Studying teacher noticing: EXAMINING the relationship among pre-service science teachers' ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking

Teaching and Teacher Education

Volumn 45, Issue , 2015, Pages 83-93

  Barnhart, Tara ^a   van Es, Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Pre service teacher education; Reflective teaching; Secondary school science; Student teachers; Student teaching; Teacher noticing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908349856     PISSN: 0742051X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Achieve, Inc The next generation science standards 2014, Retrieved May, 2014 from. http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science Benchmarks for scientific literacy 2009, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
3. Ball D.L., Cohen D.K. Developing practice, developing practitioners: toward a practice-based theory of professional education. Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice 1999, 3-32. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. L. Darling-Hammond, G. Sykes (Eds.).
4. Borko H., Livingston C. Cognition and improvisation: differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal 1989, 26(4):473-498.
5. Berliner D.C. Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research 2001, 35(5):463-482.
6. Blythe T. The teaching for understanding guide 1997, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA.
7. Carter K., Cushing K., Sabers D., Stein P., Berliner D. Expert-novice differences in perceiving and processing visual classroom information. Journal of Teacher Education 1988, 39(3):25-31.
8. Chung H.Q., van Es E. Pre-service teachers' use of tools to systematically analyze teaching and learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 2014, 20(2):113-135.
9. Copeland W.D., Birmingham C., DeMeulle L., D'Emidio-Caston M., Natal D. Making meaning in classrooms: an investigation of cognitive processes in aspiring teachers, experienced teachers, and their peers. American Educational Research Journal 1994, 31(1):166-196.
10. Corbin J., Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory 2008, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. 3rd ed.
11. Council of Chief State School Officers (2014). Retrieved May, 2014 from http://www.ccsso.org/Resources/Programs/Interstate_Teacher_Assessment_Consortium_(InTASC).html.
12. Darling-Hammond L. Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education 2006, 57(3):300-314.
13. Darling-Hammond L. Recognizing and developing effective teaching: What policy makers should know and do 2010, Partnership for Teacher Quality Policy Brief, May, 2010. Retrieved January, 2014 from. http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/HE/Effective_Teaching_-_Linda_Darling-Hammond.pdf.
14. Darling-Hammond L., Bransford J. Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should know and be able to do 2005, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
15. Davis E. Characterizing productive reflection among preservice elementary teachers: seeing what matters. Teaching and Teacher Education 2006, 22(3):281-301.
16. Davis E., Petish D., Smithey J. Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research 2006, 76(4):607-651.
17. Davis E., Smithey J. Beginning teachers moving toward effective elementary science teaching. Science Education 2009, 93(4):745-770.
18. Dewey J. How we think 1933, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, NY.
19. Earl L.M., Timperley H. Understanding how evidence and learning conversations work. Professional learning conversations: Challenges in using evidence for improvement 2008, 1-12. Springer, New York, NY. L.M. Earl, H. Timperley (Eds.).
20. Erickson F. On noticing teacher noticing. Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers' eyes 2011, 17-34. Routledge, New York, NY. M. Sherin, V. Jacobs, R. Philipp (Eds.).
21. Feiman-Nemser S. From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. The Teachers College Record 2001, 103(6):1013-1055.
22. Franke M., Kazemi E. Learning to teach mathematics: focus on student thinking. Theory Into Practice 2001, 40(2):102-109.
23. Gelfuso A., Dennis D. Getting reflection off the page: the challenges of developing support structures for pre-service teacher reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education 2014, 38(1):1-11.
24. Goldhaber D., Anthony E. Can teacher quality be effectively assessed? March 8, 2004, The Urban Institute, Retrieved February, 2014 from. http://www.urban.org/UpLoadedPDF/410958_NBPTSOutcomes.pdf.
25. Gleick J. The information: A history, a theory, a flood 2011, Harper Collins, New York, NY.
26. Hammer D. Student resources for learning introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, Physics Education Research Supplement 2000, 68(S1):S52-S59.
27. Hammerness K., Darling-Hammond L., Bransford J. How teachers learn and develop. Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should know and be able to do 2005, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. L. Darling-Hammond, J. Bransford (Eds.).
28. Hiebert J., Morris A., Berk D., Jansen A. Preparing teachers to learn from teaching. Journal of Teacher Education 2007, 58(1):47-61.
29. Hufferd-Ackles K., Fuson K.C., Sherin M.G. Describing levels and components of a math-talk learning community. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 2004, 35(2):81-116.
30. Jacobs V.R., Lamb L.L., Philipp R.A. Professional noticing of children's mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 2010, 41(2):169-202.
31. Jansen A., Bartell T., Berk D. The role of learning goals in building a knowledge base for elementary mathematics teacher education. The Elementary School Journal 2009, 109(5):525-536.
32. Kazemi E., Lampert M., Franke M. Developing pedagogies in teacher education to support novice teacher's ability to enact ambitious instruction. Crossing divides: Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia 2009, July, Vol. 1:12-30. MERGA, Palmerston North, NZ.
33. Kazemi E., Stipek D. Promoting conceptual thinking in four upper-elementary mathematics classrooms. The Elementary School Journal 2001, 102(1):59-80.
34. Korthagen F. The gap between research and practice revisited. Educational Research and Evaluation 2007, 13(3):303-310.
35. Lampert M. Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: what do we mean?. Journal of Teacher Education 2010, 61(1-2):21-34.
36. Lemke J. Discursive technologies and the social organization of meaning. Folia Linguistica 2002, 35(1-2):79-96.
37. Levin D.M., Hammer D., Coffey J.E. Novice teachers' attention to student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education 2009, 60(2):142-154.
38. Little J.W., Curry M.W. Structuring talk about teaching and learning: the use of evidence in protocol-based conversation. Professional learning conversations: Challenges in using evidence for improvement 2008, 29-42. Springer, New York, NY. L.M. Earl, H. Timperley (Eds.).
39. Little J.W., Horn I.S. 'Normalizing' problems of practice: Converting routine conversation into a resource for learning in professional communities. Professional learning communities: Divergence, detail and difficulties 2007, 79-92. Open University Press, Maidenhead, UK. L. Stoll, K.S. Louis (Eds.).
40. Loughran J. Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education 2002, 53(1):33-43.
41. Lloyd M.M., Mukherjee M. Tell me what you see: Pre-service teachers' recognition of exemplary digital pedagogy 2012, October, Paper presented at Australian Computers in Education Conference, Perth, Australia.
42. Mason J. Enabling teachers to be real teachers: Necessary levels of awareness and structure of attention. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 1998, 1:243-267.
43. Mason J. Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing 2002, Routledge Falmer, London.
44. McDonald M., Kazemi E., Kavanagh S.S. Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: a call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education 2013, 64(5):378-386.
45. Miles M.B., Huberman A.M., Saldaña J. Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook 2014, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. 3rd ed.
46. Ministry of Education-Singapore Science Syllabus: Primary 2013, Retrieved February, 2014 from. http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/syllabuses/sciences/files/science-primary-2014.pdf.
47. Morris A.K. Assessing pre-service teachers' skills for analyzing teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 2006, 9(5):471-505.
48. Morris A.K., Hiebert J., Spitzer S.M. Mathematical knowledge for teaching in planning and evaluating instruction: what can preservice teachers learn?. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 2009, 40(5):491-529.
49. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (2014) Retrieved May, 2014 from http://www.nbpts.org/mission-history.
50. National Research Council Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for Teaching and Learning. Committee on Development of an Addendum to the National Science Education Standards on Scientific Inquiry, Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education 2000, The National Academies Press, Retrieved February, 2014 from. http://www.nap.edu/download.php?record_id=9596.
51. National Research Council Taking science to school: learning and teaching science in Grades K-8. Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten through Eighth Grade. Board on Science Education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education 2007, The National Academies Press, Retrieved February, 2014 from. http://www.nap.edu/download.php?record_id=11625, R.A. Duschl, H.A. Schweingruber, A.W. Shouse (Eds.).
52. National Research Council AFramework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education 2012, National Academies Press, Retrieved February, 2014 from. http://www.nap.edu/download.php?record_id=13165.
53. Nicol C., Crespo S. Learning to see in mathematics classrooms. Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International 2004, Vol. 3:417-424. Retrieved February, 2014 from. ftp://134.76.12.4/pub/EMIS/proceedings/PME28/RR/RR263_Nicol.pdf.
54. OECD PISA 2012 Results: What students know and can do - Student performance in mathematics, reading, and science 2013, Vol 1. Retrieved February, 2014 from. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201118-en.
55. Pang J. Case-based pedagogy for prospective teachers to learn how to teach elementary mathematics in Korea. ZDM 2011, 43(6-7):777-789.
56. Pecheone R.L., Chung R.R. Evidence in teacher education: the Performance Assessment for California Teachers (PACT). Journal of Teacher Education 2006, 57(1):22-36.
57. Richardson V. Preservice teachers' beliefs. Advances in Teacher Education 2003, 6:1-22.
58. Rodgers C. Seeing student learning: teacher change and the role of reflection. Harvard Educational Review 2002, 72(2):230-253.
59. Ruiz-Primo M.A., Furtak E.M. Exploring teachers' informal formative assessment practices and students' understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2007, 44(1):57-84.
60. Sandoval W.A., Deneroff V., Franke M.L. Teaching, as learning, as inquiry: Moving beyond activity in the analysis of teaching practice 2002, April, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
61. Santagata R. From teacher noticing to a framework for analyzing and improving classroom lessons. Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers' eyes 2011, 152-168. Routledge, New York, NY. M. Sherin, V. Jacobs, R. Philipp (Eds.).
62. Santagata R., Angelici G. Studying the impact of the lesson analysis framework on preservice teachers' abilities to reflect on videos of classroom teaching. Journal of Teacher Education 2010, 61(4):339-349.
63. Santagata R., van Es E.A. Disciplined analysis of mathematics teaching as a routine of practice. Association for Mathematics Teacher Education Monograph Series 2010, Vol. 7:109-123. Association for Mathematics Teacher Educators, San Diego.
64. Santagata R., Yeh C. Learning to teach mathematics and to analyze teaching effectiveness: evidence from a video-and practice-based approach. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, December 2013, 1-24.
65. Santagata R., Zannoni C., Stigler J.W. The role of lesson analysis in pre-service teacher education: an empirical investigation of teacher learning from a virtual video-based field experience. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 2007, 10(2):123-140.
66. Schoenfeld A.H. Toward professional development for teachers grounded in a theory of decision making. ZDM 2011, 43(4):457-469.
67. Schön D.A. The reflective practitioner 1983, Basic Books, New York, NY.
68. Scribner J.P. Do-it-yourselfers or engineers? Bricolage as a metaphor for teacher work and learning 2003, April, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
69. Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers' eyes 2011, Routledge, New York, NY. M. Sherin, V. Jacobs, R. Philipp (Eds.).
70. So W.W.-M. Quality of learning outcomes in an online video-based learning community: potential and challenges for student teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 2012, 40(2):143-158.
71. Spitzer S.M., Phelps C.M., Beyers J.E., Johnson D.Y., Sieminski E.M. Developing prospective elementary teachers' abilities to identify evidence of student mathematical achievement. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 2011, 14(1):67-87.
72. Star J., Lynch K., Perova N. Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers' abilities to attend to classroom features. Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers' eyes 2011, 117-133. Routledge, New York, NY. M. Sherin, V. Jacobs, R. Philipp (Eds.).
73. Star J., Strickland S. Learning to observe: using video to improve pre-service mathematics teachers' ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 2008, 11(2):107-125.
74. Stockero S. Using a video-based curriculum to develop a reflective stance in prospective mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 2008, 11(5):373-394.
75. Strauss R.P., Sawyer E.A. Some new evidence on teacher and student competencies. Economics of Education Review 1986, 5(1):41-48.
76. Stürmer K., Könings K.D., Seidel T. Declarative knowledge and professional vision in teacher education: effect of courses in teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology 2012, 83:467-483.
77. Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research 2010, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. A. Tashakkori, C. Teddlie (Eds.).
78. Thompson J., Braaten M., Windschitl M. Learning progression as vision tools for advancing novice teachers' pedagogical performance 2009, June, Paper presented at Learning Progressions in Science (LeaPS) conference, Iowa City, IA.
79. Thompson J., Windschitl M., Braaten M., Stroupe D. Developing a theory of ambitious early-career teacher practice. American Educational Research Journal 2013, 50(3):574-615.
80. van Manen M. Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum inquiry 1977, 6(3):205-228.
81. van Zee E., Minstrell J. Using questioning to guide student thinking. Journal of the Learning Sciences 1997, 6(2):227-269.
82. van Es E., Sherin M. Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers' interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 2002, 10(4):571-596.
83. van Es E., Sherin M. Mathematics teachers' "learning to notice" in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies 2008, 24(2):244-276.
84. van Es E.A. Participants' roles in the context of a video club. Journal of the Learning Sciences 2009, 18(1):100-137.
85. van Es E. A framework for learning to notice student thinking. Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers' eyes 2011, 134-151. Routledge, New York, NY. M. Sherin, V. Jacobs, R. Philipp (Eds.).
86. Valencia S.W., Martin S.D., Place N.A., Grossman P. Complex interaction in student teaching: Lost opportunities for learning. Journal of Teacher Education 2009, 60:304-322.
87. Waddington D., Nentwig P., Schanze S. Standards in science education: Making it comparable 2007, Waxman Publishing, Munster, Germany.
88. Whitehurst G. Scientifically-based research on teacher quality: research on teacher preparation and professional development. Proceedings of the White House conference on preparing tomorrow's teachers 2002, Retrieved February, 2014 from. http://tepserver.ucsd.edu.
89. Windschitl M., Thompson J., Braaten M. Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education 2008, 92(5):941-967.
90. Windschitl M., Thompson J., Braaten M. Ambitious pedagogy by novice teachers: who benefits from tool-supported collaborative inquiry into practice and why?. Teachers College Record 2011, 113(7):1311-1360.
91. Windschitl M., Thompson J., Braaten M., Stroupe D. Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education 2012, 96(5):878-903.
92. Zeichner K. Preparing reflective teachers: an overview of instructional strategies which have been employed in preservice teacher education. International Journal of Educational Research 1987, 11(5):565-575.
93. Zeichner K., Liston D. Teaching student teachers to reflect. Harvard Educational Review 1987, 57(1):23-49.
94. Zeichner K., Liston D. Reflective teaching: An introduction 1996, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.