Video data and video links in mediated communication: what do users value?

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 165-187

  Anderson, Anne H ^a   Smallwood, Lucy ^a   MacDonald, Rory ^a   Mullin, Jim ^a   Fleming, Annemarie ^a   O'Malley, Claire ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIT ERROR RATE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINANCIAL DATA PROCESSING; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS; TELECOMMUNICATION LINKS; VIDEO CONFERENCING; VIDEOTEX;

FINANCIAL SERVICE SIMULATION; FRAME RATES; TELEDATA; TELEPRESENCE; TRAVEL SERVICE SIMULATION; VIDEO DATA; VIDEO LINKS;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

EID: 0033873952     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.1999.0335     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. ANDERSON A. H., NEWLANDS A., MULLIN J., FLEMING A. M., DOHERTY-SNEDDON G., VAN DER VELDEN J. Impact of video-mediated communication on simulated service encounters. Interacting with Computers. 8:1996;193-206.
2. ANDERSON A. H., O'MALLEY C., DOHERTY-SNEDDON G., LANGTON S., NEWLANDS A., MULLIN J., FLEMING A. M., VAN DER VELDEN J. The impact of VMC on collaborative problem solving. FINN K., SELLEN A., WILBUR S. Video-Mediated Communication. 1997;133-155 Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
3. BARBER P., LAWS J. Image quality and video communication. DAMPER R., HALL W., RICHARDS J. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia Technologies and their Future Applications. 1994;163-178 Pentech Press, London.
4. CARLETTA J., ANDERSON A. H., McEWAN R. Communication in virtual supply chain teams (1998). JACUCCI G. Globalization of Manufacturing in the Digital Communications Era of the 21st Century. 1998;Kluwer, Norwell.
5. CHAPANIS A., OCHSMAN R., PARRISH R., WEEKS G. Studies in interactive communication: the effects of four communication modes on the behaviour of teams during co-operative problem solving. Human Factors. 14:1972;487-509.
6. DAFT R. L., LENGEL R. H. Organisational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science. 32:1986;554-571.
7. DOHERTY-SNEDDON G., ANDERSON A., OMALLEY C., LANGTON S., GARROD S., BRUCE V. Face-to-face interaction and video mediated communication: a comparison of dialogue structure and co-operative task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 3:1997;105-125.
8. DOURISH P., BLY S. Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group. Proceedings of CHI 92. 1992;. p. 541-547.
9. FROWEIN H., SMOORENBURG G., PYTERS L., SCHINKEL D. Improved speech recognition through videotelephony: Experiments with the hard of hearing. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications. 9:1991;611-616.
10. GAVER W., SELLEN A., HEATH C., LUFF P. One is not enough: Multiple views in a media space. Proceedings of CHI 93. Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1993;ACM, New York. p. 335-341.
11. HOLLIER M. P., VOELCKER R. Towards a multimodal perceptual model. BT Technological Journal. 15:1997;162-316.
12. ISHII H., KOBAYASHI M., ARITA K., YAGI T. Iterative design of seamless collaboration media. FINN K., SELLEN A., WILBUR S. Video-Mediated Communication. 1997;435-456 Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
13. KRAUT R., COOL C., RICE R., FISH R. Life and death of a new technology: task, utility and social influences of a communication medium. Proceedings of CSCW 94. 1994;ACM, New York. p. 13-21.
14. KRAUT R., MILLER M., SIEGEL J. Collaboration in performance of physical tasks: effects on outcomes and communication. Proceedings of CSCW 96. 1996;ACM, New York. p. 57-66.
15. KUZUOKA H., KOSUGE T., TANAKA M. GestureCam: a video communication system for sympathetic remote collaboration. Proceedings of CSCW 94. 1994;ACM, New York. p. 35-44.
16. MONK A., MCCARTHY J., WATTS L., DALY-JONES O. Measures of process. MACLEOD M., MURRAY D. Evaluation for CSCW. 1996;125-139 Springer-Verlaag, Berlin.
17. NARDI B., HUCHINSKY A., WHITTAKER S., LEICHNER R., SCHWARZ. Video-as-data: technical and social aspects of a collaborative multimedia application. FINN K., SELLEN S., WILBUR S. Video-Mediated Communication. 1997;487-518 Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
18. NEGROPONTE N. Being Digital. 1995;Hodder & Stoughton.
19. NOLL M. Anatomy of a failure: pictophone revisited. Telecommunications Policy. 1992;307-316.
20. O'CONAILL B., WHITTAKER S, WILBUR S. Conversations over videoconferences: an evaluation of videomediated interaction. Human-Computer Interaction. 8:1993;382-428.
21. OLSON J. S., OLSON G. M., MEADER D. K. What mix of video and audio is useful for remote real-time work. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1995;Academic Press, Denver. p. 33-45.
22. O'MALLEY C., ANDERSON A. H., MULLIN J., FLEMING A., SMALLWOOD L., MACDONALD R. Factors affecting perceived quality of digitised video: tradeoffs between frame rate, resolution, and encoding format. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 1999.
23. RIMMEL A., HOLLIER M. P., VOELCKER R. The influence of cross modal interaction on audio-visual speech quality perception. Presented at the 105th AEC Convention. 1998.
24. SELLEN A. Remote conversations: the effect of mediating talk with technology. Human Computer Interaction. 7:1995;347-374.
25. SELLEN A. Assessing video-mediated communication: a comparison of different analytic approaches. FINN K., SELLEN A., WILBUR S. Video-Mediated Communication. 1997;95-106 Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
26. SHORT J., WILLIAMS E., CHRISTIE B. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. 1976;Wiley, London.
27. TANG J., ISAACS E. Why do users like video? Studies of multimedia supported collaboration. Computer Supported Collaborative Work: An International Journal. 1:1993;163-196.
28. TANG J., ISAACS E., RUA M. Supporting distributed groups with a montage of lightweight interactions. Proceedings of CSCW 94. 1994;ACM, New York. p. 23-34.
29. TORRNATZKY L., KLEIN K. Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption implementation: a meta analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. EM-29:1982;28-45.
30. TUSHMAN M. Technical communication in R&D laboratories: the impact of project work characteristics. Academy of Management Journal. 21:1978;624-645.
31. VEINOTT E., OLSON J., OLSON G. M., FU X. Video helps remote work: speakers who need to negotiate common ground benefit from seeing each other. Proceedings of CHI 99. 1999;ACM, New York. p. 302-309.
32. VITKOVITCH M., BARBER P. Effect of video frame rate on subjects ability to shadow one of two competing verbal passages. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 37:1994;1204-1210.
33. WATSON A., SASSE M. A. Evaluating audio and video quality in low cost multimedia conferencing systems. Interacting with Computers. 8:1996;255-275.
34. WATSON A., SASSE M. A. Multimedia conferencing via multicast: determining the quality of service required by the end user. Proceedings of AVSNP 97, International Workshop on Audio Visual Services over Packet Networks. 1997;. p. 189-194.
35. WATSON A., SASSE M. A. Measuring perceived quality of speech and video in multimedia conferencing applications. Proceedings of ACM multimedia 98. 1998;ACM. p. 55-60.
36. WATTS L., MONK A. Remote assistance: a view of the work and a view of the face. CHI 96 Electronic Proceedings. 1996.
37. WHITTAKER S. Rethinking video as technology for interpersonal communication. Proceedings of Workshop on Videomediated Communication at CSCW 94. 1994.
38. WHITTAKER S. Rethinking video as a technology for interpersonal communication: Theory and design implications. International Journal of Human Computer Studies. 42:1995;501-529.
39. WILLIAMS E. Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and video-mediated communication: a review. Psychological Bulletin. 84:1997;963-976.