Case-based pedagogy for prospective teachers to learn how to teach elementary mathematics in Korea

ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 777-789

  Pang, JeongSuk ^a  

^a Korea National University of Education   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Case based pedagogy; Elementary mathematics lesson; Korean mathematics education; Mathematics specific analysis; Prospective teacher education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867454313     PISSN: 18639690     EISSN: 18639704     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-011-0352-3     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2. Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2009). The work of teaching and the challenge of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 497-511.
3. Borko, H., Peressini, D., Romagnano, L., Knuth, E., Willis-Yorker, C., Wooley, C., et al. (2000). Teacher education does matter: A situative view of learning to teach secondary mathematics. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 193-206.
4. Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers' instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81-112.
5. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055.
6. Henningsen, M. A. (2008). Getting to know Catherine and David: Using a narrative classroom case to promote inquiry and reflection on mathematics, teaching, and learning. In M. S. Smith & S. Friel (Eds.), Cases in mathematics teacher education: Tools for developing knowledge needed for teaching (pp. 47-56). Fourth Monograph of the Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. San Diego, CA: Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.
7. Hillen, A. F., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Developing teachers' abilities to facilitate meaningful classroom discourse through cases: The case of accountable talk. In M. S. Smith & S. Friel (Eds.), Cases in mathematics teacher education: Tools for developing knowledge needed for teaching (pp. 73-88). Fourth Monograph of the Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. San Diego, CA: Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.
8. Kitchen, R. S., Roy, F. C., Lee, O., & Secada, W. C. (2009). Comparing teachers' conceptions of mathematics education and student diversity at highly effective and typical elementary schools. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 2, 52-80.
9. Maher, C. A. (2008). Video recordings as pedagogical tools in mathematics teacher education. In D. Tirosh & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education. Tools and processes in mathematics teacher education (Vol. 2, pp. 65-83). The Netherlands: Sense.
10. Markovits, Z., & Even, R. (1999). The decimal point situation: A close look at the use of mathematics-classroom-situations in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 653-665.
11. Markovits, Z., & Smith, M. (2008). Cases as tools in mathematics teacher education. In D. Tirosh & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education. Tools and processes in mathematics teacher education (Vol. 2, pp. 39-64). The Netherlands: Sense.
12. Merseth, K. (1996). Cases and the case method in teacher education. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 722-746). New York: Simon & Schuster/Macmillan.
13. Merseth, K. (2003). Windows on teaching math: Cases of middle and secondary classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.
14. Miller, K., & Zhou, X. (2007). Learning from classroom video: What makes it compelling and what makes it hard. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Denny (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 321-334). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2007). Mathematics teaching today. Reston, VA: The Author.
16. Pang, J. S. (2009a). Good mathematics instruction in South Korea. ZDM-The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 41(3), 349-362.
17. Pang, J. S. (2009b). An analysis of mathematics instruction for the professional development of prospective elementary teachers. Research in Elementary Subject Matter Education, 11, 35-70 (in Korean).
18. Pang, J. S. (2011). Exploring Korean teacher classroom expertise in sociomathematical norms. In Y. Li & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Expertise in mathematics instruction: An international perspective (pp. 243-262). New York: Springer.
19. Santagata, R., & Guarino, J. (2010). Using video to teach future teachers to learn from teaching. ZDM-The International Journal of Mathematics Education. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0292-3.
20. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
21. Smith, M. S., Silver, E. A., & Stein, M. K. (2005a). Improving instruction in rational numbers and proportionality: Using cases to transform mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
22. Smith, M. S., Silver, E. A., & Stein, M. K. (2005b). Improving instruction in algebra: Using cases to transform mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
23. Smith, M. S., Silver, E. A., & Stein, M. K. (2005c). Improving instruction in geometry and measurement: Using cases to transform mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
24. Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers' ability to notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 107-125.
25. Steele, M. D. (2008). Building bridges: Cases as catalysts for the integration of mathematical and pedagogical knowledge. In M. S. Smith & S. Friel (Eds.), Cases in mathematics teacher education: Tools for developing knowledge needed for teaching (pp. 57-72). Fourth Monograph of the Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. San Diego, CA: Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators.
26. Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313-340.
27. Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M. A., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York: Teachers College Press.
28. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp. 158-183). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2010). The influence of video clubs on teachers' thinking and practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(2), 155-176.