The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing

Journal of Second Language Writing

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 265-289

  Paulus, Trena M ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0043124972     PISSN: 10603743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80117-9     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Allei, S. K., & Connor, U. M. (1990). Exploring the dynamics of cross-cultural collaboration in writing classrooms. The Writing Instructor 10, 19-28.
2. Belcher, L. R. (1989). ESL composition: analyzing revision (Doctoral Dissertation, Illinois State University, 1989). Dissertation Abstracts International 50(05), 1237A.
3. Bridwell, L. S. (1980). Revising strategies in twelfth-grade students' transactional writing. Research in the Teaching of English 14, 197-222.
4. Briggs, S., & Dobson, B. (1994). MELAB Technical Manual. Ann Arbor, MI: English Language Institute, The University of Michigan.
5. Carson, J., & Nelson, G. (1996). Chinese students' perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing 5, 1-19.
6. Caulk, N. (1994). Comparing teacher and student responses to written work. TESOL Quarterly 28, 181-188.
7. Chaudron, C. (1984). The effects of feedback on students' composition revisions. RELC Journal 15(2), 1-14.
8. Chenowith, N. A. (1987). The need to teach re-writing. ELT Journal 41, 25-29.
9. Cohen, A. D. (1987). Student processing of feedback on their compositions. In A. Wenden & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner Strategies in Language Learning (pp. 57-69). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10. Cohen, A. D. (1994). Verbal reports on learning strategies. TESOL Quarterly 28, 678-682.
11. Cohen, A. D., & Cavalcanti, M. C. (1990). Feedback on compositions: teacher and student verbal reports. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom (pp. 155-177). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Connor, U., & Asenavage, K. (1994). Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: how much impact on revision? Journal of Second Language Writing 3, 257-276.
13. Devenney, R. (1989). How ESL teachers and peers evaluate and respond to student writing. RELC Journal 20, 77-90.
14. DiPardo, A., & Freedman, S. W. (1988). Peer response groups in the writing classroom: theoretic foundations and new directions. System 58, 119-149.
15. Enginarlar, H. (1993). Student response to teacher feedback in EFL writing. System 21, 193-204.
16. Faigley, L., & Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication 32, 400-414.
17. Faigley, L., & Witte, S. (1984). Measuring the effects of revisions on text structure. In R. Beach & L. S. Bridwell (Eds.), New Directions in Composition Research (pp. 95-108). New York: Guilford Press.
18. Fathman, A. K., & Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: focus on form versus content. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom (pp. 178-190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly 29, 33-53.
20. Ferris, D. R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly 31, 315-339.
21. Ferris, D. R., Pezone, S., Tade, C. R., & Tinki, S. (1997). Teacher commentary on student writing: descriptions & implications. Journal of Second Language Writing 6, 155-182.
22. Flower, L., Hayes, J. R., Carey, L., Schriver, K., & Stratman, J. (1986). Detection, diagnosis and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication 37, 16-55.
23. Gaskill, W. H. (1986). Revising in Spanish and English as a second language: a process-oriented study of composition (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1986). Dissertation Abstracts International 47(10), 3747A.
24. George, D. (1984). Working with peer groups in the composition classroom. College Composition and Communication 35, 320-326.
25. Hall, C. (1990). Managing the complexity of revising across languages. TESOL Quarterly 24, 43-60.
26. Hamp-Lyons, L. (1991). Scoring procedures for ESL contexts. In L. Hamp-Lyons (Ed.), Assessing Second Language Writing in Academic Contexts (pp. 241-276). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Co.
27. Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1992). Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing 3, 141-163.
28. Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1994). Feedback on feedback: assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing. Journal of Second Language Writing 3, 141-163.
29. Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1996). Some input on input: two analyses of student response to expert feedback in L2 writing. Modern Language Journal 80, 287-308.
30. Hillocks, G. (1982). The interaction of instruction, teacher comment and revision in teaching the composing process. Research in the Teaching of English 16, 261-278.
31. Hillocks, G. (1986). Research on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills and the National Conference on Research in English.
32. Hyland, K. (1990). Providing productive feedback. ELT Journal 44, 279-285.
33. Keh, C. L. (1990). Feedback in the writing process: a model and methods for implementation. ELT Journal 44, 294-304.
34. Kepner, C. G. (1991). An experiment in the relationships of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills. Modern Language Journal 75, 303-313.
35. Krapels, A. R. (1990). An overview of second language writing process research. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom (pp. 37-56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Lam, C. Y. P. (1991). Revision processes of college ESL students: how teacher comments, discourse types, and writing tools shape revision (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, 1991). Dissertation Abstracts International 52(12), 4248A.
37. Leki, I. (1990). Coaching from the margins: issues in written response. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing: Research Insights for the Classroom (pp. 155-177). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Leki, I. (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college-level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals 24, 203-218.
39. Lockhardt, C., & Ng, P. (1995). Analyzing talk in ESL peer response groups: stances, functions, and content. Language Learning 45, 605-655.
40. Makino, T. Y. (1993). Learner self-correction in EFL written compositions. ELT Journal 47, 337-341.
41. Mangelsdorf, K. (1992). Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: what do the students think? ELT Journal 46, 274-284.
42. Mangelsdorf, K., & Schlumberger, A. (1992). ESL student response stances in a peer-review task. Journal of Second Language Writing 1, 235-254.
43. McGroarty, M.E., & Zhu, W. (1997). Triangulation in classroom research: a study of peer revision. Language Learning 47, 1-43.
44. Mendonça, C. O., & Johnson, K. E. (1994). Peer review negotiations: revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly 28, 745-769.
45. Mittan, R. (1989). The peer review process: harnessing students' communicative power. In D. Johnson & D. Roen (Eds.), Richness in Writing: Empowering ESL Students (pp. 207-219). New York: Longman.
46. Nelson, G.L., & Carson, J.G. (1998). ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness of peer response groups. Journal of Second Language Writing 7, 113-131.
47. Nelson, G. L., & Murphy, J. M. (1993). Peer response groups: do L2 writers use peer comments in writing their drafts? TESOL Quarterly 27, 135-142.
48. Polio, C., Fleck, C., & Leder, N. (1998). If I only had more time: ESL learners' changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions. Journal of Second Language Writing 7, 43-68.
49. Radecki, P. M., & Swales, J. M. (1988). ESL student reactions to written comments on their written work. System 16, 355-365.
50. Raimes, A. (1985). What unskilled ESL students do as they write: a classroom study of composing. TESOL Quarterly 19, 229-258.
51. Raimes, A. (1987). Language proficiency, writing ability and composing strategies: a study of ESL college student writers. Language Learning 37, 439-468.
52. Reid, J. (1994). Responding to ESL students' texts: the myths of appropriation. TESOL Quarterly 28, 273-292.
53. Robb, T., Ross, S., & Shortreed, I. (1986). Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly 20, 83-95.
54. Saito, H. (1994). Teachers' practices and students' preferences for feedback on second language writing: a case study of adult ESL learners. TESL Canada Journal 11(2), 46-70.
55. Semke, H. D. (1984). The effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals 17, 195-202.
56. Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: the ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly 28, 657-677.
57. Sommers, N. (1982). Responding to student writing. College Composition and Communication 33, 148-156.
58. Stanley, J. (1992). Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators. Journal of Second Language Writing 1, 217-233.
59. Susser, B. (1994). Process approaches in ESL/EFL writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing 3, 31-47.
60. Tagong, K. (1991). Revising strategies of Thai students: text-level changes in essays written in Thai and in English (Doctoral dissertation, Illinois State University, 1991). Dissertation Abstracts International 52(08), 2849A.
61. Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning 46, 327-369.
62. Villamil, O.S., & deGuerrero, M. C. M. (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behavior. Journal of Second Language Writing 5, 51-76.
63. Winer, L. (1992). Spinach to chocolate: changing awareness and attitudes in ESL writing teachers. TESOL Quarterly 26, 57-79.
64. Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: six case studies. TESOL Quarterly 17, 165-187.
65. Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly 19, 79-101.
66. Zhang, S. (1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing 4, 209-222.
67. Ziv, N. D. (1984). The effect of teacher comments on the writing of four college freshman. In R. Beach & L. S. Bridwell (Eds.), New Directions in Composition Research (pp. 362-380). New York: Guilford Press.