Peer review in higher education: Student perceptions before and after participation

Active Learning in Higher Education

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 157-171

  Mulder, Raoul A ^a   Pearce, Jon M ^a   Baik, Chi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Feedback; formative assessment; peer assessment; peer review; student perceptions

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901370910     PISSN: 14697874     EISSN: 17412625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1469787414527391     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Ballantyne R,Hughes K,Mylonas A.Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2002;27 (5): 427-41.
2. Biggs J,Tang CTeaching for Quality Learning at University. Berkshire: Open University Press; 2007.
3. Boud D.Assessment and the promotion of academic values.Studies in Higher Education. 1990;15 (1): 101-11.
4. Boud D.Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society.Studies in Continuing Education. 2000;22 (2): 151-67.
5. Brindley C,Scoffield S.Peer assessment in undergraduate programmes.Teaching in Higher Education. 1998;3 (1): 79-90.
6. Cartney P.Exploring the use of peer assessment as a vehicle for closing the gap between feedback given and feedback used.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2010;35 (5): 551-64.
7. Cheng K-H,Tsai C-C.Students' interpersonal perspectives on, conceptions of and approaches to learning in online peer assessment.Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2012;28 (4): 599-618.
8. Cheng W,Warren M.Having second thoughts: Student perceptions before and after a peer assessment exercise.Studies in Higher Education. 1997;22 (2): 233-9.
9. Cho K,MacArthur C.Student revision with peer and expert reviewing.Learning and Instruction. 2010;20 (4): 328-38.
10. Cho K,Schunn CD,Wilson RW.Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives.Journal of Educational Psychology. 2006;98 (4): 891-901.
11. Dochy F,Segers M,Sluijsmans D.The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review.Studies in Higher Education. 1999;24 (3): 331-50.
12. Falchikov NImproving Assessment through Student Involvement: Practical Solutions for Aiding Learning. London: RoutledgeFalmer; 2005.
13. Fallows S,Chandramohan B.Multiple approaches to assessment: Reflections on use of tutor, peer and self-assessment.Teaching in Higher Education. 2001;6 (2): 229-46.
14. Gielen S,Dochy F,Onghena P, et al.Goals of peer assessment and their associated quality concepts.Studies in Higher Education. 2011;36 (6): 719-35.
15. Gielen S,Tops L,Dochy F, et al.A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback and of various peer feedback forms in a secondary school writing curriculum.British Educational Research Journal. 2010;36 (1): 143-62.
16. Hanrahan SJ,Isaacs G.Assessing self- and peer-assessment: The students' views.Higher Education Research & Development. 2001;20 (1): 53-70.
17. Hansen JG,Liu J.Guiding principles for effective peer response.ELT Journal: English Language Teachers Journal. 2005;59 (1): 31-8.
18. Hattie J,Timperley H.The power of feedback.Review of Educational Research. 2007;77 (1): 81-112.
19. Hounsell D,McCune V,Hounsell J, et al.The quality of guidance and feedback to students.Higher Education Research & Development. 2008;27 (1): 55-67.
20. Howard CD,NBarrett AF,Frick TW.Anonymity to promote peer feedback: Pre-service teachers' comments in asynchronous computer-mediated communication.Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2010;43 (1): 89-112.
21. Kaufman J,Schunn C.Students' perceptions about peer assessment for writing: Their origin and impact on revision work.Instructional Science. 2011;39 (3): 387-406.
22. Krause K-L,Hartley R,James R, et alMelbourne, VIC, Australia: Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne; 2005 2005.
23. Li L,Liu X,Steckelberg AL.Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback.British Journal of Educational Technology. 2010;41 (3): 525-36.
24. Liu NF,Carless D.Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment.Teaching in Higher Education. 2006;11 (3): 279-90.
25. Lundstrom K,Baker W.To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing.Journal of Second Language Writing. 2009;18 (1): 30-43.
26. Mei T,Yuan Q.A case study of peer feedback in a Chinese EFL writing classroom.Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics. 2010;33 (4): 87-98.
27. Moore C,Teather S.Engaging students in peer review: Feedback as learning. Proceedings of the 22nd annual teaching learning forum; 2013Murdoch University, Perth; 2013.
28. Mostert M,Snowball JD.Where angels fear to tread: Online peer-assessment in a large first-year class.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2012;38 (6): 674-686.
29. Mulder RA,Pearce JM.PRAZE: Innovating teaching through online peer review. Proceedings of the 24th annual conference of the Australasian society for computers in learning in tertiary education; 2007Singapore; 2007. 727.
30. Nicol DJ,Macfarlane-Dick D.Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice.Studies in Higher Education. 2006;31 (2): 199-218.
31. Nulty DD.Peer and self-assessment in the first year of university.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2010;36 (5): 493-507.
32. Orsmond P,Merry S,Reiling K.The use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2000;25 (1): 23-38.
33. Paulus TM.The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing.Journal of Second Language Writing. 1999;8 (3): 265-89.
34. Pearce J,Mulder R,Baik CInvolving Students in Peer Review: Case Studies and Practical Strategies for University Teaching. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne; 2009.
35. Ramsden PLearning to Teach in Higher Education. New York: RoutledgeFalmer; 2003.
36. Rodriguez CM.The impact of academic self-concept, expectations and the choice of learning strategy on academic achievement: The case of business students.Higher Education Research & Development. 2009;28 (5): 523-39.
37. Rubin RS.The academic journal review process as a framework for student developmental peer feedback.Journal of Management Education. 2006;30 (2): 378-98.
38. Rust C,Price M,O'Donovan B.Improving students' learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2003;28 (2): 147-64.
39. Shute VJ.Focus on formative feedback.Review of Educational Research. 2008;78 (1): 153-89.
40. SluijsmansD (2002) Establishing learning effects with integrated peer assessment tasks. The Higher Education Academy. Available at: http://78.158.56.101/archive/palatine/files/930.pdf (accessed 5 July 2009).
41. Somervell H.Issues in assessment, enterprise and higher education: The case for self-, peer and collaborative assessment.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 1993;18 (3): 221-33.
42. Taras M.Do unto others or not: Equity in feedback for undergraduates.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2006;31 (3): 365-77.
43. Topping K.Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities.Review of Educational Research. 1998;68 (3): 249-76.
44. Topping KJ,Smith EF,Swanson I, et al.Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2000;25 (2): 149-69.
45. Van Den Berg I,Admiraal W,Pilot A.Design principles and outcomes of peer assessment in higher education.Studies in Higher Education. 2006;31 (3): 341-56.
46. Vickerman P.Student perspectives on formative peer assessment: An attempt to deepen learning?.Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2009;34 (2): 221-30.