The extent of error-prone replication restart by homologous recombination is controlled by Exo1 and checkpoint proteins

Journal of Cell Science

Volumn 127, Issue 13, 2014, Pages 2983-2994

  Tsang, Ellen ^a   Miyabe, Izumi ^a   Iraqui, Ismail ^b   Zheng, Jiping ^c   Lambert, Sarah A E ^b   Carr, Antony M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c Key Laboratory for Bio Pesticide creation and application of Guangdong Province   (China)

Author keywords

Checkpoint; Genome instability; Homologous; Recombination

Indexed keywords

CHECKPOINT KINASE 1; CHECKPOINT KINASE 2; CHECKPOINT KINASE RAD3; EXO 1 PROTEIN; PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; EXODEOXYRIBONUCLEASE; EXODEOXYRIBONUCLEASE I; PROTEIN KINASE; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE; CELL VIABILITY; DNA METABOLISM; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME REGULATION; GENE REPLICATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETIC RISK; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; INVERTED REPEAT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; REPLISOME; S PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE; DNA REPLICATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES;

CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DNA REPLICATION; EXODEOXYRIBONUCLEASES; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; PROTEIN KINASES; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE PROTEINS;

EID: 84903766705     PISSN: 00219533     EISSN: 14779137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.152678     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Ahn, J. S., Osman, F. and Whitby, M. C. (2005). Replication fork blockage by RTS1 at an ectopic site promotes recombination in fission yeast. EMBO J. 24, 2011-2023.
2. Alabert, C., Bianco, J. N. and Pasero, P. (2009). Differential regulation of homologous recombination at DNA breaks and replication forks by the Mrc1 branch of the S-phase checkpoint. EMBO J. 28, 1131-1141.
3. Bähler, J., Wu, J. Q., Longtine, M. S., Shah, N. G., McKenzie, A., 3rd, Steever, A. B., Wach, A., Philippsen, P. and Pringle, J. R. (1998). Heterologous modules for efficient and versatile PCR-based gene targeting in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast 14, 943-951.
4. Bailis, J. M., Luche, D. D., Hunter, T. and Forsburg, S. L. (2008). Minichromosome maintenance proteins interact with checkpoint and recombination proteins to promote s-phase genome stability. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 1724-1738.
5. Barlow, J. H. and Rothstein, R. (2009). Rad52 recruitment is DNA replication independent and regulated by Cdc28 and the Mec1 kinase. EMBO J. 28, 1121-1130.
6. Bastia, D., Zzaman, S., Krings, G., Saxena, M., Peng, X. and Greenberg, M. M. (2008). Replication termination mechanism as revealed by Tus-mediated polar arrest of a sliding helicase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 12831-12836.
7. Bester, A. C., Roniger, M., Oren, Y. S., Im, M. M., Sarni, D., Chaoat, M., Bensimon, A., Zamir, G., Shewach, D. S. and Kerem, B. (2011). Nucleotide deficiency promotes genomic instability in early stages of cancer development. Cell 145, 435-446.
8. Biswas, S. and Bastia, D. (2008). Mechanistic insights into replication termination as revealed by investigations of the Reb1-Ter3 complex of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 6844-6857.
9. Boddy, M. N., Lopez-Girona, A., Shanahan, P., Interthal, H., Heyer, W. D. and Russell, P. (2000). Damage tolerance protein Mus81 associates with the FHA1 domain of checkpoint kinase Cds1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 8758-8766.
10. Bolderson, E., Tomimatsu, N., Richard, D. J., Boucher, D., Kumar, R., Pandita, T. K., Burma, S. and Khanna, K. K. (2010). Phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates homologous recombination repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 1821-1831.
11. Brown, E. J. and Baltimore, D. (2003). Essential and dispensable roles of ATR in cell cycle arrest and genome maintenance. Genes Dev. 17, 615-628.
12. Carr, A. M. (2002). Checking that replication breakdown is not terminal. Science 297, 557-558.
13. Carr, A. M. and Lambert, S. (2013). Replication stress-induced genome instability: the dark side of replication maintenance by homologous recombination. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 4733-4744.
14. Casper, A. M., Nghiem, P., Arlt, M. F. and Glover, T. W. (2002). ATR regulates fragile site stability. Cell 111, 779-789.
15. Cha, R. S. and Kleckner, N. (2002). ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones. Science 297, 602-606.
16. Chen, S. H., Albuquerque, C. P., Liang, J., Suhandynata, R. T. and Zhou, H. (2010). A proteome-wide analysis of kinase-substrate network in the DNA damage response. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 12803-12812.
17. Cobb, J. A., Bjergbaek, L., Shimada, K., Frei, C. and Gasser, S. M. (2003). DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1. EMBO J. 22, 4325-4336.
18. Cobb, J. A., Schleker, T., Rojas, V., Bjergbaek, L., Tercero, J. A. and Gasser, S. M. (2005). Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations. Genes Dev. 19, 3055-3069. Codlin, S. and Dalgaard, J. Z. (2003). Complex mechanism of site-specific DNA replication termination in fission yeast. EMBO J. 22, 3431-3440.
19. Codlin, S. and Dalgaard, J. Z. (2003). Complex mechanism of site-specific DNA replication termination in fission yeast. EMBO J 2005 22 3431-3440.
20. Cotta-Ramusino, C., Fachinetti, D., Lucca, C., Doksani, Y., Lopes, M., Sogo, J. and Foiani, M. (2005). Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. Mol. Cell 17, 153-159.
21. Dalgaard, J. Z. and Klar, A. J. (2001). A DNA replication-arrest site RTS1 regulates imprinting by determining the direction of replication at mat1 in S. pombe. Genes Dev. 15, 2060-2068.
22. De Piccoli, G., Katou, Y., Itoh, T., Nakato, R., Shirahige, K. and Labib, K. (2012). Replisome stability at defective DNA replication forks is independent of S phase checkpoint kinases. Mol. Cell 45, 696-704.
23. Durkin, S. G., Arlt, M. F., Howlett, N. G. and Glover, T. W. (2006). Depletion of CHK1, but not CHK2, induces chromosomal instability and breaks at common fragile sites. Oncogene 25, 4381-4388.
24. El-Shemerly, M., Hess, D., Pyakurel, A. K., Moselhy, S. and Ferrari, S. (2008). ATR-dependent pathways control hEXO1 stability in response to stalled forks. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 511-519.
25. Errico, A. and Costanzo, V. (2012). Mechanisms of replication fork protection: a safeguard for genome stability. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 47, 222-235.
26. Eydmann, T., Sommariva, E., Inagawa, T., Mian, S., Klar, A. J. and Dalgaard, J. Z. (2008). Rtf1-mediated eukaryotic site-specific replication termination. Genetics 180, 27-39.
27. Froget, B., Blaisonneau, J., Lambert, S. and Baldacci, G. (2008). Cleavage of stalled forks by fission yeast Mus81/Eme1 in absence of DNA replication checkpoint. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 445-456.
28. Haghnazari, E. and Heyer, W. D. (2004). The DNA damage checkpoint pathways exert multiple controls on the efficiency and outcome of the repair of a doublestranded DNA gap. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 4257-4268.
29. Halazonetis, T. D., Gorgoulis, V. G. and Bartek, J. (2008). An oncogeneinduced DNA damage model for cancer development. Science 319, 1352-1355.
30. Hartsuiker, E., Neale, M. J. and Carr, A. M. (2009). Distinct requirements for the Rad32(Mre11) nuclease and Ctp1(CtIP) in the removal of covalently bound topoisomerase I and II from DNA. Mol. Cell 33, 117-123.
31. Heichinger, C., Penkett, C. J., Bähler, J. and Nurse, P. (2006). Genome-wide characterization of fission yeast DNA replication origins. EMBO J. 25, 5171-5179.
32. Hu, J., Sun, L., Shen, F., Chen, Y., Hua, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, M., Hu, Y., Wang, Q., Xu, W. et al. (2012). The intra-S phase checkpoint targets Dna2 to prevent stalled replication forks from reversing. Cell 149, 1221-1232.
33. Iraqui, I., Chekkal, Y., Jmari, N., Pietrobon, V., Fréon, K., Costes, A. and Lambert, S. A. (2012). Recovery of arrested replication forks by homologous recombination is error-prone. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002976.
34. Jia, X., Weinert, T. and Lydall, D. (2004). Mec1 and Rad53 inhibit formation of single-stranded DNA at telomeres of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc13-1 mutants. Genetics 166, 753-764.
35. Kai, M., Boddy, M. N., Russell, P. and Wang, T. S. (2005). Replication checkpoint kinase Cds1 regulates Mus81 to preserve genome integrity during replication stress. Genes Dev. 19, 919-932.
36. Kaochar, S., Shanks, L. and Weinert, T. (2010). Checkpoint genes and Exo1 regulate nearby inverted repeat fusions that form dicentric chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 21605-21610.
37. Katou, Y., Kanoh, Y., Bando, M., Noguchi, H., Tanaka, H., Ashikari, T., Sugimoto, K. and Shirahige, K. (2003). S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424, 1078-1083.
38. Kolodner, R. D., Putnam, C. D. and Myung, K. (2002). Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 297, 552-557.
39. Koundrioukoff, S., Carignon, S., Técher, H., Letessier, A., Brison, O. and Debatisse, M. (2013). Stepwise activation of the ATR signaling pathway upon increasing replication stress impacts fragile site integrity. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003643.
40. Krejci, L., Altmannova, V., Spirek, M. and Zhao, X. (2012). Homologous recombination and its regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 5795-5818.
41. Lambert, S. and Carr, A. M. (2005). Checkpoint responses to replication fork barriers. Biochimie 87, 591-602.
42. Lambert, S. and Carr, A. M. (2013a). Impediments to replication fork movement: stabilisation, reactivation and genome instability. Chromosoma 122, 33-45.
43. Lambert, S. and Carr, A. M. (2013b). Replication stress and genome rearrangements: lessons from yeast models. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 23, 132-139.
44. Lambert, S., Mason, S. J., Barber, L. J., Hartley, J. A., Pearce, J. A., Carr, A. M. and McHugh, P. J. (2003). Schizosaccharomyces pombe checkpoint response to DNA interstrand cross-links. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 4728-4737.
45. Lambert, S., Watson, A., Sheedy, D. M., Martin, B. and Carr, A. M. (2005). Gross chromosomal rearrangements and elevated recombination at an inducible site-specific replication fork barrier. Cell 121, 689-702.
46. Lambert, S., Mizuno, K., Blaisonneau, J., Martineau, S., Chanet, R., Fréon, K., Murray, J. M., Carr, A. M. and Baldacci, G. (2010). Homologous recombination restarts blocked replication forks at the expense of genome rearrangements by template exchange. Mol. Cell 39, 346-359.
47. Lee, B. S., Grewal, S. I. and Klar, A. J. (2004). Biochemical interactions between proteins and mat1 cis-acting sequences required for imprinting in fission yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 9813-9822.
48. Lindsay, H. D., Griffiths, D. J., Edwards, R. J., Christensen, P. U., Murray, J. M., Osman, F., Walworth, N. and Carr, A. M. (1998). S-phase-specific activation of Cds1 kinase defines a subpathway of the checkpoint response in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genes Dev. 12, 382-395.
49. Lisby, M., Barlow, J. H., Burgess, R. C. and Rothstein, R. (2004). Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118, 699-713.
50. Lopes, M., Cotta-Ramusino, C., Pellicioli, A., Liberi, G., Plevani, P., Muzi-Falconi, M., Newlon, C. S. and Foiani, M. (2001). The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 412, 557-561.
51. Lucca, C., Vanoli, F., Cotta-Ramusino, C., Pellicioli, A., Liberi, G., Haber, J. and Foiani, M. (2004). Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing. Oncogene 23, 1206-1213.
52. Maundrell, K. (1993). Thiamine-repressible expression vectors pREP and pRIP for fission yeast. Gene 123, 127-130.
53. Meister, P., Taddei, A., Vernis, L., Poidevin, M., Gasser, S. M. and Baldacci, G. (2005). Temporal separation of replication and recombination requires the intra-S checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 168, 537-544.
54. Mimitou, E. P. and Symington, L. S. (2008). Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455, 770-774.
55. Miyabe, I., Morishita, T., Shinagawa, H. and Carr, A. M. (2009). Schizosaccharomyces pombe Cds1Chk2 regulates homologous recombination at stalled replication forks through the phosphorylation of recombination protein Rad60. J. Cell Sci. 122, 3638-3643.
56. Miyabe, I., Kunkel, T. A. and Carr, A. M. (2011). The major roles of DNA polymerases epsilon and delta at the eukaryotic replication fork are evolutionarily conserved. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002407.
57. Mizuno, K., Lambert, S., Baldacci, G., Murray, J. M. and Carr, A. M. (2009). Nearby inverted repeats fuse to generate acentric and dicentric palindromic chromosomes by a replication template exchange mechanism. Genes Dev. 23, 2876-2886.
58. Mizuno, K., Miyabe, I., Schalbetter, S. A., Carr, A. M. and Murray, J. M. (2013). Recombination-restarted replication makes inverted chromosome fusions at inverted repeats. Nature 493, 246-249.
59. Moreau, S., Ferguson, J. R. and Symington, L. S. (1999). The nuclease activity of Mre11 is required for meiosis but not for mating type switching, end joining, or telomere maintenance. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 556-566.
60. Moreau, S., Morgan, E. A. and Symington, L. S. (2001). Overlapping functions of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11, Exo1 and Rad27 nucleases in DNA metabolism. Genetics 159, 1423-1433.
61. Moreno, S., Klar, A. and Nurse, P. (1991). Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Enzymol. 194, 795-823.
62. Morin, I., Ngo, H. P., Greenall, A., Zubko, M. K., Morrice, N. and Lydall, D. (2008). Checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of Exo1 modulates the DNA damage response. EMBO J. 27, 2400-2410.
63. Myung, K. and Kolodner, R. D. (2002). Suppression of genome instability by redundant S-phase checkpoint pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 4500-4507.
64. Myung, K., Datta, A. and Kolodner, R. D. (2001). Suppression of spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements by S phase checkpoint functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 104, 397-408.
65. Pandita, R. K., Sharma, G. G., Laszlo, A., Hopkins, K. M., Davey, S., Chakhparonian, M., Gupta, A., Wellinger, R. J., Zhang, J., Powell, S. N. et al. (2006). Mammalian Rad9 plays a role in telomere stability, S- and G2-phasespecific cell survival, and homologous recombinational repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 1850-1864.
66. Raynard, S., Niu, H. and Sung, P. (2008). DNA double-strand break processing: the beginning of the end. Genes Dev. 22, 2903-2907.
67. Sabatinos, S. A., Green, M. D. and Forsburg, S. L. (2012). Continued DNA synthesis in replication checkpoint mutants leads to fork collapse. Mol. Cell. Biol. 32, 4986-4997.
68. Segurado, M. and Diffley, J. F. (2008). Separate roles for the DNA damage checkpoint protein kinases in stabilizing DNA replication forks. Genes Dev. 22, 1816-1827.
69. Segurado, M. and Tercero, J. A. (2009). The S-phase checkpoint: targeting the replication fork. Biol. Cell 101, 617-627.
70. Smolka, M. B., Albuquerque, C. P., Chen, S. H. and Zhou, H. (2007). Proteomewide identification of in vivo targets of DNA damage checkpoint kinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 10364-10369.
71. Sogo, J. M., Lopes, M. and Foiani, M. (2002). Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 297, 599-602.
72. Sørensen, C. S., Hansen, L. T., Dziegielewski, J., Syljuåsen, R. G., Lundin, C., Bartek, J. and Helleday, T. (2005). The cell-cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1 is required for mammalian homologous recombination repair. Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 195-201.
73. Stracker, T. H., Usui, T. and Petrini, J. H. (2009). Taking the time to make important decisions: the checkpoint effector kinases Chk1 and Chk2 and the DNA damage response. DNA Repair (Amst.) 8, 1047-1054.
74. Sun, W., Nandi, S., Osman, F., Ahn, J. S., Jakovleska, J., Lorenz, A. and Whitby, M. C. (2008). The FANCM ortholog Fml1 promotes recombination at stalled replication forks and limits crossing over during DNA double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell 32, 118-128.
75. Symington, L. S. (2002). Role of RAD52 epistasis group genes in homologous recombination and double-strand break repair. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66, 630-670.
76. Tercero, J. A. and Diffley, J. F. (2001). Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 412, 553-557.
77. Tsubouchi, H. and Ogawa, H. (2000). Exo1 roles for repair of DNA double-strand breaks and meiotic crossing over in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 2221-2233.
78. Watson, A. T., Garcia, V., Bone, N., Carr, A. M. and Armstrong, J. (2008). Gene tagging and gene replacement using recombinase-mediated cassette exchange in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Gene 407, 63-74.
79. Zhu, Z., Chung, W. H., Shim, E. Y., Lee, S. E. and Ira, G. (2008). Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 134, 981-994.
80. Zou, L. and Elledge, S. J. (2003). Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300, 1542-1548.
81. Zubko, M. K., Guillard, S. and Lydall, D. (2004). Exo1 and Rad24 differentially regulate generation of ssDNA at telomeres of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc13-1 mutants. Genetics 168, 103-115.