Students' interpersonal perspectives on, conceptions of and approaches to learning in online peer assessment

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 599-618

  Cheng, Kun Hung ^a,b   Tsai, Chin Chung ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84865384449     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.830     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K. & Mylonas, A. (2002). Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 427-441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000009302
2. Benson, P. & Lor, W. (1999). Conceptions of language and language learning. System, 27(4), 459-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00045-7
3. Biggs, J. (1994). Approaches to learning: Nature and measurement of. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 319-322). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
4. Chin, C. & Brown, D. E. (2000). Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 109-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200002)37:2<109::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-7
5. Ching, Y. H. & Hsu, Y. C. (2011). Design-grounded assessment: A framework and a case study of Web 2.0 practices in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(5), 781-797. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet27/ching.html
6. Cho, K. & Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education, 48(3), 409-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004
7. Dochy, F., Segers, M. & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079912331379935
8. Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2666999
9. Ellis, R. A., Steed, A. F. & Applebee, A. C. (2006). Teacher conceptions of blended learning, blended teaching and associations with approaches to design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(3), 312-335. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet22/ellis.html
10. Falchikov, N. & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A metaanalysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1170785
11. Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B. & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741-763. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2667054
12. Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1998). Cooperative learning and social interdependence theory. In R. S. Tindale et al. (Eds.), Theory and research on small groups (pp.9-35). New York: Plenum Press.
13. Kaufman, J. H. & Schunn, C. D. (2011). Students' perceptions about peer assessment for writing: Their origin and impact on revision work. Instructional Science, 39(3), 387-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9133-6
14. Lee, M. H., Johanson, R. E. & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Exploring Taiwanese high school students' conceptions of and approaches to learning science through a structural equation modeling analysis. Science Education, 92(2), 191-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.20245
15. Liang, J.C., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Learning through science writing via online peer assessment in a college biology course. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 242-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.04.004
16. Lin, S. S. J., Liu, E. Z. F. & Yuan, S. M. (2001). Web-based peer assessment: Feedback for students with various thinking-styles. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(4), 420-432. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.x
17. Liu, N. F. & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: The learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562510600680582
18. Magin, D. (2001). Reciprocity as a source of bias in multiple peer assessment of group work. Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 53-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075070020030715
19. Marshall, D., Summers, M. & Woolnough, B. (1999). Students' conceptions of learning in an engineering context. Higher Education, 38(3), 291-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1003866607873
20. Marton, F., Dall'Alba, G. & Beaty, E. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19(3), 277-299.
21. May, D. R., Gilson, R, L. & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), 11-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317904322915892
22. McDowell, L. (1995). The impact of innovative assessment on student learning. Innovation in Education and Training International, 32(4), 302-313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1355800950320402
23. Prins, F. J., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Kirschner, P. A. & Strijbos, J. W. (2005). Formative peer assessment in a CSCL environment: A case study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4), 417-444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930500099219
24. Raban, R. & Litchfield, A. (2007). Supporting peer assessment of individual contributions in groupwork. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(1), 34-47. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet23/raban.html
25. Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Brand-Gruwel, S. & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2002). Peer assessment training in teacher education: Effects on performance and perceptions. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), 443-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000009311
26. Smith, H., Cooper, A. & Lancaster, L. (2002). Improving the quality of undergraduate peer assessment: A case for student and staff development. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(1), 71-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13558000110102904
27. Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1170598
28. Topping, K. J. (2010). Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 339-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.003
29. Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I. & Elliot, A. (2000). Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), 149-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713611428
30. Tseng, S. C. & Tsai, C. C. (2007). On-line peer assessment and the role of the peer feedback: A study of high school computer course. Computers & Education, 49(4), 1161-1174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.01.007
31. Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W. H., Segers, M. & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments: Team learning beliefs and behaviors. Small Group Research, 37(5), 490-521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496406292938
32. Van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R. & Tillema, H. H. (2009). Peer assessment for learning from a social perspective: The influence of interpersonal variables and structural features. Educational Research Review, 4(1), 41-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2008.11.002
33. Van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2010). Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: The role of interpersonal variables and conceptions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 280-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.010
34. Wen, M. L. & Tsai, C. C. (2006). University students' perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment. Higher Education, 51(1), 27-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6375-8
35. Yang, Y. F. & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Conceptions of and approaches to learning through online peer assessment. Learning and Instruction, 20(1), 72-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.01.003
36. Zhang, Y., Fang, Y., Wei, K.-K. & Chen, H. (2010). Exploring the role of psychological safety in promoting the intention to continue sharing knowledge in virtual communities. International Journal of Information Management, 30(5), 425-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.02.003