Discussion on common data analysis strategies used in MS-based proteomics

Proteomics

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 604-619

  Matthiesen, Rune ^a   Azevedo, Luisa ^a   Amorim, Antonio ^a   Carvalho, Ana Sofia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Algorithms; Bioinformatics; Interpretation of mass spectra; Tandem mass spectra

Indexed keywords

ASPARTYLASPARTYLASPARTYLGLUTAMYLSERYLTHREONYLGLUTAMYLSERYLASPARTYLASPARTYLASPARTYLASPARAGINYLGLUTAMINYLASPARTYLASPARTYLGLUTAMYLLYSINE; PEPTIDE; PROLYLVALYLASPARAGINYLASPARAGINYLHISTIDYLASPARTYLVALYLPROLYLSERYLVALYLLYSINE; PROLYLVALYLASPARTYLASPARTYLHISTIDYLASPARTYLVALYLPROLYLSERYLVALYLGLUTAMYLPROLYLVALYLASPARTYLGLUTAMINYLHISTIDYLASPARTYLVALYLPROLYLSERYLVALYLLYSINE; PROTEIN; PROTEOME; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA ANALYSIS; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY MASS SPECTROMETRY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN MICROARRAY; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; PROTEOMICS; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 79551483264     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201000404     Document Type: Review

References (134)

1. Jensen, O. N., Interpreting the protein language using proteomics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7, 391-403.
2. Pantaleo, M. A., Palassini, E., Labianca, R., Biasco, G., Targeted therapy in colorectal cancer: do we know enough? Dig. Liver Dis. 2006, 38, 71-77.
3. Escobar, J., Pereda, J., Arduini, A., Sandoval, J. et al., Cross-talk between oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory cytokines in acute pancreatitis: a key role for protein phosphatases. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2009, 15, 3027-3042.
4. Beck, H. C., Mass spectrometry in epigenetic research. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 593, 263-282.
5. Beck, H. C., Nielsen, E. C., Matthiesen, R., Jensen, L. H. et al., Quantitative proteomic analysis of post-translational modifications of human histones. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2006, 5, 1314-1325.
6. Bates, R. C., Mercurio, A. M., The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and colorectal cancer progression. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2005, 4, 365-370.
7. Correia, M., Machado, J. C., Ristimaki, A., Basic aspects of gastric cancer. Helicobacter 2009, 14, 36-40.
8. Milne, A. N., Carneiro, F., O'Morain, C., Offerhaus, G. J., Nature meets nurture: molecular genetics of gastric cancer. Hum. Genet. 2009, 126, 615-628.
9. Vargas, A. C., Lakhani, S. R., Simpson, P. T., Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma of the breast: molecular pathology and clinical impact. Future Oncol. 2009, 5, 233-243.
10. Nakayama, T., Watanabe, M., Katsumata, T., Teramoto, T., Kitajima, M., Expression of sialyl Lewis(a) as a new prognostic factor for patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 1995, 75, 2051-2056.
11. Nakagoe, T., Fukushima, K., Tanaka, K., Sawai, T. et al., Evaluation of sialyl Lewis(a), sialyl Lewis(x), and sialyl Tn antigens expression levels as predictors of recurrence after curative surgery in node-negative colorectal cancer patients. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2002, 21, 107-113.
12. Matthiesen, R., Amorim, A., Proteomics facing the combinatorial problem. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 593, 175-186.
13. Lange, E., Gropl, C., Reinert, K., Kohlbacher, O., Hildebrandt, A., High-accuracy peak picking of proteomics data using wavelet techniques. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 2006, 11, 243-254.
14. Kast, J., Gentzel, M., Wilm, M., Richardson, K., Noise filtering techniques for electrospray quadrupole time of flight mass spectra. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 14, 766-776.
15. Savitzky, A., Golay, M., Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal. Chem. 1964, 36, 1627-1639.
16. Carroll, J., Beavis, R., Using matrix convolution filters to extract information from time-of-flight mass spectra. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1996, 10, 1683-1687.
17. Vivo-Truyols, G., Schoenmakers, P. J., Automatic selection of optimal Savitzky-Golay smoothing. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 4598-4608.
18. Eilers, P. H., A perfect smoother. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 3631-3636.
19. Fahrmeir, L., Wagenpfeil, S., Penalized likelihood estimation and iterative Kalman smoothing for non-Gaussian dynamic regression models. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 1997, 24 295-320.
20. Lee, A., Headley, L., Hardy, J., Noise reduction of gas chromatography/mass spectrometry data using principal component analysis. Anal. Chem. 1991, 63, 357-360.
21. Zhang, Z., McElvain, J., Optimizing spectroscopic signal-to-noise ratio in analysis of data collected by a chromatographic/spectroscopic system. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 39-45.
22. Du, P., Kibbe, W. A., Lin, S. M., Improved peak detection in mass spectrum by incorporating continuous wavelet transform-based pattern matching. Bioinformatics 2006, 22, 2059-2065.
23. Lange, E., Gropl, C., Reinert, K., Kohlbacher, O., Hildebrandt, A., High-accuracy peak picking of proteomics data using wavelet techniques. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 2006, 243-254.
24. Schulz-Trieglaff, O., Hussong, R., Gropl, C., Leinenbach, A. et al., Computational quantification of peptides from LC-MS data. J. Comput. Biol. 2008, 15, 685-704.
25. Wagner, M., Naik, D., Pothen, A., Protocols for disease classification from mass spectrometry data. Proteomics 2003, 3, 1692-1698.
26. Leptos, K. C., Sarracino, D. A., Jaffe, J. D., Krastins, B., Church, G. M., MapQuant: open-source software for large-scale protein quantification. Proteomics 2006, 6, 1770-1782.
27. Matthiesen, R., Methods, algorithms and tools in computational proteomics: a practical point of view. Proteomics 2007, 7, 2815-2832.
28. Brownawell, M. L., Filippo, J. J., A program for the synthesis of mass spectral isotopic abundances. J. Chem. Educ. 1982, 59, 663-665.
29. Boone, B., Mitchum, R. K., Schsppele, S. E., Computer analysis of low resolution mass spectra correction for natural abundance of 13c, 2h, 15n, 17o and 18o. Int. J. Mass Spect. Ion Physics 1970, 5, 21-27.
30. Matthiesen, R., Extracting monoisotopic single-charge peaks from liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. Methods Mol. Biol. 2007, 367, 37-48.
31. Yergey, J. A., A general approach to calculating isotopic distributions for mass spectrometry. Int. J. Mass Spect. Ion Physics 1983, 52, 337-349.
32. Rockwood, A. L., Van Orden, S. L., Ultrahigh-speed calculation of isotope distributions. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 2027-2030.
33. Rockwood, A. L., Van Orden, S. L., Smith, R. D., Rapid calculation of isotope distributions. Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 2699-2704.
34. Snider, R. K., Effcient calculation of exact mass isotopic distributions. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2007, 18, 1511-1515.
35. Kubinyi, H., Calculation of isotope distributions in mass spectrometry. A trivial solution for a non-trivial problem. Anal. Chim. Acta 1991, 247, 107-109.
36. Rockwood, A. L., Haimi, P., Efficient calculation of accurate masses of isotopic peaks. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2006, 17, 415-419.
37. Senko, M., Beu, S., McLafferty, F., Determination of monoisotopic masses and ion populations for large biomolecules from resolved isotopic distributions. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1995, 6, 229-233.
38. Wehofsky, M., Hoffmann, R., Hubert, M., Spengler, B., Isotopic deconvolution of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectra for substances-class specific analysis of complex samples. Eur. J. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 7, 39-46.
39. Hoopmann, M., Finney, G., MacCoss, M., High-speed data reduction, feature detection, and ms/ms spectrum quality assessment of shotgun proteomics data sets using high-resolution mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 5620-5632.
40. Mann, M., Meng, C. K., Fenn, J. B., Interpreting mass spectra of multiply charged ions. Anal. Chem. 1989, 61, 1702-1708.
41. Reinhold, B. B., Reinhold, V. N., Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry: deconvolution by an entropy-based algorithm. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1992, 3, 207-215.
42. Ferrige, A. G., Seddon, M. J., Jarvis, S., Maximum entropy deconvolution in electrospray mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1991, 6, 707-711.
43. Ferrige, A. G., Seddon, M. J., Green, B. N., Jarvis, S. A., Skilling, J., Disentagling electrospray spectra with maximum entropy. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1992, 6, 707-711.
44. Senko, M. W., Beu, S. C., McLafferty, F. W., Automated assignment of charge states from resolved isotopic peaks for multiply charged ions. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1995, 6, 52-56.
45. Horn, D. M., Zubarev, R. A., McLafferty, F. W., Automated reduction and interpretation of high resolution electrospray mass spectra of large molecules. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2000, 11, 320-332.
46. Chen, L., Yap, Y. L., Automated charge state determination of complex isotope-resolved mass spectra by peak-target Fourier transform. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2008, 19, 46-54.
47. Tabb, D. L., Shah, M. B., Strader, M. B., Connell, H. M. et al., Determination of peptide and protein ion charge states by Fourier transformation of isotope-resolved mass spectra. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2006, 17, 903-915.
48. Kaur, P., O'Connor, P. B., Algorithms for automatic interpretation of high resolution mass spectra. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2006, 17, 459-468.
49. Kaur, P., O'Connor, P. B., Comparison of charge state determination methods for high resolution mass spectra. IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing, Atlanta, Georgia, USA 2006, pp. 550-553.
50. Zhang, Z., Marshall, A. G., A universal algorithm for fast and automated charge state deconvolution of electrospray mass-to-charge ratio spectra. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 9, 225-233.
51. Makarov, A., Denisov, E., Lange, O., Performance evaluation of a high-field Orbitrap mass analyzer. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2009, 20, 1391-1396.
52. Cox, J., Mann, M., Computational principles of determining and improving mass precision and accuracy for proteome measurements in an Orbitrap. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2009, 20, 1477-1485.
53. Suits, F., Lepre, J., Du, P., Bischoff, R., Horvatovich, P., Two-dimensional method for time aligning liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry data. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 3095-3104.
54. Vandenbogaert, M., Li-Thiao-Te, S., Kaltenbach, H. M., Zhang, R. et al., Alignment of LC-MS images, with applications to biomarker discovery and protein identification. Proteomics 2008, 8, 650-672.
55. Petyuk, V. A., Jaitly, N., Moore, R. J., Ding, J. et al., Elimination of systematic mass measurement errors in liquid chromatography mass spectrometry-based proteomics using regression models and a priori partial knowledge of the sample content. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 693-706.
56. Prakash, A., Mallick, P., Whiteaker, J., Zhang, H. et al., Signal maps for mass spectrometry-based comparative proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2006, 5, 423-432.
57. Lange, E., Gropl, C., Schulz-Trieglaff, O., Leinenbach, A. et al., A geometric approach for the alignment of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry data. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, i273-i281.
58. Mann, M., Hojrup, P., Roepstorff, P., Use of mass spectrometric molecular weight information to identify proteins in sequence databases. Biol. Mass Spectrom. 1993, 22, 338-345.
59. Gusfield, D., Algorithms on Strings, Trees and Sequences: Computer Science and Computational Biology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1997.
60. Lu, B., Chen, T., A suffix tree approach to the interpretation of tandem mass spectra: applications to peptides of non-specific digestion and post-translational modifications. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, II113-II121.
61. Frank, A., Tanner, S., Bafna, V., Pevzner, P., Peptide sequence tags for fast database search in mass-spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 2005, 4, 1287-1295.
62. Tabb, D. L., Saraf, A., Yates, J. R., 3rd, GutenTag: high-throughput sequence tagging via an empirically derived fragmentation model. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 6415-6421.
63. Tanner, S., Shu, H., Frank, A., Wang, L. C. et al., InsPecT: identification of posttranslationally modified peptides from tandem mass spectra. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 4626-4639.
64. Kurtz, S., Reducing the space requirement of suffix trees. Software Pract. Ex. 1998, 29, 1149-1171.
65. Abouelhoda, M., Kurtz, S., Ohlebusch, E., Replacing suffix trees with enhanced suffix arrays. J. Discrete Algorithm. 2002, 2, 53-86.
66. Ferragina, P., Manzini, G., Indexing compressed text. J. ACM 2005, 52, 552-581.
67. Matthiesen, R., Lundsgaard, M., Welinder, K. G., Bauw, G., Interpreting peptide mass spectra by VEMS. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 792-793.
68. Liu, X., Shan, B., Xin, L., Ma, B., Better score function for peptide identification with ETD MS/MS spectra. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11, S4.
69. Craig, R., Beavis, R. C., A method for reducing the time required to match protein sequences with tandem mass spectra. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 17, 2310-2316.
70. Craig, R., Beavis, R. C., TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, 1466-1467.
71. Perkins, D. N., Pappin, D. J., Creasy, D. M., Cottrell, J. S., Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 1999, 20, 3551-3567.
72. Creasy, D. M., Cottrell, J. S., Error tolerant searching of uninterpreted tandem mass spectrometry data. Proteomics 2002, 2, 1426-1434.
73. Eng, J. K., Fischer, B., Grossmann, J., Maccoss, M. J., A fast SEQUEST cross correlation algorithm. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 4598-4602.
74. Yates, J. R., 3rd., Morgan, S. F., Gatlin, C. L., Griffin, P. R., Eng, J. K., Method to compare collision-induced dissociation spectra of peptides: potential for library searching and subtractive analysis. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 3557-3565.
75. Craig, R., Cortens, J. C., Fenyo, D., Beavis, R. C., Using annotated peptide mass spectrum libraries for protein identification. J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5, 1843-1849.
76. Matthiesen, R., Trelle, M. B., Hojrup, P., Bunkenborg, J., Jensen, O. N., VEMS 3.0: algorithms and computational tools for tandem mass spectrometry based identification of post-translational modifications in proteins. J. Proteome Res. 2005, 4, 2338-2347.
77. Ahrne, E., Muller, M., Lisacek, F., Unrestricted identification of modified proteins using MS/MS. Proteomics 2010, 10, 671-686.
78. Baliban, R. C., DiMaggio, P. A., Plazas-Mayorca, M. D., Young, N. L. et al., A novel approach for untargeted post-translational modification identification using integer linear optimization and tandem mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9, 764-779.
79. Bern, M., Goldberg, D., McDonald, W. H., Yates, J. R., 3rd., Automatic quality assessment of peptide tandem mass spectra. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, I49-I54.
80. Quandt, A., Masselot, A., Hernandez, P., Hernandez, C. et al., SwissPIT: an workflow-based platform for analyzing tandem-MS spectra using the Grid. Proteomics 2009, 9, 2648-2655.
81. Tanner, S., Payne, S. H., Dasari, S., Shen, Z. et al., Accurate annotation of peptide modifications through unrestrictive database search. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 170-181.
82. Desiere, F., Deutsch, E. W., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Mallick, P. et al., Integration with the human genome of peptide sequences obtained by high-throughput mass spectrometry. Genome Biol. 2005, 6, R9.
83. Morozova, O., Marra, M. A., Applications of next-generation sequencing technologies in functional genomics. Genomics 2008, 92, 255-264.
84. Huber, C., Huber, L., Special focus on top-down proteomics. Proteomics 2010, 10, 3564-3565.
85. Hines, W. M., Falick, A. M., Burlingame, A., Gibson, B. W., Pattern-based algorithm for peptide sequencing from tandem high energy collision-induced dissociation mass spectra. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1992, 3, 326-336.
86. Fenyo, D., Beavis, R. C., A method for assessing the statistical significance of mass spectrometry-based protein identifications using general scoring schemes. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 768-774.
87. Eng, J. K., McCormack, A. L., Yates, J. R., III., An approach to correlate tandem mass spectral data of peptides with amino acid sequences in a protein database. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1994, 5, 976-989.
88. Metz, C. E., Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin. Nuclear Med. 1978, VIII, 283-298.
89. Colinge, J., Chiappe, D., Lagache, S., Moniatte, M., Bougueleret, L., Differential proteomics via probabilistic peptide identification scores. Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 596-606.
90. Colinge, J., Masselot, A., Cusin, I., Mahe, E. et al., High-performance peptide identification by tandem mass spectrometry allows reliable automatic data processing in proteomics. Proteomics 2004, 4, 1977-1984.
91. Colinge, J., Masselot, A., Giron, M., Dessingy, T., Magnin, J., OLAV: towards high-throughput tandem mass spectrometry data identification. Proteomics 2003, 3, 1454-1463.
92. Wan, Y., Yang, A., Chen, T., PepHMM: a hidden Markov model based scoring function for mass spectrometry database search. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 432-437.
93. Frank, A. M., Savitski, M. M., Nielsen, M. L., Zubarev, R. A., Pevzner, P. A., De novo Peptide sequencing and identification with precision mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 114-123.
94. Baker, P. R., Medzihradszky, K. F., Chalkley, R. J., Improving software performance for peptide ETD data analysis by implementation of charge-state and sequence-dependent scoring. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9, 1795-1803.
95. Hubbard, S. J., Computational approaches to peptide identification via tandem MS. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 604, 23-42.
96. Anderson, D. C., Li, W., Payan, D. G., Noble, W. S., A new algorithm for the evaluation of shotgun peptide sequencing in proteomics: support vector machine classification of peptide MS/MS spectra and SEQUEST scores. J. Proteome Res. 2003, 2, 137-146.
97. Elias, J. E., Gibbons, F. D., King, O. D., Roth, F. P., Gygi, S. P., Intensity-based protein identification by machine learning from a library of tandem mass spectra. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004, 22, 214-219.
98. Kall, L., Canterbury, J. D., Weston, J., Noble, W. S., MacCoss, M. J., Semi-supervised learning for peptide identification from shotgun proteomics datasets. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 923-925.
99. Nesvizhskii, A. I., Keller, A., Kolker, E., Aebersold, R., A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 4646-4658.
100. Benjamini, Y., Y., H., Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Methodol. 1995, 57, 289-300.
101. Moore, R. E., Young, M. K., Lee, T. D., Qscore: an algorithm for evaluating SEQUEST database search results. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2002, 13, 378-386.
102. Klammer, A. A., MacCoss, M. J., Effects of modified digestion schemes on the identification of proteins from complex mixtures. J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5, 695-700.
103. Beausoleil, S. A., Villen, J., Gerber, S. A., Rush, J., Gygi, S. P., A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 1285-1292.
104. Matthiesen, R., Kirpekar, F., Identification of RNA molecules by specific enzyme digestion and mass spectrometry: software for and implementation of RNA mass mapping. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, e48.
105. Keller, A., Nesvizhskii, A. I., Kolker, E., Aebersold, R., Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Anal. Chem. 2002, 74, 5383-5392.
106. Kall, L., Storey, J. D., Noble, W. S., Non-parametric estimation of posterior error probabilities associated with peptides identified by tandem mass spectrometry. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, i42-i48.
107. Rodríguez-Suárez, E., Gubb, E., Alzueta, I., Falcón-Pérez, J. et al., VEMS: iTRAQ tool for database dependent search, quantitation and result storage. Proteomics 2010, 10, 1545-1556.
108. Matthiesen, R., Bunkenborg, J., Stensballe, A., Jensen, O. N. et al., Database-independent, database-dependent, and extended interpretation of peptide mass spectra in VEMS V2.0. Proteomics 2004, 4, 2583-2593.
109. Bianco, L., Mead, J., Bessant, C., Comparison of novel decoy database designs for optimizing protein identification searches using ABRF sPRG2006 standard MS/MS datasets. J. Proteome Res. 2009.
110. Cox, D. R., The Theory of the Design of Experiments, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington, DC 2000.
111. Ong, S. E., Blagoev, B., Kratchmarova, I., Kristensen, D. B. et al., Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2002, 1, 376-386.
112. Thompson, A., Schafer, J., Kuhn, K., Kienle, S. et al., Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 1895-1904.
113. Ross, P. L., Huang, Y. N., Marchese, J. N., Williamson, B. et al., Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2004, 3, 1154-1169.
114. Old, W. M., Meyer-Arendt, K., Aveline-Wolf, L., Pierce, K. G. et al., Comparison of label-free methods for quantifying human proteins by shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4, 1487-1502.
115. Gerber, S. A., Rush, J., Stemman, O., Kirschner, M. W., Gygi, S. P., Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 6940-6945.
116. Lau, K. W., Jones, A. R., Swainston, N., Siepen, J. A., Hubbard, S. J., Capture and analysis of quantitative proteomic data. Proteomics 2007, 7, 2787-2799.
117. Matthiesen, R., Carvalho, A. S., Methods and algorithms for relative quantitative proteomics by mass spectrometry. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 593, 187-204.
118. Sherman, J., McKay, M., Ashman, K., Molloy, K., How specific is my SRM? The issue of precursor and product ion redundancy. Proteomics 2009, 9, 1120-1123.
119. Cham Mead, J. A., Bianco, L., Bessant, C., Free computational resources for designing selected reaction monitoring transitions. Proteomics 2010, 10, 1106-1126.
120. Mischak, H., Apweiler, R., Banks, R., Conaway, M. et al., Clinical proteomics: a need to define the field and to begin to set adequate standards. Proteomics Clin. Appl. 2007, 1, 148-156.
121. Ransohoff, D. F., Bias as a threat to the validity of cancer molecular-marker research. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2005, 5, 142-149.
122. Hu, J., Coombes, K. R., Morris, J. S., Baggerly, K. A., The importance of experimental design in proteomic mass spectrometry experiments: some cautionary tales. Brief. Funct. Genomic. Proteomic. 2005, 3, 322-331.
123. Bonferroni, C., Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilit. Publicazioni del R Istituto Superiore di Scienze Economich e Commerciali di Firenze 1936, 8, 3-62.
124. Holm, S., A simple sequentially rejective Bonferroni test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 1979, 6, 65-70.
125. Sidak, Z., On multivariate normal probabilities of rectangles: their dependence on correlations. Ann. Math. Statist. 1968, 39, 1425-1434.
126. Sawcer, S., Bayes factors in complex genetics. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2010, 18, 746-750.
127. Dudbridge, F., Gusnanto, A., Estimation of significance thresholds for genomewide association scans. Genet. Epidemiol. 2008, 32, 227-234.
128. Wakefield, J., Bayes factors for genome-wide association studies: comparison with P-values. Genet. Epidemiol. 2009, 33, 79-86.
129. Cairns, D. A., Barrett, J. H., Billingham, L. J., Stanley, A. J. et al., Sample size determination in clinical proteomic profiling experiments using mass spectrometry for class comparison. Proteomics 2009, 9, 74-86.
130. Windig, W., Smith, W., Nichols, W., Fast interpretation of complex LC/MS data using chemometrics. Anal. Chim. Acta 2001, 446, 467-476.
131. Schlosser, A., Volkmer-Engert, R., Volatile polydimethylcyclosiloxanes in the ambient laboratory air identified as source of extreme background signals in nanoelectrospray mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 38, 523-525.
132. Nesvizhskii, A. I., Protein identification by tandem mass spectrometry and sequence database searching. Methods Mol. Biol. 2007, 367, 87-119.
133. Shen, C., Wang, Z., Shankar, G., Zhang, X., Li, L., A hierarchical statistical model to assess the confidence of peptides and proteins inferred from tandem mass spectrometry. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 202-208.
134. Jin, S., Daly, D. S., Springer, D. L., Miller, J. H., The effects of shared peptides on protein quantitation in label-free proteomics by LC/MS/MS. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 164-169.