Advances in scaffolding learning with hypertext and hypermedia: A summary and critical analysis

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 93-100

  Azevedo, Roger ^a   Jacobson, Michael J ^b  

^a University of Memphis   (United States)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 37649000942     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: 15566501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-007-9064-3     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Azevedo, R. (in press). The role of self-regulation in learning about science with hypermedia. In D. Robinson & G. Schraw (Eds.), Current perspectives on cognition, learning, and instruction.
2. Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 199-209.
3. Azevedo, R., Cromley, J. G., Winters, F. I., Moos, D. C., & Greene, J. A. (2005). Adaptive human scaffolding facilitates adolescents' self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Instructional Science, 33, 381-412.
4. Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F., (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition: Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33, 367-379.
5. Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., & Winters, F. I. (this volume). Why is externally-facilitated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research & Development, doi: 10.1007/s11423-007-9067-0.
6. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., Cocking, R. R., & Donovan, S. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (expanded edition). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7. Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction, 6(2-3), 87-110.
8. Catrambone, R. (1998). The subgoal learning model: Creating better examples to improve transfer to novel problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 355-376.
9. Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learner comprehension, control, and style. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 322-349.
10. Dillon, A., & Jobst, J. (2005). Multimedia learning with hypermedia. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 569-588). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
11. Gerjets, P. H., & Hesse, F. W. (2004). When are powerful learning environments effective? The role of learning activities and of students" conceptions of educational technology. International Journal of Educational Research, 41, 445-465.
12. Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Schuh, J. (this volume). Information comparisons in example-based hypermedia environments: Supporting learners with processing prompts and an interactive comparison tool. Educational Technology Research & Development, doi: 10.1007/s11423-007-9068-z.
13. Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Tack, W. H. (2000). Resource-adaptive selection of strategies in learning from worked-out examples. In L. R. Gleitman & A. K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference from the cognitive science society (pp. 166-171). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Jacobson, M. J. (2006). From non-adaptive to adaptive educational hypermedia: Theory, research, and design issues. In G. Magoulas & S. Chen (Eds.), Advances in web-based education: Personalized learning environments (pp. 302-330). Hershey, PA: Idea Group.
15. Jacobson, M. J. (this volume). A design framework for educational hypermedia systems: Theory, research, and learning emerging scientific conceptual structures. Educational Technology Research & Development, doi: 10.1007/s11423-007-9065-2.
16. Jacobson, M., & Archodidou, A. (2000). The design of hypermedia tools for learning: Fostering conceptual change and transfer of complex scientific knowledge. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 149-199.
17. Jacobson, M. J., & Azevedo, R. (this volume). Advances in scaffolding learning with hypertext and hypermedia: Theoretical, empirical, and design issues. Educational Technology Research & Development, doi: 10.1007/s11423-007-9066-1.
18. Jacobson, M. J., Maouri, C., Mishra, P., & Kolar, C. (1996). Learning with hypertext learning environments: Theory, design, and research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5(3/4), 239-281.
19. Jacobson, M. J., & Spiro, R. J. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(5), 301-333.
20. Kim, Y., & Baylor, A. L. (2006). A social-cognitive framework for pedagogical agents as learning companions. Educational Technology Research & Development, 54(6), 569-590.
21. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
22. Mayer, R. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 31-48). NY: Cambridge University Press.
23. Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 423-451.
24. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451-502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
25. Puntambekar, S., & Hubscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1-12.
26. Shapiro, A. (1999). The relationship between prior knowledge and interactive overviews during hypermedia-aided learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(2), 143-167.
27. Shapiro, A. (2000). The effect of interactive overviews on the development of conceptual structure in novices learning from hypermedia. Journal of Educational Multimedia & Hypermedia, 9, 57-78.
28. Shapiro, A. M. (2005). Site map principle. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 313-324). London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. Shapiro, A. (this volume). Hypermedia design as learner scaffolding. Educational Technology Research & Development, doi: 10.1007/s11423-007-9063- 4.
30. Shapiro, A., & Niederhauser, D. (2004). Learning from hypertext: Research issues and findings. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for education communications and technology (2nd ed). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1992). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In T. M. Duffy & D. H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 57-75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Spiro, R. J., & Jehng, J. C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia (pp. 163-205). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Tergan, S. (1997a). Conceptual and methodological shortcomings in hypertext/hypermedia design and research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16(3), 209-235.
34. Tergan, S. (1997b). Misleading theoretical assumptions in hypertext/hypermedia research. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 6(3-4), 257-283.
35. VanLehn, K. (1989). Problem solving and cognitive skill acquisition. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 527-579). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153-189). Mawah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17(2), 89-102.