Differential regulation of homologous recombination at DNA breaks and replication forks by the Mrc1 branch of the S-phase checkpoint

EMBO Journal

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1131-1141

  Alabert, Constance ^a   Bianco, Julien N ^a   Pasero, Philippe ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF HUMAN GENETICS   (France)

Author keywords

Checkpoints; DNA replication; Genomic instability; Homologous recombination; S. cerevisiae

Indexed keywords

ENDONUCLEASE; MEC1 PROTEIN; MRC1 PROTEIN; PROTEIN; RAD52 PROTEIN; SINGLE STRANDED DNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CHROMOSOME BREAKAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA FLANKING REGION; DNA REPLICATION; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; GENE REPRESSION; GENETIC REGULATION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

BLEOMYCIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DEOXYRIBONUCLEASES, TYPE II SITE-SPECIFIC; DNA BREAKS; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA, FUNGAL; HYDROXYUREA; METHYL METHANESULFONATE; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTAGENS; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS INHIBITORS; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; RAD51 RECOMBINASE; RAD52 DNA REPAIR AND RECOMBINATION PROTEIN; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; S PHASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 67349097341     PISSN: 02614189     EISSN: 14602075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2009.75     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Alcasabas AA, Osborn AJ, Bachant J, Hu F, Werler PJ, Bousset K, Furuya K, Diffley JF, Carr AM, Elledge SJ (2001) Mrcl transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53. Nat Cell Biol 3: 958-965
2. Alvino GM, Collingwood D, Murphy JM, Delrow J, Brewer BJ, Raghuraman MK (2007) Replication in hydroxyurea: it's a matter of time. Mol Cell Biol 27: 6396-6406
3. Aylon Y, Liefshitz B, Kupiec M (2004) The CDK regulates repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle. EMBO J 23: 4868-4875
4. Bashkirov VI, King JS, Bashkirova EV, Schmuckli-Maurer J, Heyer WD (2000) DNA repair protein Rad55 is a terminal substrate of the DNA damage checkpoints. Mol Cell Biol 20: 4393-4404
5. Boddy MN, Shanahan P, McDonald WH, Lopez-Girona A, Noguchi E, Yates IJ, Russell P (2003) Replication checkpoint kinase Cds1 regulates recombinational repair protein Rad60. Mol Cell Biol 23:5939-5946
6. Bousset K, Diffley JF (1998) The Cdc7 protein kinase is required for origin firing during S phase. Genes Dev 12: 480-490
7. Branzei D, Foiani M (2007) RecQ helicases queuing with Srs2 to disrupt Rad51 filaments and suppress recombination. Genes Dev21: 3019-3026
8. Branzei D, Foiani M (2008) Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9: 297-308
9. Branzei D, Sollier J, Liberi G, Zhao X, Maeda D, Seki M, Enomoto T, Ohta K, Foiani M (2006) Ubc9- and Mms21 -mediated sumoylation counteracts recombinogenic events at damaged replication forks. Cell 127: 509-522
10. Brush GS, Morrow DM, Hieter P, Kelly TJ (1996) The ATM homo- logue MEC1 is required for phosphorylation of replication protein A in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 15075-15080
11. Chang M, Bellaoui M, Boone C, Brown GW (2002) A genome-wide screen for methyl methanesulfonate-sensitive mutants reveals genes required for S phase progression in the presence of DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 16934-16939
12. Clerici M, Mantiero D, Lucchini G, Longhese MP (2005) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein promotes resection and bridging of double strand break ends. J Biol Chem 280:38631-38638
13. Cobb JA, Bjergbaek L, Shimada K, Frei C, Gasser SM (2003) DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mecl and the RecQ helicase Sgsl. EMBO J 22: 4325-4336
14. Cobb JA, Schleker T, Rojas V, Bjergbaek L, Tercero JA, Gasser SM (2005) Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromoso- mal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mecl kinase and RecQ helicase mutations. Genes Dev 19: 3055-3069
15. Cotta-Ramusino C, Fachinetti D, Lucca C, Doksani Y, Lopes M, Sogo J, Foiani M (2005) Exol processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. Mol Cell17: 153-159
16. Davies AA, Huttner D, Daigaku Y, Chen S, Ulrich HD (2008) Activation of ubiquitin-dependent DNA damage bypass is mediated by replication protein A. Mol Cell 29: 625-636
17. Duro E, Vaisica JA, Brown GW, Rouse J (2008) Budding yeast Mms22 and Mmsl regulate homologous recombination induced by replisome blockage. DNA Repair (Amst) 7: 811-818
18. Fabre F, Chan A, Heyer WD, Gangloff S (2002) Alternate pathways involving Sgsl/Top3, Mus81/Mms4, and Srs2 prevent formation of toxic recombination intermediates from single-stranded gaps created by DNA replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:16887-16892
19. Fasullo M, Giallanza P, Dong Z, Cera C, Bennett T (2001) Saccharomyces cerevisiae rad51 mutants are defective in DNA damage-associated sister chromatid exchanges but exhibit in- creased rates of homology-directed translocations. Genetics 158:959-972
20. Flott S, Alabert C, Toh GW, Toth R, Sugawara N, Campbell DG, Haber JE, Pasero P, Rouse J (2007) Phosphorylation of Slx4 by Mecl and Tell regulates the single-strand annealing mode of DNA repair in budding yeast. Mol Cell Biol 27: 6433-6445
21. Gangloff S, Soustelle C, Fabre F (2000) Homologous recombination is responsible for cell death in the absence of the Sgsl and Srs2 helicases. Nat Genet 25: 192-194
22. Ge XQ, Jackson DA, Blow JJ (2007) Dormant origins licensed by excess Mcm2-7 are required for human cells to survive replica- tive stress. Genes Dev 21: 3331-3341
23. Gilbert CS, Green CM, Lowndes NF (2001) Budding yeast Rad9 is an ATP-dependent Rad53 activating machine. Mol Cell 8: 129-136
24. Herzberg K, Bashkirov VI, Rolfsmeier M, Haghnazari E, McDonald WH, Anderson S, Bashkirova EV, Yates III JR, Heyer W-D (2006) Phosphorylation of Rad55 on serines 2, 8, and 14 is required for efficient homologous recombination in the recovery of stalled replication forks. Mol Cell Biol 26: 8396-8409
25. Huertas P, Cortes-Ledesma F, Sartori AA, Aguilera A, Jackson SP (2008) CDK targets Sae2 to control DNA-end resection and homologous recombination. Nature 455: 689-692
26. Ibarra A, Schwob E, Mendez J (2008) Excess MCM proteins protect human cells from replicative stress by licensing backup origins of replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 8956-8961
27. Ira G, Pellicioli A, Balijja A, Wang X, Fiorani S, Carotenuto W, Liberi G, Bressan D, Wan L, Hollingsworth NM, Haber JE, Foiani M (2004) DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 431:1011-1017
28. Kai M, Boddy MN, Russell P, Wang TS (2005) Replication check- point kinase Cdsl regulates Mus81 to preserve genome integrity during replication stress. Genes Dev 19: 919-932
29. Koc A, Wheeler LI, Mathews CK, Merrill GF (2004) Hydroxyurea arrests DNA replication by a mechanism that preserves basal dNTP pools. J Biol Chem 279: 223-230
30. Krejci L, Van Komen S, Li Y, Villemain J, Reddy MS, Klein H, Ellenberger T, Sung P (2003) DNA helicase Srs2 disrupts the Rad51 presynaptic filament. Nature 423: 305-309
31. Krogh BO, Symington LS (2004) Recombination proteins in yeast. Annu Rev Genet 38: 233-271
32. Labib K, Hodgson B (2007) Replication fork barriers: pausing for a break or stalling for time? EMBO Rep 8: 346-353
33. Lisby M, Barlow JH, Burgess RC, Rothstein R (2004) Choreography of the DNA damage response; spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118: 699-713
34. Lisby M, Rothstein R, Mortensen UH (2001) Rad52 forms DNA repair and recombination centers during S phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 8276-8282
35. Llorente B, Smith CE, Symington LS (2008) Break-induced replica- tion: what is it and what is it for? Cell Cycle 7: 859-864
36. Llorente B, Symington LS (2004) The Mrell nuclease is not required for 5' to 3' resection at multiple HO-induced double-strand breaks. Mol Cell Biol 24: 9682-9694
37. Lopes M, Cotta-Ramusino C, Pellicioli A, Liberi G, Plevani P, Muzi- Falconi M, Newlon CS, Foiani M (2001) The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature412: 557-561
38. Luke B, Versini G, Jaquenoud M, Zaidi IW, Kurz T, Pintard L, Pasero P, Peter M (2006) The cullin Rtt101p promotes replication fork progression through damaged DNA and natural pause sites. Curr Biol 16: 786-792
39. Lundin C, North M, Erixon K, Walters K, Jenssen D, Goldman AS, Helleday T (2005) Methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) produces heat-labile DNA damage but no detectable in vivo DNA double- strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res 33: 3799-3811
40. Meister P, Taddei A, Vernis L, Poidevin M, Gasser SM, Baldacci G (2005) Temporal separation of replication and recombination requires the intra-S checkpoint. J Cell Biol 168: 537-544
41. Michalet X, Ekong R, Fougerousse F, Rousseaux S, Schurra C, Hornigold N, van Slegtenhorst M, Wolfe J, Povey S, Beckmann JS, Bensimon A (1997) Dynamic molecular combing: stretching the whole human genome for high-resolution studies. Science277: 1518-1523
42. Michel B, Boubakri H, Baharoglu Z, LeMasson M, Lestini R (2007) Recombination proteins and rescue of arrested replication forks. DNA Repair (Amst) 6: 967-980
43. Mimitou EP, Symington LS (2008) Sae2, Exol and Sgsl collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455: 770-774
44. Morin I, Ngo HP, Greenall A, Zubko MK, Morrice N, Lydall D (2008) Checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of Exol modulates the DNA damage response. EMBO J 27: 2400-2410
45. Osborn AJ, Elledge SJ (2003) Mrcl is a replication fork component whose phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress activates Rad53. Genes Dev 17: 1755-1767
46. Paques F, Haber JE (1999) Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63: 349-404
47. Pasero P, Bensimon A, Schwob E (2002) Single-molecule analysis reveals clustering and epigenetic regulation of replication origins at the yeast rDNA locus. Genes Dev 16: 2479-2484
48. Pellicioli A, Lucca C, Liberi G, Marini F, Lopes M, Plevani P, Romano A, Di Fiore PP, Foiani M (1999) Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phospho- rylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase. EMBO J 18:6561-6572
49. Pfander B, Moldovan G-L, Sacher M, Hoege C, Jentsch S (2005) SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase. Nature 436: 428-433
50. Pommier Y (2006) Topoisomerase I inhibitors: camptothecins and beyond. Nat Rev Cancer 6: 789-802
51. Prakash R, Satory D, Dray E, Papusha A, Scheller J, Kramer W, Krejci L, Klein H, Haber JE, Sung P, Ira G (2009) Yeast Mphl helicase dissociates Rad51-made D-loops: implica- tions for crossover control in mitotic recombination. Genes Dev23: 67-79
52. Raffa GD, Wohlschlegel J, Yates III JR, Boddy MN (2006) SUMO-binding motifs mediate the Rad60-dependent response to replicative stress and self-association. J Biol Chem 281:27973-27981
53. Raynard S, Niu H, Sung P (2008) DNA double-strand break proces- sing: the beginning of the end. Genes Dev 22: 2903-2907
54. Redon C, Pilch DR, Rogakou EP, Orr AH, Lowndes NF, Bonner WM (2003) Yeast histone 2A serine 129 is essential for the efficient repair of checkpoint-blind DNA damage. EMBO Rep 4: 678-684
55. Rouse J, Jackson SP (2002) Lcd1p recruits Meclp to DNA lesions in vitro and in vivo. Mol Cell 9: 857-869
56. San Filippo J, Sung P, Klein H (2008) Mechanism of eukaryotic homologous recombination. Annu Rev Biochem 77: 229-257
57. Segurado M, Diffley JFX (2008) Separate roles for the DNA damage checkpoint protein kinases in stabilizing DNA replication forks. Genes Dev 22: 1816-1827
58. Sogo JM, Lopes M, Foiani M (2002) Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 297: 599-602
59. Sorensen CS, Hansen LT, Dziegielewski J, Syljuasen RG, Lundin C, Bartek J, Helleday T (2005) The cell-cycle checkpoint kinase Chk1 is required for mammalian homologous recombination repair. Nat Cell Biol 7: 195-201
60. Sugawara N, Haber JE (2006) Repair of DNA double strand breaks: in vivo biochemistry. Methods Enzymol 408: 416-429
61. Szyjka SJ, Viggiani CJ, Aparicio OM (2005) Mrcl is required for normal progression of replication forks throughout chromatin in S. cerevisiae. Mol Cell 19: 691-697
62. Tercero JA, Longhese MP, Diffley JF (2003) A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. Mol Cell11: 1323-1336
63. Tourriere H, Pasero P (2007) Maintenance of fork integrity at damaged DNA and natural pause sites. DNA Repair (Amst) 6: 900-913
64. Tourriere H, Versini G, Cordon-Preciado V, Alabert C, Pasero P (2005) Mrcl and tofl promote replication fork progression and recovery independently of Rad53. Mol Cell 19: 699-706
65. Vazquez MV, Rojas V, Tercero JA (2008) Multiple pathways coop- erate to facilitate DNA replication fork progression through alkylated DNA. DNA Repair (Amst) 7: 1693-1704
66. Veaute X, Jeusset J, Soustelle C, Kowalczykowski SC, Le Cam E, Fabre F (2003) The Srs2 helicase prevents recombination by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments. Nature 423: 309-312
67. Versini G, Comet I, Wu M, Hoopes L, Schwob E, Pasero P (2003) The yeast Sgsl helicase is differentially required for genomic and ribosomal DNA replication. EMBO J 22: 1939-1949
68. Wang X, Ira G, Tercero JA, Holmes AM, Diffley JFX, Haber JE (2004) Role of DNA replication proteins in double-strand break-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 24:6891-6899
69. Zaidi IW, Rabut G, Poveda A, Scheel H, Malmstrom J, Ulrich H, Hofmann K, Pasero P, Peter M, Luke B (2008) Rtt101 and Mmsl in budding yeast form a CUL4(DDBl)-like ubiquitin ligase that promotes replication through damaged DNA. EMBO Rep 9: 1034-1040
70. Zhu Z, Chung W-H, Shim EY, Lee SE, Ira G (2008) Sgsl helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and exol resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 134: 981-994
71. Zierhut C, Diffley JF (2008) Break dosage, cell cycle stage and DNA replication influence DNA double strand break response. EMBO J27: 1875-1885