A comparative analysis of computational approaches to relative protein quantification using peptide peak intensities in label-free LC-MS proteomics experiments

Proteomics

Volumn 13, Issue 3-4, 2013, Pages 493-503

  Matzke, Melissa M ^a   Brown, Joseph N ^a   Gritsenko, Marina A ^a   Metz, Thomas O ^a   Pounds, Joel G ^a   Rodland, Karin D ^a   Shukla, Anil K ^a   Smith, Richard D ^a   Waters, Katrina M ^a   Mcdermott, Jason E ^a   Webb Robertson, Bobbie Jo ^a  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Label free; Peak intensity; Protein quantification; Relative

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; LIMIT OF QUANTITATION; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; PLASMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW;

CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84873987395     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201200269     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Ong, S. E., Mann, M., Mass spectrometry-based proteomics turns quantitative. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2005, 1, 252-262.
2. Bantscheff, M., Schirle, M., Sweetman, G., Rick, J., Kuster, B., Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2007, 389, 1017-1031.
3. Elliott, M. H., Smith, D. S., Parker, C. E., Borchers, C., Current trends in quantitative proteomics. J. Mass Spectrom. 2009, 44, 1637-1660.
4. Noble, W. S., MacCoss, M. J., Computational and statistical analysis of protein mass spectrometry data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2012, 8, e1002296.
5. Domon, B., Aebersold, R., Options and considerations when selecting a quantitative proteomics strategy. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 710-721.
6. Arike, L., Valgepea, K., Peil, L., Nahku, R. et al., Comparison and applications of label-free absolute proteome quantification methods on Escherichia coli. J. Proteomics 2012, 75, 5437-5448.
7. Silva, J. C., Gorenstein, M. V., Li, G. Z., Vissers, J. P., Geromanos, S. J., Absolute quantification of proteins by LCMSE: a virtue of parallel MS acquisition. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2006, 5, 144-156.
8. Lu, P., Vogel, C., Wang, R., Yao, X., Marcotte, E. M., Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 117-124.
9. Martens, L., Bioinformatics challenges in mass spectrometry-driven proteomics. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 753, 359-371.
10. Ning, K., Fermin, D., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Comparative analysis of different label-free mass spectrometry based protein abundance estimates and their correlation with RNA-Seq gene expression data. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11, 2261-2271.
11. Mallick, P., Kuster, B., Proteomics: a pragmatic perspective. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 695-709.
12. Du, X., Callister, S. J., Manes, N. P., Adkins, J. N. et al., A computational strategy to analyze label-free temporal bottom-up proteomics data. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 2595-2604.
13. Dost, B., Bandeira, N., Li, X., Shen, Z. et al., Accurate mass spectrometry based protein quantification via shared peptides. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 337-348.
14. Cheng, F. Y., Blackburn, K., Lin, Y. M., Goshe, M. B., Williamson, J. D., Absolute protein quantification by LC/MS(E) for global analysis of salicylic acid-induced plant protein secretion responses. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 82-93.
15. Polpitiya, A., Qian, W., Jaitly, N., Petyuk, V. et al., DAnTE: a statistical tool for quantitative analysis of -omics data. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 1556-1558.
16. Karpievitch, Y., Stanley, J., Taverner, T., Huang, J. et al., A statistical framework for protein quantitation in bottom-up MS-based proteomics. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 2028-2034.
17. Clough, T., Key, M., Ott, I., Ragg, S. et al., Protein quantification in label-free LC-MS experiments. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 5275-5284.
18. Clough, T., Vitek, O., MSstats: statistical protein quantification in label-free LC-MS experiments. 2011. R package, version 1.1 (July 11, 2012).
19. Phillips, L. S., Weintraub, W. S., Ziemer, D. C., Kolm, P. et al., All pre-diabetes is not the same: metabolic and vascular risks of impaired fasting glucose at 100 versus 110 mg/dl: the screening for impaired glucose tolerance study 1 (SIGT 1). Diabetes Care 2006, 29, 1405-1407.
20. Webb-Robertson, B. J., Matzke, M. M., Jacobs, J. M., Pounds, J. G., Waters, K. M., A statistical selection strategy for normalization procedures in LC-MS proteomics experiments through dataset-dependent ranking of normalization scaling factors. Proteomics 2011, 11, 4736-4741.
21. Webb-Robertson, B. J., McCue, L. A., Waters, K. M., Matzke, M. M. et al., Combined statistical analyses of peptide intensities and peptide occurrences improves identification of significant peptides from MS-based proteomics data. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 5748-5756.
22. Matzke, M. M., Waters, K. M., Metz, T. O., Jacobs, J. M. et al., Improved quality control processing of peptide-centric LC-MS proteomics data. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 2866-2872.
23. Nesvizhskii, A. I., Keller, A., Kolker, E., Aebersold, R., A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 4646-4658.
24. Li, Y. F., Arnold, R. J., Li, Y., Radivojac, P. et al., A Bayesian approach to protein inference problem in shotgun proteomics. J. Comput. Biol. 2009, 16, 1183-1193.
25. Wang, X., Anderson, G. A., Smith, R. D., Dabney, A. R., A hybrid approach to protein differential expression in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Bioinformatics 2012, 28, 1586-1591.
26. Bukham, Y., Dharsee, M., Ewing, R., Chu, P. et al., Design and analysis of quantitative differential proteomics investigations using LC-MS technology. J. Bioinform. Computat. Biol. 2008, 6, 107-123.
27. Daly, D., Anderson, K., Panisko, E., Purvine, S. et al., Mixed-effects statistical model for comparative LC-MS proteomics studies. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 1209-1217.