PRAZE: Innovating teaching through online peer review

ASCILITE 2007 - The Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 727-737

  Mulder, Raoul A ^a   Pearce, Jon M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Anonymous peer review; Assessment; Online learning management systems; Student feedback

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT; EDUCATIONAL SETTINGS; ONLINE LEARNING; PEER ASSESSMENT; PEER REVIEW; STUDENT FEEDBACK; UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE; E-LEARNING;

STUDENTS;

EID: 77049092464     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Askew, S., ed (2000). Feedback for Learning. London: Routledge Falmer.
2. Boud, D. (1990). Assessment and the promotion of academic values. Studies in Higher Education, 15(1), p101.
3. Carlsen, W. S., Cunningham, C. M., & Trautmann, N. M. (2001). Peer Review by School Science Students: Its Role in Scientific Inquiry. Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. St. Louis, MO. March, 25-28.
4. TM, The White Paper: A description of CPR'. http://cpr.molsci.ucla.edu [viewed 25 July, 2007].
5. Cho, K, Schunn, C.D. & Wilson, R.W. (2006). Validity and reliability of scaffolded peer assessment of writing from instructor and student perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology 98: 981-901.
6. Cho, K. & Schunn, C.D. (2007) Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline. Computers and Education 48(3), 409-426.
7. Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331-50.
8. Falchikov, N. (2001). Learning together: peer tutoring in higher education. London: Routledge Falmer.
9. Flower, L., Hayes, J. R., Carey, L., Schriver, K. & Stratman, J. (1986). Detection, diagnosis, and the strategies of revision. College Composition and Communication, 37, 16-55.
10. Guilford, W. H. (2001). Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing. Advances in Physiology Education, 25(3), 167-75. http://advan.physiology.org/cgi/reprint/25/3/167.pdf.
11. Hounsell, D. (2003). Student feedback, learning and development. In: Slowey, M. and Watson, D. ed. Higher education and the lifecourse. Maidenhead: SRHE & Open University Press/McGraw-Hill, 67-78.
12. James, R. and Baldwin, G (2002). Nine principles guiding teaching and learning in the University of Melbourne: the framework for a first-class teaching and learning environment. Report to academic board.
13. Mulder, R.A., Elgar, M.A. & Brady, D. (2005). "APRES": electronically managed student feedback via peer review. Proceedings of the Blended Learning in Science Teaching and Learning Symposium, 30 Sep 2005. pp 2-6.
14. Pascarella, E. and Terenzini, P. (1998) How college affects students: findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
15. Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
16. Topping, K. (1998). Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-76.
17. Westberg, J., and Jason, H. (2001). Fostering reflection and providing feedback: helping others learn from experience. New York: Springer.
18. van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., & Pilot, A. (2006). Peer assessment in university teaching: Evaluating seven course designs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(1), 19-36.