The use of student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 23-38

  Orsmond, Paul ^a   Merry, Stephen ^a   Reiling, Kevin ^a  

^a STAFFORDSHIRE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0003105390     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930050025006     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Boud, D. (1989) The role of self-assessment in student grading, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 14(1), pp. 20-30.
2. Boud, D. (1990) Assessment and the promotion of academic values, Studies in Higher Education, 15(1),pp. 101-111.
3. Brown, S. & Knight, P. (1995) Assessing Learners in Higher Education, 2nd edn. (London, KoganPage)
4. Cross, K. P. (1996) Improving teaching and learning through classroom assessment and classroom research, in: G. Gibbs, (Ed.) Improving Student Learning: using research to improve student learning(Oxford, Oxford Centre For Staff Development).
5. Entwistle, N. (1997) Reconstituting approaches to learning: a response to Webb, Higher Education, 33(2), pp. 213-218.
6. Erwin, T. D. & Knight, P. (1995) A transatlantic view of assessment and quality in higher education, Quality in Higher Education, 1(2), pp. 179-188.
7. Falchikov, N. (1986) Product comparison and process benefits of collaborative peer group and self-assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 11(2), pp. 146-166.
8. Fry, S. A. (1990) Implementation and evaluation of peer marking in higher education, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 15(3), pp 177-189.
9. Habeshaw, S., Gibbs, G. & Habeshaw, T. (1993) 53 Interesting Ways To Assess Your Students, 3rd edn.(Bristol, Technical and Educational Services Ltd)
10. Harvey, L. & Knight, P, T. (1996) Transforming Higher Education (Buckingham, Society for Research into Higher Education and the Open University Press)
11. Hinett, K. (1995) Fighting the assessment war: the idea of assessment-in-learning, Quality in Higher education, 1(3), pp. 211-222
12. Hinett, K. & Knight, P. T. (1996) Quality and assessment, Quality Assurance in Education, 4(3),pp. 3-10.
13. Klenowski, V. (1995) Student self-evaluation processes in student-centred teaching and learning contexts of Australia and England, Assessment in Education, 2(2), pp. 145-163.
14. Kwan, K. & Leung, R. (1996) Tutor versus peer group assessment of student performance in a stimulation training exercise, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3),pp. 205-214.
15. Orsmond, P., Merry, S. & Reiling, K. (1996) The importance of marking criteria in peer assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3), pp. 239-249.
16. Orsmond, P., Merry, S. & Reiling, K. (1997) A study in self-assessment: tutor and students'perceptions of performance criteria, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(4),pp. 357-369.
17. Polanyi, M. (1958) The Study of Man (London, Routledge & Kegan Paul).
18. Ramsden, P. (1979) Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment, Higher Education, 8, pp. 411-427.
19. Sadler, D. R. (1983) Evaluation and the improvement of academic learning, Journal of Higher Education, 54(10), pp. 60-79.
20. Sadler, D. R. (1987) Specifying and promulgating achievement standards, Oxford Review of Education, 13(2), pp. 191-209.
21. Sadler, D. R. (1989) Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems, Instructional Science, 18, pp. 119-144.
22. Siegel, S. & Castellan, N. J. (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the Behavioural Science. (New York, McGraw Hill).
23. Stefani, L. A. J. (1994) Peer, self and tutor assessment: relative reliabilities, Studies in Higher Education, 19(1), pp. 69-75.