pathways database. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:324.
64. van Iersel M.P., Kelder T., Pico A.R., et al. Presenting and exploring biological pathways with PathVisio. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:399.
65. Smoot M.E., Ono K., Ruscheinski J., et al. Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics 2011, 27:431-432.
66. Hu Z., Hung J.H., Wang Y., et al. VisANT 3.5: multi-scale network visualization, analysis and inference based on the gene ontology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:W115-W121.
67. Gehlenborg N., Io'Donoghue S., Baliga N.S., et al. Visualization of omics data for systems biology. Nat. Methods 2010, 7:S56-S58.
68. Yip K.Y., Yu H.Y., Kim P.M., et al. The tYNA platform for comparative interactomics: a web tool for managing, comparing and mining multiple networks (vol 22, pg 2968, 2006). Bioinformatics 2007, 23:1048.
69. Shannon P., Markiel A., Ozier O., et al. Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003, 13:2498-2504.
70. Funahashi A., Matsuoka Y., Jouraku A., et al. Cell Designer 3.5: A versatile modeling tool for biochemical networks. Proc. IEEE 2008, 96:1254-1265.
71. Xia J., Psychogios N., Young N., et al. MetaboAnalyst: a web server for metabolomic data analysis and interpretation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:W652-W660.
72. Huang D.W., Sherman B.T., Lempicki R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4:44-57.
73. Shi J., Walker M.G. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) for interpreting gene expression profiles. Curr. Bioinform. 2007, 2:133-137.