A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback and of various peer feedback forms in a secondary school writing curriculum

British Educational Research Journal

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 143-162

  Gielen, Sarah ^a   Tops, Lies ^a   Dochy, Filip ^a   Onghena, Patrick ^a   Smeets, Stijn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 74249103103     PISSN: 01411926     EISSN: 14693518     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01411920902894070     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K. & Mylonas, A. (2002) Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 427-441.
2. Bangert-Drowns, R., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A. & Morgan, M. (1991) The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events, Review of Educational Research, 61, 213-238.
3. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998) Assessment and classroom learning, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7-74.
4. Bloxham, S. & West, A. (2004) Understanding the rules of the game: marking peer assessment as a medium for developing students' conceptions of assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 721-733.
5. Boud, D. (2000) Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society, Studies in Continuing Education, 22, 151-167.
6. Cho, K. & MacArthur, C. (in press). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing, Learning and Instruction.
7. Cho, K. & Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline, Computers and Education, 48, 409-426.
8. Cho, K., Schunn, C. D. & Charney, D. (2006). Commenting on writing: typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts, Written Communication, 23, 260-294.
9. Cho, K., Chung, T. R., King, W. R. & Schunn, C. D. (2008). Peer-based computer-supported knowledge refinement: an empirical investigation, Communications of the ACM, 51(3), 83-88.
10. Cole, D. (1991) Change in self-perceived competence as a function of peer and teacher evaluation, Developmental Psychology, 27, 682-688.
11. Gibbs, G. & Simpson, C. (2004) Conditions under which assessment supports students' learning, Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 3-31.
12. Gielen, S., Dochy, F. & Onghena, P. (in press) An inventory of peer assessment diversity, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education.
13. Graham, S. & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445-476.
14. Higgins, R. (2000) 'Be more critical!': rethinking assessment feedback. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference, Cardiff University, Wales, 7-10 September.
15. Hounsell, D. (1987) Essay writing and the quality of feedback, in: J. Richardson, M. W. Eysenck & D. W. Piper (Eds) Student learning: research in education and cognitive psychology (Milton Keynes, Open University Press).
16. Karengianes, M. L., Pascarella, E. T. & Pflaum, S. W. (1980). The effects of peer-editing on the writing proficiency of low-achieving tenth grade students, Journal of Educational Research, 73(4), 203-207.
17. Kember, D. (2003) To control or not to control: the question of whether experimental designs are appropriate for evaluating teaching innovations in higher education, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 89-101.
18. Kim, M. (2005) The effects of the assessor and assessee's roles on preservice teachers' metacognitive awareness, performance and attitude in a technology-related design task. PhD Dissertation, Florida State University.
19. Laurencelle, L. & Dupuis, F.-A. (2002). Statistical tables explained and applied (Singapore, World Scientific).
20. Min, H.-T. (2008). Reviewer stances and writer perceptions in EFL peer review training, English for Specific Purposes, 27, 285-305.
21. Nelson, G. L. & Murphy, J. M. (1993). Peer response groups: do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts? TESOL Quarterly, 27, 135-142.
22. Orsmond, P., Merry, S. & Reiling, K. (2002). The use of exemplars and formative feedback when using student derived marking criteria in peer and self-assessment, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 309-323.
23. Pope, N. (2001) An examination of the use of peer rating for formative assessment in the context of the theory of consumption values, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, 235-246.
24. Pope, N. K. L. (2005) The impact of stress in self- and peer assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 51-63.
25. Rust, C., Price, M. & O'Donovan, B. (2003) Improving students' learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 147-164.
26. Sadler, D. R. (1998) Formative assessment: revisiting the territory, Assessment in Education, 5, 77-84.
27. Sambell, K. & McDowell, L. (1997). The value of self- and peer assessment to the developing lifelong learner. In C. Rust (Ed.) Improving student learning: improving students as learners (Oxford, Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development), 56-66.
28. SAS Institute Inc. (2004) SAS/STAT 9.1 User's guide (Cary, SAS Institute Inc).
29. Searby, M. & Ewers, T. (1997) An evaluation of the use of peer assessment in higher education: a case study in the School of Music, Kingston University, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22, 371-383.
30. Sitthiworachart, J. & Joy, M. (2003) Deepening computer programming skills by using web-based peer assessment, Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference of the LTSN Centre for Information and Computer Sciences, NUI Galway, Ireland, August.
31. Slavin, R. E. (1989). Research on cooperative learning: an international perspective, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 33, 231-243.
32. Sluijsmans, D. (2002) Student involvement in assessment: the training of peer assessment skills, PhD dissertation, Open Universiteit Nederland, Heerlen.
33. Sluijsmans, D., Brand-Gruwel, S., van Merriënboer, J. J. G. & Bastiaens, T. (2002). The training of peer assessment skills to promote the development of reflection skills in teacher education, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 29, 23-42.
34. Sluijsmans, D. & Prins, F. (2006) A conceptual framework for integrating peer assessment in teacher education, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32, 6-22.
35. Struyven, K., Dochy, F., Janssens, S. & Gielen, S. (2008). Students' experiences with contrasting learning environments: the added value of students' perceptions, Learning Environments Research: an international journal, 11(2), 83-109.
36. Topping, K. (1998) Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities, Review of Educational Research, 68, 249-276.
37. Topping, K. J. (2003) Self- and peer assessment in school and university: reliability, validity and utility, in: M. Segers, F. Dochy & E. Cascallar (Eds) Optimizing new modes of assessment: in search of qualities and standards (Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic).
38. Tsui, A. B. M. & Ng, M. (2000) Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 147-170.
39. van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W. & Pilot, A. (2006). Peer assessment in university teaching: evaluating seven course designs, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 19-36.
40. Yang, M., Badger, R. & Yu, Z. (2006) A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class, Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179-200.